-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New Components - agrello #13875
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New Components - agrello #13875
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
3 Skipped Deployments
|
|
Important Review skippedReview was skipped due to path filters Files ignored due to path filters (1)
CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe changes introduce several new modules and functionalities to the Agrello application. Key features include actions for retrieving documents, sources for emitting events when documents are added or signed, and enhancements for managing folders and webhooks. New utility functions for file path normalization and object parsing are also included. Overall, these updates significantly expand the capabilities of the Agrello platform. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Sources - New Signature (Instant) - New Signed Document (Instant) - New Document Actions - Get Document
components/agrello/sources/new-signature-instant/new-signature-instant.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/agrello/sources/new-signed-document-instant/new-signed-document-instant.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (11)
- components/agrello/actions/get-document/get-document.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agrello/agrello.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agrello/common/utils.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agrello/package.json (2 hunks)
- components/agrello/sources/common/base.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agrello/sources/new-document/new-document.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agrello/sources/new-document/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agrello/sources/new-signature-instant/new-signature-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agrello/sources/new-signature-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agrello/sources/new-signed-document-instant/new-signed-document-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agrello/sources/new-signed-document-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/agrello/sources/new-signed-document-instant/test-event.mjs
Additional comments not posted (29)
components/agrello/package.json (2)
3-3: Version increment looks good!The version number has been incremented from
0.0.1to0.1.0, following semantic versioning. This indicates a new release with added features.
15-17: The new dependency looks good!The addition of the
@pipedream/platformdependency with version^3.0.1suggests an enhancement or addition of functionality that relies on this platform package. The version constraint allows for any compatible version within the3.x.xrange.Verify that the new dependency is being used correctly in the codebase by running the following script:
Verification successful
The new dependency is used extensively and correctly across the codebase.
The
@pipedream/platformdependency is imported and utilized in various components for handling HTTP requests, configuration errors, and polling intervals, confirming its necessity and correct usage.
- Files with usage include:
packages/prompts/src/index.tscomponents/zoho_catalyst/app/zoho_catalyst.app.tscomponents/yelp/app/yelp.app.tscomponents/xperiencify/app/xperiencify.app.ts- ...and many more.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `@pipedream/platform` dependency. # Test: Search for the dependency import statements. Expect: At least one import statement. rg --type typescript $'@pipedream/platform'Length of output: 77
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `@pipedream/platform` dependency. # Test: Search for the dependency import statements in TypeScript files. Expect: At least one import statement. rg --type ts '@pipedream/platform'Length of output: 12237
components/agrello/sources/new-signature-instant/test-event.mjs (1)
1-10: LGTM!The test event data looks good and follows the expected structure for the
new-signature-instantevent. The placeholder UUIDs and email are valid for testing purposes.components/agrello/sources/new-signed-document-instant/new-signed-document-instant.mjs (1)
1-22: LGTM!The new source component for the "new-signed-document-instant" event is implemented correctly and aligns with the PR objective. The component configuration follows the expected structure, and the overridden methods (
getEventandgetSummary) provide the necessary functionality.The past review comment suggesting a change to the
getSummarymethod has already been addressed in the current code.components/agrello/sources/new-signature-instant/new-signature-instant.mjs (4)
1-3: LGTM!The imports are necessary for the component to extend the base configuration and provide a sample emit for testing. The file paths are relative and assume a specific directory structure.
4-12: LGTM!The metadata properties are correctly defined and match the requirements specified in the PR objectives. The
keyproperty follows the naming convention, thetypeproperty is set tosource, and thededupeproperty is set touniquefor proper deduplication of events.
12-20: LGTM!The
getEventmethod correctly returns the event type specified in the PR objectives. ThegetSummarymethod generates a meaningful summary message that includes the relevant information from the event payload using string interpolation.
21-22: LGTM!The imported
sampleEmitmodule is correctly assigned to thesampleEmitproperty for testing purposes.components/agrello/actions/get-document/get-document.mjs (2)
1-35: LGTM!The code for the
agrello-get-documentaction looks good:
- The metadata is properly defined, including a helpful link to the API documentation.
- The props are correctly defined, referencing the
agrelloapp for allowed values.- The
runmethod follows best practices, usingasync/await, handling the$object, making the API request, exporting a$summary, and returning the response.Great job!
11-25: Verify thefolderIdanddocumentIdprop definitions.The
folderIdanddocumentIdprops are usingpropDefinitionto reference theagrelloapp, which is a good practice for fetching allowed values.However, please verify that the
agrelloapp has the correspondingpropDefinitionsforfolderIdanddocumentId, and that they are correctly fetching the allowed values from the Agrello API.Run the following script to verify the prop definitions:
Verification successful
Prop definitions for
folderIdanddocumentIdare correctly implemented. Both prop definitions are present in thecomponents/agrello/agrello.app.mjsfile, with appropriate attributes and options functions to fetch allowed values from the Agrello API.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `folderId` and `documentId` prop definitions in the `agrello` app. # Test: Search for the `folderId` prop definition. Expect: A `propDefinition` array for `folderId`. rg --type javascript -A 5 $'propDefinitions:\s*\[\s*\{\s*name:\s*[\'"]folderId' components/agrello/agrello.app.mjs # Test: Search for the `documentId` prop definition. Expect: A `propDefinition` array for `documentId`. rg --type javascript -A 5 $'propDefinitions:\s*\[\s*\{\s*name:\s*[\'"]documentId' components/agrello/agrello.app.mjsLength of output: 307
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `folderId` and `documentId` prop definitions in the `agrello` app. # Test: Search for the `folderId` prop definition. Expect: A `propDefinition` array for `folderId`. rg -A 5 $'propDefinitions:\s*\[\s*\{\s*name:\s*[\'"]folderId' components/agrello/agrello.app.mjs # Test: Search for the `documentId` prop definition. Expect: A `propDefinition` array for `documentId`. rg -A 5 $'propDefinitions:\s*\[\s*\{\s*name:\s*[\'"]documentId' components/agrello/agrello.app.mjsLength of output: 201
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any `propDefinitions` in the `agrello` app file to verify their existence and structure. # Test: Search for any `propDefinitions` in the file. rg -A 10 'propDefinitions' components/agrello/agrello.app.mjsLength of output: 324
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search specifically for the `documentId` prop definition in the `agrello` app file. # Test: Search for the `documentId` prop definition. rg -A 10 'documentId' components/agrello/agrello.app.mjsLength of output: 646
components/agrello/sources/common/base.mjs (4)
3-11: LGTM!The
propsare correctly defined and typed. Theagrelloimport path is relative to the current file and seems correct. SettingcustomResponsetofalsefor thehttpprop is a good practice to let the platform handle the response. Using$.service.dbfor thedbprop is correct to access the platform's DB service.
12-19: LGTM!The
methodsare correctly defined and use thedbprop to interact with the DB. The method names are prefixed with_to indicate that they are internal methods. ThewebhookIdkey is used consistently in both methods.
20-35: LGTM!The
hooksare correctly defined as async functions. Theactivatehook creates a webhook with the event and URL and sets the hook ID in the DB. Thedeactivatehook retrieves the webhook ID from the DB and deletes the webhook. Theagrelloprop is used to interact with the Agrello API. The internal methods_setHookIdand_getHookIdare used appropriately.
36-43: Looks good, but ensurethis.getSummaryis defined.The
runfunction is correctly defined as an async function. Destructuring theeventfrom thebodyis a good practice for clarity. Calculating the timestamp usingDate.parse(new Date())is correct. Emitting an event with the event name and an object containing relevant data is a common pattern. Theidconstruction using theevent.containerIdand timestamp ensures uniqueness. Thetsis correctly set to the calculated timestamp.Note: The
summaryis obtained by callingthis.getSummary, which is not defined in this file. Ensure thatthis.getSummaryis defined in the specific source that extends this base.components/agrello/sources/new-document/test-event.mjs (1)
1-70: The test event looks good!The structure and sample data of the test event aligns with the expected schema for a new document event. It includes all the relevant properties such as
id,name,status,parties,invitations,files,signatures, and most importantly, thefolderIdwhich is a required property for thenew-documentsource.This test event will serve as a good example payload for testing the
new-documentsource.components/agrello/sources/new-document/new-document.mjs (5)
1-4: LGTM!The imports are correctly defined and serve the necessary purpose.
5-27: Looks good!The metadata and prop definitions are correctly defined and align with the component's purpose and requirements.
28-67: Great implementation!The component's methods are implemented correctly and handle the necessary logic for emitting new document events efficiently. The use of pagination and filtering ensures that only new documents are processed and emitted with the required metadata.
69-73: LGTM!The
deployhook is implemented correctly and emits an initial batch of events during component deployment with a reasonable limit.
74-78: Looks good!The
runmethod andsampleEmitexport are correctly defined and serve their intended purposes.components/agrello/agrello.app.mjs (9)
7-18: LGTM!The
folderIdproperty definition is correctly implemented, and theoptionsmethod is using thelistFoldersmethod to fetch folder options asynchronously, which is the correct approach.
19-39: LGTM!The
documentIdproperty definition is correctly implemented, and theoptionsmethod is using thelistDocumentsmethod to fetch document options asynchronously based on the selected folder, which is the correct approach.
60-75: LGTM!The
listFoldersmethod is correctly implemented and is using thegetSubFoldersmethod to fetch subfolders recursively. The method is returning an array of folder options with the correct label and value format.
77-91: LGTM!The
getSubFoldersmethod is correctly implemented and is using recursion to fetch subfolders. The method is returning an array of folder options with the correct label and value format.
92-99: LGTM!The
listDocumentsmethod is correctly implemented and is using the_makeRequestmethod to make API requests. The method is passing thefolderIdparameter to the API request path.
100-104: LGTM!The
getDocumentmethod is correctly implemented and is using the_makeRequestmethod to make API requests. The method is passing thedocumentIdparameter to the API request path.
105-111: LGTM!The
createWebhookmethod is correctly implemented and is using the_makeRequestmethod to make API requests. The method is using thePOSTHTTP method to create a webhook.
112-117: LGTM!The
deleteWebhookmethod is correctly implemented and is using the_makeRequestmethod to make API requests. The method is using theDELETEHTTP method to delete a webhook and is passing thehookIdparameter to the API request path.
118-141: LGTM!The
paginatemethod is correctly implemented and is using theasync *syntax to create an asynchronous generator function. The method is using themaxResultsparameter to limit the number of results returned, thepageparameter to paginate through the results, and thefnparameter to call the API request function.
…-instant.mjs Co-authored-by: Leo Vu <[email protected]>
|
/approve |
Resolves #13863.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Version Update