Skip to content

Conversation

@khwilliamson
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #17674

  • This set of changes does not require a perldelta entry.

@khwilliamson khwilliamson requested a review from demerphq May 3, 2025 23:46
@tonycoz
Copy link
Contributor

tonycoz commented May 4, 2025

#16971 is related and is still a problem

@jkeenan jkeenan changed the title perlretut: Rmove obsolete caution about \G perlretut: Remove obsolete caution about \G May 4, 2025
@khwilliamson
Copy link
Contributor Author

#16971 is not a bug that perlretut is referring to. I'm pretty sure whatever it was has been fixed; if not it should be in perlre as well or instead of. perlretut is for issues that beginners are likely to stumble over; not things exposed by fuzzing

@khwilliamson khwilliamson merged commit 69b5e8a into Perl:blead May 23, 2025
34 checks passed
@khwilliamson khwilliamson deleted the G_retut branch May 30, 2025 16:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[doc] Inconsistent documentation of \G

3 participants