-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New Components - change_photos #15107
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@michelle0927 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 20 minutes and 17 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new image transformation module for the change_photos component. The implementation adds a comprehensive Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
components/change_photos/change_photos.app.mjs (1)
11-24: Ensure robust error handling in_makeRequestWhile this method is straightforward, consider adding error handling for HTTP errors or request failures. Adding
try/catchblocks or status code checks can help provide more descriptive error messages to the user.async _makeRequest({ $ = this, path, ...otherOpts }) { - return axios($, { + try { + return await axios($, { ...otherOpts, url: `${this._baseUrl()}${path}`, headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${this.$auth.api_key}`, }, debug: true, }); + } catch (err) { + throw new Error(`Request to ${path} failed: ${err.message}`); + } }components/change_photos/actions/transform-image/transform-image.mjs (1)
4-10: Action definition is comprehensiveThe key, name, and description accurately reflect the action’s purpose. This promotes clarity for users. Consider adding more context about image transformation capabilities right in the description if needed.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
components/change_photos/actions/transform-image/transform-image.mjs(1 hunks)components/change_photos/change_photos.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/change_photos/package.json(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
components/change_photos/change_photos.app.mjs (3)
1-1: Use named imports sparingly if only one function is imported
Since you only import axios from "@pipedream/platform", consider using a default import if it simplifies your code or referencing your usage context. Current usage is fine, but keep in mind that named imports are best used for more complex imports or multiple exports.
8-10: Good job encapsulating the base URL
Defining _baseUrl() promotes clarity and maintainability. If multiple endpoints are introduced in the future, consider centralizing environment-dependent logic (e.g., dev vs. production) in this method.
25-30: transformImage method design is concise
The transformImage method neatly delegates to _makeRequest, keeping the code focused and readable. Consider documenting supported fields within JSDoc or code comments to ensure future maintainers understand the required structure of opts.
components/change_photos/actions/transform-image/transform-image.mjs (4)
1-3: Imports are well-organized
Importing the app and ConfigurationError at the start helps keep dependencies clear. Good job!
11-118: Param props effectively cover transformation options
The optional props (width, height, flip, flop, etc.) give end users granular control over image transformations. Ensure that the documentation or user-facing interface clearly explains each prop and its valid values. Great coverage of potential transformations!
120-126: Clear validation for RGB tint configuration
Checking that all components are set if any are specified helps avoid incomplete configurations. This is a solid approach to error handling, providing immediate feedback to the user.
128-154: Comprehensive request data construction
This chunk effectively aggregates user-provided config into a request body. Be sure to confirm that back-end services accept null or skipped properties gracefully for optional parameters.
components/change_photos/package.json (2)
3-3: Incrementing version to 0.1.0 is appropriate
This change is consistent with introducing new functionality. Make sure to publish these changes to match the new semver release.
14-16: Added dependency on @pipedream/platform
This indicates the new code relies on @pipedream/platform. Validate that version ^3.0.3 is compatible with your usage (axios and other features).
Also applies to: 18-18
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate another script to check the actual usage of this package in the codebase.
Let me check one more thing to see how this package is being used in the codebase.
@pipedream/platform dependency is correctly used and compatible
The package is being used appropriately in the component:
- Used for making HTTP requests via
axiosinchange_photos.app.mjs - Used for error handling via
ConfigurationErrorintransform-image.mjs - Version
^3.0.3is compatible with these use cases as they are core features maintained across versions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Checking usage of @pipedream/platform across entire codebase
fd -t f | xargs grep -i '@pipedream/platform'
Length of output: 66275
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for actual imports and usage of @pipedream/platform
rg -l "from \"@pipedream/platform\"" --type ts --type js
Length of output: 5319
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check actual usage of @pipedream/platform in the components directory
rg -A 5 "from \"@pipedream/platform\"" components/change_photos/
Length of output: 1169
Resolves #15095.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Chores