(fix) Adding Markdown link checker to docs #14832
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe changes introduced in this pull request include the addition of a new property Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
docs-v2/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.jsonpnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
docs-v2/package.json(1 hunks)docs-v2/validate-mdx-links.mjs(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- docs-v2/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
docs-v2/validate-mdx-links.mjs
[error] 69-69: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.
(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
|
|
||
| lines.forEach((line, index) => { | ||
| let match; | ||
| while ((match = linkRegex.exec(line)) !== null) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid assignment within the while loop condition for better readability
Assigning a value within the while loop condition can be confusing and is generally discouraged as it may reduce code clarity. Consider assigning the result before the loop and updating it inside the loop.
Suggested change:
let match = linkRegex.exec(line);
- while ((match = linkRegex.exec(line)) !== null) {
+ while (match !== null) {
const [
, , link,
] = match;
// rest of the code...
+ match = linkRegex.exec(line);
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| while ((match = linkRegex.exec(line)) !== null) { | |
| let match = linkRegex.exec(line); | |
| while (match !== null) { | |
| const [ | |
| , , link, | |
| ] = match; | |
| // rest of the code... | |
| match = linkRegex.exec(line); | |
| } |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 69-69: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.
(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/docs-pr.yaml (1)
51-57: Add newline at end of fileAdd a newline character at the end of the file to follow YAML best practices.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 57-57: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/docs-pr.yaml(1 hunks)docs-v2/pages/sources.mdx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/docs-pr.yaml
33-33: workflow command "set-output" was deprecated. use echo "{name}={value}" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT instead: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-commands-for-github-actions
(deprecated-commands)
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/docs-pr.yaml
[error] 57-57: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/docs-pr.yaml (2)
1-12: LGTM: Well-configured workflow triggers
The workflow is properly configured to run on both PRs and pushes to main, with appropriate path filters for MDX files.
13-19: LGTM: Job configuration is appropriate
The job is properly configured with the correct working directory and runner environment.
docs-v2/pages/sources.mdx (1)
58-58: LGTM: Documentation link update
The CLI command reference link has been properly updated.
| - name: Get pnpm store directory | ||
| id: pnpm-cache | ||
| run: | | ||
| echo "::set-output name=pnpm_cache_dir::$(pnpm store path)" | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Update deprecated GitHub Actions command
The set-output command is deprecated. Please update to the new syntax.
- echo "::set-output name=pnpm_cache_dir::$(pnpm store path)"
+ echo "pnpm_cache_dir=$(pnpm store path)" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - name: Get pnpm store directory | |
| id: pnpm-cache | |
| run: | | |
| echo "::set-output name=pnpm_cache_dir::$(pnpm store path)" | |
| - name: Get pnpm store directory | |
| id: pnpm-cache | |
| run: | | |
| echo "pnpm_cache_dir=$(pnpm store path)" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT | |
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
33-33: workflow command "set-output" was deprecated. use echo "{name}={value}" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT instead: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-commands-for-github-actions
(deprecated-commands)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
docs-v2/pages/components/guidelines.mdx (2)
798-798: Fix indentation in the shared static IPs linkThe link to the shared static IPs documentation appears to have incorrect indentation, breaking the flow of the text.
- [shared static IPs docs](/databases#send-requests-from-a-shared-static-ip)) +[shared static IPs docs](/databases#send-requests-from-a-shared-static-ip))
Line range hint
833-858: Consider adding type information to the schema exampleWhile the schema example is clear, it would be more helpful to include TypeScript interfaces or type definitions since the referenced
sql-prop.tsfile is in TypeScript.Consider adding a TypeScript interface example:
interface ColumnMetadata { columnDefault: any; dataType: string; isNullable: boolean; tableSchema: string; } interface TableSchema { [columnName: string]: ColumnMetadata; } interface TableMetadata { rowCount: number; } interface DatabaseSchema { [tableName: string]: { metadata: TableMetadata; schema: TableSchema; }; }docs-v2/pages/troubleshooting.mdx (1)
181-181: Fix grammatical error: Remove duplicated phraseThere's a duplicated "in the" phrase that should be removed.
-[An **Update** prompt](/workflows/actions/#updating-actions-to-the-latest-version) is shown in the in the top right of the action if the component has a new version available. +[An **Update** prompt](/workflows/actions/#updating-actions-to-the-latest-version) is shown in the top right of the action if the component has a new version available.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~181-~181: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably use “in the” only once.
Context: ...actions-to-the-latest-version) is shown in the in the top right of the action if the componen...(PHRASE_REPETITION)
docs-v2/pages/destinations/http.mdx (1)
Line range hint
42-42: Consider implementing a documentation style guide for internal linksSince you're adding a Markdown link checker, this would be a good time to establish and document conventions for internal link formatting. This could include:
- Standard patterns for section IDs
- Rules for handling special characters in anchors
- Guidelines for cross-referencing between documents
This would help maintain consistency across the documentation and make the link checker more effective.
Would you like help creating a documentation style guide for internal links?
Also applies to: 72-72
docs-v2/pages/connected-accounts/api.mdx (1)
Line range hint
48-48: Fix typo in variable nameThere's a typo in the variable name
this.accoundId. It should bethis.accountIdto match the property defined inprops.Apply this diff to correct the typo:
48 const url = `https://api.pipedream.com/v1/accounts/${this.accoundId}?include_credentials=1`; + const url = `https://api.pipedream.com/v1/accounts/${this.accountId}?include_credentials=1`;docs-v2/pages/workflows/settings.mdx (1)
173-173: Fix typo in "distribution"There's a typo in the word "distribution".
-For many user-facing (even internal) applications, the number of requests over time can be modeled with a [Poisson distrubution] +For many user-facing (even internal) applications, the number of requests over time can be modeled with a [Poisson distribution]docs-v2/pages/glossary.mdx (1)
182-182: Consider improving the Events section textThe current text is repetitive and contains wordy phrases. Consider this revision for improved clarity:
-Events can be triggered by a variety of sources, including HTTP requests, cron schedules, and third-party APIs. Events can be passed to actions, which can process the event data and perform a variety of operations, including making HTTP requests, sending emails, and interacting with third-party APIs. +Events can be triggered by multiple sources such as HTTP requests, cron schedules, and third-party APIs. These events are processed by actions that can perform operations like making HTTP requests, sending emails, and interacting with third-party APIs.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~182-~182: The phrase “a variety of” may be wordy. To make your writing clearer, consider replacing it.
Context: ...y workflows. Events can be triggered by a variety of sources, including HTTP requests, cron ...(A_VARIETY_OF)
[style] ~182-~182: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ..., cron schedules, and third-party APIs. Events can be passed to actions, which can pro...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[style] ~182-~182: The phrase “a variety of” may be wordy. To make your writing clearer, consider replacing it.
Context: ... can process the event data and perform a variety of operations, including making HTTP reque...(A_VARIETY_OF)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (39)
docs-v2/package.json(2 hunks)docs-v2/pages/cli/reference.mdx(1 hunks)docs-v2/pages/code/nodejs/delay.mdx(2 hunks)docs-v2/pages/code/nodejs/index.mdx(3 hunks)docs-v2/pages/code/nodejs/rerun.mdx(1 hunks)docs-v2/pages/code/nodejs/sharing-code.mdx(2 hunks)docs-v2/pages/code/python/delay.mdx(3 hunks)docs-v2/pages/code/python/index.mdx(2 hunks)docs-v2/pages/components/api.mdx(5 hunks)docs-v2/pages/components/guidelines.mdx(1 hunks)docs-v2/pages/connect/api.mdx(2 hunks)docs-v2/pages/connect/connect-link.mdx(2 hunks)docs-v2/pages/connect/quickstart.mdx(3 hunks)docs-v2/pages/connect/webhooks.mdx(1 hunks)docs-v2/pages/connected-accounts/api.mdx(1 hunks)docs-v2/pages/connected-accounts/external-auth.mdx(3 hunks)docs-v2/pages/data-stores.mdx(1 hunks)docs-v2/pages/destinations/email.mdx(1 hunks)docs-v2/pages/destinations/emit.mdx(4 hunks)docs-v2/pages/destinations/http.mdx(1 hunks)docs-v2/pages/destinations/s3.mdx(1 hunks)docs-v2/pages/glossary.mdx(8 hunks)docs-v2/pages/http.mdx(2 hunks)docs-v2/pages/limits.mdx(4 hunks)docs-v2/pages/migrate-from-v1/index.mdx(2 hunks)docs-v2/pages/pricing.mdx(2 hunks)docs-v2/pages/rest-api/index.mdx(19 hunks)docs-v2/pages/rest-api/rss.mdx(2 hunks)docs-v2/pages/rest-api/webhooks.mdx(4 hunks)docs-v2/pages/rest-api/workflows.mdx(3 hunks)docs-v2/pages/troubleshooting.mdx(3 hunks)docs-v2/pages/workflows/domains.mdx(2 hunks)docs-v2/pages/workflows/errors.mdx(2 hunks)docs-v2/pages/workflows/events.mdx(4 hunks)docs-v2/pages/workflows/settings.mdx(3 hunks)docs-v2/pages/workflows/steps.mdx(2 hunks)docs-v2/pages/workflows/triggers.mdx(6 hunks)docs-v2/validate-mdx-links.mjs(1 hunks)pnpm-workspace.yaml(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (9)
- docs-v2/pages/cli/reference.mdx
- docs-v2/pages/connect/connect-link.mdx
- docs-v2/pages/destinations/s3.mdx
- docs-v2/pages/workflows/domains.mdx
- docs-v2/pages/connect/webhooks.mdx
- docs-v2/pages/rest-api/rss.mdx
- docs-v2/pages/code/python/delay.mdx
- docs-v2/pages/connected-accounts/external-auth.mdx
- docs-v2/pages/destinations/emit.mdx
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- docs-v2/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
docs-v2/validate-mdx-links.mjs
[error] 75-75: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.
(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
🪛 LanguageTool
docs-v2/pages/glossary.mdx
[typographical] ~9-~9: If you want to indicate numerical ranges or time ranges, consider using an en dash.
Context: ... | U | V | W-Z ## 0 - 9 ### 2FA Short for [two-factor authen...
(DASH_RULE)
[style] ~182-~182: The phrase “a variety of” may be wordy. To make your writing clearer, consider replacing it.
Context: ...y workflows. Events can be triggered by a variety of sources, including HTTP requests, cron ...
(A_VARIETY_OF)
[style] ~182-~182: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ..., cron schedules, and third-party APIs. Events can be passed to actions, which can pro...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[style] ~182-~182: The phrase “a variety of” may be wordy. To make your writing clearer, consider replacing it.
Context: ... can process the event data and perform a variety of operations, including making HTTP reque...
(A_VARIETY_OF)
docs-v2/pages/rest-api/webhooks.mdx
[misspelling] ~3-~3: Use “an” instead of ‘a’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ... webhooks as a way to deliver events to a endpoint you own. Webhooks are managed ...
(EN_A_VS_AN)
docs-v2/pages/troubleshooting.mdx
[grammar] ~181-~181: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably use “in the” only once.
Context: ...actions-to-the-latest-version) is shown in the in the top right of the action if the componen...
(PHRASE_REPETITION)
🔇 Additional comments (49)
docs-v2/pages/components/guidelines.mdx (1)
Line range hint 798-941: LGTM! Well-structured database components documentation
The new section on database components is well-organized and provides comprehensive coverage of key requirements and interfaces. It effectively explains:
- The special features of database components
- SQL editor implementation requirements
- Shared static IPs functionality
- Required interfaces and methods
The technical content is accurate and includes helpful code examples and references to existing implementations.
docs-v2/pages/code/nodejs/rerun.mdx (2)
66-66: LGTM! Clear and accurate documentation update
The added line provides clear guidance about request limits and appropriately references alternative solutions for handling large payloads. The technical content is accurate and well-integrated with the surrounding documentation.
66-66: Verify documentation links are valid and up-to-date
The line references important documentation sections about request limits and large payload handling. Let's verify these links are valid and point to the correct documentation.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the actual content of these sections to ensure they contain the relevant information.
Documentation links and content are valid and accurate
The verification confirms that:
- All three referenced sections exist in the documentation
- The content accurately describes:
- HTTP request body size limits
- Large payload handling through query string/header parameters
- Large file support via multipart/form-data uploads
- The cross-references are correctly linked and provide relevant information for users encountering size limitations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and validity of referenced documentation sections
# Look for the referenced anchor IDs in the docs
# Check for HTTP request body size limits section
echo "Checking limits documentation..."
rg -l "http-request-body-size" docs-v2/pages/
# Check for large payload documentation
echo "Checking large payload documentation..."
rg -l "sending-large-payloads" docs-v2/pages/
# Check for large file support documentation
echo "Checking large file support documentation..."
rg -l "large-file-support" docs-v2/pages/
Length of output: 733
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual content around these anchor points
echo "Checking HTTP request body size limits content..."
rg -B2 -A2 "http-request-body-size" docs-v2/pages/limits.mdx docs-v2/pages/workflows/triggers.mdx
echo -e "\nChecking large payload documentation content..."
rg -B2 -A2 "sending-large-payloads" docs-v2/pages/workflows/triggers.mdx
echo -e "\nChecking large file support documentation content..."
rg -B2 -A2 "large-file-support" docs-v2/pages/workflows/triggers.mdx
Length of output: 2958
docs-v2/pages/workflows/steps.mdx (3)
7-7: LGTM! Links updated correctly.
The updated paths for triggers, code, and actions are accurate and consistent with the new documentation structure.
18-18: LGTM! Multiple triggers link updated correctly.
The link to the multiple triggers documentation has been properly updated while maintaining clear and accurate content.
Line range hint 7-18: Verify accessibility of updated documentation links
Let's ensure all updated links are valid and accessible in the documentation structure.
✅ Verification successful
All documentation links are valid and accessible
Based on the verification results:
- The
/workflows/triggerspage exists and contains both HTTP trigger and multiple triggers sections - The
/codedirectory contains the necessary index files - The
/componentsdirectory exists with proper documentation for actions - All referenced anchors (#http, #actions, #step-exports) are present in their respective files
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of referenced documentation files and anchors
# Check for the existence of the main documentation files
echo "Checking main documentation files..."
for path in "workflows/triggers" "code" "components"; do
fd -t f "index.mdx\$|index.md\$" "docs-v2/pages/${path}"
done
# Check for HTTP trigger anchor in triggers documentation
echo "Checking for HTTP trigger anchor..."
rg -l "^##\s+HTTP" "docs-v2/pages/workflows/triggers"
# Check for multiple triggers anchor
echo "Checking for multiple triggers anchor..."
rg -l "can-i-add-multiple-triggers-to-a-workflow" "docs-v2/pages/workflows/triggers"
# Check for actions anchor in components documentation
echo "Checking for actions anchor..."
rg -l "^##\s+Actions" "docs-v2/pages/components"
Length of output: 1299
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify with a different approach by checking the exact paths
# First, let's check if the triggers documentation exists
echo "Checking triggers documentation..."
fd "triggers" "docs-v2/pages"
# Then check for specific headings and anchors
echo -e "\nChecking for HTTP trigger section..."
rg -i "http" "docs-v2/pages/workflows"
echo -e "\nChecking for multiple triggers section..."
rg -i "multiple.+triggers" "docs-v2/pages/workflows"
echo -e "\nChecking for actions section in components..."
rg -i "actions" "docs-v2/pages/components"
# Let's also check if there are any index files in workflows directory
echo -e "\nChecking workflow directory structure..."
fd "index" "docs-v2/pages/workflows"
Length of output: 59047
docs-v2/pages/troubleshooting.mdx (3)
140-141: LGTM: Link updates for large payload handling
The updated links correctly point to the new documentation structure and maintain accurate references for both large payload methods.
263-263: LGTM: Updated delay functionality reference
The link has been correctly updated to match the new documentation structure.
140-141: Verify all updated documentation links
Let's ensure all the updated links are valid and accessible in the documentation.
Also applies to: 181-181, 263-263
✅ Verification successful
Links are valid and correctly reference existing content
The links in the documentation are verified to be correct:
- The link to
/workflows/triggers/#sending-large-payloadspoints to an existing section inworkflows/triggers.mdxthat covers sending large HTTP payloads - The link to
/workflows/triggers/#large-file-supportpoints to an existing section in the same file that details the large file upload interface
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of referenced documentation pages
# Check for the existence of the new documentation paths
echo "Checking updated documentation paths..."
for path in \
"workflows/triggers" \
"workflows/actions" \
"workflows/control-flow/delay"; do
fd -t f "index.mdx$|index.md$" docs-v2/pages/${path}
done
Length of output: 922
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the documentation files
# First, let's see the structure of docs-v2/pages directory
fd . docs-v2/pages -t d
# Then, let's search for files containing the referenced anchor links
echo "Searching for files containing the referenced sections..."
rg -l "sending-large-payloads|large-file-support" docs-v2/pages
Length of output: 3237
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the content of the referenced sections in the workflows/triggers.mdx file
echo "Checking content of workflows/triggers.mdx..."
rg -A 5 "sending-large-payloads|large-file-support" docs-v2/pages/workflows/triggers.mdx
# Also check if these sections are properly defined with headers
echo -e "\nChecking for section headers..."
rg "^##.*sending.*payload|^##.*file.*support" docs-v2/pages/workflows/triggers.mdx
Length of output: 2329
docs-v2/pages/destinations/http.mdx (1)
72-72: Verify the anchor reference consistency
The link reference to #using-sendhttp-in-workflows should be verified for consistency with the document structure.
✅ Verification successful
Link reference is correct and consistent
The link reference #using-sendhttp-in-workflows correctly points to the existing section "Using $.send.http in workflows" in the document. The heading exists and follows the standard documentation structure, as evidenced by the section headings shown in the output.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the referenced anchor exists in the document
rg -i 'id=["'\'']using-sendhttp-in-workflows' docs-v2/pages/destinations/http.mdx
# Check for any other instances of similar heading patterns
rg -i '#{1,6}\s+using.*send\.?http.*in.*workflows' docs-v2/pages/destinations/http.mdx
# Check for consistency of anchor formats across all documentation
fd -e mdx -e md . docs-v2/pages/ -x rg -l 'using.*send\.[a-z]+.*in.*workflows' {} \;
Length of output: 298
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content around the heading to verify the link target
rg -B 2 -A 2 '## Using.*send\.http.*in workflows' docs-v2/pages/destinations/http.mdx
# Check if there are any other similar sections in the file
rg -A 1 '^#{1,6}\s+' docs-v2/pages/destinations/http.mdx
# Check if there are any HTML anchor tags that might be used instead
rg '<a.*?id=' docs-v2/pages/destinations/http.mdx
Length of output: 892
docs-v2/validate-mdx-links.mjs (1)
75-75: Avoid assignment within the while loop condition for better readability
Assigning a value within the while loop condition can be confusing and may reduce code clarity. Consider assigning the result before the loop and updating it inside the loop.
Apply this diff to refactor the code:
74 let match = linkRegex.exec(line);
75- while ((match = linkRegex.exec(line)) !== null) {
76+ while (match !== null) {
77 const [, , link] = match;
78 // rest of the code...
79+ match = linkRegex.exec(line);
80 }🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 75-75: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.
(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
pnpm-workspace.yaml (1)
7-7: Including 'docs-v2/' in workspace packages**
Adding 'docs-v2/**' to the workspace packages ensures that dependencies in the docs-v2 directory are managed by pnpm. This integration allows for consistent dependency management across all packages.
docs-v2/pages/code/nodejs/delay.mdx (1)
97-97: Verify the anchor link format in the internal link
The link #cancel_url-and_resume_url may not correctly reference the intended section due to the use of underscores. Anchor links typically replace spaces with hyphens. Please verify that the anchor ID in the target section matches this link.
docs-v2/pages/code/nodejs/sharing-code.mdx (1)
10-10: Verify the anchor link in the documentation
The link to Publish any Node.js code step as a reusable action should be checked to ensure it navigates correctly. Confirm that the anchor ID in the target section matches the link.
docs-v2/pages/workflows/errors.mdx (2)
50-50: LGTM! Documentation clarity improvement
The text has been updated to more clearly specify when error notifications are sent, improving user understanding.
83-83: Verify REST API endpoint documentation path
The REST API endpoint path has been updated from '/api/rest/' to '/rest-api/'.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can generate the final response as I have sufficient information to verify the REST API endpoint documentation path.
REST API endpoint path is correctly updated
The path /rest-api/ is consistently used across the documentation, and there are no remaining references to /api/rest/ in the docs-v2 directory. The old references to /api/rest/ only exist in component READMEs and older documentation files outside the main documentation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify consistency of REST API documentation paths
rg -g '*.mdx' -g '*.md' '/api/rest/'
rg -g '*.mdx' -g '*.md' '/rest-api/'
Length of output: 13771
docs-v2/pages/http.mdx (2)
86-86: LGTM! Documentation link update
The links for connecting accounts to Node.js and Python steps have been updated to reflect the new documentation structure.
178-178: Verify subscription documentation path
The subscription documentation path has been updated to use '/rest-api/' instead of the old path.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see that the path /rest-api/#subscriptions is consistently used across the documentation, particularly in:
- The file under review (docs-v2/pages/http.mdx) which references
/rest-api/#subscriptions - The actual REST API documentation (docs-v2/pages/rest-api/webhooks.mdx and docs-v2/pages/rest-api/index.mdx) which contains the subscriptions section
The path is correctly referenced and matches across the documentation. Therefore, I can generate the final response:
Path verification successful
The subscription documentation path /rest-api/#subscriptions is correctly referenced and consistent with the REST API documentation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify consistency of subscription documentation paths
rg -g '*.mdx' -g '*.md' 'subscriptions?' -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 70886
docs-v2/pages/limits.mdx (3)
59-59: LGTM! Documentation path update
The HTTP triggers documentation path has been updated to reflect the new structure.
69-70: LGTM! Improved clarity on large payload handling
The documentation now more clearly explains the two methods for handling large payloads.
84-84: Verify consistency of documentation paths
Multiple documentation paths have been updated:
- Email triggers path
- Inspector path
- Inspector reference
Let's verify the consistency of these changes across the documentation.
Also applies to: 120-120, 124-124
✅ Verification successful
Documentation paths are consistent across the codebase
The verification shows that:
- The email triggers path
/workflows/triggers/#emailis consistently used - The Inspector path
/workflows/inspectand its variations (e.g.,/workflows/inspect/#the-inspector) are consistently referenced across multiple documentation files
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify consistency of documentation paths
echo "Checking email triggers paths..."
rg -g '*.mdx' -g '*.md' 'workflows/triggers/#email' -A 2 -B 2
echo "Checking Inspector paths..."
rg -g '*.mdx' -g '*.md' 'workflows/inspect' -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 6279
docs-v2/pages/workflows/events.mdx (4)
22-22: LGTM! Event context link format updated.
The link to the event context section has been updated to use a more consistent format.
89-89: LGTM! Workspace ID link updated.
The link to the workspace ID documentation has been updated to use the correct path.
7-10: LGTM! Links updated for consistency.
The trigger links have been updated to follow a more consistent URL structure, improving navigation.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the content of the triggers documentation to ensure the links are valid.
Links are valid and correctly structured
The links in the code snippet are consistent with the content of the triggers documentation. The documentation confirms:
- HTTP triggers are documented under
/workflows/triggers#http - Schedule (Cron) triggers are documented under
/workflows/triggers#schedule - Email triggers are documented under
/workflows/triggers#email - App-based triggers are documented under
/workflows/triggers#app-based-triggers
All links in the original code snippet correctly point to their corresponding sections in the documentation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify the existence of the trigger documentation pages
fd -e mdx -e md . | rg -i "triggers|schedule|email|app-based-triggers"
Length of output: 742
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check content of the triggers documentation
cat docs-v2/pages/workflows/triggers.mdx
Length of output: 38317
118-118: LGTM! Control flow links updated.
The links to delay and suspend documentation have been updated to use the new control flow path structure.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the existence of the suspend documentation since it wasn't found in the initial search.
Let me try one more search with corrected command:
Links are correctly updated and documentation exists
The verification confirms that:
- The control-flow/delay path exists at
docs-v2/pages/workflows/control-flow/delay.mdx - The suspend documentation exists in the glossary at
docs-v2/pages/glossary.mdxwith a dedicated section - Both links in the reviewed line are valid and point to the correct documentation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify the existence of the control flow documentation
fd -e mdx -e md . | rg -i "control-flow|delay|suspend"
Length of output: 497
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for suspend-related documentation and check the glossary
fd glossary -e mdx -e md . | rg -i "suspend"
# Also check if suspend is documented elsewhere
rg -i "suspend" --type mdx --type md -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 119
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for suspend-related documentation in all markdown files
rg -i "suspend" . -g "*.md" -g "*.mdx" -A 2 -B 2
# Also check if glossary file exists
fd -e mdx -e md . | rg -i "glossary"
Length of output: 17658
docs-v2/pages/rest-api/workflows.mdx (2)
112-112: LGTM! API endpoint references updated.
The links to create workflow parameters and list accounts endpoint have been updated to use the correct paths.
Also applies to: 150-150
6-6: LGTM! API documentation links updated.
The links to the create workflow endpoint and API key documentation have been updated to use the correct paths.
Also applies to: 8-8
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the links mentioned in the review comment by checking their actual content.
Let me check the actual content of the workflow sharing documentation and the create workflow endpoint section to verify all links are properly connected.
Let me try one more time to locate the create workflow endpoint documentation with a different approach.
Links in the documentation are correctly referenced
The verification confirms that:
- The workflow sharing documentation exists at
/workflows/sharing - The create workflow endpoint is documented in the REST API index page
- The links in the original text correctly point to existing documentation:
/workflows/for general workflow documentation/rest-api/#create-a-workflowfor the create workflow endpoint/workflows/sharing/for workflow sharing documentation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify the existence of the API documentation pages
fd -e mdx -e md . | rg -i "rest-api|auth|user-api-keys"
Length of output: 1023
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the referenced endpoints exist in the REST API documentation
cat docs-v2/pages/rest-api/index.mdx | grep -A 5 "create.*workflow"
# Check if the workflow sharing documentation exists
fd -e mdx "sharing" docs-v2/pages/workflows/
Length of output: 891
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the workflow sharing documentation
cat docs-v2/pages/workflows/sharing.mdx | head -n 20
# Check the create workflow endpoint documentation
cat docs-v2/pages/rest-api/index.mdx | grep -B 2 -A 10 "### Create a workflow"
Length of output: 1305
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for create workflow endpoint in the REST API documentation
rg -i "create.*workflow" docs-v2/pages/rest-api/index.mdx -A 10
# Also check if there are any other relevant sections
rg -i "post.*/workflows" docs-v2/pages/rest-api/index.mdx -A 5
Length of output: 2077
docs-v2/pages/connect/quickstart.mdx (2)
31-32: LGTM! Step references updated for clarity.
The step references have been updated to be more descriptive and accurate:
- "Connect to the Pipedream API" → "Generate a short-lived token"
- "Connect your account" → "Connect a user's account"
114-114: LGTM! Token generation references updated.
The references to token generation have been updated to use consistent terminology throughout the document.
Also applies to: 153-153
docs-v2/pages/data-stores.mdx (1)
49-49: Verify the updated documentation link
The link has been updated to point to /workflows/using-props/#entering-expressions. Let's verify this link exists and is correct.
✅ Verification successful
Link verification successful
The link /workflows/using-props/#entering-expressions is valid. The file exists at docs-v2/pages/workflows/using-props.mdx and contains the "Entering Expressions" section that provides detailed information about how to enter expressions in props, including three different methods: using the object explorer, manual entry, and pasting from step exports.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the new link exists in the documentation
# Test: Search for the file and section. Expect: To find the referenced section.
# Search for the file
fd -t f "using-props.mdx" docs-v2/pages/workflows
# Search for the section header
rg -A 2 "## Entering expressions" docs-v2/pages/workflows
Length of output: 149
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the file to find any section that might be related to expressions
cat docs-v2/pages/workflows/using-props.mdx
Length of output: 2750
docs-v2/pages/workflows/settings.mdx (1)
80-80: Verify the updated documentation links
Multiple links have been updated to reflect the new documentation structure. Let's verify these links exist and are correct.
Also applies to: 86-86, 103-103
✅ Verification successful
The verification shows that the link /workflows/errors/#handle-errors-with-custom-logic exists and points to a valid section in the documentation. The section "## Handle errors with custom logic" is present in the docs-v2/pages/workflows/errors.mdx file with appropriate content.
Let me verify the other links mentioned in lines 86-86 and 103-103 to ensure completeness.
Based on the verification results, I can now generate the final response:
Documentation links have been verified
All referenced documentation links exist and point to the correct sections:
/workflows/errors/#handle-errors-with-custom-logic→ Found in errors.mdx/workflows/inspect/#the-inspector→ File exists at correct location/workflows/triggers/#pipedream-specific-request-parameters→ Section exists with correct heading (as H3)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the new documentation links exist
# Test: Search for the files and sections. Expect: To find all referenced sections.
# Search for the error handling section
rg -A 2 "## Handle errors with custom logic" docs-v2/pages/workflows/errors.mdx
# Search for the inspector section
fd -t f "inspect.mdx" docs-v2/pages/workflows
rg -A 2 "## The Inspector" docs-v2/pages/workflows/inspect.mdx
# Search for the request parameters section
rg -A 2 "## Pipedream-specific request parameters" docs-v2/pages/workflows/triggers.mdx
Length of output: 836
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the content of lines 86 and 103 to check the other links
sed -n '86p;103p' docs-v2/pages/workflows/settings.mdx
Length of output: 380
docs-v2/pages/pricing.mdx (2)
51-51: Verify the updated workflow segment link path.
The link path has been updated from /workflows/flow-control#workflow-segments to /workflows/control-flow#workflow-segments.
✅ Verification successful
Link path update to /workflows/control-flow#workflow-segments is correct and consistent
The updated link path is valid and properly referenced across the documentation. The search results show that:
- The concept of workflow segments is extensively documented in
/workflows/control-flow/index.mdx - Multiple other documentation files consistently reference this path
- The old path
/workflows/flow-controlis not found anywhere, suggesting the new path is the correct one
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and consistency of workflow segment documentation links
# Test: Check both old and new paths to ensure proper redirection and no broken links
rg -g '*.mdx' -g '*.md' --multiline 'workflow.*segments'
Length of output: 9041
209-209: Verify the updated REST API endpoint link path.
The link path has been updated from /api/rest/#get-current-user-info to /rest-api/#get-current-user-info.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to verify the REST API endpoint link path.
Let me check the REST API documentation file specifically to verify the endpoint.
Let me try one final verification to check the content of the REST API documentation.
The REST API endpoint link path is correct
The updated link path /rest-api/#get-current-user-info is correct and consistent with the REST API documentation. The endpoint /users/me is properly documented in the REST API docs, and the link in the pricing page correctly points to its documentation section.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and consistency of REST API endpoint documentation links
# Test: Check both old and new paths to ensure proper redirection and no broken links
rg -g '*.mdx' -g '*.md' --multiline 'get-current-user-info'
Length of output: 230
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to the old path pattern
rg -g '*.mdx' -g '*.md' '/api/rest/#'
# Search for any references to the new path pattern
rg -g '*.mdx' -g '*.md' '/rest-api/#'
# Check if there's a REST API documentation file that might contain the endpoint
fd -e md -e mdx -p 'rest-api|api|rest'
Length of output: 9249
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the REST API documentation for the user info endpoint
cat docs-v2/pages/rest-api/index.mdx | grep -A 5 -B 5 "get-current-user-info"
Length of output: 77
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the full content of the REST API documentation to verify endpoints
rg -g 'rest-api/*.mdx' -g 'rest-api/*.md' -A 10 -B 10 '/users/me'
# Also check if there are any other references to user info endpoints
rg -g '*.mdx' -g '*.md' 'users/me' -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 2167
docs-v2/pages/migrate-from-v1/index.mdx (2)
251-251: Verify the updated HTTP response documentation link.
The link path has been updated to /workflows/triggers/#http.
✅ Verification successful
The HTTP response documentation link is correctly updated and consistent
The link /workflows/triggers/#http is valid and consistent with the rest of the documentation. The search results show that:
- The main HTTP response documentation is indeed located in the triggers section
- Other files correctly reference this documentation section
- The documentation maintains consistent terminology around HTTP responses
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and consistency of HTTP response documentation links
# Test: Check for references to HTTP response documentation
rg -g '*.mdx' -g '*.md' --multiline 'http.*response'
Length of output: 5331
341-341: Verify the updated Node.js code step changes link.
The link path has been updated to /migrate-from-v1/#nodejs-code-step-changes.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify if the anchor exists in the same file.
Link to Node.js code step changes section is correctly referenced
The link /migrate-from-v1/#nodejs-code-step-changes is valid as the corresponding section heading "Node.js Code Step Changes" exists in the same file, and the anchor will be automatically generated from this heading.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and consistency of Node.js code step changes documentation links
# Test: Check for references to Node.js code step changes documentation
rg -g '*.mdx' -g '*.md' --multiline 'nodejs.*code.*step.*changes'
Length of output: 262
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the anchor "nodejs-code-step-changes" exists in the file
rg -g '*.mdx' -g '*.md' '#{1,6}\s+.*Node\.?js.*code.*step.*changes' -i
Length of output: 141
docs-v2/pages/code/nodejs/index.mdx (4)
353-353: Verify the updated HTTP response documentation link.
The link path has been updated to /workflows/triggers/#http-responses.
✅ Verification successful
Link to HTTP responses documentation is correctly referenced
The verification confirms that the updated link path /workflows/triggers/#http-responses is consistent across the documentation. Multiple files reference this anchor, including direct links and cross-references, confirming its validity.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and consistency of HTTP response documentation links
# Test: Check for references to HTTP response documentation
rg -g '*.mdx' -g '*.md' --multiline 'http.*responses'
Length of output: 2513
173-173: Verify the updated HTTP responses documentation link.
The link path has been updated to /workflows/triggers/#http-responses.
✅ Verification successful
The HTTP responses documentation link is correctly referenced and consistent
The verification shows that the updated link /workflows/triggers/#http-responses is consistent with other references in the codebase. Multiple files correctly reference this documentation section, and the link path is valid as evidenced by its presence in docs-v2/pages/workflows/triggers.mdx.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and consistency of HTTP responses documentation links
# Test: Check for references to HTTP responses documentation
rg -g '*.mdx' -g '*.md' --multiline 'http.*responses'
Length of output: 2513
347-349: Verify the updated HTTP request documentation links.
The link paths have been updated to:
/code/nodejs/http-requests//destinations/http/#using-sendhttp-in-workflows
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can verify the HTTP request documentation links. The output shows that both referenced paths exist and are consistently used across the documentation:
/code/nodejs/http-requests/is referenced multiple times, particularly in the context of using axios for HTTP requests where response data is needed./destinations/http/#using-sendhttp-in-workflowsis referenced consistently when discussing the asynchronous$.send.http()method.
The documentation links are valid and consistent with the rest of the codebase.
The links are used in the correct context, maintaining consistency with Pipedream's documentation standards where $.send.http() is recommended for fire-and-forget requests, and axios is recommended when response data is needed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and consistency of HTTP request documentation links
# Test: Check for references to HTTP request documentation
rg -g '*.mdx' -g '*.md' --multiline 'http.*requests'
Length of output: 14118
193-193: Verify the updated connected account data documentation link.
The link path has been updated to /code/nodejs/auth/#accessing-connected-account-data-with-thisappnameauth.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the specific link mentioned in the review comment by checking its existence and content.
The connected account data documentation link is correct and valid
The link /code/nodejs/auth/#accessing-connected-account-data-with-thisappnameauth correctly points to an existing section in the documentation, as verified by the presence of the heading "Accessing connected account data with this.appName.$auth" in the auth.mdx file.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and consistency of connected account data documentation links
# Test: Check for references to connected account data documentation
rg -g '*.mdx' -g '*.md' --multiline 'connected.*account.*data'
Length of output: 4583
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the specific auth documentation file exists and verify the heading
fd -e mdx -e md 'auth.mdx' -x cat {} | grep -A 2 "Accessing connected account data"
Length of output: 413
docs-v2/pages/connect/api.mdx (2)
296-302: LGTM! Documentation improvement
The added clarification about finding app IDs and name slugs enhances user experience by providing clear, actionable guidance.
710-710: LGTM! Enhanced parameter documentation
The clarification about app_id parameter values improves API usability by explicitly stating accepted values and where to find them.
docs-v2/pages/workflows/triggers.mdx (2)
132-132: LGTM! Clear OAuth setup guidance
The added step about creating OAuth clients provides clear direction and maintains documentation flow.
589-589: LGTM! Consistent terminology
The updates to Inspector references maintain documentation consistency and improve navigation.
Also applies to: 605-605
docs-v2/pages/rest-api/index.mdx (3)
78-83: LGTM! Improved parameter documentation
The updates to workspace ID references and parameter requirements enhance clarity and accuracy.
1790-1790: LGTM! Consistent workspace references
The updates maintain consistency in workspace ID reference paths throughout the documentation.
Also applies to: 2032-2032, 2063-2063, 2111-2111, 2155-2155
188-188: LGTM! Consistent OAuth references
The update to the OAuth app reference path maintains documentation consistency.
docs-v2/pages/components/api.mdx (1)
23-23: LGTM: URL path update improves consistency
The URL path update from /api/rest/#overview to /rest-api/#overview aligns with modern API documentation conventions and maintains consistency across the documentation.
docs-v2/pages/rest-api/webhooks.mdx (1)
3-3: LGTM: URL path updates improve consistency
The URL path updates from /api/rest/#subscriptions to /rest-api/#subscriptions maintain consistency with the rest of the documentation.
Also applies to: 5-5
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[misspelling] ~3-~3: Use “an” instead of ‘a’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ... webhooks as a way to deliver events to a endpoint you own. Webhooks are managed ...
(EN_A_VS_AN)
docs-v2/pages/glossary.mdx (1)
7-7: LGTM: Link updates improve navigation
The updates to anchor links (e.g., #0-9 to #0---9, #two-factor-authentication to #two-factor-authentication-2fa) improve clarity and searchability.
Also applies to: 13-13
docs-v2/pages/workflows/steps.mdx
Outdated
| ### Triggers | ||
|
|
||
| Every workflow begins with a [trigger](/workflows/steps/triggers/) step. Trigger steps initiate the execution of a workflow; i.e., workflows execute on each trigger event. For example, you can create an [HTTP trigger](/workflows/steps/triggers/#http) to accept HTTP requests. We give you a unique URL where you can send HTTP requests, and your workflow is executed on each requesingle st. | ||
| Every workflow begins with a [trigger](/workflows/triggers/) step. Trigger steps initiate the execution of a workflow; i.e., workflows execute on each trigger event. For example, you can create an [HTTP trigger](/workflows/triggers/#http) to accept HTTP requests. We give you a unique URL where you can send HTTP requests, and your workflow is executed on each requesingle st. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix typo: "requesingle st" should be "request"
There's a typographical error in the sentence that affects readability.
Apply this correction:
-your workflow is executed on each requesingle st.
+your workflow is executed on each request.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Every workflow begins with a [trigger](/workflows/triggers/) step. Trigger steps initiate the execution of a workflow; i.e., workflows execute on each trigger event. For example, you can create an [HTTP trigger](/workflows/triggers/#http) to accept HTTP requests. We give you a unique URL where you can send HTTP requests, and your workflow is executed on each requesingle st. | |
| Every workflow begins with a [trigger](/workflows/triggers/) step. Trigger steps initiate the execution of a workflow; i.e., workflows execute on each trigger event. For example, you can create an [HTTP trigger](/workflows/triggers/#http) to accept HTTP requests. We give you a unique URL where you can send HTTP requests, and your workflow is executed on each request. |
docs-v2/pages/rest-api/webhooks.mdx
Outdated
| # REST API Example: Webhooks | ||
|
|
||
| Pipedream supports webhooks as a way to deliver events to a endpoint you own. Webhooks are managed at an account-level, and you send data to these webhooks using [subscriptions](/api/rest/#subscriptions). | ||
| Pipedream supports webhooks as a way to deliver events to a endpoint you own. Webhooks are managed at an account-level, and you send data to these webhooks using [subscriptions](/rest-api/#subscriptions). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix grammatical error: Use "an" before "endpoint"
Change "to a endpoint" to "to an endpoint" to follow proper English grammar rules.
-Pipedream supports webhooks as a way to deliver events to a endpoint you own.
+Pipedream supports webhooks as a way to deliver events to an endpoint you own.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Pipedream supports webhooks as a way to deliver events to a endpoint you own. Webhooks are managed at an account-level, and you send data to these webhooks using [subscriptions](/rest-api/#subscriptions). | |
| Pipedream supports webhooks as a way to deliver events to an endpoint you own. Webhooks are managed at an account-level, and you send data to these webhooks using [subscriptions](/rest-api/#subscriptions). |
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[misspelling] ~3-~3: Use “an” instead of ‘a’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ... webhooks as a way to deliver events to a endpoint you own. Webhooks are managed ...
(EN_A_VS_AN)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/docs-pr.yaml (1)
51-57: Address potential issues in the final stepsA few minor improvements are recommended:
- The validation script path should be prefixed with
./for clarity- The DEBUG variable should be quoted to prevent word splitting
- Add a newline at the end of the file
Apply these changes:
- name: Run link validator - run: node validate-mdx-links.mjs + run: node ./validate-mdx-links.mjs env: - DEBUG: ${{ vars.DEBUG }} + DEBUG: "${{ vars.DEBUG }}" +🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 57-57: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/workflows/docs-pr.yaml(1 hunks)docs-v2/pages/rest-api/webhooks.mdx(4 hunks)docs-v2/pages/workflows/steps.mdx(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- docs-v2/pages/rest-api/webhooks.mdx
- docs-v2/pages/workflows/steps.mdx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/docs-pr.yaml
33-33: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:45: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/docs-pr.yaml
[error] 57-57: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
.github/workflows/docs-pr.yaml (5)
1-12: LGTM! Well-configured workflow triggers
The workflow triggers and path filters are properly configured to run only when MDX files are modified, preventing unnecessary workflow executions.
13-19: LGTM! Appropriate job configuration
The job configuration uses standard settings with the correct working directory for documentation validation.
20-26: LGTM! Secure and well-documented checkout configuration
Using the latest version of checkout action with full history fetch, which is properly justified in the comments.
27-43: LGTM! Efficient PNPM setup with proper caching
The PNPM setup is well-configured with:
- Latest action versions
- Proper cache configuration
- Modern GitHub output syntax
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
33-33: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:45: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
44-50: LGTM! Proper Node.js environment setup
The Node.js setup uses the latest action version with appropriate configuration for registry and caching.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes