[FEATURE] Update Algolia components to make them easier to understand and use #14984
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe changes introduce new actions for browsing, saving, and deleting records in an Algolia index while removing the actions for creating and deleting objects. A new utility module is added for handling JSON data, and the Algolia app's index management methods are streamlined. Additionally, the package version is updated along with a dependency upgrade. These modifications aim to enhance the usability of the Algolia components. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
components/algolia/algolia.app.mjs (1)
27-29: Consider adding error handlingThe
listIndicesmethod should include error handling to gracefully handle API failures.listIndices() { - return this._client().listIndices(); + try { + return this._client().listIndices(); + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to list indices: ${error.message}`); + } }components/algolia/actions/browse-records/browse-records.mjs (1)
6-6: Update documentation link to include pagination examplesThe documentation link should point to a more specific section that includes pagination examples.
- description: "Browse for records in the given index. [See the documentation](https://www.algolia.com/doc/libraries/javascript/v5/methods/search/browse/?client=javascript).", + description: "Browse for records in the given index. Supports pagination for large datasets. [See the documentation](https://www.algolia.com/doc/libraries/javascript/v5/methods/search/browse/?client=javascript#pagination-with-browse).",components/algolia/common/utils.mjs (1)
25-46: Enhance array parsing error handlingThe current implementation could be improved to provide better error messages and handle edge cases more efficiently.
Consider this improved implementation:
function parseArray(value) { try { if (!value) { return []; } if (Array.isArray(value)) { return value; } + if (typeof value !== "string") { + throw new Error("Expected a string or array"); + } + const parsedValue = JSON.parse(value); if (!Array.isArray(parsedValue)) { - throw new Error("Not an array"); + throw new Error("Expected a JSON array string"); } return parsedValue; } catch (e) { - throw new ConfigurationError("Make sure the custom expression contains a valid JSON array object"); + throw new ConfigurationError(`Invalid array input: ${e.message}`); } }components/algolia/actions/save-records/save-records.mjs (1)
36-40: Add error handling and improve success messageThe current implementation lacks proper error handling and provides a generic success message.
Consider enhancing the implementation:
const response = await saveRecords({ indexName, objects: utils.parseArray(records), waitForTasks: true, }); + +const recordCount = records.length; +$.export("$summary", `Successfully created ${recordCount} records.`);components/algolia/actions/delete-records/delete-records.mjs (2)
45-45: Improve success message with operation detailsThe success message could be more informative by including the number of records deleted.
-$.export("$summary", "Successfully deleted records."); +$.export("$summary", `Successfully deleted ${recordIds.length} records.`);
39-43: Consider adding retry mechanism for large deletionsLarge deletion operations might benefit from a retry mechanism in case of temporary failures.
Consider implementing a retry mechanism with exponential backoff for better reliability:
const retryWithBackoff = async (operation, maxRetries = 3) => { for (let i = 0; i < maxRetries; i++) { try { return await operation(); } catch (error) { if (i === maxRetries - 1) throw error; await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, Math.pow(2, i) * 1000)); } } };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
components/algolia/actions/browse-records/browse-records.mjs(1 hunks)components/algolia/actions/create-objects/create-objects.mjs(0 hunks)components/algolia/actions/delete-objects/delete-objects.mjs(0 hunks)components/algolia/actions/delete-records/delete-records.mjs(1 hunks)components/algolia/actions/save-records/save-records.mjs(1 hunks)components/algolia/algolia.app.mjs(2 hunks)components/algolia/common/utils.mjs(1 hunks)components/algolia/package.json(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- components/algolia/actions/create-objects/create-objects.mjs
- components/algolia/actions/delete-objects/delete-objects.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/algolia/package.json (1)
3-3: Verify breaking changes from Algolia SDK v5 upgrade
The upgrade from algoliasearch v4 to v5 is a major version change that may introduce breaking changes. Please ensure:
- All breaking changes from v5 are addressed
- The new SDK version is compatible with all existing functionality
Also applies to: 17-17
components/algolia/algolia.app.mjs (1)
12-13: LGTM! Clean implementation of index listing
The change to use listIndices() is more straightforward and aligns with Algolia's v5 API.
michelle0927
left a comment
michelle0927
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good, just one comment/question.
jcortes
force-pushed
the
algolia-update-components-enhance-ux
branch
from
d926c8d to
1c00a7d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
components/algolia/actions/save-records/save-records.mjs (1)
18-22:⚠️ Potential issueAdd essential validations for records.
The records property needs validation for:
- Record size limits (Algolia has a 100KB limit per record)
- Batch size limits (Algolia recommends max 1000 records per batch)
- Required fields validation (objectID is typically required)
records: { type: "string[]", label: "Records From JSON Objects", description: "The records to add to the index. Each record should be a JSON object. Eg. `{\"objectID\": \"1\", \"name\": \"Jane Doe\"}`. For a better user experience, you can use the [**CSV File To Objects**](https://pipedream.com/apps/helper-functions/actions/csv-file-to-objects) **Helper Function** action to convert a CSV file to an array of objects and then map the objects to the records field here. Eg. `{{steps.csv_file_to_objects.$return_value}}`.", + validate: { + type: "function", + async: true, + handler: async (records) => { + if (records.length > 1000) { + throw new Error("Maximum batch size is 1000 records"); + } + const parsed = records.map(r => JSON.parse(r)); + parsed.forEach((record, i) => { + if (!record.objectID) { + throw new Error(`Record at index ${i} is missing required objectID field`); + } + const size = Buffer.byteLength(JSON.stringify(record)); + if (size > 102400) { // 100KB + throw new Error(`Record at index ${i} exceeds 100KB size limit`); + } + }); + }, + }, },
🧹 Nitpick comments (9)
components/helper_functions/actions/csv-file-to-objects/csv-file-to-objects.mjs (3)
57-63: Enhance error handling for file operationsThe current error handling could be more informative for debugging purposes. Consider adding specific error types and more context to the error messages.
try { fileContent = readFileSync(path.resolve(filePath), "utf8"); } catch (error) { - console.error("Error reading file:", error); + console.error("Failed to read CSV file at path:", filePath, "\nError:", error); + if (error.code === 'ENOENT') { + throw new Error(`File not found at path: ${filePath}`); + } + if (error.code === 'EACCES') { + throw new Error(`Permission denied to read file: ${filePath}`); + } throw error; }
65-72: Add basic CSV content validationConsider adding basic validation of the CSV content before parsing to provide better error messages and prevent processing invalid files.
try { + if (!fileContent.trim()) { + throw new Error('CSV file is empty'); + } + + // Basic CSV format validation + const firstLine = fileContent.split('\n')[0].trim(); + if (!firstLine) { + throw new Error('CSV file contains no valid data'); + } + const records = parse(fileContent, { columns: hasHeaders, skip_empty_lines: skipEmptyLines, skip_records_with_empty_values: skipRecordsWithEmptyValues, skip_records_with_error: skipRecordsWithError, });
73-74: Add more detailed summary informationConsider enhancing the summary to include more useful information about the conversion process.
-$.export("$summary", `Converted ${records.length} records from CSV to objects.`); +const summary = [ + `Converted ${records.length} records from CSV to objects`, + hasHeaders ? 'using headers from first row' : 'without headers', + skipEmptyLines ? 'skipping empty lines' : 'preserving empty lines', +].join(', '); +$.export("$summary", `${summary}.`);components/algolia/algolia.app.mjs (1)
27-29: Consider adding error handlingWhile the implementation is clean, consider adding error handling for potential API failures.
listIndices() { - return this._client().listIndices(); + try { + return this._client().listIndices(); + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to list indices: ${error.message}`); + } }components/algolia/common/utils.mjs (2)
25-46: Enhance error handling in parseArrayThe error handling could be more specific and informative.
function parseArray(value) { try { if (!value) { return []; } if (Array.isArray(value)) { return value; } const parsedValue = JSON.parse(value); if (!Array.isArray(parsedValue)) { - throw new Error("Not an array"); + throw new Error(`Expected an array, but got ${typeof parsedValue}`); } return parsedValue; } catch (e) { - throw new ConfigurationError("Make sure the custom expression contains a valid JSON array object"); + throw new ConfigurationError( + e.message === `Expected an array, but got ${typeof parsedValue}` + ? e.message + : "Invalid JSON array format. Please provide a valid JSON array string or array object" + ); } }
48-51: Consider adding input validation for parseArrayAndMapThe parseArrayAndMap method should validate its input before processing.
export default { parseArray, - parseArrayAndMap: (value) => parseArray(value)?.map(valueToObject), + parseArrayAndMap: (value) => { + if (value === undefined) return []; + const array = parseArray(value); + return array?.map(valueToObject); + }, };components/algolia/actions/delete-records/delete-records.mjs (2)
40-44: Consider batching large deletionsAlgolia has rate limits and batch size limits. Consider implementing batching for large deletions.
+ const BATCH_SIZE = 1000; + const batches = []; + for (let i = 0; i < recordIds.length; i += BATCH_SIZE) { + batches.push(recordIds.slice(i, i + BATCH_SIZE)); + } + + const responses = await Promise.all( + batches.map((batch) => deleteRecords({ indexName, - objectIDs: utils.parseArray(recordIds), + objectIDs: utils.parseArray(batch), waitForTasks: true, }) + ) + );
46-46: Enhance summary message with deletion countMake the summary message more informative by including the number of records deleted.
- $.export("$summary", "Successfully deleted records."); + $.export("$summary", `Successfully deleted ${recordIds.length} records.`);components/algolia/actions/save-records/save-records.mjs (1)
42-42: Enhance the success message with record count.Make the success message more informative by including the number of records created.
- $.export("$summary", "Successfully created records."); + $.export("$summary", `Successfully created ${records.length} records in index '${indexName}'.`);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
components/algolia/actions/browse-records/browse-records.mjs(1 hunks)components/algolia/actions/create-objects/create-objects.mjs(0 hunks)components/algolia/actions/delete-objects/delete-objects.mjs(0 hunks)components/algolia/actions/delete-records/delete-records.mjs(1 hunks)components/algolia/actions/save-records/save-records.mjs(1 hunks)components/algolia/algolia.app.mjs(2 hunks)components/algolia/common/utils.mjs(1 hunks)components/algolia/package.json(2 hunks)components/helper_functions/actions/csv-file-to-objects/csv-file-to-objects.mjs(1 hunks)components/helper_functions/package.json(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- components/algolia/actions/create-objects/create-objects.mjs
- components/algolia/actions/delete-objects/delete-objects.mjs
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/helper_functions/package.json
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- components/algolia/package.json
- components/algolia/actions/browse-records/browse-records.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (6)
components/algolia/algolia.app.mjs (1)
12-13: LGTM! Simplified index listing implementation
The direct use of listIndices() removes unnecessary abstraction, making the code more maintainable.
components/algolia/common/utils.mjs (2)
3-16: Previous review comment still applies
The implementation of isJson function could be improved as per the previous review comment.
18-23: Previous review comment still applies
The implementation of valueToObject function could be improved as per the previous review comment.
components/algolia/actions/delete-records/delete-records.mjs (1)
36-38: Previous review comment about array validation still applies
The array validation could be enhanced as suggested in the previous review.
components/algolia/actions/save-records/save-records.mjs (2)
1-2: LGTM! Imports are appropriate.
The imports correctly reference the Algolia app and utility modules needed for this action.
4-9: Verify version compatibility with replaced components.
Since this component appears to be replacing older functionality (create-objects), we should ensure proper version numbering for backward compatibility.
components/helper_functions/actions/csv-file-to-objects/csv-file-to-objects.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/helper_functions/actions/csv-file-to-objects/csv-file-to-objects.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
jcortes
force-pushed
the
algolia-update-components-enhance-ux
branch
from
1c00a7d to
095ccaf
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (4)
components/algolia/common/utils.mjs (2)
3-16: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionImprove JSON validation robustness
The current implementation has potential issues with type coercion and redundant parsing.
Consider this improved implementation:
function isJson(value) { - value = - typeof(value) !== "string" - ? JSON.stringify(value) - : value; + if (typeof value !== "string") { + return false; + } try { - value = JSON.parse(value); + JSON.parse(value); + return true; } catch (e) { return false; } - - return typeof(value) === "object" && value !== null; }
18-23: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionOptimize JSON parsing and add error handling
The current implementation performs redundant parsing.
Consider this improved implementation:
function valueToObject(value) { + if (typeof value !== "string") { + return value; + } - if (!isJson(value)) { - return value; + try { + return JSON.parse(value); + } catch (e) { + return value; } - return JSON.parse(value); }components/helper_functions/actions/csv-file-to-objects/csv-file-to-objects.mjs (2)
1-4: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider using async file operations
The use of synchronous file operations could block the event loop.
14-18:⚠️ Potential issueAdd validation for filePath
The filePath prop should validate that the path is within the
/tmpdirectory.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
components/algolia/common/utils.mjs (2)
25-46: Enhance error handling with specific messagesWhile the error handling is good, the error messages could be more specific to help users debug issues.
Consider this enhancement:
function parseArray(value) { try { + if (typeof value !== "string" && !Array.isArray(value) && value !== null && value !== undefined) { + throw new Error("Input must be a string, array, null, or undefined"); + } + if (!value) { return []; } if (Array.isArray(value)) { return value; } const parsedValue = JSON.parse(value); if (!Array.isArray(parsedValue)) { - throw new Error("Not an array"); + throw new Error("Parsed value is not an array. Expected JSON string representing an array"); } return parsedValue; } catch (e) { - throw new ConfigurationError("Make sure the custom expression contains a valid JSON array object"); + throw new ConfigurationError( + `Invalid array input: ${e.message}. Please ensure the input is either an array or a valid JSON string representing an array.` + ); } }
48-51: Add JSDoc documentation for exported functionsConsider adding TypeScript-style JSDoc comments to improve code documentation and IDE support.
+/** + * Parses a value into an array + * @param {string|any[]|null|undefined} value - The value to parse + * @returns {any[]} The parsed array + * @throws {ConfigurationError} If the value cannot be parsed into an array + */ export default { parseArray, + /** + * Parses a value into an array and maps each item through valueToObject + * @param {string|any[]|null|undefined} value - The value to parse + * @returns {any[]} The parsed and mapped array + * @throws {ConfigurationError} If the value cannot be parsed into an array + */ parseArrayAndMap: (value) => parseArray(value)?.map(valueToObject), };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
components/algolia/actions/browse-records/browse-records.mjs(1 hunks)components/algolia/actions/create-objects/create-objects.mjs(0 hunks)components/algolia/actions/delete-objects/delete-objects.mjs(0 hunks)components/algolia/actions/delete-records/delete-records.mjs(1 hunks)components/algolia/actions/save-records/save-records.mjs(1 hunks)components/algolia/algolia.app.mjs(2 hunks)components/algolia/common/utils.mjs(1 hunks)components/algolia/package.json(2 hunks)components/helper_functions/actions/csv-file-to-objects/csv-file-to-objects.mjs(1 hunks)components/helper_functions/package.json(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- components/algolia/actions/create-objects/create-objects.mjs
- components/algolia/actions/delete-objects/delete-objects.mjs
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- components/helper_functions/package.json
- components/algolia/package.json
- components/algolia/algolia.app.mjs
- components/algolia/actions/browse-records/browse-records.mjs
- components/algolia/actions/save-records/save-records.mjs
- components/algolia/actions/delete-records/delete-records.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (1)
components/helper_functions/actions/csv-file-to-objects/csv-file-to-objects.mjs (1)
33-39: Add validation for skipRecordsWithEmptyValues with hasHeaders
When hasHeaders is true and skipRecordsWithEmptyValues is true, we should warn users about potential data loss.
Consider adding this validation:
skipRecordsWithEmptyValues: {
type: "boolean",
label: "Skip Records With Empty Values",
description: "Set to `true` to skip records with empty values. Don't generate records for lines containing empty values, empty Buffer or equals to `null` and `undefined` if their value was casted.",
optional: true,
default: false,
+ validate: function({ skipRecordsWithEmptyValues, hasHeaders }) {
+ if (skipRecordsWithEmptyValues && hasHeaders) {
+ return "Warning: Skipping records with empty values when headers are present may result in data misalignment";
+ }
+ },
},
components/helper_functions/actions/csv-file-to-objects/csv-file-to-objects.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
jcortes
force-pushed
the
algolia-update-components-enhance-ux
branch
from
095ccaf to
8467266
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
components/algolia/common/utils.mjs (1)
49-52: Add JSDoc documentation for exported methodsConsider adding JSDoc documentation to improve code clarity and IDE support.
+/** + * @typedef {Object} Utils + * @property {function(any): any[]} parseArray - Parses and validates array input + * @property {function(any): any[]} parseArrayAndMap - Parses array and maps elements through JSON parser + */ +/** @type {Utils} */ export default { parseArray, parseArrayAndMap: (value) => parseArray(value)?.map(parseJson), };components/algolia/actions/delete-records/delete-records.mjs (2)
8-8: Consider starting with version 1.0.0Since this is a new feature with complete functionality, consider starting with version 1.0.0 instead of 0.0.1.
42-42: Enhance success message with operation detailsConsider including the number of records deleted in the success message.
- $.export("$summary", "Successfully deleted records."); + $.export("$summary", `Successfully deleted ${recordIds.length} records from index "${indexName}".`);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
components/algolia/actions/browse-records/browse-records.mjs(1 hunks)components/algolia/actions/create-objects/create-objects.mjs(0 hunks)components/algolia/actions/delete-objects/delete-objects.mjs(0 hunks)components/algolia/actions/delete-records/delete-records.mjs(1 hunks)components/algolia/actions/save-records/save-records.mjs(1 hunks)components/algolia/algolia.app.mjs(2 hunks)components/algolia/common/utils.mjs(1 hunks)components/algolia/package.json(2 hunks)components/helper_functions/actions/csv-file-to-objects/csv-file-to-objects.mjs(1 hunks)components/helper_functions/package.json(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- components/algolia/actions/delete-objects/delete-objects.mjs
- components/algolia/actions/create-objects/create-objects.mjs
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- components/algolia/package.json
- components/helper_functions/package.json
- components/algolia/algolia.app.mjs
- components/algolia/actions/browse-records/browse-records.mjs
- components/algolia/actions/save-records/save-records.mjs
- components/helper_functions/actions/csv-file-to-objects/csv-file-to-objects.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/algolia/common/utils.mjs (1)
26-47: LGTM! Robust array parsing implementation
The implementation includes proper validation and error handling:
- Handles falsy values
- Validates array type
- Provides clear error messages
components/algolia/actions/delete-records/delete-records.mjs (1)
25-27: Add error handling to deleteRecords method
Referring to previous review comment about adding error handling to the deleteRecords method.
jcortes
force-pushed
the
algolia-update-components-enhance-ux
branch
from
8467266 to
f8ce14d
Compare
|
/approve |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
components/algolia/common/utils.mjs (2)
26-47: Add type validation for non-string/non-array inputsThe function handles falsy values and arrays well, but could be more explicit about other types.
Consider this enhancement:
function parseArray(value) { try { if (!value) { return []; } if (Array.isArray(value)) { return value; } + if (typeof value !== 'string') { + throw new Error("Input must be a string or array"); + } + const parsedValue = JSON.parse(value);
49-52: Add JSDoc documentation and consider performance optimizationThe exported functions would benefit from documentation explaining their purpose and behavior. Also, consider memoizing parseJson for repeated values in arrays.
Add documentation and optimize like this:
+/** + * Utility functions for parsing JSON arrays + * @module algolia/common/utils + */ + +/** + * Parses a value into an array + * @param {string|Array} value - The value to parse + * @returns {Array} The parsed array + * @throws {ConfigurationError} If the value cannot be parsed into an array + */ function parseArray(value) { // ... existing implementation } +/** + * Parses a value into an array and maps each element through JSON parsing + * @param {string|Array} value - The value to parse + * @returns {Array} The parsed and mapped array + */ export default { parseArray, parseArrayAndMap: (value) => parseArray(value)?.map(parseJson), };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
components/algolia/actions/browse-records/browse-records.mjs(1 hunks)components/algolia/actions/create-objects/create-objects.mjs(0 hunks)components/algolia/actions/delete-objects/delete-objects.mjs(0 hunks)components/algolia/actions/delete-records/delete-records.mjs(1 hunks)components/algolia/actions/save-records/save-records.mjs(1 hunks)components/algolia/algolia.app.mjs(2 hunks)components/algolia/common/utils.mjs(1 hunks)components/algolia/package.json(2 hunks)components/helper_functions/actions/csv-file-to-objects/csv-file-to-objects.mjs(1 hunks)components/helper_functions/package.json(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- components/algolia/actions/create-objects/create-objects.mjs
- components/algolia/actions/delete-objects/delete-objects.mjs
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
- components/helper_functions/package.json
- components/algolia/package.json
- components/algolia/actions/save-records/save-records.mjs
- components/algolia/algolia.app.mjs
- components/algolia/actions/delete-records/delete-records.mjs
- components/helper_functions/actions/csv-file-to-objects/csv-file-to-objects.mjs
- components/algolia/actions/browse-records/browse-records.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/algolia/common/utils.mjs (2)
3-24: Add safeguards for recursive JSON parsing
The recursive implementation needs additional safeguards for depth limits, array handling, and performance optimization.
1-52: Verify error handling in Algolia record operations
Since these utilities are used for parsing records in Algolia operations, we should verify proper error handling in the actual usage.
✅ Verification successful
Error handling is properly implemented in Algolia record operations
The verification shows that error handling is well-implemented across the Algolia component:
- The
parseArrayandparseJsonutilities have proper error handling with try-catch blocks and throwConfigurationErrorfor invalid inputs - These utilities are used correctly in both save-records and delete-records actions:
save-recordsusesparseArrayAndMapto safely parse and transform record objectsdelete-recordsusesparseArrayto safely parse record IDs
- The error propagation is appropriate, as any parsing errors will be caught and transformed into user-friendly configuration errors
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of these utilities in Algolia operations
echo "Searching for parseArray usage in Algolia components..."
rg -A 5 "parseArray" --glob "components/algolia/**/*"
echo "Searching for try-catch blocks around these utility calls..."
ast-grep --pattern 'try {
$$$
parseArray($$$)
$$$
} catch' --lang javascript
Length of output: 2363
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of save-records and delete-records to verify error handling
echo "Checking save-records implementation..."
cat components/algolia/actions/save-records/save-records.mjs
echo -e "\nChecking delete-records implementation..."
cat components/algolia/actions/delete-records/delete-records.mjs
# Let's also check if there are any other files using these utilities
echo -e "\nChecking for other usages of parseJson..."
rg "parseJson" --glob "components/algolia/**/*"
Length of output: 3472
WHY
Resolves #14938
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores