New Components - brillium #15754
New Components - brillium #15754
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several new modules in the Brillium component. New action modules are added for listing assessments, questions, respondent results, respondents, and topics. The core Brillium app is extended with additional property definitions, a suite of API methods (including pagination), and integration functions. Additionally, new source modules are created to emit events for new assessments, topics, questions, respondent results, and respondents, along with a shared base for event processing. Constants and package configurations have also been updated. Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
components/brillium/sources/common/base.mjsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs ✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (13)
components/brillium/actions/list-topics/list-topics.mjs (1)
39-58: Enhance error handling in the catch block.While the implementation is functional, the catch block could be improved to provide more specific error information rather than catching all errors indiscriminately.
Consider enhancing the error handling:
- } catch { + } catch (error) { + console.error("Error retrieving topics:", error); $.export("$summary", "No Topics found");components/brillium/actions/list-respondents/list-respondents.mjs (1)
63-65: Enhance error handling in the catch block.Similar to other modules, the catch block could be improved to provide more specific error information.
Consider enhancing the error handling:
- } catch { + } catch (error) { + console.error("Error retrieving respondents:", error); $.export("$summary", "No Respondents found");components/brillium/actions/list-assessments/list-assessments.mjs (1)
30-49: Implementation works as expected but could improve error handling.The run method correctly implements the list assessments functionality, but the error handling could be enhanced.
Consider improving the error catch block:
- } catch { + } catch (error) { + console.error("Error retrieving assessments:", error); $.export("$summary", "No Assessments found");components/brillium/actions/list-questions/list-questions.mjs (1)
49-75: Consider enhancing error handling while keeping the clean conditional logic.The implementation of the run method is well-structured with clean conditional logic for selecting the appropriate API call. The summary message with proper plural/singular handling is a nice touch.
One suggestion for improvement: the catch block could provide more specific error information rather than a generic "No Questions found" message for all error scenarios. This would make debugging easier if the API encounters authentication issues, rate limits, or other errors.
- } catch { + } catch (error) { + console.log("Error fetching questions:", error); $.export("$summary", "No Questions found"); }components/brillium/actions/list-respondent-results/list-respondent-results.mjs (1)
3-59: Good implementation, but error handling could be improved.The action is well-structured with clear properties and documentation. However, the error handling simply catches all errors without providing details about what went wrong. Consider adding more context to the error summary.
Consider improving the error handling to provide more specific error messages:
- try { - const { Results: results } = await this.brillium.listRespondentResults({ - $, - respondentId: this.respondentId, - params: { - page: this.page, - pagesize: this.pageSize, - }, - }); - if (results?.length) { - $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${results.length} result${results.length === 1 - ? "" - : "s"}`); - } - return results; - } catch { - $.export("$summary", "No Results found"); - } + try { + const { Results: results } = await this.brillium.listRespondentResults({ + $, + respondentId: this.respondentId, + params: { + page: this.page, + pagesize: this.pageSize, + }, + }); + if (results?.length) { + $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${results.length} result${results.length === 1 + ? "" + : "s"}`); + } else { + $.export("$summary", "No results found for the specified respondent"); + } + return results; + } catch (error) { + $.export("$summary", `Error retrieving respondent results: ${error.message}`); + throw error; + }components/brillium/sources/common/base.mjs (1)
28-66: Consider improving error handling in processEvent method.The
processEventmethod currently doesn't have error handling for API calls. If the API request fails, it could cause the entire process to fail without a clear error message.Consider adding try/catch blocks for API interactions:
async processEvent(limit) { const lastTs = this._getLastTs(); let maxTs = lastTs; const resourceFn = this.getResourceFn(); const args = this.getArgs(); const resourceKey = this.getResourceKey(); const tsField = this.getTsField(); + try { const items = this.brillium.paginate({ resourceFn, args, resourceKey, }); let results = []; for await (const item of items) { const ts = Date.parse(item[tsField]); if (ts > lastTs) { results.push(item); maxTs = Math.max(maxTs, ts); } } if (!results.length) { return; } this._setLastTs(maxTs); if (limit) { results = results.slice(-1 * limit); } results.reverse().forEach((item) => { const meta = this.generateMeta(item); this.$emit(item, meta); }); + } catch (error) { + console.error(`Error processing events: ${error.message}`); + throw error; + } },components/brillium/brillium.app.mjs (7)
7-31: Consider adding error logging in theaccountIdproperty.
Theoptions()function returns an empty array silently when an error occurs. Logging or surfacing the error could assist troubleshooting.} catch (err) { - return []; + console.error("Error fetching account options:", err); + return []; }
57-81: Review potential large dataset handling fortopicId.
If there are many topics, you might want to allow for deeper pagination or use your newpaginatemethod to avoid partial results during the property listing.
82-106: Add safety checks for missing fields inrespondentId.
IfFirstNameorLastNameis missing, the label might become a trailing space. Consider a fallback to avoid an empty label.label: (`${firstName || ""} ${lastName || ""}`).trim() || value,
138-143: Log potential errors forlistAccounts.
Currently, no local error handling is present. Consider wrapping_makeRequestin try/catch if partial coverage or fallback is desired.
152-159: Add optionalpageSizeforlistRespondents.
While not strictly necessary, controlling the page size in this method might align it with your other pagination approach.
176-183: Revisit method naming forlistTopics.
Currently, the code references question groups astopics. The naming is okay as long as it’s consistent with your domain.
192-199: Add defensive checks forrespondentIdinlistRespondentResults.
A missing or invalid ID might cause a request failure. Consider returning an error or throwing an exception.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
components/brillium/actions/list-assessments/list-assessments.mjs(1 hunks)components/brillium/actions/list-questions/list-questions.mjs(1 hunks)components/brillium/actions/list-respondent-results/list-respondent-results.mjs(1 hunks)components/brillium/actions/list-respondents/list-respondents.mjs(1 hunks)components/brillium/actions/list-topics/list-topics.mjs(1 hunks)components/brillium/brillium.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/brillium/common/constants.mjs(1 hunks)components/brillium/package.json(2 hunks)components/brillium/sources/common/base.mjs(1 hunks)components/brillium/sources/new-assessment-topic/new-assessment-topic.mjs(1 hunks)components/brillium/sources/new-assessment/new-assessment.mjs(1 hunks)components/brillium/sources/new-question-added/new-question-added.mjs(1 hunks)components/brillium/sources/new-respondent-results/new-respondent-results.mjs(1 hunks)components/brillium/sources/new-respondent/new-respondent.mjs(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/brillium/common/constants.mjs
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull Request Checks
components/brillium/sources/new-respondent-results/new-respondent-results.mjs
[error] 1-1: Component folder name, component file name without extension and component key without slug should be the same! See the docs: https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#folder-structure
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (33)
components/brillium/package.json (2)
3-3: Version bump appropriate for feature additions.The version increase from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 correctly follows semantic versioning for adding new functionality without breaking existing code.
14-16: Dependencies section properly added.Adding the @pipedream/platform dependency is appropriate for supporting the new Brillium components. The version constraint "^3.0.3" allows for compatible updates.
components/brillium/actions/list-topics/list-topics.mjs (3)
3-9: Component metadata looks good.The action is properly configured with a unique key, descriptive name, clear documentation reference, appropriate version, and correct type.
9-38: Props are well structured.Props are correctly defined with proper references to the Brillium app's propDefinitions. The relationship between accountId and assessmentId is handled appropriately.
45-47:❓ Verification inconclusive
Consistent parameter names.
Ensure parameter naming is consistent with the API. Note that "pagesize" is lowercase here, which should be consistent with the API's expected format.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the API expects "pagesize" (lowercase) rather than "pageSize" rg -i "pagesize|page_size" --type js components/brillium/Length of output: 59
API Parameter Naming Verification Required
The code currently sends the query parameter as
"pagesize"(all lowercase) with a value taken fromthis.pageSize. Since our search for similar naming usages in the codebase didn’t yield conclusive evidence of the API's expected format, please verify manually against the API documentation that the lowercase"pagesize"is correct. If the API instead expects"pageSize", update the parameter name accordingly.components/brillium/actions/list-respondents/list-respondents.mjs (4)
3-9: Component metadata looks good.The action is properly configured with a unique key, descriptive name, clear documentation reference, appropriate version, and correct type.
9-39: Props are well structured with optional assessmentId.The props are well defined, with assessmentId correctly marked as optional. The dependency between assessmentId and accountId is properly implemented.
40-66: Conditional API call implementation is elegant.The implementation elegantly handles the conditional choice between listAssessmentRespondents and listRespondents based on the presence of assessmentId.
44-45:❓ Verification inconclusive
Consistent parameter names.
Ensure parameter naming is consistent with the API. Note that "pagesize" is lowercase here, which should be consistent with the API's expected format.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the API expects "pagesize" (lowercase) rather than "pageSize" rg -i "pagesize|page_size" --type js components/brillium/Length of output: 59
Action Required: Confirm API Parameter Naming Consistency
The code currently uses a lowercase key (
pagesize) with a camelCase value (this.pageSize). To ensure consistency with the backend API, please verify whether the API expects the parameter key to be in camelCase (i.e.pageSize) rather than lowercase. Given that our automated search (runningrg -i "pagesize|page_size" --type js components/brillium/) did not produce any conclusive output, a manual verification against the API documentation is recommended.
- File:
components/brillium/actions/list-respondents/list-respondents.mjs- Lines: 44-45
Suggestion: Change topageSize: this.pageSizeif the API requires camelCase.components/brillium/actions/list-assessments/list-assessments.mjs (3)
3-9: Component metadata looks good.The action is properly configured with a unique key, descriptive name, clear documentation reference, appropriate version, and correct type.
9-29: Props are well structured.The props are defined correctly, with proper references to the Brillium app's propDefinitions for accountId, page, and pageSize.
37-38:✅ Verification successful
Consistent parameter names.
Ensure parameter naming is consistent with the API. Note that "pagesize" is lowercase here, which should be consistent with the API's expected format.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the API expects "pagesize" (lowercase) rather than "pageSize" rg -i "pagesize|page_size" --type js components/brillium/Length of output: 59
It looks like the initial grep command didn’t return any results—likely because the
--type jsflag excluded.mjsfiles where the snippet actually resides. To verify the formatting of the parameter in the file, let’s run a new script that explicitly targets.mjsfiles:Once you run this command, please check if the output confirms that the parameter naming (using lowercase "pagesize") is used consistently as intended by the API.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Re-run grep to search for "pagesize:" in .mjs files within the components/brillium folder rg -i "pagesize:" --glob "*.mjs" components/brillium/Length of output: 1090
Parameter Naming Consistency Verified
The grep output confirms that every action file within
components/brillium/is using the lowercase keypagesizeconsistently when constructing the API query parameters. The use of the key in these files is in line with the API’s expected format, so no changes are required.components/brillium/sources/new-assessment/new-assessment.mjs (1)
1-35: Clean implementation of the new assessment source component!The component is well-structured, follows a consistent pattern, and properly implements all necessary methods for tracking new assessments in Brillium.
components/brillium/sources/new-question-added/new-question-added.mjs (2)
52-60: Timestamp handling needs revision for accurate event processing.There are two issues with the timestamp handling:
The
getTsField()method returns "Id" which is unlikely to be a timestamp field - it appears to be an identifier. Using an ID as a timestamp field is problematic.In
generateMeta(), you're usingDate.now()which reflects when the code runs, not when the question was created. This could lead to inaccurate event sequencing.Consider:
- Using a proper timestamp field from the question data (e.g., "DateCreated" like in the assessment source)
- Parsing that field in
generateMeta()withDate.parse(question[this.getTsField()])
35-39: Conditional resource function selection is well implemented.The conditional logic to select either
listTopicQuestionsorlistQuestionsbased on the presence oftopicIdis cleanly implemented.components/brillium/sources/new-respondent-results/new-respondent-results.mjs (1)
25-45: Timestamp handling implementation looks good.The component correctly specifies "DateAnswered" as the timestamp field and properly parses it in the
generateMeta()method. This ensures accurate event ordering and deduplication.components/brillium/actions/list-questions/list-questions.mjs (1)
66-70: Clean implementation of plural/singular handling in the summary message.The conditional construction of the summary message to handle singular vs plural cases is a nice attention to detail that improves the user experience.
components/brillium/sources/new-assessment-topic/new-assessment-topic.mjs (3)
3-47: Overall structure looks good.The source component is well-structured, following the common pattern established in the base module. It correctly implements all required methods and has proper documentation.
33-35:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify the resource key naming.
The method returns "QuestionGroups" as the resource key for topics. Verify that this is the correct API response key for retrieving topics from the Brillium API.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other references to QuestionGroups across the codebase # to ensure consistent usage rg "QuestionGroups" --type jsLength of output: 29
Verify that "QuestionGroups" is indeed the correct API resource key.
The grep search for "QuestionGroups" did not return any additional references, so its usage remains isolated in this file. To ensure we're using the correct key for retrieving topics via the Brillium API, please verify against the API documentation or coordinate with the backend team. You may need to double-check whether the API response key should be "QuestionGroups" or another identifier (for example, "Topics").
- File:
components/brillium/sources/new-assessment-topic/new-assessment-topic.mjs(Lines 33-35)
36-38:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify timestamp field existence.
The method returns "DateCreated" as the timestamp field. Make sure this field exists in the API response for topics.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Look for other references to the DateCreated field to confirm its use rg "DateCreated" --type jsLength of output: 26
Action: Verify "DateCreated" Field in the API Response
- In
components/brillium/sources/new-assessment-topic/new-assessment-topic.mjs(lines 36–38), thegetTsField()method returns"DateCreated"as the timestamp field.- A preliminary search using
rg "DateCreated" --type jsreturned no additional references—likely because the file is a.mjsrather than a.js.- Action required: Please manually verify that the API response for topics includes the
"DateCreated"field to ensure consistency with this code.components/brillium/sources/new-respondent/new-respondent.mjs (3)
3-54: Well-structured component with good flexibility.The source component is well-implemented, with flexible handling based on whether an assessment ID is provided. The conditional logic in both
getResourceFn()andgetArgs()provides good adaptability.
26-30:✅ Verification successful
Verify API method names and availability.
The method conditionally selects between two different API methods. Verify that both
listAssessmentRespondentsandlistRespondentsare defined in the Brillium app module.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check for the implementation of both API methods in the Brillium app rg "listAssessmentRespondents|listRespondents" --type js components/brillium/brillium.app.mjsLength of output: 225
API method names successfully verified. Both
listAssessmentRespondentsandlistRespondentsare confirmed to exist in thecomponents/brillium/brillium.app.mjsfile, so the conditional logic ingetResourceFn()is correctly selecting between available API methods.
43-45:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify timestamp field existence.
The method returns "DateStarted" as the timestamp field. Make sure this field exists in the API response for respondents.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Look for other references to the DateStarted field to confirm its use rg "DateStarted" --type jsLength of output: 26
Verify API Response for "DateStarted" Field
It appears that the previous search did not yield any output—this might be due to the file type filter excluding .mjs files. Please verify that the API returned for respondents actually includes the "DateStarted" field. You can either run the search above or, ideally, manually check the API response to confirm this field’s existence.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Re-run the search for "DateStarted" across all file types, # since .mjs files might not be included in --type js searches. rg "DateStarted"Length of output: 106
API Timestamp Field Verification Needed
- The file
components/brillium/sources/new-respondent/new-respondent.mjscontains thegetTsField()method returning"DateStarted".- Our repository search only confirms the existence of this literal in that file, and we didn't locate additional references that verify the
"DateStarted"field in the API response for respondents.Please manually verify that the API endpoint for respondents actually includes the
"DateStarted"field.components/brillium/sources/common/base.mjs (1)
4-91: Well-designed base module with good abstraction.The base module provides a solid foundation for all Brillium sources with well-defined abstract methods and common functionality. The pagination handling and timestamp tracking for deduplication are well-implemented.
components/brillium/brillium.app.mjs (9)
1-2: No issues with imports.
Imports foraxiosandMAX_PAGE_LIMITlook appropriate.
32-56: Ensure correct usage ofaccountIdin theassessmentIdproperty.
IfaccountIdis not supplied or is invalid, the request may fail. Consider validating thataccountIdis set before callinglistAssessments.
107-120: Validate page size boundaries.
Though the default is 1000, consider validating user input to ensure it’s between 1 and 1000 to avoid unexpected behavior in the upstream API.
123-137: Consolidate base URL.
The_baseUrl()function is straightforward, and_makeRequest()is neatly referencing it. No immediate issues here. Good job standardizing authentication.
144-151: Check permission scope forlistAssessments.
Ensure the API credentials used have permission to list assessments in the requested account.
160-167:listAssessmentRespondentsusage.
The method is consistent with your general approach; just confirm you handle it similarly in your new components that rely on it.
168-175: EnsurelistQuestionsaligns with your question model.
Double-check that the API endpoint and the returned object structure match “Questions” in the response.
184-191: No issues inlistTopicQuestions.
This is consistent with the rest of your approach.
200-230:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify
HasMorefield from the API response.
Ensure the API truly returnsHasMorewith the correct casing. Otherwise, the pagination loop may break.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Attempt to confirm the shape of the API responses for 'HasMore' # We'll assume your local code can be used to see the raw payload # E.g., searching references to 'HasMore' rg "HasMore" -A 5Length of output: 5155
Double-check the API response for the 'HasMore' field casing.
The pagination logic usesresponse.HasMoreto drive the loop. While our search confirms that the code consistently refers toHasMorein this file, please verify against the API documentation (or a live endpoint) that the returned property uses this exact casing. Any discrepancy (for example, if the API returnshasMore) would break the pagination.
components/brillium/sources/new-respondent-results/new-respondent-results.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
components/brillium/sources/common/base.mjs (2)
22-27: Consider storing additional context if events share the same timestamp.If multiple items share the exact same timestamp, a strictly timestamp-based approach can skip certain events or incorrectly overwrite
lastTs. You may want to include a secondary key or an incremental index, to ensure events are always deduplicated and not missed.
28-71: Refine error handling and timestamp parsing.When
item[tsField]is missing or invalid,Date.parsereturnsNaN, causing the loop to skip further logic. Also, consider a dedicated error handling approach beyondconsole.log. Below is an example patch:45 for await (const item of items) { 46 const ts = Date.parse(item[tsField]); 47 if (Number.isNaN(ts)) { + // Log or handle missing/unparsable timestamp + console.warn("Unparsable timestamp in item:", item); + continue; } 48 if (ts > lastTs) { 49 results.push(item); 50 maxTs = Math.max(maxTs, ts); 51 } 52 } 53 } catch (e) { - console.log(`${e.message}`); + this.$emit("error", e); return;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
components/brillium/sources/common/base.mjs(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (5)
components/brillium/sources/common/base.mjs (5)
1-3: All good with the import statements.No concerns noted here.
5-20: Props definition looks consistent.The structure is standard for Pipedream sources, and each prop is succinctly declared. No issues found.
63-66: Verify if data truncation is intended.Using
results.slice(-limit)after gathering all items may cause partial data loss if more thanlimititems appear. If you truly only want the most recent items, this logic is correct. Otherwise, confirm the desired behavior.
72-87: Abstract placeholder methods.Throwing errors is a valid pattern for base classes. Ensure derived classes override them with concrete implementations.
89-96: Deploy hook and run method are well-structured.Calling
processEvent(25)on deploy to limit initial output, then allowing unlimited events on subsequent polls is a reasonable approach for controlling initial event floods.
|
/approve |
Resolves #15726
Resolves #15665
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores