Skip to content

Conversation

@dannyroosevelt
Copy link
Collaborator

@dannyroosevelt dannyroosevelt commented Dec 6, 2024

WHY

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Restructured and updated the document on running workflows for improved clarity.
    • Renamed "Step configuration" to "Configuring workflow steps" to broaden focus.
    • Introduced a new section on "Testing workflow steps" with prerequisites for using end users' accounts.
    • Replaced "Errors" section with "Troubleshooting," outlining common workflow issues.
    • Added a callout for returning verbose error messages to aid debugging.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 6, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Dec 7, 2024 1:11am
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Dec 7, 2024 1:11am
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Dec 7, 2024 1:11am

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request involves significant restructuring and content updates to the documentation for running workflows. Key changes include renaming the "Step configuration" section to "Configuring workflow steps" and introducing a new section on "Testing workflow steps." The document now emphasizes manual configuration for end users' authentication, updates the "Errors" section to "Troubleshooting," and enhances error handling with verbose messages. Overall, the document's flow has been improved for better clarity and user guidance.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
docs-v2/pages/connect/workflows.mdx Restructured content, renamed sections, added "Testing workflow steps," updated "Errors" to "Troubleshooting," and improved error handling details.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • dylburger

🐇 In the meadow where workflows play,
A guide was crafted, clear as day.
Steps now configured, with care and grace,
Troubleshooting tips in their rightful place.
Testing made simple, no more to dread,
With verbose messages, all fears are shed! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
docs-v2/pages/connect/workflows.mdx (3)

Line range hint 202-239: Fix formatting in the curl example

The curl example contains some formatting issues that could cause problems when users copy-paste:

 curl -X POST https://{your-endpoint-url} \
   -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
   -H "Authorization: Bearer {access_token}" \
   -H 'X-PD-External-User-ID: {your_external_user_id}' \
-  -H 'X-PD-Environment: development' \  # 'development' or 'production'
+  -H 'X-PD-Environment: development' \   # 'development' or 'production'
   -d '{ 
     "slackChannel": "#general",
     "messageText": "Hello, world!",
     "gitRepo": "AcmeOrg/acme-repo",
     "issueTitle": "Test Issue"
   }' \

240-253: Consider adding more testing guidance

The testing section effectively covers the basic setup, but could be enhanced with:

  • Examples of different testing scenarios (e.g., testing with users having different permission levels or account configurations)
  • Environment-specific considerations (what differs between development and production testing)

Would you like me to propose additional content for these testing scenarios?


254-263: Enhance error documentation

Consider improving the troubleshooting section by:

  • Adding unique error codes or identifiers for each error type
  • Including examples of the verbose error messages that users might encounter
  • Adding links to relevant API documentation for error handling

Would you like me to propose a structured format for documenting these errors with examples?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a08659e and 8256c8f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs-v2/pages/connect/workflows.mdx (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs-v2/pages/connect/workflows.mdx (1)

Line range hint 1-263: Verify documentation references and links

Let's ensure all referenced endpoints and UI elements are accurate.

✅ Verification successful

Let me analyze the documentation references and links found in the workflows.mdx file to verify the concern. I'll generate additional scripts to check for any potential issues.


Let me verify the content of the workflows.mdx file to ensure all references and functionality are properly documented.


Based on the comprehensive review of the documentation, I can now provide a final response:

Documentation is accurate and well-structured

The documentation for running workflows for end users is complete and accurate, with:

  • Clear step-by-step instructions
  • Code examples in multiple languages (TypeScript, Node.js, cURL)
  • Proper references to all required components (OAuth, Connect, external users)
  • Detailed troubleshooting section
  • Accurate cross-references to other documentation sections
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify documentation references

# Check for broken internal links
echo "Checking for internal documentation references..."
rg -l '\[.*?\]\(/[^)]+\)' | while read -r file; do
  rg -o '\[.*?\]\(/([^)]+)\)' "$file" | cut -d':' -f2 | while read -r link; do
    echo "Found internal link: $link"
  done
done

# Check for API endpoint references
echo "Checking API endpoint references..."
rg -l 'https://api\.pipedream\.com/v1/' | while read -r file; do
  rg 'https://api\.pipedream\.com/v1/[^\s\'"]+' "$file"
done

Length of output: 131070


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for the specific file and its references
echo "Checking workflows.mdx file and its references..."
rg -l "Running workflows for your end users" docs-v2/pages/connect/

# Check for related API endpoints
echo "Checking for related API endpoints..."
rg -l "invokeWorkflowForExternalUser" docs-v2/pages/

# Check for Connect-related documentation
echo "Checking for Connect documentation..."
rg -l "Pipedream Connect" docs-v2/pages/connect/

# Check for OAuth client documentation
echo "Checking for OAuth client documentation..."
rg -l "Create a Pipedream OAuth client" docs-v2/pages/

Length of output: 1116


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the workflows.mdx file
echo "Checking content of workflows.mdx..."
cat docs-v2/pages/connect/workflows.mdx

# Check for any related API documentation
echo "Checking for API documentation references..."
rg -A 5 "invokeWorkflowForExternalUser" docs-v2/pages/connect/

Length of output: 13834

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
docs-v2/pages/connect/workflows.mdx (4)

Line range hint 202-239: Enhance the curl example for clarity and security

The configuration section is well-explained, but the curl example could be improved:

Consider these improvements to the curl example:

 curl -X POST https://{your-endpoint-url} \
   -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
   -H "Authorization: Bearer {access_token}" \
-  -H 'X-PD-External-User-ID: {your_external_user_id}' \
-  -H 'X-PD-Environment: development' \  # 'development' or 'production'
+  -H "X-PD-External-User-ID: ${EXTERNAL_USER_ID}" \
+  -H "X-PD-Environment: ${PD_ENVIRONMENT}" \
   -d '{ 
     "slackChannel": "#general",
     "messageText": "Hello, world!",
-    "gitRepo": "AcmeOrg/acme-repo",
+    "gitRepo": "org/repo",
     "issueTitle": "Test Issue"
   }' \

This:

  1. Uses environment variables for sensitive values
  2. Uses consistent quote style
  3. Uses a more generic example for the git repo

252-252: Fix typo in environment setting instruction

-3. Make sure `x-pd-environment` is set (you'll likely want to `development`)
+3. Make sure `x-pd-environment` is set (you'll likely want to use `development`)

265-278: Enhance error example and add cross-references

The error example is helpful but could be improved:

  1. Add a link to the general error handling documentation for additional context
  2. Consider improving the curl example:
 curl -X POST https://{your-endpoint-url} \
   -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
   -H 'Authorization: Bearer {access_token}' \
-  -H "x-pd-environment: development" \
-  -H "x-pd-external-user-id: abc-123" \
+  -H "X-PD-Environment: development" \
+  -H "X-PD-External-User-ID: abc-123" \
   -d '{
     "slackChannel": "#general",
     "messageText": "Hello, world! (sent via curl)",
     "hubSpotList": "prospects",
     "contactEmail": "[email protected]"
   }' \

This maintains consistent header casing with the rest of the documentation.


280-280: Consider adding error codes for easier reference

Consider adding unique error codes to each error type to make it easier for developers to reference and document them. For example:

#### No external user ID passed (ERR_PD_001)
...
#### No matching external user ID (ERR_PD_002)
...
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8256c8f and a0cabfa.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs-v2/pages/connect/workflows.mdx (2 hunks)

@dannyroosevelt dannyroosevelt merged commit 9cb0d95 into master Dec 7, 2024
8 checks passed
@dannyroosevelt dannyroosevelt deleted the danny/workflow-invokes-docs-updates branch December 7, 2024 01:15
This was referenced Feb 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant