2400 apps #14564
2400 apps #14564
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe pull request updates the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
docs-v2/next.config.js (1)
51-51: Please complete the PR description.The PR description is currently empty. Could you please add details under the "## WHY" section to explain:
- The reason for increasing the public apps limit
- Whether this is part of a larger system update
- Any impact on existing documentation or functionality
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs-v2/next.config.js(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs-v2/next.config.js (1)
51-51: LGTM! Simple documentation update.
The update to PUBLIC_APPS from "2,200" to "2,400" is straightforward and aligns with the PR title.
Let's verify this change is reflected in the documentation:
✅ Verification successful
The PUBLIC_APPS value update is correctly reflected in documentation
The change from "2,200" to "2,400" in next.config.js is properly referenced in the documentation through the environment variable {process.env.PUBLIC_APPS}. The value is dynamically injected into the documentation pages, particularly in docs-v2/pages/apps/index.mdx, which means the update will be automatically reflected wherever this variable is used. No hardcoded instances of the old value "2,200" were found that would need updating.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any hardcoded references to the old number that might need updating
rg -i "2,200|2200" docs-v2/
Length of output: 29
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for any references to the number in various formats across the docs
rg -i "2[,.]?[24]00" docs-v2/
# Also check for any markdown files specifically mentioning apps limit
fd -e md -e mdx . docs-v2/ -x grep -l -i "apps\|applications" {} \;
Length of output: 2042
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the most relevant files that might contain the apps limit
cat docs-v2/pages/pricing.mdx docs-v2/pages/apps/index.mdx 2>/dev/null | grep -B2 -A2 -i "2[,.]?[24]00\|public.*apps\|apps.*limit"
Length of output: 1262
WHY
Summary by CodeRabbit