Implemented relative error estimates for adaptive step size selection #515
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I should have done this long ago. For the Williamson 5 test case that simulates the Earth, the numbers are so huge, that you really need to look at relative errors. The tutorial for the Gusto coupling will use the Williamson 5 test case and with adaptive step size selection. However, I thought I would do a separate PR for all the non-Gusto related changes that are needed for that.
This PR includes a Firedrake-compatible version of dt-k-adaptivity. The interpolation was done in a NumPy specific way, which I want to keep because it is faster on NumPy and CuPy data than a more generic version. This Firedrake enabled version should actually work with any datatype, but we are not entirely sure if you need to invert the mass matrix during the interpolation. Currently I left in the FE/Firedrake specific bit as a comment. If we become more confident that we don't need to invert the mass matrix, we can eventually rename this to something more general and remove the comment.