[Components] Virifi: Added new components. #13939
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 1 Skipped Deployment
|
|
@jcortes is attempting to deploy a commit to the Pipedreamers Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe changes introduce several new modules and functionalities for the Virifi application, including actions for adding members, certifying documents, and signing documents. Additionally, constants and utility functions are defined to streamline API interactions. The package configuration has been updated to reflect new dependencies and versioning. Overall, these modifications enhance the application's capabilities in managing documents and user interactions. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
components/virifi/actions/certify-document/certify-document.mjs (1)
60-89: Consider adding error handling.The
runmethod looks good overall. It correctly constructs the multipart form request with the document files and other parameters.However, consider wrapping the main logic inside a try-catch block to handle any potential errors that may occur during the execution of the component. This will ensure a more robust error handling mechanism.
Here's an example of how you can add error handling:
async run({ $ }) { try { // Existing code... const response = await certifyDocument({ $, data: form, headers: form.getHeaders(), }); $.export("$summary", "Document certified successfully"); return response; } catch (error) { console.error("Error certifying document:", error); throw error; } }components/virifi/actions/sign-document/sign-document.mjs (1)
59-86: Consider adding error handling and logging to improve robustness and debuggability.While the code relies on the underlying Pipedream framework for error handling and logging, it would be beneficial to add explicit error handling and logging statements within the
runmethod. This can help improve the robustness of the component and make it easier to debug issues.For example, you can wrap the API request in a try-catch block to catch and handle any errors that may occur during the signing process. You can also add logging statements to log the input values, API response, and any relevant information for debugging purposes.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (7)
- components/virifi/actions/add-member/add-member.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/virifi/actions/certify-document/certify-document.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/virifi/actions/sign-document/sign-document.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/virifi/common/constants.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/virifi/common/utils.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/virifi/package.json (2 hunks)
- components/virifi/virifi.app.mjs (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (17)
components/virifi/package.json (2)
3-3: Version update looks good!The version increment from
0.0.1to0.1.0aligns with semantic versioning conventions, suggesting the introduction of new features or significant changes. This matches the expectations set in the PR summary.
14-14:publishConfiglooks good!Setting
"access": "public"in thepublishConfigsection ensures that the package is published publicly, which is a standard configuration for open-source packages.components/virifi/common/constants.mjs (3)
1-2: LGTM!The constants
BASE_URLandVERSION_PATHare correctly defined and match the Virifi API documentation.
19-22: LGTM!The constant
SIGNATURE_TYPE_OPTIONis correctly defined and the values of the properties match the Virifi API documentation.
24-29: LGTM!The default export is correctly defined and contains all the constants defined in the file.
components/virifi/virifi.app.mjs (6)
8-13: LGTM!The
digitalTwinproperty is correctly defined with a clear description and an appropriate default value.
16-18: LGTM!The
getUrlmethod correctly constructs the full URL using constants, which is a good practice.
19-24: LGTM!The
getHeadersmethod correctly prepares the authorization headers and allows for additional headers to be merged.
25-33: LGTM!The
_makeRequestmethod correctly centralizes the logic for making HTTP requests using thegetUrlandgetHeadersmethods. The underscore prefix indicates that it is intended for internal use within the module.
34-38: LGTM!The
postmethod provides a convenient way to make POST requests by leveraging the_makeRequestmethod and setting the HTTP method to "POST".
1-2: LGTM!The imports are correctly placed at the top of the file. Using the
axioslibrary for making HTTP requests and importing constants from a separate module are good practices.components/virifi/actions/add-member/add-member.mjs (1)
1-55: LGTM!The component follows the standard structure and best practices for defining an action component in the Pipedream platform:
- It imports the necessary dependencies.
- It defines the component's metadata properties (
key,name,description,version,type).- The
descriptionincludes a link to the documentation.- The
propsobject correctly defines the input properties with their types, labels, and descriptions.- The
lastNameprop is marked as optional, aligning with the API requirements.- The
addMembermethod is a wrapper around theapp.postmethod for making the API request.- The
runmethod destructures the component's properties, calls theaddMembermethod with the destructured data, exports a success summary, and returns the API response.Overall, the component is well-structured and implemented correctly.
components/virifi/actions/certify-document/certify-document.mjs (4)
1-32: LGTM!The import statements and default export object look good. The necessary dependencies are imported, and the component metadata is properly defined.
33-51: LGTM!The
additionalPropsmethod correctly generates dynamic props based on thetotalDocvalue. The error handling for the maximum number of documents is appropriate, and the generated props have the correct structure.
52-59: LGTM!The
methodsobject and thecertifyDocumentmethod look good. The method provides a clean way to make the API request for certifying documents, and theargsparameter allows flexibility for additional options.
1-90: Overall assessment: The component is well-implemented and ready for use.The Virifi "Certify Document" action component is a solid implementation that provides a user-friendly way to certify documents using the Virifi API. The code is well-structured, follows best practices, and handles the necessary logic for constructing the API request.
With the suggested improvement for error handling, the component will be more reliable and handle potential errors gracefully.
Great job on this component! It's ready to be used in Pipedream workflows with the Virifi integration.
components/virifi/actions/sign-document/sign-document.mjs (1)
1-87: The code looks good and aligns with the PR objectives!The new "Sign Document" action component for Virifi is well-structured and follows best practices. It imports necessary dependencies, defines the component metadata correctly, and implements the
runmethod to execute the action by sending a POST request to the Virifi API with the provided document and signing details.The code is modular, uses meaningful variable and function names, and follows a consistent formatting style.
| "dependencies": { | ||
| "@pipedream/platform": "3.0.1", | ||
| "form-data": "^4.0.0", | ||
| "fs": "^0.0.1-security" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Dependencies section looks mostly good, but there's a question about the fs dependency.
The addition of the dependencies section and the new dependencies aligns with the AI-generated summary, which mentions an enhancement in functionality.
- The
@pipedream/platformdependency at version3.0.1suggests an integration with the Pipedream platform, which makes sense for this component. - The
form-datadependency at version^4.0.0is likely used for handling form data in the component, which is a common requirement.
However, the fs dependency at version ^0.0.1-security seems unusual. Node.js has a built-in fs module that can be used directly without installing it as a dependency.
Consider removing the fs dependency and using the built-in fs module instead:
"dependencies": {
"@pipedream/platform": "3.0.1",
"form-data": "^4.0.0",
- "fs": "^0.0.1-security"
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "dependencies": { | |
| "@pipedream/platform": "3.0.1", | |
| "form-data": "^4.0.0", | |
| "fs": "^0.0.1-security" | |
| "dependencies": { | |
| "@pipedream/platform": "3.0.1", | |
| "form-data": "^4.0.0" | |
| } |
| const SIGN_BY_OPTION = { | ||
| SIGN_BY_YOURSELF: { | ||
| label: "Sing By Yourself", | ||
| value: "signByYourself", | ||
| }, | ||
| SIGN_AND_INVITE_OTHERS: { | ||
| label: "Sign And Invite Others", | ||
| value: "signAndInviteOthers", | ||
| }, | ||
| SIGN_OTHER: { | ||
| label: "Sign Other", | ||
| value: "signOther", | ||
| }, | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the typo in the label property of SIGN_BY_YOURSELF.
The label property of SIGN_BY_YOURSELF has a typo. It should be "Sign By Yourself" instead of "Sing By Yourself".
Apply this diff to fix the typo:
const SIGN_BY_OPTION = {
SIGN_BY_YOURSELF: {
- label: "Sing By Yourself",
+ label: "Sign By Yourself",
value: "signByYourself",
},
SIGN_AND_INVITE_OTHERS: {
label: "Sign And Invite Others",
value: "signAndInviteOthers",
},
SIGN_OTHER: {
label: "Sign Other",
value: "signOther",
},
};Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const SIGN_BY_OPTION = { | |
| SIGN_BY_YOURSELF: { | |
| label: "Sing By Yourself", | |
| value: "signByYourself", | |
| }, | |
| SIGN_AND_INVITE_OTHERS: { | |
| label: "Sign And Invite Others", | |
| value: "signAndInviteOthers", | |
| }, | |
| SIGN_OTHER: { | |
| label: "Sign Other", | |
| value: "signOther", | |
| }, | |
| }; | |
| const SIGN_BY_OPTION = { | |
| SIGN_BY_YOURSELF: { | |
| label: "Sign By Yourself", | |
| value: "signByYourself", | |
| }, | |
| SIGN_AND_INVITE_OTHERS: { | |
| label: "Sign And Invite Others", | |
| value: "signAndInviteOthers", | |
| }, | |
| SIGN_OTHER: { | |
| label: "Sign Other", | |
| value: "signOther", | |
| }, | |
| }; |
1 participant
WHY
The API responds with errors when tested
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Enhancements
Dependencies