Skip to content

Conversation

@jcortes
Copy link
Collaborator

@jcortes jcortes commented Feb 19, 2025

WHY

Resolves #15593

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor

    • Simplified the search query input by transitioning from multiple values to a single string for a more straightforward experience.
  • Documentation

    • Enhanced guidance on formulating search queries, now including details on using advanced search parameters.
  • Chores

    • Updated component versions and dependency support to ensure improved compatibility and performance.

@jcortes jcortes added bug Something isn't working action New Action Request labels Feb 19, 2025
@jcortes jcortes self-assigned this Feb 19, 2025
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 19, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 21, 2025 5:26pm
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 21, 2025 5:26pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 21, 2025 5:26pm

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 19, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@jcortes has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 49 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ab7db59 and b0055ef.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • components/serpapi/actions/scrape-search/scrape-search.mjs (2 hunks)
  • components/serpapi/package.json (2 hunks)
  • components/serpapi/serpapi.app.mjs (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

This pull request updates version numbers and refines query parameter handling in the SerpAPI components. It modifies the construction of the data object in the search action—from joining array values to directly assigning a string—and adjusts the boolean conversion for caching. Additionally, the package metadata is updated along with a dependency bump, and the query property definition is simplified from an array to a single string with enhanced documentation.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
components/serpapi/actions/.../scrape-search.mjs, components/serpapi/package.json - Updated version numbers (scrape-search: 0.0.2 → 0.0.3, package: 0.1.1 → 0.1.2)
- In scrape-search.mjs: Modified run method to assign q directly and convert noCache to a string ("true"/"false")
- In package.json: Updated dependency @pipedream/platform from ^3.0.0 to ^3.0.3
components/serpapi/serpapi.app.mjs Changed propDefinitions for q: type altered from an array (string[]) to a single string with an updated description including advanced search query parameters and a reference link

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant SS as ScrapeSearch Action
    participant API as SerpAPI Service

    U->>SS: Initiate search with query & noCache
    SS->>SS: Construct data object
    Note right of SS: Set q as a direct string<br/>Convert noCache to "true"/"false"
    SS->>API: Call scrapeSearch with data
    API-->>SS: Return search results
    SS-->>U: Respond with results
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

ai-assisted

Suggested reviewers

  • GTFalcao
  • lcaresia

Poem

I hopped through lines of updated code,
New versions bloom on every node,
Queries now leap in a single bound,
Boolean strings in clarity found,
A joyful hop in our code garden—so bold!


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Collaborator

@GTFalcao GTFalcao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I left one text suggestion attached, but this can be moved forward

@jcortes jcortes force-pushed the serpapi-fix-no-cache-prop branch from ab7db59 to b0055ef Compare February 21, 2025 17:26
@jcortes
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jcortes commented Feb 21, 2025

/approve

@GTFalcao GTFalcao merged commit 41c3dce into master Feb 21, 2025
11 checks passed
@GTFalcao GTFalcao deleted the serpapi-fix-no-cache-prop branch February 21, 2025 18:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

action New Action Request bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

SerpApi

3 participants