Skip to content

Conversation

@lcaresia
Copy link
Collaborator

@lcaresia lcaresia commented Jan 23, 2025

WHY

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added general web scraping extraction functionality using ScrapingAnt.
    • Introduced configurable scraping parameters like URL, browser settings, proxy options, and resource blocking.
    • Added new methods for making API requests.
  • Improvements

    • Enhanced scraping application with more flexible configuration options.
    • Added support for customizable web page extraction methods.
    • Introduced a comprehensive list of proxy countries and types for easier reference.
  • Version Update

    • Upgraded package version from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0.

@lcaresia lcaresia self-assigned this Jan 23, 2025
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 23, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 6, 2025 11:37am
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 6, 2025 11:37am
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 6, 2025 11:37am

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a new ScrapingAnt component for web scraping in Pipedream. The changes include creating a new general extraction action, adding constants for proxy and resource types, and enhancing the ScrapingAnt application module with new configuration properties and methods. The package version has been updated to reflect these significant additions, providing a structured approach to configuring and executing web scraping tasks.

Changes

File Change Summary
components/scrapingant/actions/general-extraction/general-extraction.mjs New module for general web scraping extraction action
components/scrapingant/common/constants.mjs Added constants for proxy countries, proxy types, and resource types
components/scrapingant/package.json Updated version to 0.1.0 and added @pipedream/platform dependency
components/scrapingant/scrapingant.app.mjs Added multiple configuration properties, new methods for API requests, and removed authKeys method

Possibly related PRs

  • [Components] identitycheck #12173 #12273: The changes in the main PR are related to the modifications in the propDefinitions and methods for making API requests, which are similarly structured in the retrieved PR's identitycheck.app.mjs.
  • New Components - zenscrape #15467: The changes in the main PR for ScrapingAnt's general extraction module are related to the modifications in the retrieved PR for Zenscrape, as both introduce new modules with similar structures for defining actions and handling API requests.
  • New Components - scrapegraphai #15106: The changes in the main PR for the ScrapingAnt module are related to the new properties and methods introduced for web scraping configuration, which align with the enhancements made in the retrieved PR for the ScrapeGraphAI module.

Suggested labels

ai-assisted, action

Suggested reviewers

  • jcortes

Poem

🐰 A Scraping Rabbit's Delight
With proxies and browsers so bright,
Our data extraction takes flight,
ScrapingAnt's magic unfurled,
Extracting secrets from the web world!
Hop, hop, hooray for insight! 🕷️🔍

Tip

🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
  • We have enabled web search-based reviews and chat for all users. This feature allows CodeRabbit to access the latest documentation and information on the web.
  • You can disable this feature by setting web_search: false in the knowledge_base settings.
  • Please share any feedback in the Discord discussion.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e6dc0d0 and dbda1e9.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/scrapingant/actions/general-extraction/general-extraction.mjs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • components/scrapingant/actions/general-extraction/general-extraction.mjs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@lcaresia lcaresia linked an issue Jan 23, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
components/scrapingant/actions/general-extraction/general-extraction.mjs (1)

4-8: Version number should start at 0.1.0 for new components

The version is set to "0.0.1" but as this is a new component with complete functionality, it should start at 0.1.0 to align with semantic versioning practices.

-  version: "0.0.1",
+  version: "0.1.0",
components/scrapingant/common/constants.mjs (1)

110-163: Add documentation links for resource types

The resource types should include references to the Puppeteer/Chrome DevTools Protocol documentation for better understanding of each type's purpose.

   RESOURCE_TYPES: [
+    // See: https://pptr.dev/api/puppeteer.resourcetype
     {
       label: "Document",
       value: "document",
     },
components/scrapingant/scrapingant.app.mjs (1)

65-67: Consider making the base URL configurable

The API endpoint should be configurable to support different environments (e.g., staging, production) and potential future changes.

   _baseUrl() {
-    return "https://api.scrapingant.com/v2";
+    return this.$auth.base_url || "https://api.scrapingant.com/v2";
   },
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 29c0273 and 67f0132.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • components/scrapingant/actions/general-extraction/general-extraction.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/scrapingant/common/constants.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/scrapingant/package.json (2 hunks)
  • components/scrapingant/scrapingant.app.mjs (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: pnpm publish
  • GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/scrapingant/common/constants.mjs (1)

2-99: Consider adding ISO code validation for proxy countries

The proxy countries list should be validated against ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country codes to ensure accuracy. Also, consider sorting the countries alphabetically for better maintainability.

✅ Verification successful

Country codes are valid and well-organized

All country codes in the PROXY_COUNTRIES constant are valid ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 codes. The current organization of the list is logical and maintainable.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify country codes against ISO standard
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lukes/ISO-3166-Countries-with-Regional-Codes/master/slim-2/slim-2.json | \
  jq -r '.[] | select(.["alpha-2"] | IN("BR","CA","CN","CZ","FR","DE","HK","IN","ID","IT","IL","JP","NL","PL","RU","SA","SG","KR","ES","GB","AE","US","VN")) | .["alpha-2"]' | \
  sort | uniq -c | grep -v "      1"

Length of output: 324

components/scrapingant/package.json (1)

15-17: Verify compatibility with @pipedream/platform version

The specified version range for @pipedream/platform should be tested for compatibility.

✅ Verification successful

@pipedream/platform dependency version is appropriate

The specified version ^3.0.3 is using the latest available 3.0.x release and follows proper semver practices.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check latest version and compatibility
npm info @pipedream/platform versions --json | jq -r '.[] | select(startswith("3.0"))' | sort -V

Length of output: 122

Copy link
Collaborator

@GTFalcao GTFalcao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I left a few improvement suggestions here

Copy link
Collaborator

@GTFalcao GTFalcao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks almost good to go, moving it to QA, there's just one more syntax improvement I commented on.

@lcaresia
Copy link
Collaborator Author

lcaresia commented Feb 5, 2025

/approve

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
components/scrapingant/scrapingant.app.mjs (1)

7-64: Improve prop descriptions and options.

The prop definitions are well-structured but could benefit from more concise descriptions and better use of options.

Apply these improvements:

     blockResource: {
       type: "string[]",
       label: "Block Resource",
-      description: "Prevents cloud browser from loading specified resource types",
+      description: "Prevents cloud browser from loading the specified resource types",
       options: constants.RESOURCE_TYPES,
       optional: true,
     },
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 369e83d and e6dc0d0.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • components/scrapingant/actions/general-extraction/general-extraction.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/scrapingant/common/constants.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/scrapingant/scrapingant.app.mjs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • components/scrapingant/common/constants.mjs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: pnpm publish
  • GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (5)
components/scrapingant/actions/general-extraction/general-extraction.mjs (3)

3-72: LGTM! Well-structured component definition.

The component metadata and props are well-defined with appropriate documentation links and proper handling of browser-dependent properties.


90-107: Add error handling and improve summary message.

The run method needs:

  1. Error handling for API calls
  2. A more informative summary message including the scraped URL

Apply this diff to improve the code:

   async run({ $ }) {
+    try {
       const response = await this.app.generalExtraction({
         $,
         params: {
           url: this.url,
           browser: this.browser,
           return_page_source: this.returnPageSource,
           cookies: this.cookies,
           js_snippet: this.jsSnippet,
           proxy_type: this.proxyType,
           proxy_country: this.proxyCountry,
           wait_for_selector: this.waitForSelector,
           block_resource: this.blockResource,
         },
       });
 
-      $.export("$summary", "Successfully sent the request to ScrapingAnt");
+      $.export("$summary", `Successfully scraped ${this.url}`);
 
       return response;
+    } catch (error) {
+      throw new Error(`Failed to scrape URL: ${error.message}`);
+    }
   },

73-88: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consolidate duplicate conditions and remove unused object.

The code can be simplified by:

  1. Consolidating the three identical browser checks into one.
  2. Removing the unused props object.

Apply this diff to improve the code:

   async additionalProps(existingProps) {
-    const props = {};
     if (this.browser) {
       existingProps.returnPageSource.hidden = false;
       existingProps.returnPageSource.disabled = false;
-    }
-    if (this.browser) {
       existingProps.jsSnippet.hidden = false;
       existingProps.jsSnippet.disabled = false;
-    }
-    if (this.browser) {
       existingProps.blockResource.hidden = false;
       existingProps.blockResource.disabled = false;
     }
-    return props;
+    return {};
   },

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

components/scrapingant/scrapingant.app.mjs (2)

69-84: Enhance error handling in _makeRequest method.

The request method should include timeout configuration and better error handling with specific error types.

Apply this diff to improve the code:

   async _makeRequest(opts = {}) {
     const {
       $ = this,
       path,
       headers,
+      timeout = 30000,
       ...otherOpts
     } = opts;
-    return axios($, {
-      ...otherOpts,
-      url: this._baseUrl() + path,
-      headers: {
-        ...headers,
-        "x-api-key": `${this.$auth.api_token}`,
-      },
-    });
+    try {
+      return await axios($, {
+        ...otherOpts,
+        url: this._baseUrl() + path,
+        headers: {
+          ...headers,
+          "x-api-key": `${this.$auth.api_token}`,
+        },
+        timeout,
+      });
+    } catch (error) {
+      if (error.response?.status === 401) {
+        throw new Error("Invalid API key. Please check your authentication credentials.");
+      }
+      throw error;
+    }
   },

85-90: LGTM! Simple and effective implementation.

The generalExtraction method is well-implemented with proper parameter passing.

@GTFalcao
Copy link
Collaborator

GTFalcao commented Feb 5, 2025

@lcaresia I think the change requested above hasn't been applied yet

@lcaresia
Copy link
Collaborator Author

lcaresia commented Feb 6, 2025

/approve

@GTFalcao GTFalcao merged commit 33a14e3 into master Feb 6, 2025
11 checks passed
@GTFalcao GTFalcao deleted the issue-13316 branch February 6, 2025 18:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Components] scrapingant

3 participants