Wrike - fix base url to use $auth.host #14300
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request includes version updates for multiple Wrike components, adjusting their version numbers to reflect minor changes. Additionally, the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/wrike/sources/new-folder-created/new-folder-created.mjs (1)
Line range hint
1-78: Consider enhancing error handling and logging.While the existing code appears to function correctly for handling new folder creation events, consider implementing the following improvements:
- Add try-catch blocks in asynchronous methods like
deploy(),emitEvent(), andrun()to handle potential errors gracefully.- Implement more detailed logging throughout the code to aid in debugging and monitoring.
Example for the
run()method:async run(event) { console.log("Webhook received"); try { for (const data of event.body) { console.log(`Processing folder: ${data.folderId}`); const folder = await this.wrike.getFolder({ folderId: data.folderId, }); await this.emitEvent(folder); } } catch (error) { console.error("Error processing webhook:", error); // Consider how to handle the error (e.g., retrying, notifying the user, etc.) } }These enhancements will improve the robustness and maintainability of the code.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- components/wrike/actions/new-task/new-task.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/wrike/actions/update-task-custom-fields/update-task-custom-fields.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/wrike/package.json (2 hunks)
- components/wrike/sources/new-folder-created/new-folder-created.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/wrike/sources/new-subtask-created/new-subtask-created.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/wrike/sources/new-task-created/new-task-created.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/wrike/wrike.app.mjs (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- components/wrike/actions/new-task/new-task.mjs
- components/wrike/actions/update-task-custom-fields/update-task-custom-fields.mjs
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (11)
components/wrike/package.json (3)
17-17: Explain the major version bump of @pipedream/platformThe @pipedream/platform dependency has been updated from ^1.3.0 to ^3.0.3, which is a major version bump. Can you please clarify if this update is related to the base URL fix mentioned in the PR objectives? Are there any breaking changes or new features in this version that are relevant to the current PR?
#!/bin/bash # Check for any recent changes in wrike.app.mjs that might be related to this dependency update git log -p -n 1 -- components/wrike/wrike.app.mjs
3-3: Clarify the version downgrade from 0.0.2 to 0.0.1The version number has been changed from 0.0.2 to 0.0.1, which appears to be a downgrade. This is unusual and doesn't follow semantic versioning principles. Could you please explain the reasoning behind this change?
#!/bin/bash # Check if this is truly a downgrade or if there's a mistake in the change git log -p -1 -- components/wrike/package.json | grep 'version'
Line range hint
1-20: Address discrepancy between file changes and PR objectivesThe changes in this file don't directly address the base URL issue mentioned in the PR objectives. The PR is supposed to fix the base URL for Wrike API requests, but this file doesn't contain any URL-related changes. Could you please clarify how these changes in package.json relate to the PR objectives, or if there are other files in this PR that contain the actual fix for the base URL?
components/wrike/sources/new-subtask-created/new-subtask-created.mjs (2)
Line range hint
1-67: Component structure is sound, but doesn't address the main PR objective.The overall structure and functionality of this component appear to be well-implemented for detecting new subtask creation. However, it's important to note that this file doesn't contain any changes related to the main objective of the PR, which is to fix the base URL for Wrike API requests.
Given that this component relies on the Wrike API, it's crucial to ensure that it's using the correct base URL indirectly through the Wrike client or app file.
Let's verify if the necessary changes have been made in the Wrike app file:
#!/bin/bash # Check for changes in the Wrike app file git diff origin/main -- components/wrike/wrike.app.mjsIf no changes are found in the app file, we should investigate where the base URL is set and ensure it's updated to "https://app-eu.wrike.com/api/v4/" as per the PR objectives.
10-10: Version update looks good, but verify if additional changes are needed.The version update from "0.0.1" to "0.0.2" is appropriate for reflecting the changes made in this PR. However, given that the main objective of this PR is to fix the base URL issue for Wrike API requests, please verify if any additional changes are needed in this file to address that specific problem.
To ensure we haven't missed any necessary changes, let's check if this file or any related files reference the Wrike API base URL:
✅ Verification successful
Version update verified and approved. No additional changes needed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Wrike API base URL references rg --type js 'https?://.*wrike\.com/api'Length of output: 90
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Wrike API base URL references without relying on git revisions rg --type js 'https?://.*wrike\.com/api' .Length of output: 44
components/wrike/sources/new-folder-created/new-folder-created.mjs (2)
Line range hint
1-78: Summary: Version updated, but base URL fix not found in this file.The version update in this file is appropriate, and I've suggested some improvements for error handling and logging. However, the main objective of this PR - fixing the base URL to use $auth.host - is not addressed in this file.
To ensure the PR objectives are met:
- Please clarify where the base URL fix has been implemented.
- If the fix should be in this file, please update the code accordingly.
- If the fix is in another file, consider adding a comment in this file to reference the location of the base URL configuration.
To help locate the base URL fix, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for recent changes related to base URL in all Wrike-related files # Test: Look for recent changes (last 7 days) related to base URL or $auth.host in Wrike files git log --since="7 days ago" --pretty=format:"%H" | xargs -I {} git show {} | rg --type js -e 'baseUrl|$auth\.host' -g '*wrike*'This will help identify recent changes related to the base URL in Wrike-related files.
10-10: Version update looks good, but clarification needed on base URL fix.The version update from "0.0.1" to "0.0.2" is appropriate for a minor change or bug fix. However, the PR objectives mention fixing the base URL to use $auth.host, which is not reflected in this file. Could you please clarify where the base URL fix has been implemented?
To verify the base URL fix implementation, please run the following script:
components/wrike/sources/new-task-created/new-task-created.mjs (2)
Line range hint
1-78: Verify compatibility with updated Wrike appWhile this file doesn't directly handle the base URL, it relies on the
wrikeobject for API interactions. Please ensure that the changes made to the base URL in the Wrike app file are compatible with this component and don't introduce any breaking changes.Let's check for any changes in the Wrike app file that might affect this component:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for changes in the Wrike app file that might affect this component # Test: Search for methods used by this component in the Wrike app file rg --type javascript 'listTasks|getTask' components/wrike/wrike.app.mjs -A 5
10-10: Version bump looks good, but verify if it's sufficient.The version has been updated from "0.0.1" to "0.0.2", which is appropriate for minor changes or bug fixes. However, given the PR objectives mentioning a fix for the base URL, we should verify if this change is reflected in the codebase and if it warrants a more significant version bump.
Let's check if the base URL change is implemented in the Wrike app file:
components/wrike/wrike.app.mjs (2)
75-75: Verify the impact on all API requestsThe change in
_baseUrl()will affect all API requests made through the_makeRequest()method. While this should resolve the authorization issues, it's crucial to ensure that all API endpoints are still functioning correctly with this change.To verify the impact:
- Test all methods that use
_makeRequest()to ensure they're working as expected with the new base URL.- Run the following script to identify all methods that might be affected:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Identify methods that use _makeRequest() echo "Methods potentially affected by the _baseUrl() change:" rg --type js "_makeRequest\(" components/wrike/
- Consider adding or updating unit tests to cover the
_baseUrl()method and ensure it's correctly usingthis.$auth.host.
75-75: LGTM! This change addresses the base URL issue.The modification to use
this.$auth.hostin the_baseUrl()method is correct and aligns with the PR objectives. This dynamic approach allows for flexible configuration of the API endpoint, which should resolve the authorization issues mentioned in issue #14292.To ensure this change is correctly implemented and there are no unintended side effects, let's verify the usage of
_baseUrl()method:
|
/approve |
Resolves #14292
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores