[Feature] Add RewardWithPenalties class and penalty functions#78
[Feature] Add RewardWithPenalties class and penalty functions#78
RewardWithPenalties class and penalty functions#78Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @Pabloo22, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request enhances the library's ability to handle scheduling constraints by introducing a robust system for incorporating penalties into both metaheuristic objective functions and reinforcement learning reward mechanisms. It provides new classes and functions to calculate and apply penalties for deadline and due date violations, making the optimization and learning processes more sensitive to these critical constraints.
Highlights
- New Penalty Computation Functions: Introduced
compute_penalty_for_deadlinesandcompute_penalty_for_due_datesin themetaheuristicsmodule for modular and reusable penalty calculations related to schedule violations. - Refactored Makespan Objective: The
get_makespan_with_penalties_objectivefunction now leverages the newly introduced dedicated penalty computation functions, enhancing code clarity and maintainability. - RewardWithPenalties Class for RL: A new
RewardObserverclass,RewardWithPenalties, has been added to the reinforcement learning module. This class allows for the flexible combination of a base reward with custom penalties for constraint violations, such as deadlines and due dates. - RL Penalty Utility Functions: Specific utility functions (
get_deadline_violation_penalty,get_due_date_violation_penalty) were added to the reinforcement learning utilities for calculating penalties on a per-scheduled-operation basis, facilitating their use within theRewardWithPenaltiesclass. - Test File Renaming and Updates: The test file
test_rl_utils.pywas renamed totest_utils.pyand updated to include comprehensive test cases for the newly added penalty utility functions, ensuring their correctness.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR introduces a RewardWithPenalties class for the reinforcement learning module that adds penalty functionality to existing reward functions. The changes enable penalties for deadline and due date violations in job shop scheduling problems.
Key changes include:
- Added
RewardWithPenaltiesclass that wraps base reward observers with penalty functions - Introduced penalty computation functions for deadline and due date violations
- Refactored metaheuristic objective functions to extract reusable penalty computation logic
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 7 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
job_shop_lib/reinforcement_learning/_reward_observers.py |
Adds the new RewardWithPenalties class that combines base rewards with penalty functions |
job_shop_lib/reinforcement_learning/_utils.py |
Introduces get_deadline_violation_penalty and get_due_date_violation_penalty functions |
job_shop_lib/reinforcement_learning/__init__.py |
Exports the new class and penalty functions in the module's public API |
job_shop_lib/metaheuristics/_objective_functions.py |
Refactors existing code to extract penalty computation into reusable functions |
job_shop_lib/metaheuristics/__init__.py |
Exports the new penalty computation functions |
tests/reinforcement_learning/test_utils.py |
Adds comprehensive tests for the penalty functions |
Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new RewardWithPenalties reward observer and associated penalty functions for deadline and due date violations. The implementation refactors existing penalty calculation logic from get_makespan_with_penalties_objective into separate, reusable functions. My review focuses on improving code maintainability by addressing duplication in the new penalty functions, correcting documentation, and highlighting a potential loss of test coverage from a removed file. I've also suggested adding type hints to a new test helper for better clarity.
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
Copilot reviewed 9 out of 9 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
Copilot reviewed 10 out of 10 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.
No description provided.