-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
Add getEnvironment to BaseClient #15488
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add getEnvironment to BaseClient #15488
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@bzwrk has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 15 minutes and 37 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new public method Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
packages/sdk/jest.config.js(1 hunks)packages/sdk/src/server/__tests__/server.test.ts(2 hunks)packages/sdk/src/server/index.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 ESLint
packages/sdk/src/server/__tests__/server.test.ts
[error] 731-731: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
(@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any)
[error] 731-731: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
(@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any)
[error] 731-731: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
(@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any)
[error] 732-732: A linebreak is required after '['.
(array-bracket-newline)
[error] 732-732: There should be a linebreak after this element.
(array-element-newline)
[error] 732-732: A linebreak is required before ']'.
(array-bracket-newline)
[error] 733-733: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
(@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any)
[error] 737-737: Empty block statement.
(no-empty)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull Request Checks
packages/sdk/src/server/__tests__/server.test.ts
[error] 54-54: Expected a line break after this opening brace.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/sdk/src/server/index.ts (1)
1-371: Verify the integration with the newgetEnvironmentmethod.The AI summary mentions that this change is part of a broader update that includes adding a new
getEnvironmentmethod to theBaseClientclass. However, this file doesn't show those changes.Let's verify the integration with the new method:
✅ Verification successful
Integration Verified for
getEnvironmentMethod
- The new
getEnvironmentmethod is implemented in the BaseClient (seepackages/sdk/src/shared/index.ts), and its existence is confirmed.- Usage of the method across the codebase (e.g., in
components/dbtandcomponents/postman) confirms its integration.- The
packages/sdk/src/server/index.tsfile correctly inherits from BaseClient and does not require direct modifications for this change.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and usage of the new getEnvironment method # Test 1: Check if BaseClient has the new getEnvironment method echo "Checking BaseClient implementation..." ast-grep --pattern 'class BaseClient { $$$ getEnvironment() { $$$ } $$$ }' # Test 2: Check if the method is being used in the codebase echo "Checking method usage..." rg "getEnvironment" -A 3Length of output: 2598
🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 202-202: Expected a line break after this opening brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 202-202: Expected a line break before this closing brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 224-224: Empty block statement.
(no-empty)
packages/sdk/jest.config.js (1)
17-19: LGTM! Configuration updated to support ES modules.The changes correctly configure Jest to handle TypeScript files as ES modules by:
- Adding
.tsextension toextensionsToTreatAsEsm- Enabling
useESMin the ts-jest configurationAlso applies to: 27-27
packages/sdk/src/server/__tests__/server.test.ts (1)
1-1: LGTM! Import statement added.The import of
jestfrom@jest/globalsis correctly added, following best practices for Jest usage in TypeScript.
| expiresAt: number | ||
| }; | ||
| protected override projectId: string; | ||
| protected override projectId: string = ""; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Reconsider adding a default empty string value for projectId.
The default empty string value for projectId seems unnecessary and potentially problematic because:
projectIdis a required field inBackendClientOpts(line 44)- The constructor always sets it from
opts.projectId(line 158) - An empty
projectIdmight cause issues in API requests
Remove the default value since it's not needed:
- protected override projectId: string = "";
+ protected override projectId: string;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| protected override projectId: string = ""; | |
| protected override projectId: string; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve type safety and error handling.
Several improvements can be made to enhance type safety and error handling:
- Replace
anytypes with specific types - Add error handling for the empty catch block
- Fix array bracket formatting
Apply this diff to improve the code:
- jest.spyOn<any, any, any>(global, "fetch").mockImplementation(jest.fn<typeof fetch>(async (...args: Parameters<typeof fetch>) => {
- const [url, init] = args
+ jest.spyOn(global, "fetch").mockImplementation(jest.fn(async (url: string | URL | Request, init?: RequestInit) => {
let json: any
- if (init?.body && typeof init.body === "string") {
+ if (init?.body && typeof init.body === "string") {
try {
json = JSON.parse(init.body)
- } catch {}
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.warn("Failed to parse request body:", error)
+ }
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| jest.spyOn<any, any, any>(global, "fetch").mockImplementation(jest.fn<typeof fetch>(async (...args: Parameters<typeof fetch>) => { | |
| const [url, init] = args | |
| let json: any | |
| if (init.body && typeof init.body === "string") { | |
| if (init?.body && typeof init.body === "string") { | |
| try { | |
| json = JSON.parse(init.body) | |
| } catch {} | |
| } | |
| if (url instanceof Request) { | |
| throw new Error("not supported") | |
| } | |
| const ifOpts: IfOpts = { | |
| method: init.method || "GET", | |
| url, | |
| headers: init.headers as Record<string, string> || {}, | |
| method: init?.method || "GET", | |
| url: url.toString(), | |
| headers: init?.headers as Record<string, string> || {}, | |
| json, | |
| jest.spyOn(global, "fetch").mockImplementation(jest.fn(async (url: string | URL | Request, init?: RequestInit) => { | |
| let json: any | |
| if (init?.body && typeof init.body === "string") { | |
| try { | |
| json = JSON.parse(init.body) | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.warn("Failed to parse request body:", error) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| if (url instanceof Request) { | |
| throw new Error("not supported") | |
| } | |
| const ifOpts: IfOpts = { | |
| method: init?.method || "GET", | |
| url: url.toString(), | |
| headers: init?.headers as Record<string, string> || {}, | |
| json, |
🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 731-731: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
(@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any)
[error] 731-731: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
(@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any)
[error] 731-731: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
(@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any)
[error] 732-732: A linebreak is required after '['.
(array-bracket-newline)
[error] 732-732: There should be a linebreak after this element.
(array-element-newline)
[error] 732-732: A linebreak is required before ']'.
(array-bracket-newline)
[error] 733-733: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
(@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any)
[error] 737-737: Empty block statement.
(no-empty)
WHY
Summary by CodeRabbit