Skip to content

Conversation

@UlisesGascon
Copy link
Member

@UlisesGascon UlisesGascon commented Jun 16, 2025

Related #216

image

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new API endpoint to retrieve a compliance checklist by its ID.
    • Updated API documentation to include the new endpoint.
  • Tests

    • Added tests covering successful retrieval, invalid ID handling, not found, and error scenarios for the new compliance checklist endpoint.

@UlisesGascon UlisesGascon added this to the v1.0.0 milestone Jun 16, 2025
@UlisesGascon UlisesGascon self-assigned this Jun 16, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 16, 2025

Walkthrough

A new API endpoint for retrieving a compliance checklist by its ID has been introduced. This includes updates to the API router, OpenAPI specification, and store layer, along with new tests covering successful retrieval, error scenarios, and input validation for the new endpoint.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
tests/httpServer/apiV1.test.js Added tests for the new GET /api/v1/compliance-checklist/{checklistId} endpoint and related store setup.
src/httpServer/routers/apiV1.js Added route handler for fetching a compliance checklist by ID using the new store method.
src/httpServer/swagger/api-v1.yml Documented the new GET endpoint, parameters, responses, and operation in the OpenAPI spec.
src/store/index.js Added getChecklistById method to retrieve a checklist by ID from the database.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant API_Router
    participant Store

    Client->>API_Router: GET /api/v1/compliance-checklist/{checklistId}
    API_Router->>Store: getChecklistById(checklistId)
    Store-->>API_Router: Checklist data or null
    alt Checklist found
        API_Router-->>Client: 200 OK + checklist
    else Checklist not found
        API_Router-->>Client: 404 Not Found
    end
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Poem

In the warren of code, a new path appears,
Fetch a checklist by ID—no bugs, no fears!
With tests and docs, the endpoint is clear,
Now checklists arrive when you call them near.
🐇✨
Hooray for the code, let’s give it a cheer!

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/store/index.js (1)

253-255: Consider exposing a generic getById helper to avoid the proliferation of one-off wrappers

getCheckById and the newly added getChecklistById are thin aliases around getOne(table, id).
As the number of tables grows we risk ending up with many almost-identical wrappers, increasing maintenance overhead without adding real abstraction.

-    getCheckById: (id) => getOne('compliance_checks', id),
-    getChecklistById: (id) => getOne('compliance_checklists', id)
+    /**
+     * Generic getter for any table by primary key.
+     * Usage: store.getById('compliance_checks', 42)
+     */
+    getById: (table, id) => getOne(table, id),

You can still keep the semantic aliases if you think they improve DX, but having a single canonical entry point will make future additions cheaper and avoid forgetting to wire new tables.

src/httpServer/routers/apiV1.js (1)

30-31: Minor: keep the destructuring alphabetically sorted for readability

The destructured list is getting long. Sorting (e.g. addProject, getAllChecks, getAllChecklists, getChecklistById, …) helps spot duplicates and merge conflicts faster.

__tests__/httpServer/apiV1.test.js (1)

466-496: Add tests for 0 and negative IDs to document the intended behaviour

The suite checks invalid strings and non-existent IDs but not boundary values (0, -1).
Once the router uses explicit validation (see previous comment) these cases should return 400; capturing them in tests prevents regressions.

    test('should return 400 for zero checklist ID', async () => {
      const response = await app.get('/api/v1/compliance-checklist/0')
      expect(response.status).toBe(400)
    })

    test('should return 400 for negative checklist ID', async () => {
      const response = await app.get('/api/v1/compliance-checklist/-1')
      expect(response.status).toBe(400)
    })
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1a8cae3 and d6364e1.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • __tests__/httpServer/apiV1.test.js (3 hunks)
  • src/httpServer/routers/apiV1.js (2 hunks)
  • src/httpServer/swagger/api-v1.yml (1 hunks)
  • src/store/index.js (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Playwright Tests
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/httpServer/swagger/api-v1.yml (1)

349-389: Spec looks good – remember to update the server URL examples if needed

No issues with the schema / responses; the minimum: 1 constraint aligns with recommended positive-int validation.

@UlisesGascon UlisesGascon merged commit 5fd3908 into main Jun 16, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants