Skip to content

Conversation

@PastaPastaPasta
Copy link
Owner

Please remove the italicized help prompts before submitting or merging

Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above

Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
immediately.

Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it improves
Dash Core user experience or Dash Core developer experience
significantly:

  • Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always welcome.
  • All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see src/test/) or
    functional tests (see test/). Contributors should note which tests cover
    modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new tests
    should accompany the change.
  • Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or an
    explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the bug
    was fixed.
  • Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope issues.
    If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should first
    consider building the system outside of Dash Core, if possible.

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

  • Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?
  • If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here.

What was done?

Describe your changes in detail

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe in detail how you tested your changes.

Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran
to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc.

Breaking Changes

Please describe any breaking changes your code introduces

Checklist:

Go over all the following points, and put an x in all the boxes that apply.

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone (for repository code-owners and collaborators only)

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 31, 2025

✅ No Merge Conflicts Detected

This PR currently has no conflicts with other open PRs.

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta deleted the pr-into-skip branch July 31, 2025 17:19
PastaPastaPasta added a commit to dashpay/dash that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2025
…s to build workflow

7417fb9 ci: simplify skip logic to only affect container jobs (pasta)
6d89784 ci: add SKIP_ON_PUSH and SKIP_ON_PR environment variables to build workflow (pasta)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  In DashCoreAutoGuix/dash, it's a pain to see which PRs have successfully CI, because the PR CI cancels the push CI, and GitHub UI interprets a cancel as a fail. This will allow me to configure the CI to only run the CI for the push commit, allow the CI status on the PR page to accurately reflect the true status.

  ## What was done?
  Add support for skipping CI builds based on environment variables:
  - SKIP_ON_PUSH: Skip all builds when set on push events
  - SKIP_ON_PR: Skip all builds when set on pull request events

  This provides a quick way to disable CI runs without modifying workflow files directly, useful for maintenance periods or resource management.

  ## How Has This Been Tested?
  See PastaPastaPasta#37 for this working in my fork.

  ## Breaking Changes
  None

  ## Checklist:
    _Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
  - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  UdjinM6:
    utACK 7417fb9

Tree-SHA512: feef92af6bf43977e38f78370201cd21e1c4193c622e8c2b0685cf4f7c7c274b020c2cc9ff7a93f311a25676a652d3a94e5cf17ea4341b1278aa35d6bbc7ec07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants