Skip to content

Conversation

@bzwrk
Copy link
Contributor

@bzwrk bzwrk commented Feb 3, 2025

WHY

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new method to retrieve the current environment settings in the BaseClient.
  • Chores
    • Updated the package version to 1.3.2 for improved package management.
    • Modified the test script for better environment variable handling.
    • Adjusted Jest configuration to enhance TypeScript file processing.
    • Enhanced type safety and error handling in testing utilities.
    • Set a default value for the projectId property in the BackendClient.

@linear
Copy link

linear bot commented Feb 3, 2025

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 3, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 4, 2025 5:44pm
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 4, 2025 5:44pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 4, 2025 5:44pm

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 3, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@bzwrk has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 15 minutes and 37 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9d77584 and 69e1260.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/sdk/src/server/__tests__/server.test.ts (19 hunks)

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new public method getEnvironment to the BaseClient in the SDK, allowing retrieval of the current environment configuration. The package version is updated from 1.3.1 to 1.3.2 in both the changelog and the package configuration. Additionally, modifications are made to the Jest configuration and the setupFetchMock function to enhance type safety and error handling. No other changes or removals have been made.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
packages/sdk/CHANGELOG.md, packages/sdk/src/shared/index.ts Added new getEnvironment method to BaseClient
packages/sdk/package.json Updated version from "1.3.1" to "1.3.2"; modified test script for NODE_OPTIONS
packages/sdk/jest.config.js Removed preset, added extensionsToTreatAsEsm, updated transform for ESM support
packages/sdk/src/server/tests/server.test.ts Updated setupFetchMock for enhanced type safety and error handling
packages/sdk/src/server/index.ts Set default value for projectId in BackendClient to an empty string

Possibly related PRs

  • Require project environment in SDK #14679: The changes in the main PR, which add the getEnvironment method to the BaseClient class, are related to the modifications in the retrieved PR that enhance environment handling in the BackendClient class, as both involve functionality that deals with environment configurations within the SDK.

Suggested labels

enhancement, pd-api, javascript, tracked internally, prioritized

Suggested reviewers

  • jverce

Poem

In a garden of code, I hop with glee,
Unveiling getEnvironment for all to see.
A version bump lifts our spirits high,
As bytes and bugs wave goodbye.
With every line, my heart beats fast—
A rabbit's cheer for changes that last!
🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

jsendo
jsendo previously approved these changes Feb 3, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d0ac161 and 642295e.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • packages/sdk/jest.config.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/sdk/src/server/__tests__/server.test.ts (2 hunks)
  • packages/sdk/src/server/index.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 ESLint
packages/sdk/src/server/__tests__/server.test.ts

[error] 731-731: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

(@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any)


[error] 731-731: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

(@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any)


[error] 731-731: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

(@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any)


[error] 732-732: A linebreak is required after '['.

(array-bracket-newline)


[error] 732-732: There should be a linebreak after this element.

(array-element-newline)


[error] 732-732: A linebreak is required before ']'.

(array-bracket-newline)


[error] 733-733: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

(@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any)


[error] 737-737: Empty block statement.

(no-empty)

🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull Request Checks
packages/sdk/src/server/__tests__/server.test.ts

[error] 54-54: Expected a line break after this opening brace.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: pnpm publish
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/sdk/src/server/index.ts (1)

1-371: Verify the integration with the new getEnvironment method.

The AI summary mentions that this change is part of a broader update that includes adding a new getEnvironment method to the BaseClient class. However, this file doesn't show those changes.

Let's verify the integration with the new method:

✅ Verification successful

Integration Verified for getEnvironment Method

  • The new getEnvironment method is implemented in the BaseClient (see packages/sdk/src/shared/index.ts), and its existence is confirmed.
  • Usage of the method across the codebase (e.g., in components/dbt and components/postman) confirms its integration.
  • The packages/sdk/src/server/index.ts file correctly inherits from BaseClient and does not require direct modifications for this change.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation and usage of the new getEnvironment method

# Test 1: Check if BaseClient has the new getEnvironment method
echo "Checking BaseClient implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class BaseClient {
  $$$
  getEnvironment() {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

# Test 2: Check if the method is being used in the codebase
echo "Checking method usage..."
rg "getEnvironment" -A 3

Length of output: 2598

🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint

[error] 202-202: Expected a line break after this opening brace.

(object-curly-newline)


[error] 202-202: Expected a line break before this closing brace.

(object-curly-newline)


[error] 224-224: Empty block statement.

(no-empty)

packages/sdk/jest.config.js (1)

17-19: LGTM! Configuration updated to support ES modules.

The changes correctly configure Jest to handle TypeScript files as ES modules by:

  1. Adding .ts extension to extensionsToTreatAsEsm
  2. Enabling useESM in the ts-jest configuration

Also applies to: 27-27

packages/sdk/src/server/__tests__/server.test.ts (1)

1-1: LGTM! Import statement added.

The import of jest from @jest/globals is correctly added, following best practices for Jest usage in TypeScript.

expiresAt: number
};
protected override projectId: string;
protected override projectId: string = "";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Reconsider adding a default empty string value for projectId.

The default empty string value for projectId seems unnecessary and potentially problematic because:

  1. projectId is a required field in BackendClientOpts (line 44)
  2. The constructor always sets it from opts.projectId (line 158)
  3. An empty projectId might cause issues in API requests

Remove the default value since it's not needed:

-  protected override projectId: string = "";
+  protected override projectId: string;
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
protected override projectId: string = "";
protected override projectId: string;

Comment on lines 731 to 746
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve type safety and error handling.

Several improvements can be made to enhance type safety and error handling:

  1. Replace any types with specific types
  2. Add error handling for the empty catch block
  3. Fix array bracket formatting

Apply this diff to improve the code:

-    jest.spyOn<any, any, any>(global, "fetch").mockImplementation(jest.fn<typeof fetch>(async (...args: Parameters<typeof fetch>) => {
-      const [url, init] = args
+    jest.spyOn(global, "fetch").mockImplementation(jest.fn(async (url: string | URL | Request, init?: RequestInit) => {
       let json: any
-      if (init?.body && typeof init.body === "string") {
+      if (init?.body && typeof init.body === "string") {
         try {
           json = JSON.parse(init.body)
-        } catch {}
+        } catch (error) {
+          console.warn("Failed to parse request body:", error)
+        }
       }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
jest.spyOn<any, any, any>(global, "fetch").mockImplementation(jest.fn<typeof fetch>(async (...args: Parameters<typeof fetch>) => {
const [url, init] = args
let json: any
if (init.body && typeof init.body === "string") {
if (init?.body && typeof init.body === "string") {
try {
json = JSON.parse(init.body)
} catch {}
}
if (url instanceof Request) {
throw new Error("not supported")
}
const ifOpts: IfOpts = {
method: init.method || "GET",
url,
headers: init.headers as Record<string, string> || {},
method: init?.method || "GET",
url: url.toString(),
headers: init?.headers as Record<string, string> || {},
json,
jest.spyOn(global, "fetch").mockImplementation(jest.fn(async (url: string | URL | Request, init?: RequestInit) => {
let json: any
if (init?.body && typeof init.body === "string") {
try {
json = JSON.parse(init.body)
} catch (error) {
console.warn("Failed to parse request body:", error)
}
}
if (url instanceof Request) {
throw new Error("not supported")
}
const ifOpts: IfOpts = {
method: init?.method || "GET",
url: url.toString(),
headers: init?.headers as Record<string, string> || {},
json,
🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint

[error] 731-731: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

(@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any)


[error] 731-731: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

(@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any)


[error] 731-731: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

(@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any)


[error] 732-732: A linebreak is required after '['.

(array-bracket-newline)


[error] 732-732: There should be a linebreak after this element.

(array-element-newline)


[error] 732-732: A linebreak is required before ']'.

(array-bracket-newline)


[error] 733-733: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

(@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any)


[error] 737-737: Empty block statement.

(no-empty)

@bzwrk bzwrk merged commit d57c8f6 into master Feb 4, 2025
10 checks passed
@bzwrk bzwrk deleted the biz/dj-2857-add-getenvironment-to-sdk-baseclient branch February 4, 2025 17:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants