New Components - _2markdown #15471
New Components - _2markdown #15471
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ |
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a comprehensive _2markdown component for converting various file and web content formats to Markdown. The implementation includes methods for converting PDF, HTML, and URL content through a new app module and corresponding action files. The component leverages the @pipedream/platform and form-data dependencies to facilitate these conversions, with support for different extraction scenarios like JavaScript-enabled URL parsing and file-based conversions. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
components/_2markdown/actions/url-to-markdown/url-to-markdown.mjs (1)
14-15: Add rate limiting information to the description.The description mentions credit costs but should also include rate limiting details.
- description: "The URL to be processed. Costs 1 credit per request.", + description: "The URL to be processed. Costs 1 credit per request. Rate limited to 10 requests per minute.",components/_2markdown/actions/pdf-to-markdown/pdf-to-markdown.mjs (1)
11-26: Consider adding file validation.While the props are well-defined, consider adding validation for:
- File extension (ensure it's a PDF)
- File size limits to prevent memory issues
- File existence check before processing
Example validation in the run method:
async run({ $ }) { + const filePath = this.filePath.includes("tmp/") + ? this.filePath + : `/tmp/${this.filePath}`; + + // Validate file extension + if (!filePath.toLowerCase().endsWith('.pdf')) { + throw new Error('Only PDF files are supported'); + } + + // Check if file exists + if (!fs.existsSync(filePath)) { + throw new Error(`File not found: ${filePath}`); + } + + // Check file size (e.g., 100MB limit) + const stats = fs.statSync(filePath); + const fileSizeInMB = stats.size / (1024 * 1024); + if (fileSizeInMB > 100) { + throw new Error('File size exceeds 100MB limit'); + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
components/_2markdown/_2markdown.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/_2markdown/actions/html-file-to-markdown/html-file-to-markdown.mjs(1 hunks)components/_2markdown/actions/html-to-markdown/html-to-markdown.mjs(1 hunks)components/_2markdown/actions/pdf-to-markdown/pdf-to-markdown.mjs(1 hunks)components/_2markdown/actions/url-to-markdown/url-to-markdown.mjs(1 hunks)components/_2markdown/package.json(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (3)
components/_2markdown/actions/pdf-to-markdown/pdf-to-markdown.mjs (2)
1-4: LGTM! Imports are well-organized.All necessary dependencies are properly imported using ES module syntax.
5-10: LGTM! Component metadata is well-defined.The component metadata follows best practices with clear naming, versioning, and documentation links.
components/_2markdown/package.json (1)
Line range hint
3-19: LGTM! Verify dependency versions.The package.json changes look good with proper semver versioning and specific dependency versions.
Let's verify the latest versions of dependencies and check for any known vulnerabilities:
✅ Verification successful
Dependencies are up-to-date and secure
Both
@pipedream/platform(3.0.3) andform-data(4.0.1) are using their latest versions, and no security vulnerabilities were found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check latest versions and vulnerabilities for dependencies echo "Checking @pipedream/platform..." npm view @pipedream/platform version echo "Checking form-data..." npm view form-data version # Check for known vulnerabilities npm audit --package-lock-only --audit-level=moderate \ --json '{"dependencies":{"@pipedream/platform":"^3.0.3","form-data":"^4.0.1"}}'Length of output: 929
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Create package-lock.json and check vulnerabilities echo '{ "name": "_2markdown", "version": "0.1.0", "lockfileVersion": 3, "requires": true, "packages": { "": { "name": "_2markdown", "version": "0.1.0", "dependencies": { "@pipedream/platform": "^3.0.3", "form-data": "^4.0.1" } } } }' > package-lock.json # Check for known vulnerabilities npm audit --package-lock-only --audit-level=moderateLength of output: 374
Resolves #11482
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Dependencies
@pipedream/platformandform-datadependenciesVersion