[Components] pingone - WIP #15068
[Components] pingone - WIP #15068
Conversation
jcortes
added
action
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ |
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces comprehensive support for PingOne API integration, adding new modules for user management actions and webhook event sources. The changes include creating and updating users, managing user assignments to applications, and implementing instant event sources for user-related activities. The implementation leverages a modular approach with common utilities and constants, providing a flexible framework for interacting with the PingOne platform. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (11)
components/pingone/pingone.app.mjs (4)
38-46: Consider robust error handling for the listLanguages response
When you destructurelanguagesandnextfrom_embeddedand_links, an unexpected payload structure could cause errors. Consider adding safety checks or error handling to manage cases where_embeddedorlanguagesis missing from the response.
60-86: Prevent repeated logic in async options
TheuserIdproperty’soptionsmethod largely mirrors the same pattern aslocalesandapplicationId. Consider extracting a common function to fetch the data and handle pagination. This DRY approach can simplify maintenance.
144-153: Centralize and bubble up error messages
The_makeRequestmethod does not explicitly handle API errors (e.g., non-2xx responses). Consider enhancing it to catch and throw meaningful error messages. This will give clearer feedback when API calls fail.
172-188: Efficient data retrieval strategy
listUsers,listApplications, andlistLanguagesrely on streaming or paginated data but do not handle pagination by default. If you plan to retrieve large datasets, incorporate a mechanism to continue fetching data until all results are retrieved.components/pingone/sources/new-user-created-instant/new-user-created-instant.mjs (2)
14-24: Configurable subscription data
getSubscriptionData()filters forUSER_CREATED. Consider exposing additional filters (e.g., organizational unit, user attributes, etc.) if you need more refined event scoping in the future.
25-33: Enrich metadata
IngenerateMeta(), you only provide minimal metadata: an ID, summary, and timestamp. For debugging or display, consider adding further contextual information like the user ID or other relevant attributes from the event.components/pingone/sources/new-user-assigned-to-app-instant/new-user-assigned-to-app-instant.mjs (2)
14-27: Consider actions beyond OAUTH_CONSENT_ACCEPTED
Currently,getSubscriptionData()focuses onevents.OAUTH_CONSENT_ACCEPTED. If you want to capture all user-to-app assignments (not just OAuth permission grants), confirm this action type covers every scenario.
28-35: Add more details to meta
Similar to the other event sources,generateMeta()only includes minimal details. Adding user/application IDs would help correlate these events with other system logs or triggers.components/pingone/actions/update-user/update-user.mjs (2)
56-63: Partial vs. full updates
UsingPATCHgenerally allows partial updates. Ensure any fields omitted are not cleared unintentionally by the PingOne API.
90-92: Success message clarity
You export a success summary, “Successfully updated user.”. Consider including the updated user’s ID or other identifying info in the summary to quickly confirm which user was updated.components/pingone/sources/common/events.mjs (1)
1-340: Extensive enumeration of event constants.
Having a large constants object can be a good way to centralize references. Consider structuring them in smaller groups or converting them into dedicated modules if they continue to grow, preserving clarity and maintainability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
components/pingone/actions/create-user/create-user.mjs(1 hunks)components/pingone/actions/update-user/update-user.mjs(1 hunks)components/pingone/common/constants.mjs(1 hunks)components/pingone/pingone.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/pingone/sources/common/events.mjs(1 hunks)components/pingone/sources/common/webhook.mjs(1 hunks)components/pingone/sources/new-user-assigned-to-app-instant/new-user-assigned-to-app-instant.mjs(1 hunks)components/pingone/sources/new-user-created-instant/new-user-created-instant.mjs(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/pingone/common/constants.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (12)
components/pingone/pingone.app.mjs (1)
134-143: Validate environment ID usage
getUrl constructs the API endpoint using this.$auth.environment_id. Ensure the environment ID is always provided and valid; missing or malformed environment IDs could break all requests.
components/pingone/sources/new-user-created-instant/new-user-created-instant.mjs (1)
1-3: Modular import structure
You import both common and events from similar directories. Validate that they do not introduce circular dependencies. So far, it looks fine, but keep an eye on overall dependency structure.
components/pingone/sources/new-user-assigned-to-app-instant/new-user-assigned-to-app-instant.mjs (1)
1-2: Event naming clarity
You name the event “New User Assigned to Application,” but the subscription data references “New Login Activity.” Validate that these strings accurately reflect the user-assignment scenario to avoid confusion.
components/pingone/actions/create-user/create-user.mjs (4)
1-2: Check references to pingone.app.mjs
You import app from "../../pingone.app.mjs". Verify that all property definitions align with the fields your “Create User” action expects (e.g., username, email, etc.), ensuring no mismatch.
41-46: Evaluate array handling
locales is an array of strings. The downstream PingOne API might expect a particular format (e.g., a nested object). Confirm that locales is properly accepted if stored as an array.
49-54: Leverage uniform methods across actions
createUser uses this.app.post(...), and other actions use updateUser, etc. This is a good pattern for consistency. Just ensure that the request body and error handling remain consistent across all actions.
70-78: Optional fields
The data object includes optional fields like email, department, and locales. Verify if the PingOne API can handle partially empty payloads without issues, or if you need to exclude null fields.
components/pingone/actions/update-user/update-user.mjs (2)
1-2: Validate user references
You import app from "../../pingone.app.mjs". Confirm that userId and other user props are in sync with the definitions in pingone.app.mjs.
70-87: Warn on required attributes
username is marked as non-optional. Validate that it always exists in the request body. If missing, the PingOne API might respond with an error.
components/pingone/sources/common/webhook.mjs (3)
1-4: Good use of the ConfigurationError import.
You’re properly importing ConfigurationError from @pipedream/platform and referencing the shared app and constants modules.
5-10: Props declaration looks consistent.
Declaring db and http as props aligns well with the Pipedream approach, ensuring these dependencies can be readily injected as needed.
78-85: Consider adding security or signature validation in run().
Responding 200 to all incoming requests without verifying their authenticity could be a security risk. Evaluate whether PingOne webhook payloads need signature checking, or at least a token check.
Would you like me to propose a sample approach for verifying event authenticity?
| import { axios } from "@pipedream/platform"; | ||
| import constants from "./common/constants.mjs"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure safe handling of sensitive data in debug logs
Setting debug: true in _makeRequest() (line 149) could potentially log sensitive information. Make sure no confidential data (like OAuth tokens or user PII) is exposed in the logs.
| hooks: { | ||
| async activate() { | ||
| const { | ||
| createSubscription, | ||
| http: { endpoint: url }, | ||
| setSubscriptionId, | ||
| getSubscriptionData, | ||
| } = this; | ||
|
|
||
| const response = | ||
| await createSubscription({ | ||
| data: { | ||
| enabled: true, | ||
| httpEndpoint: { | ||
| url, | ||
| }, | ||
| ...getSubscriptionData(), | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| setSubscriptionId(response.id); | ||
| }, | ||
| async deactivate() { | ||
| const { | ||
| deleteSubscription, | ||
| getSubscriptionId, | ||
| } = this; | ||
|
|
||
| const webhookId = getSubscriptionId(); | ||
| if (webhookId) { | ||
| await deleteSubscription({ | ||
| webhookId, | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential runtime error due to unimplemented getSubscriptionData().
In activate(), you spread the return value of getSubscriptionData(), but that method currently throws a ConfigurationError. If any code path relies on activate(), this will cause a runtime error.
async activate() {
const {
...
getSubscriptionData,
} = this;
const response = await createSubscription({
data: {
enabled: true,
httpEndpoint: { url },
- ...getSubscriptionData(),
+ // Provide sensible fallback or implement getSubscriptionData()
},
});
setSubscriptionId(response.id);
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| methods: { | ||
| setSubscriptionId(value) { | ||
| this.db.set(constants.SUBSCRIPTION_ID, value); | ||
| }, | ||
| getSubscriptionId() { | ||
| return this.db.get(constants.SUBSCRIPTION_ID); | ||
| }, | ||
| generateMeta() { | ||
| throw new ConfigurationError("generateMeta is not implemented"); | ||
| }, | ||
| getSubscriptionData() { | ||
| throw new ConfigurationError("getSubscriptionData is not implemented"); | ||
| }, | ||
| processResource(resource) { | ||
| this.$emit(resource, this.generateMeta(resource)); | ||
| }, | ||
| createSubscription(args = {}) { | ||
| return this.app.post({ | ||
| path: "/subscriptions", | ||
| ...args, | ||
| }); | ||
| }, | ||
| deleteSubscription({ | ||
| subscriptionId, ...args | ||
| } = {}) { | ||
| return this.app.delete({ | ||
| path: `/subscriptions/${subscriptionId}`, | ||
| ...args, | ||
| }); | ||
| }, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Inconsistent usage of subscription vs. webhook IDs.
deleteSubscription() destructures { subscriptionId } from the object, while in deactivate() you pass { webhookId }. This mismatch could lead to a silent failure. Rename or fix either the key passed to deleteSubscription or the destructured parameter.
async deactivate() {
const {
deleteSubscription,
getSubscriptionId,
} = this;
const webhookId = getSubscriptionId();
if (webhookId) {
- await deleteSubscription({
- webhookId,
- });
+ await deleteSubscription({
+ subscriptionId: webhookId,
+ });
}
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| methods: { | |
| setSubscriptionId(value) { | |
| this.db.set(constants.SUBSCRIPTION_ID, value); | |
| }, | |
| getSubscriptionId() { | |
| return this.db.get(constants.SUBSCRIPTION_ID); | |
| }, | |
| generateMeta() { | |
| throw new ConfigurationError("generateMeta is not implemented"); | |
| }, | |
| getSubscriptionData() { | |
| throw new ConfigurationError("getSubscriptionData is not implemented"); | |
| }, | |
| processResource(resource) { | |
| this.$emit(resource, this.generateMeta(resource)); | |
| }, | |
| createSubscription(args = {}) { | |
| return this.app.post({ | |
| path: "/subscriptions", | |
| ...args, | |
| }); | |
| }, | |
| deleteSubscription({ | |
| subscriptionId, ...args | |
| } = {}) { | |
| return this.app.delete({ | |
| path: `/subscriptions/${subscriptionId}`, | |
| ...args, | |
| }); | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| methods: { | |
| setSubscriptionId(value) { | |
| this.db.set(constants.SUBSCRIPTION_ID, value); | |
| }, | |
| getSubscriptionId() { | |
| return this.db.get(constants.SUBSCRIPTION_ID); | |
| }, | |
| generateMeta() { | |
| throw new ConfigurationError("generateMeta is not implemented"); | |
| }, | |
| getSubscriptionData() { | |
| throw new ConfigurationError("getSubscriptionData is not implemented"); | |
| }, | |
| processResource(resource) { | |
| this.$emit(resource, this.generateMeta(resource)); | |
| }, | |
| createSubscription(args = {}) { | |
| return this.app.post({ | |
| path: "/subscriptions", | |
| ...args, | |
| }); | |
| }, | |
| deleteSubscription({ | |
| subscriptionId, ...args | |
| } = {}) { | |
| return this.app.delete({ | |
| path: `/subscriptions/${subscriptionId}`, | |
| ...args, | |
| }); | |
| }, | |
| async deactivate() { | |
| const { | |
| deleteSubscription, | |
| getSubscriptionId, | |
| } = this; | |
| const webhookId = getSubscriptionId(); | |
| if (webhookId) { | |
| await deleteSubscription({ | |
| subscriptionId: webhookId, | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| }, |
WHY
Resolves #14933
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements