[FIX] Broken references causes oca-gen-addon-readme to fail #824
Conversation
|
All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅ |
aldnav
changed the title
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @aldnav, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
I've addressed issues with the documentation generation process by fixing broken internal references and removing redundant text across various module README and HTML description files. This ensures that the oca-gen-addon-readme tool runs successfully and that the documentation accurately reflects the current state and maturity of the modules.
Highlights
- Documentation Reference Fixes: I've fixed numerous broken internal references within the reStructuredText (RST) documentation files. These broken links were causing the
oca-gen-addon-readmetool to fail during its execution. - Redundant Content Removal: I've removed redundant or repeated phrases, specifically the 'IMPORTANT' admonition blocks, from various documentation files. This streamlines the content and removes unnecessary clutter.
- Maturity Badge Updates: I've updated the maturity badges in the
README.rstandindex.htmlfiles across many modules. This includes changing badges from 'Alpha' to 'Beta' or 'Production/Stable' where appropriate, reflecting the current development status of these modules. - Source Digest Updates: The source digest hashes in the generated documentation files (
README.rstandindex.html) have been updated. This is a direct result of the documentation regeneration process, ensuring the digests accurately reflect the current content.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request addresses broken references in several README files, which was causing oca-gen-addon-readme to fail. The changes include fixing malformed reStructuredText links, updating maturity badges across multiple modules, and removing obsolete warnings about alpha versions.
The fixes for the broken links and the updates to the documentation are well-executed and improve the overall quality and consistency of the project's documentation.
I've found a couple of minor issues where a broken link was not fully resolved or where the text could be improved for clarity. My suggestions aim to complete these fixes. Overall, this is a valuable contribution that improves the maintainability of the documentation.
|
I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA |
aldnav
force-pushed
the
imp/fix-broken-readme
branch
from
79ee74f to
ea17132
Compare
Broken references cause oca-gen-addon-readme to fail Signed-off-by: Aldrin Navarro <[email protected]>
…ucture Enhance the readability and consistency of the spp_event_data module documentation by: - Remove redundant text - Converting bullet points from asterisk (*) to dash (-) format for better markdown consistency - Restructuring long text lines to improve readability and maintain proper line length - Improving overall documentation structure and clarity Signed-off-by: Aldrin Navarro <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Aldrin Navarro <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Aldrin Navarro <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Aldrin Navarro <[email protected]>
aldnav
force-pushed
the
imp/fix-broken-readme
branch
from
ea17132 to
39d80b9
Compare
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 17.0 #824 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 76.13% 76.14%
=======================================
Files 766 766
Lines 20306 20306
Branches 2504 2504
=======================================
+ Hits 15460 15461 +1
Misses 4302 4302
+ Partials 544 543 -1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Why is this change needed?
Broken references causes some RSTs to fail and skipped by
oca-gen-addon-readme.Here is how it appears when viewing some module info.
And you unexpectedly get too many
.... Maybe one is enough.How was the change implemented?
pre-commit run --hook-stage manual oca-gen-addon-readme. I'm not sure if this should be part of this PR. Some parts may have been re-generated aside from doc description (i.e. badges). Maybe a matter of "who" ought to re-generate and "when" to update - and this commit can be moved to a separate PR.New unit tests
N/A
Unit tests executed by the author
N/A
How to test manually
View module info and verify no broken text (
[*(*])*)Related links
N/A