Skip to content

fix:move metrics to a thread#667

Merged
JarbasAl merged 1 commit intodevfrom
fix/move_upload_to_thread
Mar 27, 2025
Merged

fix:move metrics to a thread#667
JarbasAl merged 1 commit intodevfrom
fix/move_upload_to_thread

Conversation

@JarbasAl
Copy link
Member

@JarbasAl JarbasAl commented Mar 27, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor

    • Enhanced background task handling with an asynchronous approach to improve responsiveness.
  • Style

    • Updated formatting and comment clarity to promote better code readability and maintainability.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the fix label Mar 27, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 27, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the ovos_core/intent_services/__init__.py file. The changes include reorganizing import statements and adjusting control flow within the IntentService class. The _emit_match_message method now wraps calls to _upload_match_data with create_daemon for asynchronous processing in multiple match scenarios. Furthermore, the signature of _upload_match_data was updated by adding spaces around type hints, and minor comment formatting adjustments were made.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
ovos_core/intent_services/init.py - Reorganized import statements; moved several service imports and added create_daemon.
- Updated _emit_match_message to wrap _upload_match_data calls asynchronously via create_daemon in multiple match cases.
- Adjusted _upload_match_data signature spacing around type hints and improved comment formatting.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant IS as IntentService
    participant DA as Daemon Wrapper (create_daemon)
    participant UMD as _upload_match_data

    IS->>+DA: Invoke create_daemon for PipelineMatch
    DA->>+UMD: Execute _upload_match_data asynchronously
    UMD-->>-DA: Return match upload result
    DA-->>-IS: Complete asynchronous task
    
    Note over IS, DA: Similar flow for IntentHandlerMatch and failure cases.
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

fix

Suggested reviewers

  • goldyfruit

Poem

I hop through the lines with eager delight,
Skipping through imports both day and night.
Daemon threads dance in asynchronous play,
Spaces and hints guide my fur-lined way.
With code so neat, I cheer—happy as a rabbit today!

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@JarbasAl JarbasAl requested a review from goldyfruit March 27, 2025 00:14
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 27, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.61%. Comparing base (23f0bab) to head (f6e2a30).
Report is 217 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #667      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   75.33%   69.61%   -5.73%     
==========================================
  Files          15       15              
  Lines        3094     1675    -1419     
==========================================
- Hits         2331     1166    -1165     
+ Misses        763      509     -254     
Flag Coverage Δ
end2end 53.73% <100.00%> (?)
unittests 46.08% <66.66%> (-29.25%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@github-actions github-actions bot added fix and removed fix labels Mar 27, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
ovos_core/intent_services/__init__.py (1)

278-367: Overall implementation of threaded metrics collection is well done.

The changes to move metrics collection to background threads are implemented consistently throughout the _emit_match_message method, covering all three scenarios where metrics are collected (PipelineMatch, IntentHandlerMatch, and fallback cases). This will prevent the main processing thread from being blocked by network operations, improving responsiveness.

One minor suggestion to consider for the future: since threaded metrics collection is now consistently used in all places, you could refactor the _upload_match_data method to automatically use threading internally rather than requiring the caller to use create_daemon.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5c82b41 and f6e2a30.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • ovos_core/intent_services/__init__.py (5 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: license_tests
  • GitHub Check: end2end_tests (3.11)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
ovos_core/intent_services/__init__.py (7)

34-34: Good addition of the thread utility import.

The addition of create_daemon from ovos_utils.thread_utils is appropriate for the planned optimization of metrics collection.


23-29: Import organization looks good.

The reorganization of imports to group related functionality together improves code organization and readability.

Also applies to: 37-41


320-323: Good optimization: Moving metrics collection to a background thread.

Using create_daemon to handle metrics collection asynchronously is an excellent change that will prevent blocking the main execution thread when uploading match data, resulting in improved performance for the intent service.


333-336: Consistent implementation of threaded metrics handling.

This change correctly applies the same threading pattern for intent handler matches, ensuring consistent behavior across different matching scenarios.


363-366: Complete coverage for all metrics collection paths.

This change ensures that metrics collection for failed intents also happens in a background thread, providing a complete and consistent solution across all code paths.


369-369: Improved type hint formatting.

Adding spaces around type hints improves readability and follows PEP 8 style guidelines.


378-380: Better type annotation and comment formatting.

The explicit List[str] type annotation provides clearer documentation for the endpoints variable, and the added space after the comment symbol improves formatting consistency.

@JarbasAl JarbasAl merged commit 6ac5c51 into dev Mar 27, 2025
6 of 8 checks passed
@JarbasAl JarbasAl deleted the fix/move_upload_to_thread branch March 27, 2025 00:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant