Update "Content Helper" to "Content Intelligence" on settings page#3489
Update "Content Helper" to "Content Intelligence" on settings page#3489alecgeatches merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe label for the settings section related to content assistance was changed from "Content Helper" to "Content Intelligence" in both the application and its end-to-end tests. No additional logic or structural changes were introduced. Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
npm error Exit handler never called! ✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/UI/class-settings-page.php (1)
439-444: Label change looks good – consider renaming the internal slug too.Switching the user-facing label to “Content Intelligence” is 👍.
For perfect consistency you could also rename the internal section key / CSS class fromcontent-helper-sectionto something likecontent-intelligence-section. This is purely cosmetic but avoids future confusion between UI wording and code identifiers.- $section_key = 'content-helper-section'; + $section_key = 'content-intelligence-section';Update of the nav-tab anchors that rely on the ID would be required as well.
tests/e2e/specs/activation-flow.spec.ts (1)
60-66: Locator updated – inline comments still mention “Content Helper”.The locator text was updated correctly, but the later comment block (
// Test section visibility when the Content Helper tab is clicked.) still references the old wording. Consider updating it (and any similar comments) for clarity.- // Test section visibility when the Content Helper tab is clicked. + // Test section visibility when the Content Intelligence tab is clicked.No code logic changes needed.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/UI/class-settings-page.php(1 hunks)tests/e2e/specs/activation-flow.spec.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
`**/*.{js,ts,tsx,jsx}`: "Perform a detailed review of the provided code with fol...
**/*.{js,ts,tsx,jsx}: "Perform a detailed review of the provided code with following key aspects in mind:
- Review the code to ensure it is well-structured and adheres to best practices.
- Verify compliance with WordPress coding standards.
- Ensure the code is well-documented.
- Check for security vulnerabilities and confirm the code is secure.
- Optimize the code for performance, removing any unnecessary elements.
- Validate JSDoc comments for accuracy, currency, and adherence to WordPress coding standards.
- Ensure each line comment concludes with a period.
- Confirm every JSDoc comment includes a @SInCE tag indicating the next version of the plugin to include the code.
- Guarantee compatibility with the latest version of WordPress, avoiding deprecated functions or features."
⚙️ Source: CodeRabbit Configuration File
List of files the instruction was applied to:
tests/e2e/specs/activation-flow.spec.ts
`**/*.{html,php}`: "Perform a detailed review of the provided code with followin...
**/*.{html,php}: "Perform a detailed review of the provided code with following key aspects in mind:
- Review the HTML and PHP code to ensure it is well-structured and adheres to best practices.
- Ensure the code follows WordPress coding standards and is well-documented.
- Confirm the code is secure and free from vulnerabilities.
- Optimize the code for performance, removing any unnecessary elements.
- Validate comments for accuracy, currency, and adherence to WordPress coding standards.
- Ensure each line comment concludes with a period.
- Verify code compatibility with the latest version of WordPress, avoiding deprecated functions or features."
⚙️ Source: CodeRabbit Configuration File
List of files the instruction was applied to:
src/UI/class-settings-page.php
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: E2E against WordPress latest
…b Update "Content Helper" to "Content Intelligence" on settings page" (e359731)
|
Related to #3519. |
Description
Update the "Content Helper" tab on the settings page to "Content Intelligence":
Motivation and context
Clarified terminology.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Style
Tests