New Components - checkvist #14481
New Components - checkvist #14481
Conversation
luancazarine
added
the
ai-assisted
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe changes introduce several new modules and functionalities for the Checkvist application. Key additions include the ability to create individual and multiple list items, create new lists, and emit events when new lists or list items are added. The application now features methods for interacting with the Checkvist API, including fetching lists and list items, and constants for status options. Additionally, a new utility function for parsing objects has been added, enhancing the overall functionality of the Checkvist component. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Sources - New List - New List Item Actions - Create List Item - Create Multiple List Items - Create New List
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 16
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (14)
components/checkvist/common/utils.mjs (2)
4-15: Improve error handling for array parsing.The current implementation silently ignores parsing errors, which could mask potential issues. Consider logging these errors or handling them more explicitly.
Consider adding error logging:
return obj.map((item) => { if (typeof item === "string") { try { return JSON.parse(item); } catch (e) { + console.warn(`Failed to parse array item: ${e.message}`); return item; } }
1-24: Add JSDoc documentation for better maintainability.The function would benefit from proper documentation explaining its purpose, parameters, and return values.
Add JSDoc documentation:
+/** + * Attempts to parse JSON strings within an object or array. + * @param {*} obj - The input to parse. Can be an array, string, or any other type + * @returns {*} Parsed object if successful, original input otherwise + * @example + * parseObject('{"key": "value"}') // Returns { key: 'value' } + * parseObject(['{"key": "value"}']) // Returns [{ key: 'value' }] + */ export const parseObject = (obj) => {components/checkvist/sources/new-list-item/new-list-item.mjs (1)
4-11: Add version update guidelines in comments.The component metadata is well-structured. Consider adding a comment above the version field to document the versioning strategy for future updates.
version: "0.0.1", +// Increment version when making breaking changes: +// - Major: Breaking changes to the component's interface +// - Minor: New features in a backwards compatible manner +// - Patch: Backwards compatible bug fixescomponents/checkvist/actions/create-new-list/create-new-list.mjs (1)
3-8: Consider enhancing the component description.While the metadata is well-structured, the description could be more detailed to help users understand:
- What happens after list creation
- Whether there are any limits or constraints
- What the response contains
Consider expanding the description like this:
- description: "Creates a new list in Checkvist. [See the documentation](https://checkvist.com/auth/api)", + description: "Creates a new list in Checkvist. Returns the created list details including its ID and settings. [See the documentation](https://checkvist.com/auth/api)",components/checkvist/sources/common/base.mjs (5)
1-2: Add JSDoc type definitions for better code documentation.Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the imported types and module purpose.
+/** + * @typedef {import('@pipedream/types').App} App + * @typedef {import('@pipedream/types').PropDefinition} PropDefinition + */ import { DEFAULT_POLLING_SOURCE_TIMER_INTERVAL } from "@pipedream/platform"; import checkvist from "../../checkvist.app.mjs";
5-14: Document props with type definitions and descriptions.Add prop definitions to improve code maintainability and developer experience.
props: { + /** @type {App} */ checkvist, + /** @type {PropDefinition} Database service for storing state */ db: "$.service.db", + /** @type {PropDefinition} Timer configuration for polling */ timer: { type: "$.interface.timer", default: { intervalSeconds: DEFAULT_POLLING_SOURCE_TIMER_INTERVAL, }, }, },
22-24: Document the purpose of getArgs method.The empty implementation suggests this is meant to be overridden by child classes. Add JSDoc to clarify the intended usage.
+ /** + * Returns arguments for API calls. Should be overridden by implementing classes. + * @returns {Object} Arguments to pass to the API call + */ getArgs() { return {}; },
61-69: Document hooks and run method.Add JSDoc comments to clarify the purpose of each hook and method.
hooks: { + /** + * Called once when the source is deployed. + * Emits up to 25 initial events to avoid overwhelming the system. + */ async deploy() { await this.emitEvent(25); }, }, +/** + * Called on each timer interval. + * Processes and emits all new events since the last run. + */ async run() { await this.emitEvent(); },
1-69: Consider enhancing resilience and performance.The base implementation provides a good foundation but could benefit from these architectural improvements:
- Rate limiting to prevent API throttling
- Exponential backoff for error recovery
- Batch processing for better performance
- Metrics collection for monitoring
Would you like me to provide implementation examples for any of these improvements?
components/checkvist/actions/create-list-item/create-list-item.mjs (3)
5-11: Consider enhancing the documentation.The basic structure looks good, but consider adding example usage in the description to make it more user-friendly.
- description: "Creates a new list item within a specified list. [See the documentation](https://checkvist.com/auth/api)", + description: "Creates a new list item within a specified list. Example: Create a task 'Review PR' with tag 'urgent'. [See the documentation](https://checkvist.com/auth/api)",
46-51: Clarify position property description.The position property description should explicitly mention it's 1-based indexing to prevent confusion.
- description: "1-based position of the task (omit to add to the end of the list).", + description: "Position of the task (starts from 1, omit to add to the end of the list). Example: 1 places the task at the beginning.",
34-39: Consider adding tags format example.Since tags are converted to a comma-separated string, it would be helpful to show the expected format.
- description: "An array of tags.", + description: "An array of tags. Example: ['urgent', 'review']",components/checkvist/actions/create-multiple-list-items/create-multiple-list-items.mjs (1)
12-59: Enhance props documentation and defaults.While the props are well-structured, consider the following improvements:
- Add a default value for
parseTasksto ensure consistent behavior- Enhance the
positionprop description to clarify valid ranges- Add an example to the
itemsContentdescription to demonstrate the expected formatApply these changes:
parseTasks: { type: "boolean", label: "Parse Tasks", description: "If true, recognize **^due** and **#tags** syntax in imported list items", + default: false, }, position: { type: "integer", label: "Position", - description: "1-based position of the task (omit to add to the end of the list).", + description: "1-based position of the task (must be >= 1, omit to add to the end of the list).", optional: true, }, itemsContent: { type: "string", label: "Content Items", - description: "list items in the same format, as supported by [Checkvist's import function](https://checkvist.com/help#import).", + description: "List items in the same format, as supported by [Checkvist's import function](https://checkvist.com/help#import). Example:\nTask 1\n Subtask 1.1\n Subtask 1.2\nTask 2", },components/checkvist/checkvist.app.mjs (1)
43-45: Consider using a constant for the base URLIf the base URL is constant, you might define it outside the methods to avoid recreating the function every time.
Example:
+ const BASE_URL = "https://checkvist.com"; methods: { - _baseUrl() { - return "https://checkvist.com"; - },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
components/checkvist/actions/create-list-item/create-list-item.mjs(1 hunks)components/checkvist/actions/create-multiple-list-items/create-multiple-list-items.mjs(1 hunks)components/checkvist/actions/create-new-list/create-new-list.mjs(1 hunks)components/checkvist/checkvist.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/checkvist/common/constants.mjs(1 hunks)components/checkvist/common/utils.mjs(1 hunks)components/checkvist/package.json(1 hunks)components/checkvist/sources/common/base.mjs(1 hunks)components/checkvist/sources/new-list-item/new-list-item.mjs(1 hunks)components/checkvist/sources/new-list-item/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)components/checkvist/sources/new-list/new-list.mjs(1 hunks)components/checkvist/sources/new-list/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- components/checkvist/package.json
- components/checkvist/sources/new-list-item/test-event.mjs
- components/checkvist/sources/new-list/test-event.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (15)
components/checkvist/common/utils.mjs (2)
1-24: Verify usage in list item creation context.
Based on the PR objectives, this utility is likely used for parsing list item content. Let's verify its integration with the list creation components.
#!/bin/bash
# Check how parseObject is used in list creation components
rg -l "parseObject" --type js components/checkvist/actions/1-2: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding input validation for malicious JSON.
While the null check is good, the function might benefit from additional input validation to prevent potential security issues with malicious JSON input.
Let's check if there are any security measures in place for JSON parsing in other utility files:
Consider adding input validation:
export const parseObject = (obj) => {
+ // Validate input size to prevent DoS
+ if (typeof obj === "string" && obj.length > 1000000) {
+ throw new Error("Input too large");
+ }
if (!obj) return undefined;components/checkvist/sources/new-list/new-list.mjs (4)
1-2: LGTM! Imports are properly structured.
The imports correctly utilize ES module syntax and include both the common base functionality and test events.
21-21: Verify test event structure.
Ensure the sample event in test-event.mjs accurately represents the Checkvist list structure and includes all necessary fields for testing.
Let's check the test event implementation:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for the test event structure
rg -A 10 "export default" "components/checkvist/sources/new-list/test-event.mjs"
# Compare with actual API response structure
fd -g "*checkvist*.{js,mjs}" -x rg -A 5 "getLists"12-20: Verify API method and add error handling.
While the methods are concise, consider:
- Adding error handling in
getFunction - Verifying the existence of
checkvist.getLists
Let's verify the API implementation:
4-11: Add version update guidelines in documentation.
The component configuration looks good and follows the expected format. Consider adding documentation about version update guidelines to help maintain semantic versioning as the component evolves.
Let's verify if version guidelines exist in the repository:
components/checkvist/sources/new-list-item/new-list-item.mjs (3)
1-2: LGTM! Clean imports following ES modules best practices.
The imports are well-structured, importing the common base functionality and test events separately.
35-35: Verify test event structure.
Let's ensure the test event provides comprehensive coverage of possible scenarios.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the test event implementation
# Expected: Find the test event definition with various scenarios
# Search for test event implementation
cat components/checkvist/sources/new-list-item/test-event.mjs12-20: Verify listId validation in common props.
The listId prop is correctly defined using propDefinition. Let's verify the validation implementation in the common module.
✅ Verification successful
listId prop validation is properly implemented
The listId prop is well-defined in the app's propDefinitions with:
- Type validation as "string"
- Descriptive label and description
- Dynamic options populated from the API via getLists method
- Required by default (no optional flag)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the validation implementation for listId prop
# Expected: Find the propDefinition for listId in common checkvist module
# Search for listId validation in checkvist common files
rg -A 5 "listId.*propDefinition|propDefinition.*listId" components/checkvist/
Length of output: 614
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the common props and listId validation
# First, let's find the common module
fd "common.mjs" components/checkvist/
# Then let's examine its contents
cat components/checkvist/common.mjs
# Also search for any other files that might contain listId validation
rg -l "listId.*type|type.*listId" components/checkvist/
Length of output: 197
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find the app definition and common props in a different location
# First, check if it's in a different directory structure
fd -t f common components/checkvist/
# Also let's check the actual source file to see the full context
cat components/checkvist/sources/new-list-item/new-list-item.mjs
# And check for any references to checkvist prop definitions
rg -A 5 "propDefinition.*checkvist" components/checkvist/
Length of output: 902
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Now we know the common file is at ../common/base.mjs relative to new-list-item.mjs
# Let's check its contents
cat components/checkvist/sources/common/base.mjs
# Also let's check for any app definition files that might contain the listId prop definition
rg -A 5 "listId.*{" components/checkvist/app/
Length of output: 1774
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the app definition file for the listId prop definition
cat components/checkvist/checkvist.app.mjs
# Also search for any prop definitions in the app
rg "propDefinitions" components/checkvist/
Length of output: 2291
components/checkvist/actions/create-new-list/create-new-list.mjs (2)
1-1: LGTM!
The import statement correctly references the Checkvist app module using a relative path.
6-6: Verify API documentation link.
The current documentation link points to the general API documentation. Consider updating it to link directly to the list creation endpoint documentation if available.
✅ Verification successful
Documentation link is consistent with codebase patterns
The current documentation link (https://checkvist.com/auth/api) is consistently used across multiple action components in the codebase, including create-multiple-list-items, create-list-item, and create-new-list. This appears to be the standard API documentation reference point for Checkvist integration. Since this is an external API and the link is used consistently throughout the codebase, the current documentation reference is appropriate.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there's a more specific API documentation file in the repository
rg -l "checkvist.*api.*documentation" --type md
Length of output: 49
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for Checkvist API references
rg -i "checkvist.*api" --type md
# Also check if there are any other files referencing the Checkvist API documentation URL
rg -i "checkvist.com/auth/api"
Length of output: 1242
components/checkvist/actions/create-list-item/create-list-item.mjs (2)
1-3: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and appropriate.
The necessary dependencies are correctly imported using ES module syntax.
61-74: Verify integration with other Checkvist components.
Let's verify the integration points with other components being added in this PR.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the integration points by checking for other Checkvist components and their interactions.
Let me check the actual implementation details of the Checkvist components to verify the integration.
Based on the code analysis, I can now provide a final response:
Integration with Checkvist components is properly implemented
The create-list-item action is correctly integrated with the Checkvist app component:
- The action properly imports and uses the Checkvist app methods
- The createListItem API method is consistently implemented across components
- Error handling and data flow between components follow standard patterns
- Required props and optional parameters are properly passed through
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistent API usage across components
echo "Checking for createListItem usage consistency..."
rg -l "createListItem" components/checkvist/
echo "Checking for consistent error handling patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'throw new Error($_)'
Length of output: 164421
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for Checkvist component files and their API usage
echo "Checking Checkvist component files..."
fd "^checkvist" components/checkvist/
echo "\nChecking API method usage in Checkvist components..."
rg -l "createListItem" components/checkvist/ -A 2
echo "\nChecking for error handling patterns in Checkvist components..."
rg "throw new Error" components/checkvist/
Length of output: 624
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation details of Checkvist components
echo "Checking Checkvist app implementation..."
cat components/checkvist/checkvist.app.mjs
echo "\nChecking create-list-item action implementation..."
cat components/checkvist/actions/create-list-item/create-list-item.mjs
Length of output: 4495
components/checkvist/actions/create-multiple-list-items/create-multiple-list-items.mjs (2)
1-11: LGTM! Component metadata and imports are well-structured.
The component metadata is properly defined with clear naming, description, and version. The documentation link in the description helps users understand the feature.
61-72: Verify the existence of createMultipleListItems method.
Let's ensure the createMultipleListItems method is properly defined in the Checkvist app.
✅ Verification successful
The createMultipleListItems method is properly defined and implemented
The method exists in components/checkvist/checkvist.app.mjs and is correctly implemented as a POST request to /checklists/${listId}/import.json endpoint. The usage in the code under review matches the implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for createMultipleListItems method definition
ast-grep --pattern 'createMultipleListItems($$$) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 61
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for createMultipleListItems using ripgrep
rg "createMultipleListItems" -A 5
Length of output: 1156
* checkvist init * [Components] checkvist #13230 Sources - New List - New List Item Actions - Create List Item - Create Multiple List Items - Create New List * pnpm update
Resolves #13230.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Enhancements
Documentation