Apollo.io - People Enrichment #14641
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
components/apollo_io/actions/people-enrichment/people-enrichment.mjs (2)
92-101: Consider adding validation for webhook URL requirement.While the implementation is good, consider adding runtime validation to ensure the webhook URL is provided when
revealPhoneNumberis true.async additionalProps() { const props = {}; if (this.revealPhoneNumber) { props.webhookUrl = { type: "string", label: "Webhook URL", description: "Enter the webhook URL that specifies where Apollo should send a JSON response that includes the phone number you requested. Required if \"Reveal Phone Number\" is set to `true`", + required: true, }; } return props; }
121-147: Consider enhancing error handling and input validation.While the parameter mapping is correct, consider adding input validation for critical fields and handling potential API errors gracefully.
async run({ $: step }) { const { // ... destructured props ... } = this; + // Validate required combinations + if (revealPhoneNumber && !webhookUrl) { + throw new Error("Webhook URL is required when revealing phone numbers"); + } + const response = await peopleEnrichment({ step, data: { // ... request data ... }, }); + if (!response?.person?.id) { + throw new Error("Failed to enrich person data"); + } + step.export("$summary", `Successfully enriched person with ID ${response.person.id}`); return response; },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
components/apollo_io/actions/people-enrichment/people-enrichment.mjs(3 hunks)components/apollo_io/package.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/apollo_io/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (3)
components/apollo_io/actions/people-enrichment/people-enrichment.mjs (3)
8-8: LGTM! Version bump is appropriate.
The version increment from 0.0.4 to 0.0.5 aligns with the addition of new features and properties.
72-77: Successfully implements LinkedIn URL support.
The linkedinUrl property implementation fulfills the primary PR objective from issue #14615, allowing users to enrich person data using LinkedIn profile URLs.
23-90: LGTM! Properties are well-structured and documented.
The new properties are well-defined with clear labels and descriptions. The personId implementation with dynamic options loading is a nice touch for better UX.
Let's verify the people search implementation:
components/apollo_io/actions/people-enrichment/people-enrichment.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/apollo_io/actions/people-enrichment/people-enrichment.mjs (1)
Line range hint
153-153: Enhance the success message with more details.The current success message only shows the person ID. Consider including more meaningful information like the person's name or email (if available) to make it more user-friendly.
- step.export("$summary", `Successfully enriched person with ID ${response.person.id}`); + step.export("$summary", `Successfully enriched ${response.person.name || 'person'} (ID: ${response.person.id})`);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
components/apollo_io/actions/people-enrichment/people-enrichment.mjs(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/apollo_io/actions/people-enrichment/people-enrichment.mjs (2)
23-28: LGTM! Well-structured property definitions.
The new properties are well-defined with clear labels, descriptions, and appropriate optional flags. The linkedinUrl property successfully implements the requirement from issue #14615.
Also applies to: 35-40, 47-52, 72-90
92-101: LGTM! Verify webhook URL validation.
The dynamic property addition for webhookUrl is well implemented. However, consider adding URL validation to ensure valid webhook URLs are provided.
Let's check if URL validation is implemented elsewhere in the codebase:
Resolves #14615
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
people-enrichmentaction with new properties:name,hashedEmail,domain,personId,linkedinUrl,revealPersonalEmails, andrevealPhoneNumber.peopleSearchmethod for improved data retrieval.additionalPropsmethod for conditional property inclusion.Version Updates
people-enrichmentfrom0.0.4to0.0.5.0.4.0to0.4.1.