13944 components zenventory #14233
13944 components zenventory #14233
Conversation
Sources - New Customer Order - New Purchase Order - New Item Created Actions - Create Item - Create Customer Order - Generate Inventory Export
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe changes introduced in this pull request include the addition of multiple modules to the Zenventory application, specifically for creating customer orders, purchase orders, and items, as well as handling events related to these entities. New utility functions and constants have been added to enhance functionality, and the main application file has been updated to support new properties and methods for API interactions. The Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 19
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (24)
components/zenventory/common/constants.mjs (1)
1-5: LGTM! Consider adding a brief comment for clarity.The
POSTAGE_ACCOUNT_OPTIONSconstant is well-defined and appropriately exported. It provides a clear set of options for postage account selection, which aligns with the PR objectives related to order creation.Consider adding a brief comment above the constant to explain its purpose and usage. For example:
// Defines the available options for selecting the party responsible for postage costs export const POSTAGE_ACCOUNT_OPTIONS = [ "sender", "client", "recipient", ];This addition would enhance code readability and provide context for other developers who might use this constant in the future.
components/zenventory/common/utils.mjs (3)
2-2: Consider a more explicit null check.While the current check for falsy values works, it might be more explicit to check specifically for
nullandundefined. This would prevent unexpected behavior with other falsy values like empty strings or zero.Consider replacing the current check with:
- if (!obj) return undefined; + if (obj === null || obj === undefined) return undefined;
4-15: LGTM: Array handling logic is sound.The array processing logic is well-implemented, correctly handling JSON parsing for string items and preserving non-string items.
Consider a minor optimization:
if (Array.isArray(obj)) { - return obj.map((item) => { - if (typeof item === "string") { - try { - return JSON.parse(item); - } catch (e) { - return item; - } - } - return item; - }); + return obj.map((item) => + typeof item === "string" + ? parseObject(item) // Reuse the parseObject function for strings + : item + ); }This change simplifies the logic and reuses the
parseObjectfunction for string items, promoting DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principles.
23-24: Consider adding a comment for the default case.The default return is correct, but it might be helpful to add a comment explaining this case for improved readability.
Consider adding a comment:
+ // If obj is neither an array nor a string, return it unchanged return obj;components/zenventory/sources/new-purchase-order/test-event.mjs (2)
1-32: LGTM! Consider adding sample items and documentation.The overall structure of the purchase order object is well-organized and includes relevant properties for a comprehensive representation. The use of nested objects for supplier, warehouse, and user is a good practice.
A few suggestions for improvement:
- Consider adding sample items to the
itemsarray to provide a more complete test event.- It might be helpful to add a comment at the top of the file explaining its purpose as a test event and any specific usage instructions.
Would you like me to provide an example of how to add sample items and a documentation comment?
2-3: Consider standardizing data types and handling of optional fields.
Data type consistency:
id(line 2) is a number, whileorderNumber(line 3) is a string. Consider standardizing the type used for identifiers.Date format consistency:
createdDate(line 20) uses ISO 8601 format with timezone.requiredByDate(line 22) uses a simpler date format.
Consider using the same format for all date fields for consistency.Optional fields:
- Several fields (lines 24-31) use empty strings for optional values.
Consider usingnullfor optional fields that haven't been set, as it more clearly indicates the absence of a value.Would you like me to provide an example of how these suggestions could be implemented?
Also applies to: 20-22, 24-31
components/zenventory/sources/new-purchase-order/new-purchase-order.mjs (1)
1-35: Overall implementation aligns well with PR objectives.The new purchase order source component is well-structured and implements all necessary methods for polling new purchase orders from Zenventory. It correctly integrates with the common base functionality and follows best practices for Pipedream source components.
The implementation satisfies the PR objective of creating a polling source for new purchase orders, emitting events with the required purchase order ID (assumed to be part of the item object). Consider adding optional properties like vendor ID and order status to the emitted event if they are available in the API response.
To enhance the component's robustness and usability:
- Consider adding input parameters for customizing the polling interval or filter criteria.
- Implement error handling for API requests and response parsing.
- Add documentation comments to describe the component's functionality and usage.
components/zenventory/sources/new-item-created/test-event.mjs (3)
8-14: Clarify economic order quantity and pricing propertiesThe pricing and quantity properties look good overall. However, I have a couple of suggestions:
The
defaultEconOrder(line 11) is set to 0. Is this intentional? Typically, the economic order quantity would be a positive value.Could you clarify the difference between
rrp(Recommended Retail Price) andprice(lines 12-13)? In this example,rrpis 0 whilepriceis 50. It might be helpful to use more realistic values in the test event or add a comment explaining this discrepancy.
15-26: Consider using realistic values for dimensions and weightThe boolean flags for item characteristics (lines 15-20) provide a comprehensive set of attributes, which is great. However, I noticed that all dimension and weight values (lines 21-26) are set to 0. For a more effective test event, consider using realistic, non-zero values for these properties. This would better represent a real-world scenario and could help catch potential issues related to these fields during testing.
27-44: Enhance test coverage with multiple unitsThe structure for additional fields and dates looks good. The use of ISO 8601 format for dates (lines 33-34) is appropriate. However, to improve test coverage, consider adding more entries to the
unitsarray inadditionalFields(lines 36-43). This would better represent scenarios where an item might have multiple units of measurement (e.g., "Each", "Box", "Pallet"). For example:"units": [ { "name": "Each", "quantity": 1 }, { "name": "Box", "quantity": 10 }, { "name": "Pallet", "quantity": 100 } ]This change would help ensure that the system correctly handles multiple units for a single item.
components/zenventory/sources/new-customer-order/test-event.mjs (5)
1-33: LGTM! Consider adding documentation for test data usage.The structure of the main order details is well-organized and comprehensive. It includes essential information such as order ID, customer details, and various date and status fields. The use of ISO 8601 date format is a good practice.
Consider adding a comment at the top of the file explaining the purpose of this test event data and how it should be used in testing scenarios. This would help other developers understand the intent and proper usage of this file.
51-68: LGTM! Consider improving test data for billing address.The billing address structure is consistent with the shipping address, which is good for maintainability and clarity. However, the use of "N/A" for the
line1field might not be the best practice for test data.Consider using a more realistic value for the
line1field in the billing address, or leave it empty like the other fields. This would provide more accurate test scenarios, especially when testing address validation or formatting.
69-90: LGTM! Consider adding more varied test data.This section comprehensively covers various order properties including shipping method, warehouse information, and custom fields. The structure is well-organized and allows for testing different scenarios.
To enhance test coverage, consider adding more varied data to some of the fields (e.g., discountPercentage, tags) in additional test events. This would help ensure that the system correctly handles a wider range of inputs.
91-109: LGTM! Consider expanding test data for order items.The structure of the order item is well-defined and includes all necessary fields such as SKU, description, quantities, and price. This allows for comprehensive testing of item-related functionality.
To improve test coverage, consider the following suggestions:
- Add more items to the
itemsarray to test scenarios with multiple items.- Include an item with
partOfKit: trueto test kit-related functionality.- Add an item with non-null
additionalFieldsto ensure proper handling of custom fields.
These additions would help ensure that the system correctly handles various item configurations and order compositions.
1-109: Overall, well-structured test event. Consider enhancing test coverage.This test event provides a comprehensive representation of a new customer order, covering all essential aspects such as order details, customer information, addresses, shipping details, and order items. The structure is well-organized and aligns with the requirements outlined in the PR objectives.
To further improve the effectiveness of this test event:
- Add a comment at the top of the file explaining its purpose and usage in testing scenarios.
- Create additional test events with varied data to cover more scenarios, such as:
- Orders with multiple items
- Different discount percentages
- Various shipping and billing address combinations
- Orders with tags and custom fields populated
- Ensure consistency in test data (e.g., use realistic values for address fields across all test events).
These enhancements will provide more robust test coverage for the new customer order functionality in Zenventory.
components/zenventory/sources/new-item-created/new-item-created.mjs (1)
17-19: Handle missing or undefineditem.skuingetSummaryIn the
getSummary(item)method, you useitem.skuto generate the event summary. Ifitem.skuisundefinedor missing, this could result in a summary likeNew Item: undefined. Consider adding a fallback or checking for the existence ofitem.skuto enhance robustness.Apply this diff to handle missing
sku:getSummary(item) { - return `New Item: ${item.sku}`; + const sku = item.sku || 'unknown SKU'; + return `New Item: ${sku}`; },components/zenventory/sources/common/base.mjs (1)
35-35: Simplify timestamp generation withDate.now()Instead of using
Date.parse(new Date()), you can useDate.now()to get the current timestamp in milliseconds more succinctly.Apply this diff to improve the code:
- ts: Date.parse(new Date()), + ts: Date.now(),components/zenventory/zenventory.app.mjs (2)
8-10: Consistent capitalization of 'ID' in labels and descriptionsFor consistency and adherence to standard conventions, consider capitalizing "ID" in "Client Id" to "Client ID" in both the label and description.
13-15: Clarify the description forclientNameTo improve clarity, consider rephrasing the description:
"Name of the client that the customer order is for. Ignored if
clientIdis provided and is nonzero."This ensures that users understand the priority between
clientIdandclientName.components/zenventory/actions/create-purchase-order/create-purchase-order.mjs (5)
15-15: Ensure consistent capitalization of 'ID' in labelsThe labels for
Supplier Id,Warehouse Id, andClient Iduse "Id" instead of the standard "ID". To maintain consistency and adhere to standard conventions, consider capitalizing "ID" in these labels.Apply this diff to update the labels:
- label: "Supplier Id", + label: "Supplier ID", - label: "Warehouse Id", + label: "Warehouse ID", - label: "Client Id", + label: "Client ID",Also applies to: 27-27, 39-39
62-63: Remove unnecessary period in the 'Required By' labelThe label
"Required By."includes an unnecessary period at the end. Please remove it to maintain consistency across all labels.Apply this diff:
- label: "Required By.", + label: "Required By",
82-82: Fix typo in the 'Items' prop descriptionThere's a typo in the description of the
Itemsprop: the word "fro" should be "for".Apply this diff:
- "... [See the documentation](https://docs.zenventory.com/#tag/purchase_order/paths/~1purchase-orders/post) fro further information.", + "... [See the documentation](https://docs.zenventory.com/#tag/purchase_order/paths/~1purchase-orders/post) for further information.",
76-76: Clarify the 'Notes' prop descriptionThe current description
"A note of the purchase."could be improved for clarity. Consider rephrasing it to better convey the purpose of the notes.Apply this diff:
- description: "A note of the purchase.", + description: "Notes about the purchase order.",
88-88: Ensure consistent capitalization in error messageIn the error message, capitalize "ID" in "Supplier Id" and "Supplier Name" to match the updated labels and maintain consistency.
Apply this diff:
- throw new ConfigurationError("You must provide at least 'Supplier Id' or 'Supplier Name'."); + throw new ConfigurationError("You must provide at least 'Supplier ID' or 'Supplier Name'.");
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
- components/zenventory/actions/create-customer-order/create-customer-order.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/zenventory/actions/create-item/create-item.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/zenventory/actions/create-purchase-order/create-purchase-order.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/zenventory/common/constants.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/zenventory/common/utils.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/zenventory/package.json (2 hunks)
- components/zenventory/sources/common/base.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/zenventory/sources/new-customer-order/new-customer-order.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/zenventory/sources/new-customer-order/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/zenventory/sources/new-item-created/new-item-created.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/zenventory/sources/new-item-created/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/zenventory/sources/new-purchase-order/new-purchase-order.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/zenventory/sources/new-purchase-order/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/zenventory/zenventory.app.mjs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (22)
components/zenventory/package.json (4)
3-3: Version update looks good.The version increment from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 aligns with semantic versioning principles and reflects the addition of new features (Zenventory components) as outlined in the PR objectives.
15-17: New dependency looks appropriate.The addition of "@pipedream/platform" as a dependency with version "^3.0.3" is appropriate for a Pipedream component. The caret (^) in the version constraint allows for compatible updates, which is a good practice for maintaining up-to-date dependencies while avoiding breaking changes.
12-14: PublishConfig modification is correct.Setting "access" to "public" in the publishConfig section is appropriate for a publicly accessible npm package. This ensures that the Zenventory component can be published and accessed by users on npm, which aligns with the open-source nature of Pipedream components.
Line range hint
1-18: Overall package.json changes look good and align with PR objectives.The changes made to the package.json file are consistent with the introduction of new Zenventory components:
- The version update reflects the addition of new features.
- The new dependency on @pipedream/platform is appropriate for a Pipedream component.
- The publishConfig modification ensures public access to the package.
These changes provide a solid foundation for the new Zenventory components and align well with the PR objectives.
components/zenventory/common/utils.mjs (3)
1-1: LGTM: Function declaration and export.The function is well-named, appropriately exported, and uses modern JavaScript syntax.
16-22: LGTM: String handling is correct.The string processing logic is well-implemented. It correctly attempts to parse JSON strings and gracefully falls back to the original string if parsing fails.
1-24: Overall, the parseObject function is well-implemented.The function provides a robust utility for parsing JSON-like objects, handling various input types gracefully. It safely parses JSON strings (both standalone and within arrays) while preserving non-string values and the original input when parsing fails.
The implementation is solid, with only minor suggestions for improvements:
- More explicit null/undefined check
- Potential optimization in array handling
- Adding a comment for the default case
These suggestions aside, the function is well-structured and should serve its purpose effectively in the Zenventory application.
components/zenventory/sources/new-purchase-order/new-purchase-order.mjs (7)
1-2: LGTM: Appropriate imports for the module's purpose.The import statements are well-structured and import the necessary modules for the component's functionality.
4-11: LGTM: Well-structured source component definition.The exported object's main properties are correctly defined and align with the Pipedream source component structure. The use of spreading from the common base (
...common) promotes code reuse.
14-20: LGTM: Effective parameter generation for API requests.The
getParamsmethod correctly structures the parameters for fetching new purchase orders, using thelastDateto ensure only new orders are retrieved and sorting them appropriately.
24-26: LGTM: Correct data field specification.The
getDataFieldmethod correctly returns "purchaseOrders" as the field name for accessing purchase order data in the API response.
27-29: LGTM: Appropriate date field specification.The
getFieldDatemethod correctly returns "createdDate" as the field name for the purchase order creation date, which aligns with the sorting parameter ingetParams.
34-34: LGTM: Proper assignment of sample event emitter.The
sampleEmitproperty is correctly assigned using the importedsampleEmitfrom the test event module, which is essential for testing the component.
30-32: LGTM: Concise summary generation for purchase orders.The
getSummarymethod effectively generates a summary string for new purchase orders using theorderNumber.Verify that the
itemobject always contains theorderNumberproperty. Run the following script to check for its usage and potential null checks:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of item.orderNumber and check for null checks # Test: Search for item.orderNumber usage rg --type javascript 'item\.orderNumber' # Test: Search for null checks on item or item.orderNumber rg --type javascript '(item(\s*\?\.\s*|\s*&&\s*)orderNumber|orderNumber\s*in\s*item)'components/zenventory/sources/new-item-created/test-event.mjs (1)
1-7: LGTM for basic item properties, clarification needed on "client"The basic structure of the item object looks good, including essential properties like id, sku, description, and category. However, the purpose of the "client" property (line 7) is unclear. Could you please clarify its intended use and why it's set to null in this test event?
components/zenventory/sources/new-customer-order/test-event.mjs (1)
33-50: LGTM! Comprehensive shipping address structure.The shipping address object is well-structured with all necessary fields, including address lines, city, state, zip, country, and verification status. This comprehensive approach allows for thorough testing of address-related functionality.
components/zenventory/sources/new-customer-order/new-customer-order.mjs (1)
1-46: Well-implemented new customer order event sourceThe module is well-structured and aligns with the PR objectives. The methods are correctly defined, extending common functionalities, and the integration with the Zenventory API appears accurate. The code follows the project's conventions and is ready for merge.
components/zenventory/zenventory.app.mjs (1)
77-100: LGTM on thepaginatemethodThe pagination logic in the
paginatemethod is well-implemented, correctly handling page increments and iteration over results.components/zenventory/actions/create-purchase-order/create-purchase-order.mjs (2)
91-107: Verify all required fields are correctly passed to 'createPurchaseOrder'Ensure that all necessary fields are included and correctly named in the data passed to
createPurchaseOrder(). Cross-reference with the Zenventory API documentation to confirm that all required parameters are provided and optional parameters are correctly handled.You can review the API documentation here for further details.
1-112: Overall, the action is well-implementedThe code is well-structured, and the action should function as intended after making the above adjustments. Good job on implementing the
createPurchaseOrderaction with comprehensive props and proper error handling.components/zenventory/actions/create-customer-order/create-customer-order.mjs (2)
267-275: Enhance customer validation logic to match API requirementsThe current validation checks if none of the customer identification fields are provided and throws an error. Ensure this aligns with the API requirements. If the API requires a specific combination of fields when
customerIdis not provided, you might need to adjust the validation logic accordingly.Please verify the API documentation to confirm the required fields for creating a new customer when
customerIdis not provided.
290-340: Verify that all required fields are correctly mapped and adhere to API schemaEnsure that all fields passed to the
createCustomerOrderAPI method align with the API schema requirements. Confirm that the field names and data types match what the API expects, especially for nested objects likecustomer,shippingAddress, andbillingAddress.
components/zenventory/actions/create-customer-order/create-customer-order.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/zenventory/actions/create-customer-order/create-customer-order.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/zenventory/actions/create-customer-order/create-customer-order.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/zenventory/actions/create-customer-order/create-customer-order.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/zenventory/actions/create-customer-order/create-customer-order.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
components/zenventory/zenventory.app.mjs (3)
22-27: Simplify authentication object creationThe
_authmethod currently uses template literals unnecessarily for simple string values.Consider simplifying the return statement:
_auth() { return { username: this.$auth.api_key, password: this.$auth.api_secret, }; }This change removes the redundant template literals, making the code cleaner and more straightforward.
38-75: LGTM: Consistent implementation of API methodsThe implementation of
create*andlist*methods is consistent and provides a clean interface for common API operations.To further improve code maintainability, consider defining the API endpoints as constants:
const ENDPOINTS = { ITEMS: '/items', CUSTOMER_ORDERS: '/customer-orders', PURCHASE_ORDERS: '/purchase-orders', }; // Then use them in the methods: createItem(opts = {}) { return this._makeRequest({ method: "POST", path: ENDPOINTS.ITEMS, ...opts, }); } // Apply similar changes to other methodsThis approach centralizes endpoint definitions, making it easier to update them if needed and reducing the risk of typos.
77-100: LGTM: Well-implemented pagination logicThe
paginatemethod effectively handles paginated API responses using an async generator. It correctly implements the pagination logic, respects themaxResultsparameter, and yields individual items.Consider adding a safeguard against potential infinite loops:
async *paginate({ fn, params = {}, dataField, maxResults = null, maxPages = 1000, ...opts }) { // ... existing code ... do { // ... existing code ... hasMore = page < response.meta.totalPages && page < maxPages; } while (hasMore); if (page >= maxPages) { console.warn(`Pagination stopped after reaching ${maxPages} pages.`); } }This change adds a
maxPagesparameter with a default high value to prevent potential infinite loops in case of API inconsistencies, while still allowing for flexibility in usage.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- components/zenventory/actions/create-purchase-order/create-purchase-order.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/zenventory/zenventory.app.mjs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- components/zenventory/actions/create-purchase-order/create-purchase-order.mjs
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/zenventory/zenventory.app.mjs (2)
1-103: Overall assessment: Well-implemented Zenventory integrationThe changes in this file successfully implement the Zenventory API integration, addressing the PR objectives related to creating and listing items, customer orders, and purchase orders. The code is generally well-structured and consistent.
Key points:
- Proper abstraction of API requests with the
_makeRequestmethod.- Consistent implementation of CRUD operations.
- Robust pagination handling with the
paginatemethod.Areas for improvement:
- Error handling in the
_makeRequestmethod.- Flexibility in base URL configuration.
- Minor optimizations in authentication and endpoint definitions.
These suggestions, if implemented, would further enhance the robustness and maintainability of the integration.
28-37:⚠️ Potential issueImplement error handling in _makeRequest method
The
_makeRequestmethod currently lacks error handling, which could lead to unhandled exceptions and poor user experience when API requests fail.As mentioned in a previous review, consider implementing error handling:
async _makeRequest({ $ = this, method = "GET", path, ...opts }) { try { const response = await axios($, { method, url: this._baseUrl() + path, auth: this._auth(), ...opts, }); return response; } catch (error) { console.error('API request failed:', error.message); throw new Error(`Zenventory API request failed: ${error.message}`); } }This implementation will catch and log errors, then throw a more informative error message for better debugging and user feedback.
|
/approve |
Resolves #13944
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Version Update