Skip to content

Conversation

@michelle0927
Copy link
Collaborator

@michelle0927 michelle0927 commented Sep 24, 2024

Resolves #14072

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new constant for pull request review states: "approved", "changes_requested", and "commented".
    • Enhanced webhook event functionality with new properties and methods for better event control based on pull request review states.
  • Version Updates

    • Multiple components have been updated to new version numbers, ensuring improved stability and performance.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 24, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Sep 24, 2024 8:05pm
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Sep 24, 2024 8:05pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Sep 24, 2024 8:05pm

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 24, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several updates across various components of the GitHub integration. Key changes include version increments for multiple source modules, the addition of a new constant for pull request review states, and enhancements to the webhook events functionality. These modifications aim to improve the overall event handling and management capabilities within the GitHub integration.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
components/github/package.json Version updated from 1.4.0 to 1.4.1.
components/github/sources/common/constants.mjs Added constant PULL_REQUEST_REVIEW_STATES with values ["approved", "changes_requested", "commented"].
components/github/sources/new-branch/new-branch.mjs Version updated from 1.0.5 to 1.0.6.
components/github/sources/new-card-in-column/new-card-in-column.mjs Version updated from 1.0.4 to 1.0.5.
components/github/sources/new-collaborator/new-collaborator.mjs Version updated from 1.0.5 to 1.0.6.
components/github/sources/new-commit-comment/new-commit-comment.mjs Version updated from 1.0.5 to 1.0.6.
components/github/sources/new-commit/new-commit.mjs Version updated from 1.0.6 to 1.0.7.
components/github/sources/new-discussion/new-discussion.mjs Version updated from 1.0.5 to 1.0.6.
components/github/sources/new-fork/new-fork.mjs Version updated from 1.0.5 to 1.0.6.
components/github/sources/new-issue-with-status/new-issue-with-status.mjs Version updated from 0.1.2 to 0.1.3.
components/github/sources/new-label/new-label.mjs Version updated from 1.0.5 to 1.0.6.
components/github/sources/new-or-updated-issue/new-or-updated-issue.mjs Version updated from 1.1.2 to 1.1.3.
components/github/sources/new-or-updated-milestone/new-or-updated-milestone.mjs Version updated from 1.1.2 to 1.1.3.
components/github/sources/new-or-updated-pull-request/new-or-updated-pull-request.mjs Version updated from 1.2.2 to 1.2.3.
components/github/sources/new-release/new-release.mjs Version updated from 1.0.5 to 1.0.6.
components/github/sources/new-star/new-star.mjs Version updated from 1.0.5 to 1.0.6.
components/github/sources/webhook-events/webhook-events.mjs Version updated from 1.0.5 to 1.0.6, added dedupe property, enhanced events with reloadProps, and introduced async additionalProps() method.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Expect events like "A pull request was approved" (Issue #14072) The addition of PULL_REQUEST_REVIEW_STATES may support this, but specific event emissions are not detailed.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

triaged, action, trigger / source

Suggested reviewers

  • jcortes

Poem

In the garden of code, where changes bloom,
A rabbit hops lightly, dispelling the gloom.
With new states for reviews, and versions that rise,
GitHub's integration now reaches new skies!
Hooray for the updates, let events dance and play,
In the world of GitHub, it's a bright, sunny day! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/github/sources/common/constants.mjs (1)

352-356: Consider these improvements for consistency and maintainability.

While the implementation is correct, consider the following suggestions to enhance consistency and maintainability:

  1. Convert the array to an object for easier lookup and consistency with other constants in the file. For example:
PULL_REQUEST_REVIEW_STATES: {
  APPROVED: "approved",
  CHANGES_REQUESTED: "changes_requested",
  COMMENTED: "commented",
},
  1. Add a comment explaining the purpose and usage of the new constant:
// States for pull request reviews, used for filtering events
PULL_REQUEST_REVIEW_STATES: {
  // ...
},
  1. Consider moving this constant higher up in the file, possibly near other pull request related constants like EVENT_TYPES_PULL_REQUEST for better discoverability.

These changes would improve code consistency and make the constant easier to use and maintain in the future.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2fab769 and b248183.

Files selected for processing (17)
  • components/github/package.json (1 hunks)
  • components/github/sources/common/constants.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/github/sources/new-branch/new-branch.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/github/sources/new-card-in-column/new-card-in-column.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/github/sources/new-collaborator/new-collaborator.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/github/sources/new-commit-comment/new-commit-comment.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/github/sources/new-commit/new-commit.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/github/sources/new-discussion/new-discussion.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/github/sources/new-fork/new-fork.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/github/sources/new-issue-with-status/new-issue-with-status.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/github/sources/new-label/new-label.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/github/sources/new-or-updated-issue/new-or-updated-issue.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/github/sources/new-or-updated-milestone/new-or-updated-milestone.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/github/sources/new-or-updated-pull-request/new-or-updated-pull-request.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/github/sources/new-release/new-release.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/github/sources/new-star/new-star.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/github/sources/webhook-events/webhook-events.mjs (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (15)
  • components/github/package.json
  • components/github/sources/new-branch/new-branch.mjs
  • components/github/sources/new-card-in-column/new-card-in-column.mjs
  • components/github/sources/new-collaborator/new-collaborator.mjs
  • components/github/sources/new-commit-comment/new-commit-comment.mjs
  • components/github/sources/new-commit/new-commit.mjs
  • components/github/sources/new-discussion/new-discussion.mjs
  • components/github/sources/new-fork/new-fork.mjs
  • components/github/sources/new-issue-with-status/new-issue-with-status.mjs
  • components/github/sources/new-label/new-label.mjs
  • components/github/sources/new-or-updated-issue/new-or-updated-issue.mjs
  • components/github/sources/new-or-updated-milestone/new-or-updated-milestone.mjs
  • components/github/sources/new-or-updated-pull-request/new-or-updated-pull-request.mjs
  • components/github/sources/new-release/new-release.mjs
  • components/github/sources/new-star/new-star.mjs
Additional comments not posted (3)
components/github/sources/webhook-events/webhook-events.mjs (3)

11-12: Version update and addition of dedupe property look good.

Updating the version to "1.0.6" and adding dedupe: "unique" ensures proper event de-duplication and reflects the new changes.


25-25: Addition of reloadProps enhances dynamic property handling.

Setting reloadProps: true in the events property enables dynamic reloading of properties when the selected events change, improving the user experience.


28-41: additionalProps method is well-implemented for conditional properties.

The additionalProps method correctly adds the reviewState prop when "pull_request_review" is included in the selected events. This allows users to filter pull_request_review events by state, enhancing configurability.

@michelle0927 michelle0927 merged commit 5efbd06 into master Sep 27, 2024
12 checks passed
@michelle0927 michelle0927 deleted the issue-14072 branch September 27, 2024 14:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Github

3 participants