-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
Naive crosstalk #175
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Naive crosstalk #175
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
dcc5fb7
Basic prototype. I think there's a major issue, I have not tested yet.
PabloAndresCQ b18def7
Now discarding outcomes from crosstalk projections
PabloAndresCQ 28bb322
Changed nomenclature from initialization to preparation
PabloAndresCQ 8657286
I forgot to change initialized_qubits to prepared_qubits in default.rs
PabloAndresCQ aed8122
Adding with_average methods for crosstalk
PabloAndresCQ 34ff8ac
Typo
PabloAndresCQ d1e59b1
Linting
PabloAndresCQ 526a31a
Linting (again)
PabloAndresCQ File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Comment from Ciaran on the commit:
dcc5fb7#r164014518
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, I think I understand. Without tagging in ByteMessage, what I could do is add an extra bool to
measured_qubits, so that'sVec<(usize, bool, bool)>where the second bool corresponds tois_crosstalkto indicate its origin.For the naive crosstalk, I'd just throw away the measurement outcome at
apply_noise_on_continue_processinghere wheneveris_crosstalkis True. In future versions, it could be used to make a decision on how to apply crosstalk.That makes sense, I can do it tomorrow morning. I guess there's no need for tags for the first version, but if you get them in, I'll use them.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, sounds good. Later I can add a tag system and replace that.