Improve appearance of the descriptions of -M/-m switches in perlrun.pod

[t-a-k]

The description of -M/-m switches in perlrun.pod used to have the constructs like C<use> I<module>C<;>, but this was rendered as separate blocks of text.
C<use I<module> ... will be rendered as a single block of code and looks better. I think.

---

• This set of changes does not require a perldelta entry.

[jkeenan]

And you, dear reader of the pull requests queue, were wondering when your next opportunity for bikeshedding would come by ... well, here it is!

I'm attaching 4 .png files which represent:

• the current output of running blead's version of pod/perlrun.pod through pod2man;

• the branch output of running the pull request's version of pod/perlrun.pod through pod2man;

• the current output of running blead's version of pod/perlrun.pod through pod2html;

• the branch output of running the pull request's version of pod/perlrun.pod through pod2html;

Assuming that I have properly generated the .man and .html files underlying the .png images, I have a slight preference for the pull request versions over the current versions in blead. This preference is based on typographic readability. I don't believe we have any documentation rules that are strict enough to require one formatting over the other. I'm going to cast a vote in favor of this pull request (which, since it does not change working code, is still eligible for merging in the next 9 days). But I recognize there may be difference of opinion here.

Discuss.

[book]

I took me a while to actually see the differences in the screenshots attached by @jkeenan, but once I did, I couldn't unsee them. And I like the new version better.

[jkeenan]

I took me a while to actually see the differences in the screenshots attached by @jkeenan, but once I did, I couldn't unsee them. And I like the new version better.

Thanks. I will self-assign this ticket and merge it into blead in about 4 days unless we hear some serious objection.