[Components] Certifier: Add create-group action
#14082
Conversation
…credential`, `send-credential` actions for Certifier
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 1 Skipped Deployment
|
|
@mariczne is attempting to deploy a commit to the Pipedreamers Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new action for creating groups within the Certifier application, along with updates to existing components. A new file Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Thank you so much for submitting this! We've added it to our backlog to review, and our team has been notified. |
|
Thanks for submitting this PR! When we review PRs, we follow the Pipedream component guidelines. If you're not familiar, here's a quick checklist:
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
components/certifier/actions/create-group/create-group.mjs (2)
9-42: Props are well-structured, but consider improving the alert prop.The props are correctly defined using propDefinitions from the Certifier app, which is a good practice. The inclusion of an alert prop to inform users about required fields is helpful.
However, there's room for a minor improvement:
Consider removing the eslint-disable comment for the alert prop and instead add the missing
labelanddescriptionproperties. This would make the code more consistent and eliminate the need for the eslint exception. For example:alert: { type: "alert", alertType: "warning", label: "Required Fields", description: "Alert about required fields", content: "At least one of `Certificate Design` and `Badge Design` fields is required.", },
43-44: Consider removing the empty methods object.The action type is correctly set to "action". However, the
methodsobject is empty and doesn't serve any purpose in its current state.If there are no methods to be defined, you can safely remove the empty
methodsobject to keep the code concise:type: "action", - methods: {},components/certifier/certifier.app.mjs (6)
66-72: LGTM: createGroup method implementation with a minor suggestionThe
createGroupmethod is well-implemented, following the existing pattern of other methods in the file. It correctly uses thecallApimethod and allows for flexible argument passing.Consider adding a brief JSDoc comment above the method to describe its purpose and parameters, for consistency with best practices:
/** * Creates a new group * @param {Object} args - Additional arguments to pass to the API call * @returns {Promise<Object>} The API response */ createGroup(args = {}) { // ... existing implementation }
137-142: LGTM: groupName property definition with a minor suggestionThe
groupNameproperty is well-defined with appropriate type, label, and description.Consider adding the
optionalfield to explicitly indicate whether this property is required or optional. For example:groupName: { type: "string", label: "Group Name", description: "The group's name that is used as [group.name] attribute later on.", optional: false, // or true, depending on whether it's required },
143-171: LGTM: certificateDesignId property definition with a minor suggestionThe
certificateDesignIdproperty is well-defined with appropriate type, label, description, and optional flag. The async options method correctly retrieves and filters certificate designs, handling pagination appropriately.Consider adding error handling to the async options method. For example:
async options({ prevContext } = {}) { try { const response = await this.searchDesigns({ params: { cursor: prevContext.cursor, }, }); // ... existing implementation } catch (error) { console.error("Error fetching certificate designs:", error); return { options: [], context: prevContext, }; } },This will ensure that the method gracefully handles any API errors.
172-200: LGTM: badgeDesignId property definition with refactoring suggestionThe
badgeDesignIdproperty is well-defined with appropriate type, label, description, and optional flag. The async options method correctly retrieves and filters badge designs, handling pagination appropriately.Consider refactoring the
certificateDesignIdandbadgeDesignIdproperties to reduce code duplication. You could create a helper method to generate the options for both properties:async getDesignOptions(designType, prevContext) { try { const response = await this.searchDesigns({ params: { cursor: prevContext.cursor, }, }); const designs = response.data; const cursor = response.pagination.next; return { options: designs .filter((design) => design.type === designType) .map(({ id, name }) => ({ label: name, value: id, })), context: { cursor, }, }; } catch (error) { console.error(`Error fetching ${designType} designs:`, error); return { options: [], context: prevContext, }; } }, // Then use it in both properties: certificateDesignId: { // ... other properties async options({ prevContext } = {}) { return this.getDesignOptions("certificate", prevContext); }, }, badgeDesignId: { // ... other properties async options({ prevContext } = {}) { return this.getDesignOptions("badge", prevContext); }, },This refactoring will reduce code duplication and make it easier to maintain both properties.
208-213: LGTM: credentialId property definition with a minor suggestionThe
credentialIdproperty is well-defined with appropriate type, label, and description.Consider explicitly setting the
optionalflag for this property. If it's a required field, set it tofalse; otherwise, set it totrue. For example:credentialId: { type: "string", label: "Credential ID", description: "The credential's unique ID.", optional: false, // or true, depending on whether it's required },This will make the property definition more explicit and consistent with other properties in the file.
Line range hint
1-213: Overall assessment: Well-implemented changes aligned with PR objectivesThe changes in this file successfully implement the new
createGroupaction and add necessary properties for the Certifier integration enhancement. The implementation follows existing patterns in the file and generally adheres to best practices.Key points:
- The
createGroupmethod has been added, fulfilling the main PR objective.- New properties (
groupName,certificateDesignId,badgeDesignId,learningEventUrl, andcredentialId) have been added to support the new functionality.- The
searchDesignsmethod has been implemented to support the retrieval of certificate and badge designs.The changes meet the requirements outlined in the PR objectives and enhance the Certifier integration within the Pipedream platform.
To further improve the code:
- Consider implementing error handling in the async methods.
- Refactor the similar implementations of
certificateDesignIdandbadgeDesignIdto reduce code duplication.- Ensure consistent use of the
optionalflag across all property definitions.- Add JSDoc comments to new methods for better documentation.
These improvements will enhance the maintainability and robustness of the code.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- components/certifier/actions/create-group/create-group.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/certifier/actions/issue-credential/issue-credential.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/certifier/certifier.app.mjs (3 hunks)
- components/certifier/package.json (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- components/certifier/actions/issue-credential/issue-credential.mjs
- components/certifier/package.json
🔇 Additional comments not posted (3)
components/certifier/actions/create-group/create-group.mjs (1)
1-8: LGTM! The import and action metadata are well-structured.The import statement and action metadata are correctly implemented. The action key follows the recommended format, and the description includes a link to the API documentation, which is helpful for users.
components/certifier/certifier.app.mjs (2)
39-44: LGTM: searchDesigns method implementationThe
searchDesignsmethod is well-implemented, following the existing pattern of other search methods in the file. It correctly uses thecallApimethod and allows for flexible argument passing.
201-207: LGTM: learningEventUrl property definitionThe
learningEventUrlproperty is well-defined with appropriate type, label, description, and optional flag. The description clearly explains the purpose of the property.
|
I wasn't sure whether to bump |
Yes, the version for |
|
Hi everyone, all test cases are passed! Ready for release! |
5 participants
WHY
This PR adds a new action for Certifier integration.
It uses a public endpoint detailed here: https://developers.certifier.io/reference/create-a-group
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Version Updates
@pipedream/certifierpackage.