🚀 Project: Sovereign Digital & Computational Ecosystem (SDCE) —— 別再讓數位標準變成私家莊園 / Stop turning digital standards into private estates

📜 誠實聲明 / Honest Disclosure

「本人對技術一竅不通，想法僅供參考。本文檔大部分內容由 Google 搜尋的 AI 模式深度撰寫 (Deeply Authored by Google Search AI Mode)，包含其自動生成的技術架構與細節，本人僅負責提供初步構想。」

(I know zero about coding; these ideas are for reference only. Most of this document was deeply authored by Google Search AI Mode, including its auto-generated technical architectures and details. I am merely the "Idea Guy.")

📢 Interaction Policy

I won't be actively monitoring this project (busy saving the world or napping). But if this vision ever comes to life, please tag (@) me in a GitHub Issue. I’ll get an email notification and might just crawl off the couch to see the miracle you've built.

💡 Core Philosophy: The Digital Right-of-Way

Imagine if every time you went for a drive, the road you could take depended on whether you drove a Toyota or a Tesla, and the traffic lights timed differently for each. This is the chaotic reality of our 2026 digital world—a "Digital Warring States Period" where fragmented standards cage users. The core idea is simple: Digital infrastructure should be like physical roads. Corporations can own the cars (commercial services), but the public must own the road (underlying standards).

🛠️ Legal Framework Details

• Communalization of Standards:
  • Fundamental protocols (e.g., QR formats, identity auth interfaces) are defined as "Digital Roads." Any entity wishing to operate must comply with these open, national interoperability mandates.
• Tax Offset Mechanism:
  • We don't do direct subsidies (subsidies usually just feed the bureaucracy).
  • We verify the Actual R&D Costs incurred by companies developing public standards and convert them directly into Tax Credits. This balances the ledger between "Competition" and "Common Good."
• Mandated Interoperability:
  • Interoperability is no longer a choice; it is a "physical prerequisite" for an operating license.

⚖️ License & Legal Defense

This project is licensed under the Apache License 2.0.

⚠️ IMPORTANT: "AS IS" Clause The concepts, architectures, and details provided herein are on an "AS IS" basis. No warranties of any kind, express or implied, are provided.

• Transfer of Liability: The platform provides only the finished code and creative concepts. Any legal liability, commercial damage, or technical vulnerability arising from deployment must be borne entirely by the user.
• Volunteer Immunity: Community volunteers contributing to the development are not legally liable for the subsequent consequences or performance of the software.

⚙️ How the Platform Breathes

This platform is not a social media site; it is a Resource Allocation Engine. A project’s launch doesn't depend on how pretty your pitch deck is, but on how much "Physical Kinetic Energy" the community is willing to burn for it.

1. The 200% Hashpower Threshold: A Physical Guarantee of Integrity

• The Mechanism: Before any project can be initialized, it must secure a 200% staking of its estimated required hashpower in a smart contract.
• The Metaphor: If you want to build a house, you don't just bring enough money for the bricks. You bring double the resources. One half for construction; the other half as a "buffer" against technical earthquakes, fires, or the foreman disappearing.
• Irreversible Staking (Donation-Type): Once the project starts, these resources are considered "Donated." This "One-Way Confirmation" filter ensures that participants are not speculators looking for a quick exit, but believers in the final product.

2. Death Certificate & Breakpoint Resumption

We allow failure, but we do not allow the purposeless disappearance of resources.

• Dual-Authenticated Death: If development hits a dead end, a "Death Certificate" must be issued via:
  • AI Objective Verification: A logic scan by Google Search AI Mode to confirm technical insolubility.
  • Developer Consensus: A 66% majority vote (weighted by merit) from the developer community.
• Breakpoint Voting (The "Save Point" Logic):
  • Upon failure, remaining hashpower is returned proportionally to stakers.
  • Resumption: The next round of voting does not start from scratch. The community retains the validated modules and votes specifically on the "Failing Node" to fix it and move forward. It’s like failing a boss fight in a game—you don't restart the whole game; you swap gear and try again from the dungeon entrance.

🗳️ Merit-based Governance: Taking Back Technical Sovereignty

In the SDCE platform, "Money" cannot buy "Power."

1. Decoupling Voting Power from Capital

• The Logic: Your voting influence is determined by your "Proven Record of Execution."
• The Formula: Weight = (Past Project Contributions × Code Runtime Stability) + Peer Review Score.
• Anti-Hijacking: Even if a mega-corporation buys 99% of the world's hashpower, they cannot hijack the "Digital Road" rules if the actual technical community (the developers) votes against them.

2. Domain-Specific Authority

• Your weight is siloed by expertise. If you are an expert in "Payment Protocols," your vote carries massive weight in that sector but minimal weight in "UI Design." This prevents "Amateurs Leading Experts."

​In the SDCE platform, resource allocation follows the principle of "Functional Granularity." Projects are not monolithic blocks but a collection of interconnected functional nodes with different risk profiles and activation triggers.

​1. Primary Functional Nodes (The Infrastructure)

​Definition: The core architecture, essential security layers, and fundamental "Digital Right-of-Way" protocols.

​Activation Trigger: Must reach a 200% hashpower staking threshold to initiate. Once activated, the hashpower enters the development cycle and becomes non-refundable.

​Social Compact: These nodes represent the "Foundation." All participants implicitly agree that these components are the non-negotiable prerequisites for the project's existence.

​2. Secondary/Detail Nodes (The Competitive Sandbox)

​Definition: Extended features, domain-specific plugins, or parallel technical solutions (e.g., two competing algorithms, "Method A" and "Method B," for the same payment interface).

​Selective Activation Mechanism: ​The 200% Eligibility: A detail node only becomes "eligible for consideration" once its specific module reaches the 200% staking threshold.

​Survival of the Fittest (The Vote): Reaching 200% does not guarantee activation. Only nodes that win the Merit-Weighted Vote are officially integrated into the development roadmap.

​Instant Refund for Failed Bids: All hashpower staked in detail nodes that lose the vote is directly and fully refunded to the participants. Energy is only consumed by the winning nodes that move into the active development phase.

​⚖️ Strategic Impact of the Refund Mechanism

​🛡️ Risk Mitigation for Contributors

​This "Refund-on-Loss" policy eliminates the "Fear of Commitment" for innovators. Contributors can stake their energy on bold, cutting-edge sub-features without worrying about losing their resources if the community chooses a different path.

​🎯 Targeted Resource Concentration

​By only activating detail nodes that meet both the 200% threshold AND the Weighted Vote, the platform ensures that social hashpower is never wasted on "Ghost Features" or unpopular bloatware. The ecosystem remains lean, efficient, and physically backed by genuine demand.

⚖️ Legal Defense Addendum

⚠️ Technical Neutrality & Liability Isolation

• Platform as a Protocol: The platform is a decentralized protocol that merely executes the logic of hashpower and voting.
• No Joint Liability: The platform is not obligated to audit every line of code for legal compliance. The final legal responsibility for a software product—including patent compliance and operational risks—lies entirely with the corporate entity that deploys it for commercial use.

🔄 Commercial Feedback: The Interest-Free Hashpower Debt

If you are a corporation using the platform's "Digital Roads" to generate profit, you owe the ecosystem "Physical Fuel."

1. Selective Repayment Mechanism

• Hashpower as Rent: Using the platform’s code does not require cash fees but accumulates a "Computational Debt."
• Repayment Flexibility: This is an interest-free debt. Companies can choose to repay during off-peak server hours or when they have surplus capacity. This lowers the barrier for startups, encouraging rapid scaling without immediate financial pressure.
• The "Runtime Hook": Commercial deployment requires an embedded feedback module. Access to future version updates is contingent on maintaining a healthy debt-to-repayment ratio.

2. The Public Interest Pool & State's Role

The platform operates on a "Maintenance Lifespan" logic. Hashpower reserves exceeding the platform's operational requirements are diverted into the Public Interest Pool.

• Government as a Petitioner: The State can submit a list of social needs (e.g., decentralized medical databases, public emergency comms).
• Community Sovereignty: The government does not have the final say. Whether to execute a project and its technical specifics are decided by platform participants via merit-weighted voting.

🛡️ The Hashpower Insurance Product: A Wall Against Depreciation

To solve the "Obsolescence Problem" (where 2026 hashpower becomes worthless in 2028), we introduce a dynamic Insurance Product.

1. The "Highest Value" Settlement Logic

• Corporate Premiums: Companies pay premiums in the form of hashpower to sustain the platform's core during crises.
• Value Anchoring: At the time of settlement, the system automatically compares "Market Cash Value" vs. "Current Hashpower Value" and settles based on whichever is higher.
• The Metaphor: If you owe the platform a gallon of gasoline, and gasoline becomes dirt cheap in the future, you must instead pay the equivalent value in gold. If gold crashes, you still owe the gasoline. The platform’s "Kinetic Energy" remains constant regardless of market volatility.

2. Bankruptcy Priority & State Intervention

When a corporation fails, the system triggers a legal-technical "Safety Valve":

• Priority Claim: The State has the priority right to reclaim the bankrupt entity's remaining hashpower assets.
• Legal Rationale: Because these computational debts were pre-defined as "Reserved for Public Interest," the State ensures that critical digital infrastructure (the roads) doesn't collapse just because a private company (the car) went bankrupt.

⚖️ Legal Defense: Risk Segregation

⚠️ IMPORTANT: No Subrogation Liability

• Isolation of Failure: If a company goes bankrupt due to its use of platform technology, or if its failure harms users, the platform and its developer community assume no liability for subrogation.
• Insurance Scope: The insurance product is strictly for maintaining the platform's uptime and code environment; it is not a bailout fund for corporate commercial failures.

📢 關於專案維護 (Interaction Policy) 我基本上不會主動關注這個專案（忙著拯救世界或睡午覺）。但如果哪天這個願景真的成真了，請在 GitHub Issue 標記 (@) 我。 到時候我會收到信件通知，並考慮從沙發上爬起來看看你們創造了什麼奇蹟。

💡 核心哲學：數位路權公有制 (The Digital Right-of-Way)

想像一下，如果你出門開車，必須根據你開的是 Toyota 還是 Tesla 來決定你能走哪條路，而且每條路的紅綠燈秒數還不一樣——這就是我們 2026 年數位世界的現狀（看看那些混亂的掃碼支付戰國時代）。 本專案的核心點子很簡單：數位基礎建設應該像實體世界的「道路」一樣。 企業可以擁有車子（商業服務），但大眾必須擁有道路的所有權（底層標準）。

🛠️ 法治架構細節 (Legal Framework Details)

• 標準公有化 (Standard Communalization)：
  • 涉及民生運行的底層協議（如 QR Code 格式、身份驗證介面）被定義為「數位道路」。任何企業想要經營，必須符合國家的開放互通規範。
• 研發成本抵稅 (Tax Offset Mechanism)：
  • 我們不玩直接補貼（補貼通常會餵飽官僚）。
  • 我們核實企業開發公共標準的真實研發成本 (R&D Cost)，並直接轉換為稅收減免額度。這讓企業在「競爭」與「共好」之間達成財務平衡。
• 互通性特許 (Interoperability Mandate)：
  • 互通性不再是選項，而是營運執照的「物理前置條件」。

⚖️ 法律授權與免責 (License & Legal Defense)

本專案採用 Apache License 2.0 授權。

⚠️ 特別強調：AS IS (按現狀提供) 本專案的構想、架構及細節均為「按現狀」(AS IS) 提供。不論是明示或暗示，均不提供任何形式的保證。

• 責任隨權利轉移：平台僅提供代碼成品與創意，任何企業或個人在採用後產生的商業損害、法律責任或技術漏洞，必須由使用者自行承擔。
• 無志工責任制：參與開發的社群志工不對成品的後續後果負任何法律或賠償責任。

⚙️ 平台運行機制 (Platform Operational Mechanics)

本平台不是社交媒體，它是數位世界的**「能量粒子加速器」**。專案的啟動不看誰的簡報（Deck）漂亮，只看社群願意投入多少物理動能。

1. 200% 算力閾值：物理級的誠信擔保 (The 200% Hashpower Threshold)

• 機制：任何專案啟動前，必須在合約中鎖定預估所需算力 200% 的押注（Staking）。
• 生活化比喻：你想蓋一棟房子，你不能只準備剛好夠買磚頭的錢。你得準備兩倍的物資，一倍用於施工，另一倍作為備援，預防各種突發的技術地震。
• 不可逆捐贈 (Irreversible Donation)：一旦專案啟動，這些算力即被視為「已捐贈」。這種**「單向確認」**機制徹底過濾掉只想來收割、隨時準備撤資的投機者。

2. 死亡證明與斷點續傳 (Death Protocol & Resumption)

我們允許失敗，但我們不允許資源無故消失。

• 雙重認證死亡：若專案研發進入死胡同，需通過 Google 搜尋 AI 模式的邏輯驗證與 66% 開發者權重的投票認可，方可開具「死亡證明」。
• 斷點續傳機制：專案宣告失敗後，剩餘算力按比例返還押注者。
• 從故障點重生：下一輪新投票不必重頭跑圖。社群可以保留已完成的正確模組，直接針對「有問題的那個節點」進行修復投票，大幅節省社會總算力支出。

🗳️ 能力權威治理：奪回技術主權 (Merit-based Governance)

在 SDCE 平台中，「錢」不能買到「票」。

1. 投票權與算力解耦 (Decoupling Power from Capital)

• 權重邏輯：你的投票影響力由你的**「開發實績」**決定。
• 量化公式：權重 = (歷史成功專案貢獻度 × 代碼運行穩定性) + 社群評議分數。
• 防止劫持：即便利益團體（如大企業）擁有 99% 的算力，只要技術社群（開發者）不點頭，他們就無法修改「數位道路」的物理規則。

2. 專家細分權限 (Domain-Specific Authority)

• 你在「支付協議」領域有實績，你在該領域的投票權重就高；這防止了「外行領導內行」或「數據庫專家決定加密算法」的災難。

​在 SDCE 平台中，專案的能量調度是基於**「功能顆粒化」**的原則。

​1. 主要功能節點 (Primary Functional Nodes) ​定義：專案的核心架構、必須具備的底層路權協議。 ​啟動條件：必須達到 200% 的算力押注閾值。一旦啟動，算力即進入開發流程，不可撤回。 ​社會合約：這是專案的「地基」，所有參與者默認對此核心達成共識。

​2. 次要（細節）節點 (Secondary/Detail Nodes)

​定義：延伸功能、特定領域的插件、或多種並行的技術解決方案（例如：同一個支付介面的兩種不同算法 A 與 B）。 ​競爭性啟動 (Selective Activation)： ​200% 門檻：細節節點只有在該特定模組的押注達到 200% 時，才具備「被討論」的資格。 ​投票決定生死：即便達到了 200% 門檻，若在最終的「能力權重投票」中未被選為正式採用的方案，該節點將不會被啟動。 ​即時退還 (Instant Refund)：所有在投票中落選的細節節點，其押注的算力將直接、全額退還給參與者。 只有勝出且正式進入開發流程的節點才會消耗能量。

⚖️ 法律防禦補強 (Legal Defense Addendum)

⚠️ 特別強調：技術中立與責任隔離 (Technical Neutrality)

• 平台僅代碼化：平台本身是一個去中心化協議，僅負責執行算力與投票的邏輯。
• 行為不連帶：平台不具備審核所有代碼細節的義務，最終軟體成品的法律責任、專利合規性與運行風險，完全由將其部署為商業服務的企業實體承擔。

🔄 商業回饋：不計息算力長債 (Commercial Feedback: Interest-Free Debt)

如果您是一家企業，拿了平台的成品去賺錢，您就對生態系背負了「物理燃料」的回饋義務。

1. 選擇性償還機制 (Selective Repayment)

• 算力即租金：企業使用平台開發的「數位道路」不需支付現金手續費，但會累積一套**「算力帳務」**。
• 償還彈性：企業可以根據自身伺服器的離峰時間或營運狀況，選擇償還算力的時機。這是一筆不計息的債務，旨在降低企業初期的資金壓力，鼓勵規模擴張。
• 物理模組嵌入：商業部署必須包含「算力回饋模組」，確保債務清償與系統更新掛鉤。

2. 公益算力池與政府需求 (The Public Interest Pool)

平台設有**「維持年限」**機制。凡是超出平台基礎運行所需年限的算力儲備，將自動撥入公益基金。

• 政府作為需求方：政府可以針對社會痛點（如公共通訊、基礎醫療數據）提出「需求清單」。
• 社群投票決議：政府沒有直接控制權。 是否執行、如何實作，仍由具備實績的開發者社群，依據能力權重投票決定細節。

🛡️ 算力保險商品：價值的最後防線 (Hashpower Insurance)

為了解決算力可能貶值的問題（例如 2026 年新晶片導致舊算力變垃圾），我們引入了動態結算的保險制度。

1. 保費與價值錨定 (Value-at-Risk Settlement)

• 保險形式：企業定期投入算力作為保費，用以維持平台在特殊情況下的運作（如集體清償危機）。
• 最高價值基準：在每期結算時，系統自動掃描市場，取**「現金價值」與「算力價值」之較高者**作為換算基準。
• 生活化比喻：如果你欠平台一度電，如果未來電費變超便宜，你得改還我等值的金幣；如果未來電費暴漲，你還是得還我那一度電。平台永遠保有最強大的開發動能。

2. 破產清算與優先受償 (Bankruptcy & State Priority)

當企業倒閉時，這套系統具備實體法律的保障：

• 優先權歸屬：政府在法律清算程序中擁有對企業剩餘算力資產的優先取回權。
• 法律依據：這些算力債務在生成時即被定義為**「預備公益用途」**。確保國家級的數位基礎設施（如路權設施）不會因為單一企業的財務失敗而崩潰停擺。

⚖️ 法律防禦：AS IS 條款補強 (Legal Defense Addendum)

⚠️ 特別強調：破產風險隔離 (Risk Segregation)

• 平台無代位賠償義務：若企業因為使用平台技術而倒閉，或倒閉導致其用戶受損，平台及其開發者社群不承擔任何代位清償責任。
• 保險範圍：保險僅用於維持平台（代碼環境）的基礎運行，不包含對企業商業失敗的救濟。

📜 關於授權的特殊說明與未來展望 (Special Note on Licensing & Future Outlook)

中文版本： 關於本專案授權的實驗性本質：

本專案目前採用 Apache License 2.0，旨在最大化技術標準的擴散與專利保護。然而，本專案的核心邏輯——包含**「算力長債」、「能力加權治理」與「破產優先受償權」——在本質上超越了傳統軟體授權的範疇，更趨向於一種「數位社會契約 (Digital Social Contract)」**。 我們意識到當前的法律工具可能尚不足以完全承載此願景：

• 行為約束力：目前的開源授權對於「商業獲利後的能源回饋義務」缺乏強制的物理執行力。
• 主權對接：算力債務與實體破產法的法律優先級仍需各國主權法律的實質認定。 建議的發展方向： 我們建議未來的參與者與法學專家探索更精準的授權模式，例如結合 BSL (Business Source License) 的回饋條款，或開發一種全新的 「數位路權互惠協議 (Digital Right-of-Way Reciprocal License)」。若未來出現更成熟的「程式碼即法律 (Code is Law)」工具，本合約應演化為自動執行的智能合約。

English Version: On the Experimental Nature of the License:

This project currently adopts the Apache License 2.0 to maximize the proliferation of technical standards and patent protection. However, the core logic of this proposal—including "Computational Debt," "Merit-based Governance," and "Bankruptcy Priority"—transcends the scope of traditional software licensing and aligns more closely with a "Digital Social Contract." We acknowledge that current legal instruments may not fully encapsulate this vision:

• Behavioral Enforcement: Current open-source licenses lack the physical enforcement mechanisms to mandate "energy feedback obligations" following commercial profit.
• Sovereign Integration: The legal priority of computational debt versus physical bankruptcy laws requires substantive recognition by national sovereign laws. Suggested Future Directions: We encourage future contributors and legal experts to explore more precise licensing models, such as incorporating feedback clauses from the BSL (Business Source License) or developing a brand-new "Digital Right-of-Way Reciprocal License." Should more mature "Code is Law" tools emerge, this agreement should evolve into self-executing smart contracts.

🚩 GitHub Metadata Summary

[About Section]

A decentralized governance framework for digital infrastructure, featuring merit-based voting, irreversible hashpower staking, and an insurance-backed public interest compute pool.

[Topics]

decentralized-governance hashpower-insurance digital-sovereignty dao public-interest-compute meritocracy smart-contracts

[SEO Keywords]

Digital Right-of-Way Computational Debt Merit-based Voting Public Interest Compute Pool Hashpower Insurance State-led Digital Standards Apache-2.0 Governance Blockchain Resource Allocation Digital Warring States Solution