Skip to content

Conversation

@jcortes
Copy link
Collaborator

@jcortes jcortes commented Feb 24, 2025

WHY

Resolves #15703

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced new actions to manage profiles, enabling you to create, update, and delete profiles seamlessly.
    • Launched enhanced browser session management with customizable settings, including options for ad blocking, proxy configuration, and recording.
  • Chores

    • Updated the component version and dependency configuration for improved system reliability.
    • Minor formatting adjustment made to a file for consistency.

@jcortes jcortes self-assigned this Feb 24, 2025
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 24, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 25, 2025 3:07pm
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 25, 2025 3:07pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 25, 2025 3:07pm

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 24, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@jcortes has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 14 minutes and 59 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d5c62e5 and a25b04b.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • components/anchor_browser/actions/create-profile/create-profile.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/anchor_browser/actions/delete-profile/delete-profile.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/anchor_browser/actions/start-browser/start-browser.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/anchor_browser/actions/update-profile/update-profile.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/anchor_browser/anchor_browser.app.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/anchor_browser/package.json (2 hunks)

Walkthrough

This pull request expands the Anchor Browser application by adding new action modules for creating, deleting, updating profiles, and starting a browser session. Each module defines metadata, properties, and a run method that handles API requests (POST, PUT, DELETE) to the appropriate endpoints. Additionally, the main app file is enhanced with expanded property definitions and new modular HTTP methods for API interactions. The package configuration is updated with a version bump and a new dependency.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
components/anchor_browser/actions/(create-profile, delete-profile, start-browser, update-profile).mjs Added new action modules for profile creation, deletion, updating, and browser session start. Each module exports an action object with metadata and implements a run method to perform HTTP requests to the corresponding API endpoints.
components/anchor_browser/…/anchor_browser.app.mjs Expanded property definitions by adding name, description, source, sessionId, and profileName. Refactored methods: removed authKeys and added new API request methods (getUrl, getHeaders, _makeRequest, post, put, delete, listSessions, listProfiles).
components/anchor_browser/package.json Updated version from "0.0.1" to "0.1.0" and added the dependency "@pipedream/platform": "^3.0.3".
components/griptape/griptape.app.mjs Added a newline character at the end of the file for formatting consistency.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant A as Action Module
    participant API as Anchor Browser API

    U->>A: Trigger action (Create/Update/Delete/Start)
    A->>API: Send HTTP request (POST/PUT/DELETE)
    API-->>A: Return response data
    A-->>U: Return summary message
Loading

Suggested labels

action, ai-assisted

Suggested reviewers

  • michelle0927

Poem

I'm a rabbit, quick and bright,
Hopping through code with delight.
Profiles created, sessions begun,
New changes dance in the coding sun.
Each file a leap, each commit a smile—
Cheers to updates that make it all worthwhile!
🐇💻✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (11)
components/anchor_browser/actions/delete-profile/delete-profile.mjs (1)

29-42: Consider adding error handling and validation.

The run method could benefit from additional error handling and validation:

  1. Validate the response status
  2. Handle potential API errors
  3. Include error details in the summary
 async run({ $ }) {
   const {
     deleteProfile,
     profileName,
   } = this;

   const response = await deleteProfile({
     $,
     profileName,
   });

+  if (!response?.success) {
+    throw new Error(`Failed to delete profile: ${response?.error || 'Unknown error'}`);
+  }
+
   $.export("$summary", "Successfully deleted profile.");
   return response;
 },
components/anchor_browser/actions/create-profile/create-profile.mjs (2)

36-42: Consider adding request validation.

The createProfile method could benefit from input validation before making the API request.

 methods: {
   createProfile(args = {}) {
+    const { data } = args;
+    if (!data?.name) {
+      throw new Error('Profile name is required');
+    }
     return this.app.post({
       path: "/profiles",
       ...args,
     });
   },
 },

53-61: Consider adding response validation.

The API response should be validated to ensure the profile was created successfully.

 const response = await createProfile({
   $,
   data: {
     name,
     description,
     source,
     session_id: sessionId,
   },
 });

+if (!response?.id) {
+  throw new Error(`Failed to create profile: ${response?.error || 'Unknown error'}`);
+}
components/anchor_browser/actions/update-profile/update-profile.mjs (2)

37-44: Consider adding request validation.

The updateProfile method could benefit from input validation before making the API request.

 methods: {
   updateProfile({
     profileName, ...args
   } = {}) {
+    if (!profileName) {
+      throw new Error('Profile name is required');
+    }
     return this.app.put({
       path: `/profiles/${encodeURIComponent(profileName)}`,
       ...args,
     });
   },
 },

55-63: Consider adding response validation.

The API response should be validated to ensure the profile was updated successfully.

 const response = await updateProfile({
   $,
   profileName,
   data: {
     description,
     source,
     session_id: sessionId,
   },
 });

+if (!response?.success) {
+  throw new Error(`Failed to update profile: ${response?.error || 'Unknown error'}`);
+}
components/anchor_browser/actions/start-browser/start-browser.mjs (3)

71-76: Consider using integer type for timeout property.

The timeout property is defined as a string type but represents a duration in minutes. Using an integer type would be more appropriate and prevent potential type conversion issues.

-      type: "string",
+      type: "integer",

77-82: Consider using integer type for idleTimeout property.

Similar to the timeout property, the idleTimeout property should use integer type. Additionally, the warning about long-living sessions is good, but consider adding validation to prevent very large values.

-      type: "string",
+      type: "integer",
+      max: 60, // Example: limit to 1 hour

141-142: Enhance the success message with session details.

Consider including the session ID in the success message to help users track their sessions.

-    $.export("$summary", "Successfully started browser session.");
+    $.export("$summary", `Successfully started browser session (ID: ${response.session_id}).`);
components/anchor_browser/anchor_browser.app.mjs (3)

18-26: Consider simplifying the source property.

Since only one option is supported, consider using a constant value instead of an options array until more sources are added.

-      options: [
-        "session",
-      ],
-      default: "session",
+      default: "session",
+      optional: false,

56-64: Consider enhancing error handling in _makeRequest.

The method could benefit from custom error handling to provide more context about API errors.

     _makeRequest({
       $ = this, path, headers, ...args
     } = {}) {
-      return axios($, {
-        ...args,
-        url: this.getUrl(path),
-        headers: this.getHeaders(headers),
-      });
+      return axios($, {
+        ...args,
+        url: this.getUrl(path),
+        headers: this.getHeaders(headers),
+      }).catch((error) => {
+        const status = error.response?.status;
+        const message = error.response?.data?.message || error.message;
+        throw new Error(`API request failed (${status}): ${message}`);
+      });
     },

83-94: Consider adding response validation for list methods.

The methods assume the response data structure but should validate it to prevent runtime errors.

     async listSessions(args = {}) {
-      return this._makeRequest({
+      const response = await this._makeRequest({
         path: "/sessions/active",
         ...args,
       });
+      if (!Array.isArray(response)) {
+        throw new Error('Expected array of sessions');
+      }
+      return response;
     },
     async listProfiles(args = {}) {
-      return this._makeRequest({
+      const response = await this._makeRequest({
         path: "/profiles",
         ...args,
       });
+      if (!response?.data || !Array.isArray(response.data)) {
+        throw new Error('Expected array of profiles in response.data');
+      }
+      return response;
     },
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e49a80d and 219e9f9.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • components/anchor_browser/actions/create-profile/create-profile.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/anchor_browser/actions/delete-profile/delete-profile.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/anchor_browser/actions/start-browser/start-browser.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/anchor_browser/actions/update-profile/update-profile.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/anchor_browser/anchor_browser.app.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/anchor_browser/package.json (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: pnpm publish
  • GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (8)
components/anchor_browser/package.json (2)

3-3: LGTM! Version bump follows semantic versioning.

The version bump from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 correctly reflects the addition of new features.


15-16:

✅ Verification successful

Verify the @pipedream/platform version.

Let's ensure we're using a compatible version of the @pipedream/platform package.


🌐 Web query:

What is the latest version of @pipedream/platform package?

💡 Result:

The latest version of the @pipedream/platform npm package is 3.0.3, as indicated by its npm registry listing last updated on September 16, 2024[9][10]. This package provides typing and runtime type checking for Pipedream's platform globals and includes utilities like axios integration examples[9][10].

Citations:


Verification Successful: The @pipedream/platform package version is current.

The package version in components/anchor_browser/package.json is set to ^3.0.3, which matches the latest version available on npm, as confirmed by the web query.

components/anchor_browser/actions/delete-profile/delete-profile.mjs (2)

4-8: LGTM! Action metadata is well-defined.

The action's key, name, description, version, and type are properly configured. The documentation link provides additional context.


20-27: LGTM! URL encoding is correctly implemented.

The deleteProfile method properly encodes the profile name to handle special characters in URLs.

components/anchor_browser/actions/create-profile/create-profile.mjs (1)

4-8: LGTM! Action metadata is well-defined.

The action's key, name, description, version, and type are properly configured. The documentation link provides additional context.

components/anchor_browser/actions/update-profile/update-profile.mjs (1)

4-8: LGTM! Action metadata is well-defined.

The action's key, name, description, version, and type are properly configured. The documentation link provides additional context.

components/anchor_browser/actions/start-browser/start-browser.mjs (2)

3-8: LGTM! Clear module metadata with documentation link.

The module metadata is well-defined with a descriptive name, clear description, and helpful documentation link.


84-91: LGTM! Clean method implementation.

The startBrowserSession method follows a consistent pattern and properly delegates to the app's POST method.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
components/anchor_browser/anchor_browser.app.mjs (3)

47-64: Consider adding error handling to the _makeRequest method.

The central HTTP request method is well-structured, but it lacks error handling. Consider implementing try/catch blocks to handle potential API errors gracefully.

_makeRequest({
  $ = this, path, headers, ...args
} = {}) {
+  try {
    return axios($, {
      ...args,
      url: this.getUrl(path),
      headers: this.getHeaders(headers),
    });
+  } catch (error) {
+    console.error(`Request failed: ${error.message}`);
+    throw error;
+  }
},

83-94: Add JSDoc comments to data retrieval methods.

The listSessions and listProfiles methods would benefit from JSDoc comments to document their purpose, parameters, and return values for better code maintainability.

+ /**
+  * Retrieves a list of active sessions
+  * @param {Object} args - Additional request parameters
+  * @returns {Promise<Array>} List of active sessions
+  */
listSessions(args = {}) {
  return this._makeRequest({
    path: "/sessions/active",
    ...args,
  });
},

+ /**
+  * Retrieves a list of profiles
+  * @param {Object} args - Additional request parameters
+  * @returns {Promise<Object>} Object containing profiles data
+  */
listProfiles(args = {}) {
  return this._makeRequest({
    path: "/profiles",
    ...args,
  });
},

47-49: Consider extracting the base URL as a constant.

The API base URL is hardcoded in the getUrl method. For better maintainability, consider extracting it as a constant at the top of the file.

import { axios } from "@pipedream/platform";

+const BASE_URL = "https://api.anchorbrowser.io/api";

export default {
  type: "app",
  app: "anchor_browser",
  // ...
  methods: {
    getUrl(path) {
-      return `https://api.anchorbrowser.io/api${path}`;
+      return `${BASE_URL}${path}`;
    },
    // ...
  }
};
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 219e9f9 and d5c62e5.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • components/anchor_browser/actions/create-profile/create-profile.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/anchor_browser/actions/delete-profile/delete-profile.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/anchor_browser/actions/start-browser/start-browser.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/anchor_browser/actions/update-profile/update-profile.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/anchor_browser/anchor_browser.app.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/anchor_browser/package.json (2 hunks)
  • components/griptape/griptape.app.mjs (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • components/griptape/griptape.app.mjs
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
  • components/anchor_browser/package.json
  • components/anchor_browser/actions/delete-profile/delete-profile.mjs
  • components/anchor_browser/actions/start-browser/start-browser.mjs
  • components/anchor_browser/actions/update-profile/update-profile.mjs
  • components/anchor_browser/actions/create-profile/create-profile.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/anchor_browser/anchor_browser.app.mjs (2)

7-44: Well-structured property definitions with good documentation.

The newly added properties are well-defined with appropriate types, labels, and descriptions. The async options for sessionId and profileName provide a good user experience by dynamically fetching available options.


65-82: Good use of method wrapper pattern for HTTP requests.

The implementation of HTTP method wrappers (post, put, delete) is clean and follows a consistent pattern. This approach promotes code reuse and maintainability.

@jcortes jcortes force-pushed the anchor-browser-new-components branch from d5c62e5 to b83e506 Compare February 25, 2025 15:04
@jcortes jcortes force-pushed the anchor-browser-new-components branch from b83e506 to a25b04b Compare February 25, 2025 15:07
@jcortes jcortes merged commit 4bf8df0 into master Feb 26, 2025
11 checks passed
@jcortes jcortes deleted the anchor-browser-new-components branch February 26, 2025 14:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Components] anchor_browser

3 participants