GetScreenshot new components #14070
GetScreenshot new components #14070
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe pull request updates the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested labels
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
components/getscreenshot/getscreenshot.app.mjsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.15.0 Error [ERR_REQUIRE_ESM]: require() of ES Module /node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected]/node_modules/estree-to-babel/lib/estree-to-babel.js from /node_modules/.pnpm/@putout[email protected]/node_modules/@putout/engine-parser/lib/parse.js not supported. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
components/getscreenshot/getscreenshot.app.mjs (4)
11-22: LGTM: Well-structured _makeRequest method. Consider adding error handling.The _makeRequest method is well-implemented, providing a reusable way to make API requests with the necessary authentication and base URL. The use of object spread for additional options provides good flexibility.
Consider adding basic error handling to provide more informative error messages. For example:
async _makeRequest({ $, params, ...otherOpts }) { try { return await axios($, { ...otherOpts, baseURL: this._baseUrl(), params: { ...params, apikey: this.$auth.api_key, }, }); } catch (error) { console.error('Request failed:', error.message); throw error; } }This will log errors while still allowing the caller to handle them as needed.
23-28: LGTM: Concise getScreenshot method. Consider adding JSDoc for clarity.The getScreenshot method is well-implemented, effectively using the _makeRequest method and allowing for flexible argument passing.
Consider adding a JSDoc comment to clarify the expected arguments and return value. For example:
/** * Get a screenshot from the specified URL. * @param {Object} args - The arguments for the screenshot request. * @param {string} args.url - The URL to capture. * @param {Object} [args.options] - Additional options for the screenshot. * @returns {Promise<Object>} The API response containing the screenshot data. */ async getScreenshot(args) { return this._makeRequest({ path: "/get-screenshot", ...args, }); }This addition would improve the method's self-documentation and make it easier for other developers to use.
29-34: LGTM: Concise getApiUsage method. Consider adding JSDoc for consistency.The getApiUsage method is well-implemented, effectively using the _makeRequest method and allowing for flexible argument passing.
For consistency with the suggested improvement for getScreenshot, consider adding a JSDoc comment here as well:
/** * Get API usage statistics. * @param {Object} [args] - Additional arguments for the usage request. * @returns {Promise<Object>} The API response containing usage data. */ async getApiUsage(args) { return this._makeRequest({ path: "/usage", ...args, }); }This addition would maintain consistency in documentation style across methods and improve overall code clarity.
1-36: Overall implementation aligns well with PR objectives.The getscreenshot.app.mjs file successfully implements the core functionality required for the GetScreenshot new components as described in the PR objectives. It provides methods for capturing screenshots and retrieving API usage, which align with the described actions in issue #13268.
Key points:
- The implementation allows for taking screenshots of websites (getScreenshot method).
- It provides a way to check API usage (getApiUsage method).
- The code is well-structured and follows good practices for Pipedream apps.
While the current implementation meets the basic requirements, consider the following enhancements for future iterations:
- Implement specific methods for element screenshots and email sending as mentioned in the PR objectives.
- Add input validation for the required properties (e.g., 'website URL', 'element selector', 'email address').
- Implement error handling and provide meaningful error messages to users.
As the component grows, consider splitting the functionality into separate files for better maintainability. For example, you could have separate files for screenshot-related methods, API usage methods, and utility functions.
components/getscreenshot/actions/get-account-api-usage/get-account-api-usage.mjs (3)
1-9: LGTM! Consider enhancing the description.The import statement and action metadata look good and align with the PR objectives. The key, name, and type are appropriate for this action.
Consider adding a brief explanation of what the API usage information includes in the description. For example:
description: - "Retrieve your current API usage and available quota. [See the documentation](https://docs.rasterwise.com/docs/getscreenshot/api-reference-1/)", + "Retrieve your current API usage (e.g., number of requests made) and available quota. [See the documentation](https://docs.rasterwise.com/docs/getscreenshot/api-reference-1/)",
10-17: Add email validation pattern.The props section looks good overall. The
rasterwiseprop is correctly included, and theTo enhance data validation, consider adding a pattern for email validation:
email: { type: "string", label: "Email Address", description: "The email address of this account.", + pattern: "^[a-zA-Z0-9._%+-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+\\.[a-zA-Z]{2,}$", },This pattern will ensure that the entered email address follows a standard format.
18-28: Add error handling to the run method.The structure and logic of the
runmethod look good. It correctly uses therasterwiseobject to make the API call and provides a summary message.To improve robustness, consider adding error handling:
async run({ $ }) { const { rasterwise, ...params } = this; - const response = await rasterwise.getApiUsage({ - $, - params, - }); - $.export("$summary", "Successfully retrieved API usage"); - return response; + try { + const response = await rasterwise.getApiUsage({ + $, + params, + }); + $.export("$summary", "Successfully retrieved API usage"); + return response; + } catch (error) { + $.export("$summary", `Failed to retrieve API usage: ${error.message}`); + throw error; + } },This change will provide more informative error messages if the API call fails.
components/getscreenshot/actions/get-website-screenshot/get-website-screenshot.mjs (3)
3-8: LGTM: Action metadata is well-defined.The action metadata is correctly structured and includes all necessary information. The key, name, description, and type are appropriately set. The description helpfully includes a link to the documentation.
Consider using semantic versioning starting with "1.0.0" for the initial public release, as "0.0.1" typically indicates a pre-release or development version.
9-46: LGTM: Props are well-defined and align with PR objectives.The props definition is comprehensive and aligns well with the PR objectives. Each prop has appropriate types, labels, and descriptions. The inclusion of optional props like
elementsupports the various screenshot actions mentioned in the PR objectives.Consider adding input validation for the
urlprop to ensure it starts withhttp://orhttps://. This can be done using apatternproperty in the prop definition. For example:url: { type: "string", label: "Website URL", description: "URL of the website / page you want to screenshot. Should start with `http://` or `https://`", pattern: "^https?://.*$", },This will enforce the URL format at the Pipedream UI level, preventing potential errors due to invalid URLs.
47-67: LGTM: Run method is well-implemented.The run method is efficiently implemented, correctly handling asynchronous operations and prop destructuring. The conditional logic for PDF format and the inclusion of additionalParams are well done. The summary export provides good user feedback.
Consider adding error handling to improve robustness. For example:
async run({ $ }) { const { getscreenshot, format, additionalParams, ...params } = this; try { const response = await getscreenshot.getScreenshot({ $, params: { ...params, ...(format === "pdf" ? { pdf: true, } : { format, }), ...additionalParams, }, }); $.export("$summary", `Successfully captured screenshot of "${this.url}"`); return response; } catch (error) { $.export("$summary", `Failed to capture screenshot of "${this.url}"`); throw error; } }This will provide more informative feedback to the user in case of errors and ensure that errors are properly propagated.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (6)
- components/getscreenshot/.gitignore (0 hunks)
- components/getscreenshot/actions/get-account-api-usage/get-account-api-usage.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/getscreenshot/actions/get-website-screenshot/get-website-screenshot.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/getscreenshot/app/getscreenshot.app.ts (0 hunks)
- components/getscreenshot/getscreenshot.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/getscreenshot/package.json (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (2)
- components/getscreenshot/.gitignore
- components/getscreenshot/app/getscreenshot.app.ts
Additional comments not posted (8)
components/getscreenshot/package.json (4)
3-3: Version update looks good.The version bump from 0.0.3 to 0.1.0 is appropriate for the addition of new features (screenshot components) while maintaining backwards compatibility.
1-18: Overall package.json changes align with PR objectives.The updates to version, main entry point, and dependencies in this package.json file are consistent with the introduction of new screenshot components as outlined in the PR objectives. These changes support the implementation of the new actions: take-screenshot, capture-element-screenshot, and send-email-screenshot.
However, to ensure a smooth integration:
- Verify that the new main entry point doesn't break existing imports.
- Confirm that the @pipedream/platform dependency is utilized in the new components.
These verifications will help maintain the stability of the system while introducing the new screenshot functionalities.
15-17: Dependency addition approved, verify usage.The addition of @pipedream/platform as a dependency is appropriate for new components. The version constraint (^3.0.3) allows for compatible updates, which is good practice.
To ensure this dependency is necessary and properly used, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of @pipedream/platform in the new components # Test: Search for imports of @pipedream/platform in the new components. Expect: At least one result. rg --type javascript --type typescript 'from [\'"]@pipedream/platform[\'"]' components/getscreenshot/
5-5: Main entry point update approved, but verify impact.The simplification of the main entry point is good for maintainability. However, ensure that this change doesn't break existing imports in other parts of the system.
Run the following script to check for any imports that might be affected:
Verification successful
Entry point change verified with no impact on existing imports. Approved.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for imports of the old entry point across the codebase # Test: Search for imports of the old entry point. Expect: No results. rg --type javascript --type typescript 'from [\'"]@pipedream/getscreenshot/dist/app/getscreenshot\.app\.mjs[\'"]'Length of output: 93
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for imports of the old entry point across the codebase # Test: Search for imports of the old entry point. Expect: No results. rg --type javascript --type typescript "from ['\"]@pipedream/getscreenshot/dist/app/getscreenshot\.app\.mjs['\"]"Length of output: 154
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for imports of the old entry point across the codebase # Test: Search for imports of the old entry point. Expect: No results. rg --type js --type ts "from ['\"]@pipedream/getscreenshot/dist/app/getscreenshot\.app\.mjs['\"]"Length of output: 103
components/getscreenshot/getscreenshot.app.mjs (1)
1-6: LGTM: Proper import and module structure.The import statement and module structure are correctly implemented for a Pipedream app. Using
axiosfrom the Pipedream platform is a good practice for making HTTP requests.components/getscreenshot/actions/get-account-api-usage/get-account-api-usage.mjs (1)
1-29: Overall, the implementation looks good and aligns with PR objectives.This new action for retrieving account API usage is well-structured and concise. It fulfills the intended purpose as described in the PR objectives. The implementation follows good practices and there are no apparent security issues.
The suggested improvements (email validation and error handling) will enhance the robustness and user-friendliness of the action. Once these are addressed, the implementation will be even stronger.
components/getscreenshot/actions/get-website-screenshot/get-website-screenshot.mjs (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct.The import statement correctly imports the
getscreenshotmodule from the relative path. This follows the expected pattern for Pipedream components.
1-68: Overall assessment: Well-implemented and aligned with PR objectives.This new Pipedream action for capturing website screenshots is well-structured and aligns closely with the PR objectives. It implements the core functionality described in the linked issue #13268, including options for different image formats, email sending, and element-specific captures.
Key strengths:
- Clear and informative metadata
- Comprehensive prop definitions covering all required functionalities
- Efficient implementation of the run method
Suggestions for enhancement:
- Consider using semantic versioning starting with "1.0.0"
- Add input validation for the URL prop
- Implement error handling in the run method
These suggestions are minor and aimed at improving robustness and user experience. The current implementation is solid and ready for use.
|
/approve |
|
@jcortes there was a pnpm-lock conflict. Can you merge this after approving, please, in case it happens again? |
|
/approve |
Closes #13268
Summary by CodeRabbit
.gitignoreentries to include previously ignored files in version control.