Skip to content

Conversation

@dannyroosevelt
Copy link
Collaborator

@dannyroosevelt dannyroosevelt commented Dec 13, 2024

WHY

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Removed outdated documentation on accessing account credentials via the Pipedream API.
    • Enhanced clarity and detail in the Pipedream REST API documentation, including updates on authentication, pagination, error handling, and webhook management.
    • Added a new redirect for easier access to the API section related to connected accounts.
    • Updated the connected accounts documentation to clarify account management and access control.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 13, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 13, 2024 11:56pm
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Dec 13, 2024 11:56pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Dec 13, 2024 11:56pm

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request involves the deletion of a documentation file related to accessing account credentials via the Pipedream API, which included details on OAuth processes, API calls, and best practices for security. Additionally, enhancements were made to the Pipedream REST API documentation, clarifying authentication methods, parameters, pagination, error handling, and webhook management. A new redirect was added to the vercel.json configuration file to improve documentation routing.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
docs-v2/pages/connected-accounts/api.mdx Deleted file containing documentation on accessing account credentials and OAuth management.
docs-v2/pages/rest-api/index.mdx Enhanced API documentation with clarifications on authentication, parameters, pagination, error handling, and webhook management.
docs-v2/vercel.json Added a new redirect from /docs/connected-accounts/api to /docs/connect/api#accounts.
docs-v2/pages/connected-accounts/index.mdx Added a new section with a Callout component for connecting accounts and clarified access management details.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

docs, dependencies, tracked internally

Suggested reviewers

  • dylburger

🐰 In the meadow, where bunnies play,
Documentation changes brighten the day!
OAuth and accounts, all now more clear,
With redirects in place, we give a cheer!
So hop along, developers, take a look,
The Pipedream API's now a well-written book! 📚✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bbcf596 and 9675ba4.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • docs-v2/pages/connected-accounts/api.mdx (0 hunks)
  • docs-v2/pages/rest-api/index.mdx (0 hunks)
  • docs-v2/vercel.json (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • docs-v2/pages/connected-accounts/api.mdx
  • docs-v2/pages/rest-api/index.mdx
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs-v2/vercel.json (1)

280-284: Consider checking for additional related paths.

Since this is part of updating references to accounts APIs, we should verify if there are other documentation paths related to connected accounts that might need similar redirects.

✅ Verification successful

No additional redirects needed for connected accounts paths

Based on the search results, the only documentation paths containing "connected-accounts" are:

  • /docs/connected-accounts/api (which is being redirected in this change)
  • /docs/connected-accounts/oauth-clients (which has its own redirect)

All other references to connected accounts in the documentation use the newer /connected-accounts path format (without the /docs prefix), so no additional redirects are needed.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find other potential paths that might need updates

# Look for files/paths containing "connected-accounts"
fd "connected-accounts" 

# Look for content mentioning "connected accounts" that might need updating
rg -i "connected.?accounts?" --type=mdx

Length of output: 127


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for files with connected accounts references using ripgrep
# Including common documentation file extensions
rg -i "connected.?accounts?" -g "*.md" -g "*.mdx" -g "*.json" -g "*.js" -g "*.jsx" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"

# List all files in the docs directory that might be documentation
fd . "docs-v2" -e md -e mdx -e json

# Specifically check vercel.json for all redirects related to accounts
rg "/docs/connected-accounts|/docs/connect" docs-v2/vercel.json

Length of output: 65751

Comment on lines +280 to 284
},
{
"source": "/docs/connected-accounts/api",
"destination": "/docs/connect/api#accounts"
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Redirect path verified and remaining references found

The destination path /docs/connect/api#accounts exists in docs-v2/pages/connect/api.mdx, and the content includes a comprehensive API reference with an "Accounts" section. However, there are two remaining references to the old path that need to be updated:

  • docs-v2/pages/rest-api/index.mdx
  • docs-v2/pages/connected-accounts/index.mdx
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify the destination path exists.

The redirect looks good, but let's ensure the destination path /docs/connect/api#accounts exists and contains the relevant content from the deleted documentation file.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the destination path and related files

# Check if the destination file exists (without the #accounts anchor)
fd -t f "api.mdx" -p "docs-v2/pages/connect/"

# Look for any remaining references to the old path
rg -i "connected-accounts/api" --type=mdx

Length of output: 143


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the destination file exists and look for the 'accounts' section
rg -l "accounts" docs-v2/pages/connect/api.mdx

# Look for any remaining references to connected-accounts, without file type restriction
rg -i "connected-accounts/api"

# Check the content of the API documentation to verify the accounts section
cat docs-v2/pages/connect/api.mdx

Length of output: 64090

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
docs-v2/pages/rest-api/index.mdx (3)

Line range hint 13-27: Consider adding authentication comparison examples.

While the authentication section clearly explains the distinction between OAuth and User API keys, it would be helpful to add code examples showing both authentication methods side by side. This would make it easier for users to understand the practical differences.

Consider adding these examples:

+ // OAuth authentication (recommended)
+ curl https://api.pipedream.com/v1/accounts \
+   -H "Authorization: Bearer <oauth_token>"
+
+ // User API key authentication
+ curl https://api.pipedream.com/v1/accounts?org_id=o_abc123 \
+   -H "Authorization: Bearer <user_api_key>"
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~230-~230: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...al credentials (API key or OAuth access token for example). #### Endpoint ``` GET /...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)


230-230: Improve sentence structure and punctuation.

The current sentence could be clearer and is missing a comma before the parenthetical example.

Apply this change:

- By default, this route returns metadata for a specific connected account. Set `include_credentials=true` to return credentials that you can use in any app where you need the actual credentials (API key or OAuth access token for example).
+ By default, this route returns metadata for a specific connected account. Set `include_credentials=true` to return credentials (such as API keys or OAuth access tokens) that you can use in your apps.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~230-~230: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...al credentials (API key or OAuth access token for example). #### Endpoint ``` GET /...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)


Line range hint 147-156: Enhance error handling documentation.

The errors section could be more helpful by including specific examples of common error scenarios and their corresponding responses.

Consider adding examples like:

+ #### Common Error Scenarios
+ 
+ ```json
+ // 400 Bad Request - Missing required parameter
+ {
+   "error": {
+     "message": "org_id is required when using user API keys",
+     "code": "BadRequest"
+   }
+ }
+ 
+ // 401 Unauthorized - Invalid credentials
+ {
+   "error": {
+     "message": "Invalid authentication credentials",
+     "code": "Unauthorized"
+   }
+ }
+ 
+ // 403 Forbidden - Insufficient permissions
+ {
+   "error": {
+     "message": "You don't have permission to access this resource",
+     "code": "Forbidden"
+   }
+ }
+ ```
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~230-~230: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...al credentials (API key or OAuth access token for example). #### Endpoint ``` GET /...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9675ba4 and f5d8cac.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs-v2/pages/connected-accounts/index.mdx (1 hunks)
  • docs-v2/pages/rest-api/index.mdx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs-v2/pages/rest-api/index.mdx

[uncategorized] ~230-~230: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...al credentials (API key or OAuth access token for example). #### Endpoint ``` GET /...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
docs-v2/pages/connected-accounts/index.mdx (2)

41-43: LGTM! Clear distinction between personal and customer accounts.

The added callout effectively clarifies the scope of this documentation section and provides appropriate cross-referencing to the Connect documentation.


41-43: Verify the Connect documentation link.

Let's ensure the referenced /connect documentation path is valid and accessible.

✅ Verification successful

The Connect documentation link is valid and correctly referenced

The link to /connect is valid as:

  1. The Connect documentation exists at docs-v2/pages/connect/index.mdx
  2. The Next.js configuration shows a basePath: "/docs", which means the MDX file will be accessible at /docs/connect
  3. The content of the Connect documentation matches the context, as it describes Pipedream Connect functionality for customer integrations
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the referenced Connect documentation exists and is accessible

# Check if the Connect documentation file exists
fd -t f "index.mdx" docs-v2/pages/connect/

# Check for any references to this path in vercel.json redirects
if [ -f "vercel.json" ]; then
  jq '.redirects[] | select(.source == "/docs/connect" or .destination | contains("/connect"))' vercel.json
fi

Length of output: 316


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the content and existence of the Connect documentation
# First, check if the file exists and show its content
if [ -f "docs-v2/pages/connect/index.mdx" ]; then
    echo "=== Content of Connect documentation ==="
    head -n 20 docs-v2/pages/connect/index.mdx
fi

# Also check if there are any other files that might contain relevant routing information
echo -e "\n=== Checking for Next.js configuration files ==="
fd -t f "next.config" -x head -n 20 {}

Length of output: 2591

@dannyroosevelt dannyroosevelt merged commit 50adb89 into master Dec 13, 2024
8 checks passed
@dannyroosevelt dannyroosevelt deleted the danny/connected-accounts-docs-patch branch December 13, 2024 23:57
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 17, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Feb 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant