Skip to content

Upgrade Jackson 2.20.0 -> 2.20.1#1940

Merged
rickie merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
renovate/jackson-2.x
Nov 10, 2025
Merged

Upgrade Jackson 2.20.0 -> 2.20.1#1940
rickie merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
renovate/jackson-2.x

Conversation

@Picnic-DevPla-Bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
Jackson import patch 2.20.0 -> 2.20.1

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 1, 2025

Looks good. No mutations were possible for these changes.
Mutation testing report by Pitest. Review any surviving mutants by inspecting the line comments under Files changed.

@Stephan202 Stephan202 added this to the 0.27.0 milestone Nov 1, 2025
Copy link
Member

@Stephan202 Stephan202 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To be merged after #1927 #1942.

Suggested commit message:

Upgrade Jackson 2.20.0 -> 2.20.1 (#1940)

See:
- https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson/wiki/Jackson-Release-2.20.1
- https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-bom/compare/jackson-bom-2.20.0...jackson-bom-2.20.1

@Picnic-DevPla-Bot Picnic-DevPla-Bot force-pushed the renovate/jackson-2.x branch 4 times, most recently from adbce0f to 8dcc600 Compare November 9, 2025 02:01
@rickie rickie force-pushed the renovate/jackson-2.x branch from 8dcc600 to b065873 Compare November 10, 2025 13:33
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@github-actions
Copy link

Looks good. No mutations were possible for these changes.
Mutation testing report by Pitest. Review any surviving mutants by inspecting the line comments under Files changed.

@rickie rickie merged commit 56152cb into master Nov 10, 2025
18 checks passed
@rickie rickie deleted the renovate/jackson-2.x branch November 10, 2025 13:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants