Shopify - Migrate to Updated GraphQL API #15827
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe pull request broadly refactors the Shopify integration. Many action modules now feature updated metadata, restructured property definitions, and new asynchronous run methods while several common modules have been removed. The changes also update versioning and documentation links across actions, constants, and utility modules. The Shopify app’s core has been overhauled to include new GraphQL query/mutation definitions, enhanced error handling via retry logic, and a more modular structure. Finally, various source integrations are rewritten for improved polling, event metadata generation, and incremental data fetching. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User as Action Trigger
participant Action as Action Module (run method)
participant App as Shopify App Instance
participant API as Shopify API
User->>Action: Invoke run method with input properties
Action->>App: Prepare request (build query/mutation, process dynamic props)
App->>API: _makeGraphQlRequest(query, variables)
API-->>App: Return response or error
App-->>Action: Process response (handle errors, construct summary)
Action-->>User: Export summary message
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
Scope: all 2 workspace projects ✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Nitpick comments (73)
components/shopify/actions/get-pages/get-pages.mjs (1)
24-39: Consider adding error handling in the run method.The new async run method looks good overall, properly utilizing the updated GraphQL API through the
getPaginatedmethod. However, there's no explicit error handling for potential API failures.Consider adding try/catch blocks to handle API errors gracefully:
async run({ $ }) { + try { const pages = await this.shopify.getPaginated({ resourceFn: this.shopify.listPages, resourceKeys: [ "pages", ], variables: { reverse: this.reverse, }, max: this.maxResults, }); $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${pages.length} page${pages.length === 1 ? "" : "s"}`); return pages; + } catch (error) { + $.export("$summary", `Failed to retrieve pages: ${error.message}`); + throw error; + } },components/shopify/actions/create-page/create-page.mjs (1)
29-31: Consider enhancing error handling to show all user errorsThe current implementation only shows the first user error if multiple are present. Consider improving the error handling to include all error messages when multiple errors are returned by the API.
- if (response.pageCreate.userErrors.length > 0) { - throw new Error(response.pageCreate.userErrors[0].message); - } + if (response.pageCreate.userErrors.length > 0) { + const errorMessages = response.pageCreate.userErrors + .map(error => error.message) + .join("; "); + throw new Error(`Failed to create page: ${errorMessages}`); + }components/shopify/actions/update-metaobject/update-metaobject.mjs (2)
32-43: Conditional fallback withinadditionalProps.
Catching errors ingetMetaobjectFieldsand defaulting togetTypeFieldsis user-friendly. However, consider logging or surfacing the original error for better debugging.
62-75:getTypeFieldsconsistently defaults new fields tostring.
Similar togetMetaobjectFields, ensure we handle or parse different data types if needed. Otherwise, this approach works for text-based metaobject fields.components/shopify/actions/update-page/update-page.mjs (3)
30-44: Consider conditional inclusion of optional propertiesThe implementation correctly calls the GraphQL API with proper error handling, but could be improved by only including optional properties when they have values.
async run({ $ }) { + const page = {}; + if (this.title !== undefined) page.title = this.title; + if (this.body !== undefined) page.body = this.body; + const response = await this.shopify.updatePage({ id: this.pageId, - page: { - title: this.title, - body: this.body, - }, + page, }); if (response.pageUpdate.userErrors.length > 0) { throw new Error(response.pageUpdate.userErrors[0].message); } $.export("$summary", `Updated page with ID ${response.pageUpdate.page.id}`); return response; },
39-41: Consider improving error handling to display all errorsCurrently only the first error message is shown. Consider displaying all error messages to provide more comprehensive feedback.
if (response.pageUpdate.userErrors.length > 0) { - throw new Error(response.pageUpdate.userErrors[0].message); + const errorMessages = response.pageUpdate.userErrors.map(error => error.message).join(', '); + throw new Error(`Failed to update page: ${errorMessages}`); }
42-43: Consider returning a more focused response objectThe function currently returns the entire API response. It might be more useful to return just the updated page data.
$.export("$summary", `Updated page with ID ${response.pageUpdate.page.id}`); - return response; + return response.pageUpdate.page;components/shopify/actions/create-custom-collection/create-custom-collection.mjs (2)
31-36: Consider validating or sanitizing the image URL
If you expect only valid URLs, you could add a lightweight client-side check or parse logic to handle malformed input (e.g., throwing a user-friendly error).
38-53: Improve JSON parse and user errors handling
- If
this.metafieldsis not valid JSON,utils.parseJsonmay throw. Consider wrappingparseJsonin a try/catch to provide friendlier error messages.- Consider surfacing all user errors rather than just the first (
response.collectionCreate.userErrors[0]) to assist in diagnosing multiple issues.components/shopify/actions/delete-article/delete-article.mjs (1)
27-33: Consider adding error handling to the run method.The new run method implements the article deletion functionality but lacks explicit error handling. Consider adding a try/catch block to handle potential API errors gracefully.
async run({ $ }) { + try { const response = await this.shopify.deleteArticle({ id: this.articleId, }); $.export("$summary", `Deleted article with ID ${this.articleId} from blog with ID ${this.blogId}`); return response; + } catch (error) { + $.export("$summary", `Failed to delete article: ${error.message}`); + throw error; + } },components/shopify/actions/search-products/search-products.mjs (1)
73-120: Query building and filtering logic looks robust.
- Building the
querywith conditional checks fortitle,productIds,collectionId,productType, andvendorimproves search customization.- The exact match vs. partial match approach is thoughtfully separated:
- Exact match applies a fully quoted
title:in the query string.- Partial match filters client-side with JavaScript’s
includes()method.- Ensuring no more than
maxResultsitems are returned is a good performance safeguard.- Exporting a summary string is user-friendly, informing about the search outcome.
Consider verifying if fields with potential spaces (e.g.,
productType,vendor) also require quotes in the GraphQL query for consistent matching, similar to how you handle exact matches fortitle. This can help avoid unexpected results or errors. Otherwise, the logic is clear and effective.components/shopify/actions/delete-page/delete-page.mjs (1)
18-24: New run method implementation looks good but consider adding error handling.The new implementation correctly uses the GraphQL API through the shopify module. However, there's no explicit error handling in case the API call fails.
Consider adding a try/catch block to handle potential API errors:
async run({ $ }) { + try { const response = await this.shopify.deletePage({ id: this.pageId, }); $.export("$summary", `Deleted page with ID ${this.pageId}`); return response; + } catch (error) { + $.export("$summary", `Failed to delete page: ${error.message}`); + throw error; + } },components/shopify/actions/create-metaobject/create-metaobject.mjs (4)
2-3: Use a more descriptive alias for 'common' if desired.
The generic aliascommonmight make it harder to differentiate from other imports as the codebase grows. Consider renaming it to something more explicit (e.g.metaobjectCommon), though this is purely optional.
48-56: Validate field types if your metaobject definitions contain non-string fields.
Currently, all fields are treated as strings. If certain field definitions require numeric or date values, consider additional type checks or transformations.
63-65: Consider aggregating multiple user errors.
Currently, only the first user error is thrown. If multiple errors exist, logging or throwing them all might improve debugging.
67-72: Provide a fallback summary if no ID is returned.
If the creation fails silently (e.g., no ID but no user errors), you might want a fallback summary message or a warning to signal partial success or unexpected conditions.components/shopify/actions/update-product/update-product.mjs (3)
92-112: Therunmethod handles async product updates well.
Consider throwing or collecting multiple user errors, if necessary. Otherwise, the approach of raising the first error is acceptable.
113-117: Use optional chaining for cleaner handling ofthis.images.- media: this.images && this.images.map((image) => ({ + media: this.images?.map((image) => ({🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 113-116: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
118-120: Consider surfacing all user errors for better troubleshooting.
Currently, only the first error message is thrown. You could join multiple errors if needed.- if (response.productUpdate.userErrors.length > 0) { - throw new Error(response.productUpdate.userErrors[0].message); - } + if (response.productUpdate.userErrors.length > 0) { + const messages = response.productUpdate.userErrors.map((e) => e.message).join("; "); + throw new Error(messages); + }components/shopify/common/mutations.mjs (3)
109-132: Mutation name mismatch in query commentThere's a discrepancy between the variable name
CREATE_COLLECTIONand the GraphQL operation name in the commentcreateCollectionMetafields. This could cause confusion during implementation.- mutation createCollectionMetafields($input: CollectionInput!) { + mutation collectionCreate($input: CollectionInput!) {
176-192: Identical mutations for CREATE_METAFIELD and UPDATE_METAFIELDBoth CREATE_METAFIELD and UPDATE_METAFIELD use the same
metafieldsSetGraphQL operation. While this is valid if Shopify's API uses the same mutation for both operations, adding a comment explaining this behavior would improve clarity.Consider adding a comment to one of these constants explaining that Shopify's GraphQL API uses the same operation for both creating and updating metafields:
const CREATE_METAFIELD = ` mutation MetafieldsSet($metafields: [MetafieldsSetInput!]!) { metafieldsSet(metafields: $metafields) { metafields { key namespace value createdAt updatedAt } userErrors { field message } } } `; +// Note: UPDATE_METAFIELD uses the same GraphQL operation as CREATE_METAFIELD +// because Shopify's API uses metafieldsSet for both creating and updating metafields const UPDATE_METAFIELD = ` mutation MetafieldsSet($metafields: [MetafieldsSetInput!]!) { metafieldsSet(metafields: $metafields) { metafields { key namespace value createdAt updatedAt } userErrors { field message } } } `;Also applies to: 229-245
1-445: Consider adding JSDoc comments for improved documentationWhile the GraphQL mutations are well-structured, adding JSDoc comments for each mutation would improve maintainability and make the file more developer-friendly, especially for those who may not be familiar with all aspects of the Shopify GraphQL API.
Example implementation:
+/** + * Creates a webhook subscription in Shopify + * @param {string} topic - The webhook topic to subscribe to + * @param {Object} webhookSubscription - The webhook subscription details + * @returns {Object} The created webhook and any user errors + */ const CREATE_WEBHOOK = ` mutation webhookSubscriptionCreate( $topic: WebhookSubscriptionTopic!, $webhookSubscription: WebhookSubscriptionInput! ) { // ... existing code }`;components/shopify/sources/common/webhook.mjs (1)
42-46: Added null check for safer webhook deletion.The addition of a check to verify that
webhookIdexists before attempting to delete it is a good defensive programming practice. This prevents potential errors if deactivation is called before a webhook ID has been set or if webhook creation failed.Consider adding a log message when webhookId doesn't exist to help with debugging:
if (webhookId) { await this.app.deleteWebhook(webhookId); +} else { + console.log("No webhook ID found during deactivation"); }components/shopify/actions/update-inventory-level/update-inventory-level.mjs (2)
7-7: Fix the minor spelling error in the URL description.Please update "documenation" to "documentation" to maintain professionalism and clarity.
- description: "Sets the inventory level for an inventory item at a location. [See the documenation](https://shopify.dev/docs/api/admin-graphql/latest/mutations/inventorySetOnHandQuantities)" + description: "Sets the inventory level for an inventory item at a location. [See the documentation](https://shopify.dev/docs/api/admin-graphql/latest/mutations/inventorySetOnHandQuantities)"
38-43: Set a default for the inventory adjustment reason if none is provided.If this prop is required, ensure the user must select a reason. Alternatively, provide a sensible default to avoid potential upstream errors.
components/shopify/common/queries.mjs (3)
29-65: Consider paginating article metafields separately.The query is well-structured, but using the same
$firstparameter for both articles and their metafields might lead to unexpected behavior, as it limits both the number of articles and the number of metafields per article.Consider using a separate parameter for metafields pagination:
- query BlogShow($id: ID!, $first: Int, $after: String, $reverse: Boolean) { + query BlogShow($id: ID!, $first: Int, $after: String, $reverse: Boolean, $metafieldsFirst: Int) { blog(id: $id) { articles(first: $first, after: $after, reverse: $reverse) { // ... - metafields (first: $first) { + metafields (first: $metafieldsFirst) { // ... } } } }
67-88: Same pagination parameter issue for blogs metafields.Similar to the previous query, using the same
$firstparameter for both blogs and metafields pagination.Consider using a separate parameter for metafields pagination:
- query BlogList($first: Int, $after: String) { + query BlogList($first: Int, $after: String, $metafieldsFirst: Int) { blogs(first: $first, after: $after) { // ... - metafields (first: $first) { + metafields (first: $metafieldsFirst) { // ... } } }
213-237: Apply separate pagination to productVariants and their metafields.Similar pagination parameter reuse issue as in previous queries.
Use a dedicated parameter for metafields pagination:
- query ($first: Int, $after: String, $query: String) { + query ($first: Int, $after: String, $query: String, $metafieldsFirst: Int) { productVariants (first: $first, after: $after, query: $query) { // ... - metafields (first: $first) { + metafields (first: $metafieldsFirst) { // ... } } }components/shopify/actions/add-product-to-custom-collection/add-product-to-custom-collection.mjs (3)
27-37: Add handling for empty productIds array.The run method doesn't check if the
productIdsarray is empty before making the API call, which could lead to unnecessary API requests.Add a check for empty productIds:
async run({ $ }) { + if (!this.productIds.length) { + $.export("$summary", "No products provided to add to the collection"); + return { skipped: true }; + } const response = await this.shopify.addProductsToCollection({ id: this.collectionId, productIds: this.productIds, }); if (response.collectionAddProductsV2.userErrors.length > 0) { throw new Error(response.collectionAddProductsV2.userErrors[0].message); } $.export("$summary", `Added product(s) \`${this.productIds}\` to collection \`${this.collectionId}\``); return response; },
32-34: Improve error handling to include all error messages.The current implementation only reports the first error message when multiple errors might be present, which could hide additional important information.
Consider returning all error messages:
if (response.collectionAddProductsV2.userErrors.length > 0) { - throw new Error(response.collectionAddProductsV2.userErrors[0].message); + const errorMessages = response.collectionAddProductsV2.userErrors + .map(error => error.message) + .join(", "); + throw new Error(`Failed to add products to collection: ${errorMessages}`); }
35-35: Improve summary message for better clarity.The current summary message uses template literals with backticks for variables, which isn't very readable when displaying array values.
Enhance the summary message for better readability:
-$.export("$summary", `Added product(s) \`${this.productIds}\` to collection \`${this.collectionId}\``); +$.export("$summary", `Added ${this.productIds.length} product(s) to collection ${this.collectionId}`);components/shopify/sources/new-article/new-article.mjs (1)
34-40: Ensure robust metadata generation.The
generateMetamethod assumes that the article object always has valid properties but doesn't handle cases where properties might be missing.Add null checks and fallbacks for metadata generation:
generateMeta(article) { return { id: article.id, - summary: `New Article: ${article.title}`, + summary: `New Article: ${article.title || "Untitled"}`, ts: Date.parse(article[this.getTsField()]), }; },components/shopify/actions/delete-metafield/delete-metafield.mjs (2)
10-19: Consider documenting the dynamic properties.The new
additionalProps()logic is clear, but it might be helpful to add brief comments explaining how each dynamically generated property is determined (e.g.,ownerIdusage, reload, etc.) to aid maintainability and future updates.
20-35: Fix the label to reflect a delete operation.Line 24’s description says "The metafield to update," but this file is for deleting a metafield. Consider changing that text to avoid confusion.
- description: "The metafield to update" + description: "The metafield to delete"components/shopify/actions/update-metafield/update-metafield.mjs (3)
7-8: Add or fix the documentation link.The description references documentation with empty parentheses. Please provide the correct Shopify docs URL to prevent confusion for users looking to reference the official guide.
10-19: Docstring for dynamic properties suggested.Similar to the delete-metafield file, adding docstrings explaining the logic behind
additionalProps()—particularly howownerIdis used and reloaded—can be beneficial for long-term maintainability.
38-46: Ensure consistency in property naming and descriptions.The logic to display a
valueproperty only ifthis.metafieldIdis present is a clean approach. Adding a short comment clarifying this conditional property can prevent confusion for future maintainers.components/shopify/common/utils.mjs (2)
1-2: Validategidprior to splitting.
getIdFromGid()assumesgidis a string containing/. For defensive programming, consider checking the type ofgidand whether it contains/, returning a more descriptive error or fallback if conditions aren’t met.
5-33: Confirm any JSON parsing edge cases.
parseJson()gracefully handles arrays of JSON strings, single strings, and other inputs. Ensure large or malformed JSON inputs are accounted for, and consider adding logs or user feedback when parsing fails.components/shopify/actions/search-custom-collection-by-name/search-custom-collection-by-name.mjs (1)
45-72: Efficient custom collection search logic.
The run method’s approach to pagination, filtering, and limiting results is effective. Truncating withcollections.length = this.maxResultsworks, but ensure calling code is aware of the possibility of partial results.components/shopify/sources/new-product-created/new-product-created.mjs (1)
15-15: Hard-coded event topic.
Using a literal"PRODUCTS_CREATE"is fine if constants are deprecated, but referencing a global constant may reduce duplication if you rely on the same topic in multiple places.components/shopify/actions/update-article/update-article.mjs (1)
33-37: HTML body property.
Exposing an optionalbodyHtmlhelps with partial article updates, but consider clarifying usage constraints (e.g., large HTML content).components/shopify/actions/search-product-variant/search-product-variant.mjs (4)
2-3: Streamline or remove imports if unnecessary
If these imports fromutils.mjsandconstants.mjsaren't used extensively, consider removing or consolidating them to keep imports lean.
32-36: Optional Title usage
Although specifying a Title is optional, consider validating the string length or contents (e.g., no leading/trailing whitespace) to ensure data hygiene.
55-74: Dynamic property injection
ModifyingexistingProps.optionIds.hiddenand returning additional props conditionally is clever. However, mutatingexistingPropscan occasionally introduce side effects. Consider cloning it to maintain a more functional approach.
76-92: Potential performance note in getOptionValues
This approach effectively builds a mapping for option values. If product variants scale significantly, caching or partial fetches might be beneficial to reduce repeated lookups.components/shopify/actions/create-article/create-article.mjs (2)
18-21: Title is mandatory
Setting a required title is expected for an article. Make sure to handle scenarios where a blank title is inadvertently provided.
53-74: Error handling for multiple userErrors
Currently, you only throw the first user error (response.articleCreate.userErrors[0]). For broader transparency, consider aggregating all error messages or clarifying them for the user.components/shopify/actions/add-tags/add-tags.mjs (3)
24-35: Resource ID (gid) & tag props
Both are now well-defined. Consider ensuring the user fully understands how to retrievegidfrom Shopify Admin to prevent confusion.
36-60: Conditional property injection
Fetching product data only whenresource === "Product"is elegant. You may want to log or surface more user-friendly messages if the resource detail fetch fails.
61-70: User error aggregation
Similar to other actions, only the first user error is thrown. Aggregating all errors might improve the debugging experience.components/shopify/actions/create-metafield/create-metafield.mjs (3)
8-9: Consider referencing a stable version of the Shopify docs.
If there’s a stable equivalent of themetafieldsSetdocumentation, it might offer more consistent and reliable guidance than theunstablelink.
31-43: Allow different data types in “value.”
Currently,valueis hardcoded to a string type. If there’s a plan to store numbers, JSON, or other types in the metafield, consider making this field’s type more flexible.
44-58: Collect all user errors.
Right now, you throw only the first user error that appears. If multiple errors occur, consider concatenating them or returning all of them so the user has full context.components/shopify/actions/create-smart-collection/create-smart-collection.mjs (2)
35-57: Consider a max limit on rules.
Dynamically generating properties is neat. However, a large value of “rules” could clutter the UI or degrade performance.
58-82: Display all user error messages.
You’re throwing only the first error returned inresponse.collectionCreate.userErrors. Issuing all error messages might be more helpful.components/shopify/actions/common/metaobjects.mjs (1)
27-35: Updating metaobjects consistently.
Matches the create flow well. If there’s a scenario where partial updates need special handling, consider adding a rollback process or more thorough validation.components/shopify/actions/common/metafield-actions.mjs (4)
117-125: Potential edge case ingetMetafields().
Accessing nested keys could fail ifresultsorresults[key]is undefined. Consider adding checks or error handling.
126-174: No default case for unrecognized ownerResource.
Consider handling an else scenario if the resource doesn't match. This prevents undefinedresourceFnorresourceKeys.
175-185: Use.find()instead of.filter()if only one metafield is needed.
This would simplify returning the first matched metafield.
187-189: Consider returning an empty array.
Currently returns early ifmetafieldsOriginalis falsy, potentially returningundefined. An empty array might be more consistent.components/shopify/actions/create-product-variant/create-product-variant.mjs (4)
30-34: Price property is typed as string.
Consider numeric or validation to avoid unexpected behavior.
66-71: Weight property typed as string.
Consider numeric type or input validation if weight must be a number.
91-108:getOptionValues()approach.
Works well for retrieving product option IDs. Consider error handling if product retrieval fails.
115-146: Final variant creation logic.
Parses metafields, handles user errors, and returns summary. Consider numeric parsing forprice/weight.components/shopify/actions/create-product/create-product.mjs (1)
77-80: Static analysis hint: consider optional chaining.
You can simplify:- media: this.images && this.images.map((image) => ({ + media: this.images?.map((image) => ({🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 77-80: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
components/shopify/actions/update-product-variant/update-product-variant.mjs (4)
39-43: Potential numeric vs. string mismatch
Since Shopify typically expects numeric values for pricing, consider ensuring the GraphQL API accepts a string or convert to numeric types.
44-49: Clarify image usage
This field expects a URL string. Consider additional validation or a short usage note to avoid invalid URLs at runtime.
62-67: Weight property type
Weight is stored as a string. If needed, parse or convert to numeric to avoid confusion or type mismatches.
68-79: Explicit weight units
Providing pre-defined units is great for consistency and validation. Consider a default fallback if none is provided.components/shopify/shopify.app.mjs (3)
196-215: productOptionIds
Collecting all option values from the product. The approach is solid, but confirm how you handle large product catalogs with many options.
320-346: Helper method getPropOptions
Centralizing resource retrieval is excellent for code reuse. Adding a breadcrumb for debugging or logging might be helpful in the future.
460-485: Pagination generator
Streaming items in a loop is good for large data sets. Confirm the memory usage ifmaxisn’t set; repeated calls could load many nodes.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (92)
components/shopify/actions/add-product-to-custom-collection/add-product-to-custom-collection.mjs(2 hunks)components/shopify/actions/add-product-to-custom-collection/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/add-tags/add-tags.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/actions/add-tags/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/common/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/common/constants.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/common/metafield-actions.mjs(5 hunks)components/shopify/actions/common/metaobjects.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/actions/common/rules.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/create-article/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/create-article/create-article.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/actions/create-blog/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/create-blog/create-blog.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/actions/create-custom-collection/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/create-custom-collection/create-custom-collection.mjs(2 hunks)components/shopify/actions/create-customer/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/create-metafield/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/create-metafield/create-metafield.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/actions/create-metaobject/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/create-metaobject/create-metaobject.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/actions/create-order/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/create-page/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/create-page/create-page.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/actions/create-product-variant/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/create-product-variant/create-product-variant.mjs(3 hunks)components/shopify/actions/create-product/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/create-product/create-product.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/actions/create-smart-collection/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/create-smart-collection/create-smart-collection.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/actions/delete-article/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/delete-article/delete-article.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/actions/delete-blog/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/delete-blog/delete-blog.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/actions/delete-metafield/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/delete-metafield/delete-metafield.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/actions/delete-page/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/delete-page/delete-page.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/actions/get-articles/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/get-articles/get-articles.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/actions/get-metafields/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/get-metafields/get-metafields.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/actions/get-metaobjects/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/get-metaobjects/get-metaobjects.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/actions/get-pages/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/get-pages/get-pages.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/actions/search-custom-collection-by-name/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/search-custom-collection-by-name/search-custom-collection-by-name.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/actions/search-customers/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/search-product-variant/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/search-product-variant/search-product-variant.mjs(2 hunks)components/shopify/actions/search-products/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/search-products/search-products.mjs(2 hunks)components/shopify/actions/update-article/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/update-article/update-article.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/actions/update-customer/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/update-inventory-level/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/update-inventory-level/update-inventory-level.mjs(2 hunks)components/shopify/actions/update-metafield/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/update-metafield/update-metafield.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/actions/update-metaobject/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/update-metaobject/update-metaobject.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/actions/update-page/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/update-page/update-page.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/actions/update-product-variant/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/update-product-variant/update-product-variant.mjs(3 hunks)components/shopify/actions/update-product/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/actions/update-product/update-product.mjs(2 hunks)components/shopify/common-app.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/common/constants.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/common/mutations.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/common/queries.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/common/rest-admin.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/common/utils.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/package.json(1 hunks)components/shopify/shopify.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/sources/collection-updated/collection-updated.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/sources/collection-updated/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/sources/common/polling.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/sources/common/utils.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/sources/common/webhook.mjs(2 hunks)components/shopify/sources/customer-data-request/customer-data-request.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/sources/new-abandoned-cart/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/sources/new-abandoned-cart/new-abandoned-cart.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/sources/new-article/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/sources/new-article/new-article.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/sources/new-event-emitted/new-event-emitted.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/sources/new-page/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/sources/new-page/new-page.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/sources/new-product-created/new-product-created.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/sources/new-product-created/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/sources/product-added-to-custom-collection/common.mjs(0 hunks)components/shopify/sources/product-added-to-custom-collection/product-added-to-custom-collection.mjs(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (44)
- components/shopify/sources/product-added-to-custom-collection/product-added-to-custom-collection.mjs
- components/shopify/sources/common/utils.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/get-metaobjects/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/common/constants.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/create-blog/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/search-customers/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/common/rules.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/create-custom-collection/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/add-product-to-custom-collection/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/update-article/common.mjs
- components/shopify/sources/product-added-to-custom-collection/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/create-article/common.mjs
- components/shopify/sources/new-abandoned-cart/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/delete-blog/common.mjs
- components/shopify/sources/new-page/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/get-pages/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/update-inventory-level/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/delete-article/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/add-tags/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/create-product/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/search-product-variant/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/get-metafields/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/common/common.mjs
- components/shopify/common/rest-admin.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/update-customer/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/update-product/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/create-order/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/create-metafield/common.mjs
- components/shopify/sources/new-article/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/update-metaobject/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/search-products/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/delete-page/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/update-page/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/search-custom-collection-by-name/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/create-customer/common.mjs
- components/shopify/common-app.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/update-product-variant/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/create-metaobject/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/update-metafield/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/get-articles/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/create-smart-collection/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/create-product-variant/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/delete-metafield/common.mjs
- components/shopify/actions/create-page/common.mjs
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- components/shopify/package.json
- components/shopify/sources/new-product-created/test-event.mjs
- components/shopify/sources/collection-updated/test-event.mjs
- components/shopify/sources/customer-data-request/customer-data-request.mjs
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
components/shopify/sources/collection-updated/collection-updated.mjs
[warning] 7-7:
Source names should start with "New". See https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#source-name
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
components/shopify/actions/create-product/create-product.mjs
[error] 77-80: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
components/shopify/actions/update-product/update-product.mjs
[error] 113-116: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (205)
components/shopify/actions/get-pages/get-pages.mjs (4)
1-1: Import path updated correctly for the new API structure.The import has been updated to use the central Shopify app module, which aligns with the PR objective of migrating to the updated GraphQL API.
6-7: Documentation link and version update look good.The documentation link has been correctly updated to point to the latest Admin GraphQL API, and the version has been properly incremented to reflect the changes.
9-23: Props updated correctly with new pagination parameters.The props have been enhanced with
maxResultsandreverseproperties, providing better control over the API query results. The replacement ofappwithshopifyis consistent with the updated import path.
24-39: Paginated data retrieval implemented correctly.The implementation of
getPaginatedwith the appropriate resource function and keys will enable efficient retrieval of pages using the updated GraphQL API. The summary message export is helpful for users to understand the action's result.components/shopify/actions/create-page/create-page.mjs (4)
1-1: Good update to import the GraphQL client instead of RESTThe import change from REST admin to the main Shopify app module reflects the migration to GraphQL API as mentioned in the PR objectives.
6-7: Documentation and versioning updates look goodThe description now correctly points to the GraphQL API documentation, and the version has been properly incremented to reflect the changes.
9-21: Props structure improvements enhance usabilityThe props have been properly restructured:
shopifyreplacesappto match the GraphQL client importtitlenow has proper type and label definitionsbodyHtmlhas been replaced withbodyto align with GraphQL mutation field namesThese changes improve both the code structure and developer experience.
22-34: Well-implemented async run method with proper error handlingThe new
runmethod is well-structured:
- Uses async/await pattern correctly
- Properly structures the page creation request
- Includes good error handling that surfaces user errors from the GraphQL API
- Exports a useful summary of the action for the user
- Returns the complete response for downstream processing
This implementation aligns well with the GraphQL migration objectives.
components/shopify/actions/update-metaobject/update-metaobject.mjs (6)
2-3: Refined import usage looks good.
Bringing incommonfrom../common/metaobjects.mjsandMAX_LIMITfrom../../common/constants.mjscentralizes shared logic and constants effectively.
9-10: Documentation and version updates are correct.
Thank you for pointing to the relevant Shopify documentation and incrementing the version to0.0.7.
15-20: Dynamic property definition is well-structured.
UsingpropDefinitionandreloadPropsfortypeensures property reloading based on user selection. This pattern cleanly handles dynamic data retrieval from Shopify.
21-31: Flexible metaobject property validated by type.
Passingtype: c.typeto themetaobjectIdpropDefinition allows the component to fetch only the relevant metaobject. If a user picks an invalid type, ensure upstream or fallback logic handles that gracefully.
45-61: Field mapping is well-implemented, but consider non-string types.
Currently, all fields are generated asstring. If metaobjects can contain numeric, boolean, or complex data, consider mapping them to more suitable prop types.
78-103: Robust update logic with user error handling.
ConstructingnewFieldsfrom existing data and user-provided values is clear and maintains existing metaobject structure. Throwing the firstuserErroris an effective and concise approach.components/shopify/actions/update-page/update-page.mjs (5)
1-1: Appropriate import update for GraphQL migrationThe import statement has been correctly updated to import the Shopify app module directly, aligning with the PR's goal of migrating to the updated GraphQL API.
6-7: Documentation and versioning properly updatedThe description now correctly links to the GraphQL API documentation and the version has been appropriately incremented to reflect the changes.
10-10: Correctly updated Shopify reference in propsThe module now properly references the imported shopify app throughout the props definitions, maintaining consistency with the updated import structure.
Also applies to: 13-13
17-22: Enhanced title property definitionThe title property has been improved with explicit type, label, and optional flag, making the interface more intuitive and self-documenting.
23-28: Appropriately renamed bodyHtml to bodyThe property has been renamed from bodyHtml to body to align with the GraphQL API naming conventions, and includes proper type definitions and descriptions.
components/shopify/actions/create-custom-collection/create-custom-collection.mjs (3)
2-2: Dependency import appears correct
No issues found with importing and leveraging theutilsmodule for JSON parsing.
7-8: Verify documentation link alignment with latest GraphQL API
The new documentation link points to the current Shopify GraphQL docs, but please confirm it aligns precisely with the updated deployment used in this PR.
13-14: Property definition looks good
Straightforward string property for the collection's title. No concerns.components/shopify/actions/delete-article/delete-article.mjs (5)
1-1: Properly migrated import statement to use GraphQL API.The import has been correctly updated to use the unified
shopifymodule instead of the previous implementation that likely imported separateappandcommonmodules. This is consistent with the PR objective to migrate to the updated GraphQL API.
6-6: Documentation updated to reference GraphQL API.The documentation link has been appropriately updated to point to the GraphQL API mutation
articleDeleteinstead of the previous REST API endpoint. This aligns with the PR's goal of migrating to the latest GraphQL API.
7-7: Proper version increment.Version has been incremented from 0.0.6 to 0.0.7, correctly indicating a new version of this component.
10-25: Props updated to reference the shopify app integration.The propDefinitions have been properly updated to reference the
shopifyimport instead of the previousappreference. The context function for thearticleIdproperty now correctly uses the parametercto accessblogId.
28-30:✅ Verification successful
Verify the deleteArticle method accepts the correct parameters.
Ensure that the
deleteArticlemethod in the shopify app module is designed to work with the GraphQL API and accepts the parameter format shown here. If the GraphQL mutation requires different parameters or a specific input structure, this call might need adjustment.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check the implementation of the deleteArticle method in the shopify app module grep -A 20 "deleteArticle" components/shopify/shopify.app.mjsLength of output: 714
Verified: The deleteArticle parameter format is correct.
The
deleteArticlemethod in the Shopify app module simply forwards the receivedvariablesobject to the GraphQL mutation. Since in your action you pass an object with{ id: this.articleId }, the parameter structure perfectly aligns with the method's implementation. No changes are required.components/shopify/actions/search-products/search-products.mjs (10)
2-3: Imports look good.
The introduction ofPRODUCT_SORT_KEYandutilsis consistent with improving modularity, as each import now has a clear and specific purpose.
8-9: Documentation and version updated.
Using the latest Shopify docs reference is helpful for clarity. The updated versioning supports better tracking of changes.
14-16: Property definition for “title” is clear.
Defining type, label, and description aligns with best practices for user-facing property docs.
19-25: AddedexactMatchproperty.
Having a boolean flag for an exact match significantly increases flexibility in search queries.
39-39: OptionalcollectionIdusage is consistent.
Allowing this property to be optionally set is a valid approach, enabling broader usage without requiring the collection context.
42-46: IntroducedproductTypeproperty.
This is a beneficial field for granular product searching. IfproductTypevalues can contain spaces, consider quoting them in queries for reliability.
47-52: Introducedvendorproperty.
This property helps refine or filter by vendor. Similar toproductType, you may need to wrap the vendor name in quotes if it can include spaces or special characters.
53-53:maxResultsproperty is well-defined.
Limiting the number of returned items reduces overhead and improves performance.
59-65:sortKeyproperty referencing constant keys.
Leveraging the pre-definedPRODUCT_SORT_KEYoptions ensures consistency in sorting choices.
66-71:reverseproperty correctly complementssortKey.
Providing a way to reverse the sort order extends the sorting flexibility for product queries.components/shopify/actions/delete-page/delete-page.mjs (5)
1-1: Import updated to use GraphQL client instead of REST API.The import has been updated to use the Shopify app module which likely implements GraphQL API calls, aligning with the PR objective to migrate to the updated GraphQL API.
6-6: Documentation link correctly updated to reference GraphQL API.The documentation link now points to the appropriate GraphQL mutation (
pageDelete) instead of the REST API endpoint, which is consistent with the migration to GraphQL.
7-7: Version increment reflects the API implementation change.The version bump from 0.0.6 to 0.0.7 appropriately indicates a non-breaking implementation change.
10-10: Props updated to use new shopify module.References to the app module have been consistently updated to use the new shopify module throughout the component definition.
Also applies to: 13-13
19-21:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify parameter format for GraphQL mutation.
Make sure the
deletePagemethod in the shopify module correctly formats the page ID for use in the GraphQL mutation. GraphQL IDs often need specific formatting or encoding.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Look for the implementation of deletePage to verify parameter handling rg -A 10 "deletePage.*\(" --glob="*.mjs" components/shopify/Length of output: 1370
Action: Verify the GraphQL ID format for the deletePage mutation.
It appears that thedeletePagemethod in the Shopify app simply passesthis.pageIdwithout any additional formatting. Please ensure thatthis.pageIdis already in the correct GraphQL ID format (for example, a properly encoded Shopify GID) or add the necessary formatting before calling_makeGraphQlRequest.components/shopify/actions/create-metaobject/create-metaobject.mjs (4)
9-10: Documentation link and version update look good.
The updated link points to the latest Shopify GraphQL documentation and version bump aligns with the new functionality.
15-18: Dynamically referencing metaobject type is a clean approach.
Switching from a static definition topropDefinitionhelps keep the code DRY and in sync with the Shopify app properties.
40-46: Handle missing definition before destructuring.
This block has a similar risk of failing if the definition wasn’t found. The same approach in the previous comment applies here.
58-61: Metaobject creation call appears correctly structured.
The usage oftypeandfieldsfollows the Shopify GraphQL spec, and no concerns are apparent here.components/shopify/actions/update-product/update-product.mjs (14)
2-2: No concerns with importing fromcommon.
8-9: Good job updating the action description and version.
No issues identified.
20-22:titleproperty definition looks correct.
26-29:productDescriptionproperty is well-structured with clear HTML support.
32-35:vendorproperty is properly defined.
38-41:productTypeproperty changes look good.
44-53: Ensure alignment between the code and Shopify’s expectedstatusvalues.
The description references lowercase values, while the code enumerates uppercase versions (ACTIVE,ARCHIVED,DRAFT). Confirm that the GraphQL API indeed uses uppercase, and adjust the description text if needed to avoid confusion.
55-58:imagesproperty is properly declared as an array of URLs.
No immediate issues.
65-65: Markingtagsas optional provides added flexibility for product updates.
73-78:handleproperty addition is consistent with Shopify’s URL structure.
79-84:seoTitleproperty is a fine addition for SEO customization.
85-90:seoDescriptionproperty is clearly defined for search engine optimization.
121-121: Informative summary message.
Clear feedback is provided to the user upon success.
122-122: Returning the entire response promotes flexibility for downstream usage.components/shopify/common/mutations.mjs (3)
1-22: Well-structured GraphQL mutation for webhook creationThe CREATE_WEBHOOK mutation is properly defined with clear parameters and a comprehensive response structure that includes both the created webhook details and potential user errors.
421-445: Comprehensive export of GraphQL mutationsThe file effectively exports all defined mutations in a clean, organized manner that makes them easily importable in other components of the application.
1-445:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify compatibility with Shopify's GraphQL API versioning
GraphQL schemas can change between API versions. Since this PR is about migrating to an updated GraphQL API, ensure that all mutation structures align with the target Shopify API version.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Look for API version references in the codebase to confirm which version these mutations are designed for # Search for Shopify API version references echo "Searching for Shopify API version references:" rg -i "shopify.*api.*version|api.*version.*shopify" --type js --type mjs # Look for any app.js or main configuration files that might specify the Shopify API version echo "Looking for potential configuration files with API version:" fd -e js -e mjs -e json "app|config|shopify" | xargs rg -l "version" # Check if there are any specific GraphQL schema version imports echo "Checking for GraphQL schema version imports:" rg "import.*schema.*version|version.*schema" --type js --type mjsLength of output: 9889
Action Required: Manually Verify Shopify API Version Compatibility
Automated searches for explicit Shopify API version references and schema imports returned no conclusive evidence—likely due to file type limitations (e.g., use of “.mjs”). Please double-check that these mutation structures conform to the expected GraphQL schema for the target Shopify API version. In particular, verify that:
- All mutation fields, naming conventions, and structures align with the specifications of the desired Shopify API version.
- Version identifiers are documented or configured elsewhere in the project so that there is no ambiguity for future maintenance.
components/shopify/actions/get-metaobjects/get-metaobjects.mjs (4)
2-3: Appropriate imports for the updated component structure.The changes to import
commonfrom the metaobjects module andMAX_LIMITfrom constants are aligned with the PR objective to migrate to the updated GraphQL API. Using a constant for maximum limits is a good practice rather than hardcoding values.
9-10: Documentation and versioning updated correctly.The description has been properly updated to reference the "unstable" version of the Shopify API documentation, and the version has been incremented to reflect these changes. This aligns with the migration to the updated GraphQL API as mentioned in the PR objectives.
14-19: Simplified props structure using propDefinition.The refactoring to use
propDefinitioninstead of a directly defined object improves code maintainability and reusability. This standardized approach will make future updates more consistent.
21-33: Well-implemented async run method with proper response handling.The new implementation correctly:
- Uses the Shopify API to list metaobjects
- Calculates the number of objects returned
- Provides a user-friendly summary message with proper singular/plural handling
- Returns the full response for downstream processing
This implementation aligns with the PR objective to update components to use the latest GraphQL API.
components/shopify/actions/delete-blog/delete-blog.mjs (4)
1-1: Updated import to use the primary shopify app module.The import change from a REST-specific module to the main Shopify app module reflects the migration to the GraphQL API as intended by the PR.
6-7: Documentation and version properly updated.Documentation link now points to the GraphQL mutation (blogDelete) instead of a REST endpoint, and the version has been incremented accordingly. This correctly represents the API migration stated in the PR objectives.
10-16: Updated prop definition to use the shopify app module.The props have been properly updated to use the imported shopify module for defining the blogId prop, which is consistent with the import changes and aligns with the GraphQL migration.
18-24: Well-implemented async run method.The new run method:
- Makes the appropriate call to delete a blog via GraphQL
- Provides a clear summary message
- Returns the full response for potential downstream use
Implementation is clean and follows the pattern seen in other updated actions.
components/shopify/sources/common/webhook.mjs (2)
27-39: Comprehensive update to webhook creation logic.The webhook creation implementation has been significantly modernized to align with Shopify's updated GraphQL API:
- Now uses the proper GraphQL mutation structure
- Correctly formats the webhook subscription parameters
- Properly handles metafield namespaces by combining regular and private ones
- Extracts the ID from the nested response structure
This implementation is a substantial improvement that directly addresses the PR objective of migrating to the updated GraphQL API.
68-68: Updated webhook topic validation.The change to use constants.EVENT_TOPIC lookup for topic validation is a good practice that centralizes topic mapping and makes it easier to update if Shopify changes their event topic structure.
components/shopify/sources/new-abandoned-cart/new-abandoned-cart.mjs (3)
1-2: Updated imports to use the polling common module.The changes to import the common polling functionality and MAX_LIMIT constant align with the broader refactoring effort to standardize source components as part of the GraphQL API migration.
9-10: Updated version and explicitly specified type.Version increment to 0.0.20 is appropriate for the functional changes, and explicitly specifying "source" as the type improves code clarity.
12-31:✅ Verification successful
Well-structured methods implementation for abandoned cart polling.
The new methods section:
- Properly inherits shared functionality from common.methods
- Implements getResults to fetch abandoned checkouts using GraphQL
- Defines getTsField to specify the timestamp field for deduplication
- Creates well-formatted metadata for each checkout
The implementation follows a consistent pattern that's likely used across multiple source components, improving maintainability and reducing code duplication.
One point to verify:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the app object has the listAbandonedCheckouts method rg -A 3 'listAbandonedCheckouts' --type js components/shopify/Length of output: 62
I'll run an additional verification command without filtering by file type to ensure we capture occurrences within .mjs files. This will help confirm whether the app object indeed implements the
listAbandonedCheckoutsmethod.Once this search is executed and reviewed, please confirm whether the definition exists. This manual verification will help validate the assumption made in the approved review comment.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for 'listAbandonedCheckouts' throughout the entire repository (all file types) rg -A 3 'listAbandonedCheckouts' .Length of output: 781
Abandoned Cart Methods Verified and Approved
The implementation correctly integrates with the shared
common.methods, and the usage oflistAbandonedCheckoutshas been verified incomponents/shopify/shopify.app.mjs. The methods—getResults,getTsField, andgenerateMeta—follow the project pattern and are correctly implemented.
- Confirmed
listAbandonedCheckoutsexists in the app object.- Verified proper parameter passing in the new-abandoned-cart component.
- No additional changes are necessary.
components/shopify/actions/update-inventory-level/update-inventory-level.mjs (2)
33-37: Consider validating the acceptable range foravailable.Currently, this integer field can accept negative values, which might be invalid depending on your business rules. If negative inventory is disallowed, please add validation or a descriptive error message for negative values.
44-49: ValidatereferenceDocumentUriif strict URI format is required.Currently, this prop is optional with no validation. If you need valid URIs to ensure data consistency, consider either validating or clarifying that any string is acceptable.
components/shopify/common/constants.mjs (2)
1-1: Confirm that the API version is supported in your environment.“2025-01” might be valid, but ensure your Shopify store has this version available. Otherwise, consider using a stable or generally available API version.
55-124: Good organization of inventory adjustment reasons.Centralizing these enumerated values helps maintain clarity and consistency. Ensure that internal references to these reasons remain in sync with Shopify’s official docs.
components/shopify/sources/new-event-emitted/new-event-emitted.mjs (2)
10-10: Version increment looks correct.Incrementing the version from
0.0.14to0.0.15is appropriate with the latest changes.
18-24: Verify the shape of EVENT_TOPIC before mapping.If the
EVENT_TOPICobject has a nested or unexpected structure, the destructured[key, value]approach might produce unexpected results. Confirm thatEVENT_TOPICis a flat object of topic pairs so your returned array is consistent.components/shopify/sources/collection-updated/collection-updated.mjs (4)
1-3: LGTM! Clear import statements for a webhook-based source.The import statements correctly bring in the common webhook functionality and a test event for sample emission.
12-25: LGTM! Well-structured methods for topic handling and metadata generation.The methods implementation is clean and follows good practices:
getTopic()correctly identifies the Shopify webhook topicgenerateMeta()properly combines the collection ID with timestamp for deduplication- Using
updatedAtfollows the GraphQL camelCase convention
26-27: LGTM! Proper sample event export for testing.The component correctly includes sample event data to enable testing in the Pipedream UI.
4-11:❓ Verification inconclusive
Naming convention may need adjustment per Pipedream guidelines.
The component is properly configured with appropriate metadata. However, there's a naming convention issue to address.
According to Pipedream guidelines, source names should start with "New". Consider renaming from "Collection Updated (Instant)" to "New Collection Update (Instant)" for consistency with platform conventions.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other source components in the codebase to verify naming convention rg -l "name: \"New" --type js components/shopify/sources/Length of output: 58
Please verify: Naming Convention Alignment
The component metadata is correctly configured, but according to Pipedream guidelines, source names should start with "New". Currently, this file uses "Collection Updated (Instant)" and a repository-wide search for names starting with "New" returned no examples. This makes it unclear whether the naming guideline is enforced across the codebase.
- Observation: No other source components were found with names starting with "New", suggesting that the convention may not be uniformly followed.
- Recommendation: Verify with the team or against the official guidelines whether the source name should be updated. If so, consider renaming from "Collection Updated (Instant)" to "New Collection Update (Instant)".
export default { ...common, key: "shopify-collection-updated", name: "New Collection Update (Instant)", description: "Emit new event whenever a collection is updated, including whenever products are added or removed from a collection.", version: "0.0.7", type: "source", dedupe: "unique",🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
[warning] 7-7:
Source names should start with "New". See https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#source-namecomponents/shopify/actions/create-blog/create-blog.mjs (4)
1-1: LGTM! Updated import to use the GraphQL-based Shopify app.This change aligns with the PR objective of migrating to the updated GraphQL API.
6-7: Documentation link and version update.The description now references the GraphQL documentation, and the version has been appropriately incremented.
10-15: LGTM! Improved UI properties for better usability.The title property now includes type and label definitions, enhancing the user experience in the Pipedream UI.
17-28: LGTM! Well-implemented run method with proper error handling.The new run method:
- Uses the GraphQL API via
this.shopify.createBlog- Properly handles and surfaces user errors
- Provides a clear summary message with the new blog ID
- Returns the complete response for further processing
This implementation aligns with best practices for Pipedream actions.
components/shopify/sources/new-page/new-page.mjs (3)
1-2: LGTM! Updated imports for the polling-based source.The imports correctly reference the common polling module and constants.
10-10: Version appropriately incremented.The version has been updated from 0.0.18 to 0.0.19 to reflect the changes.
12-31:✅ Verification successful
Well-structured methods for data retrieval, but potential app reference issue.
The methods implementation follows a good pattern for polling sources, but there's a potential issue with the
appreference.In the
getResults()method,this.app.listPagesis called, but there's no explicit import or property forappshown in the code. This might be inherited from thecommonmodule, but it should be verified to ensure it will work correctly.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if app is defined in the common polling module cat components/shopify/sources/common/polling.mjs | grep -A 10 "app"Length of output: 428
Final Verification: The
appreference is correctly defined via the common polling module.Your methods implementation in
new-page.mjsis well-structured for data retrieval. The initial concern regarding theappreference has been addressed—theappproperty is properly imported and added within the common polling module (components/shopify/sources/common/polling.mjs). No further action is needed.components/shopify/actions/get-articles/get-articles.mjs (4)
1-1: LGTM! Updated import to use the GraphQL-based Shopify app.This change aligns with the PR objective of migrating to the updated GraphQL API.
6-7: Documentation link and version update.The description now references the GraphQL documentation, and the version has been appropriately incremented.
10-29: LGTM! Enhanced properties with pagination options.The props have been updated to:
- Use the GraphQL-based Shopify app
- Add maxResults for pagination control
- Add reverse option for sorting flexibility
These additions improve the usability and functionality of the component.
30-47: LGTM! Well-implemented run method with pagination support.The new run method:
- Uses the efficient
getPaginatedhelper for handling large result sets- Properly structures the GraphQL query variables
- Provides a clear, grammatically correct summary message
- Returns the complete results array
This implementation follows best practices for Pipedream actions that retrieve potentially large datasets.
components/shopify/common/queries.mjs (2)
1-27: GraphQL query for abandoned checkouts is well-structured.The query includes all essential fields for abandoned checkout data including customer information, addresses, and important timestamps.
470-488: Export all queries in an organized way.The export structure is clean and exports all defined queries.
components/shopify/sources/common/polling.mjs (2)
1-14: Well-structured props with proper timer configuration.The props section correctly defines the app dependency, database storage, and timer with default interval. This provides a solid foundation for polling sources.
15-35: Good design pattern with required abstract methods.The methods section follows a good design pattern with utility methods for timestamp management and abstract methods that must be implemented by subclasses. This enforces a consistent structure across sources.
components/shopify/actions/add-product-to-custom-collection/add-product-to-custom-collection.mjs (2)
5-7: Updated name, description, and version.The name has been correctly updated to "Add Products to Custom Collection" (singular collection), and the description now references the correct GraphQL API documentation. Version increment is appropriate for the changes made.
19-25: Prop changed from array to single value.The
collectionIdsprop has been correctly renamed tocollectionIdto reflect that it now operates on a single collection rather than multiple ones.components/shopify/sources/new-article/new-article.mjs (2)
1-2: Good module imports.The imports have been updated to use the new polling common module and constants, which is consistent with the migration to the updated GraphQL API.
10-20: Version increment and prop addition.The version has been correctly incremented. The new
blogIdprop has been added to allow specifying which blog to monitor for new articles.components/shopify/actions/delete-metafield/delete-metafield.mjs (2)
7-8: Use a consistent and self-explanatory doc URL.The documentation link and version fields look good overall. Please ensure that the linked Shopify docs match your desired API version or endpoint for deleting metafields, so users can reference the most appropriate documentation.
37-37: No issues found.Returning
propshere is straightforward and follows best practices for dynamic property generation.components/shopify/actions/update-metafield/update-metafield.mjs (1)
20-35: Validate the selected metafield.While dynamically populating
metafieldIdoptions is convenient, consider handling edge cases (e.g., if no metafields exist) or explicitly alerting the user if none are available.components/shopify/actions/get-metafields/get-metafields.mjs (5)
1-1: Use of updated import path is valid.
The switch to../common/metafield-actions.mjsaligns with the new modular structure, improving maintainability.
7-8: Confirm usage of the “unstable” docs link.
You may want to verify that referencing theunstableGraphQL documentation is intentional, as some endpoints or features could be subject to change.
12-23: Check array-based property usage.
Usingstring[]for bothnamespaceandkeyis fine, but ensure upstream usage consistently passes arrays. An unexpected single-string parameter could cause runtime issues.
25-26: Ensure owner resource definitions are present.
this.getOwnerIdProp()relies onthis.ownerResource. Verify thatownerResourceis properly set in all possible use cases to avoid runtime errors.
28-40: Efficient filtering and summary.
The logic for filtering bynamespaceorkeyand exporting a clear summary is well-structured. Confirm if partial matching or advanced filtering is required, or if exact comparisons are sufficient.components/shopify/actions/search-custom-collection-by-name/search-custom-collection-by-name.mjs (4)
2-2: Usage of external constants is well-organized.
ImportingCOLLECTION_SORT_KEYfrom../../common/constants.mjscentralizes and standardizes sort options.
7-8: Updated description and version.
These changes provide clarity on the action’s functionality and confirm a new version.
13-24: Conditional title search with exact match.
Providing a flexible search option (exactMatch) is helpful. Consider validating minimal string length fortitleif needed.
25-44: Enhanced sorting and limiting capabilities.
IncludingmaxResults,sortKey, andreverseprops increases user control over retrieval.components/shopify/sources/new-product-created/new-product-created.mjs (4)
2-2: New dependency for sample events.
ImportingsampleEmitimproves testability and debugging of event-based flows.
10-10: Version bump is straightforward.
No concerns with updating from0.0.14to0.0.15.
18-21: Updated naming for creation timestamp and better product labeling.
Switching fromcreated_at→createdAtaligns with the new schema, and referencingresource.titlein the summary is more descriptive than using the ID.
26-26: Seamless sample event emission.
IncludingsampleEmitfosters clarity on how events are triggered and tested.components/shopify/actions/update-article/update-article.mjs (10)
1-1: Direct import of the Shopify app.
Replacing any previous common imports withshopify.app.mjsclarifies dependencies and ensures a consistent approach to the Shopify API.
6-7: Accurate documentation link and version increment.
The reference to the GraphQLarticleUpdatemutation is appropriate, and versioning is aligned with these new changes.
10-10: Property injection for the Shopify instance.
This design encourages reusability of underlying methods across multiple actions.
13-15: Linked blog/article ID definitions.
Pulling prop definitions from the sharedshopifypropDefinition ensures consistency and type safety across actions referencing blogs or articles.Also applies to: 19-21
27-31: Optional title field.
Allowing partial updates for the article’s title is flexible. Confirm if additional validation is needed to prevent empty submissions.
38-43: Optional author field.
Storing author data can be valuable. Confirm if thenameattribute in the Shopify API has length or character constraints.
44-49: Article summary handling.
Providing an optional summary is beneficial for dynamic display in themes. No major issues noted.
50-55: Image property usage.
Including an optionalimageURL is practical. Ensure correct URL format to prevent broken images.
57-62: Optional tags definition.
Leveraging a sharedtagspropDefinition maintains consistency with other actions.
64-86: Robust article update method.
Performing partial updates, capturing user errors, and returning a summary is well-structured.components/shopify/actions/search-product-variant/search-product-variant.mjs (5)
9-10: Clarity in documentation and version bump
The updated description and bumped version accurately reflect the new enhancements. Good job keeping documentation aligned with recent changes.
24-26: Context-based prop definitions
VerifyingproductIdwhen deriving from component context is sensible. Ensure that any external references to this prop are updated or remain consistent.
37-44: createIfNotFound flag
Enabling creation of product variants when not found is a valuable feature. Confirm you have tests or other validations to avoid accidentally creating duplicates when multiple variants share the same title.
45-54: Hidden property usage
HidingoptionIdsuntil needed is a neat approach. This helps keep the UI clutter-free. No issues noted.
94-141: Handle multiple product variant matches
Currently, only the first matching variant (nodes[0]) is used. If multiple variants match the provided title, there’s no logic for disambiguation. Verify that it’s expected to return the first match. Also ensure that theproductVariantsBulkCreatemutation is stable in the current Shopify version.components/shopify/actions/create-article/create-article.mjs (5)
1-1: Direct import from shopify
Usingshopify.app.mjsdirectly simplifies dependencies and is consistent with your new architecture.
6-7: Description and version
Clear mention of the new blog article creation and version bump is on point.
10-10: Leverage shopify prop definition
Passing theshopifyobject as a prop is consistent with other actions in this refactor. No issues noted.Also applies to: 13-13
22-26: Author as an object
You're passingauthor: { name: this.author }inrun(). Verify with Shopify docs that an object with anamefield is valid for author specification.
27-32: Optional article fields
These optional fields (body, summary, image, tags) nicely reflect flexible creation scenarios. The approach is clean and easy to extend.Also applies to: 33-38, 39-44, 45-50
components/shopify/actions/add-tags/add-tags.mjs (2)
5-7: Action naming, description, and version
Good consistency in naming conventions and updated link references.
11-22: Resource type approach
Allowing users to specify different resources (Product, Customer, etc.) is a helpful design for reusability.components/shopify/actions/create-metafield/create-metafield.mjs (1)
1-2: Imports look good.
No issues with importingcommonandconstants.components/shopify/actions/create-smart-collection/create-smart-collection.mjs (4)
2-3: Imports verified.
Using constants for columns and relations avoids hardcoding magic strings.
9-10: Version increment is appropriate.
The version bump to “0.0.13” aligns well with the introduced changes.
15-16: Title prop looks good.
Defining the collection’s title as a string is straightforward and intuitive.
19-33: Robust rule configuration.
Allowing a dynamic number of rules and supporting disjunctive logic gives users more flexibility.components/shopify/actions/common/metaobjects.mjs (3)
1-2: Refactored imports.
Using direct imports for queries and mutations simplifies the code and removes the need for extra custom request functions.
6-9: Confirm error handling in_makeGraphQlRequest.
Ensure network failures or server errors are surfaced properly since this method is a critical path for data retrieval.
12-23: Creating metaobjects with clarity.
Delegating the request logic to_makeGraphQlRequestis straightforward, but verify that any user errors are raised or handled consistently.components/shopify/actions/common/metafield-actions.mjs (10)
2-4: Imports look good.
No issues found with referencing constants, utils, and MAX_LIMIT from their respective modules.
13-13: Resource types options look appropriate.
No concerns about referencingRESOURCE_TYPESfor the metafield owner resource.
23-29: Dynamic product options retrieval is clear.
CallsgetPropOptionswithlistProductsand appropriate resource keys. All good.
35-44: Correct approach for listing product variants.
Links tolistProductVariantswith the correct resource keys. Be surethis.productIdis set beforehand.
49-56: Collection options retrieval is consistent.
Same pattern, no issues found.
62-69: Blog options retrieval aligns with the pattern.
Implementation looks consistent with other resource fetches.
74-87: Article options retrieval is consistent.
Ensures blog ID is passed in variables. Looks good.
90-99: Page options retrieval is consistent.
Maintains the same logic as other resources.
104-104: Conditional assignment for product ID is correct.
IfownerResourceis "variants", we loadprops.productIdfrom the product resources. Makes sense.
191-191: Switching toutils.parseJsonis fine.
No further concerns, improved consistency across the codebase.components/shopify/actions/create-product-variant/create-product-variant.mjs (10)
2-4: Imports and constants look good.
No issues referencingutils,MAX_LIMIT, andConfigurationError.
9-10: Documentation and version updates are correct.
No concerns here.
20-29: Refined props foroptionIds.
Renaming tooptionIdsclarifies intention. Good change.
35-40: Image URL usage is appropriate.
Implementation is straightforward.
42-46: SKU props look good.
No issues found.
54-59: Available quantity property.
Integer type is correct, no issues.
60-65: Barcode handling is fine.
Optional string property is clearly labeled.
72-83: Weight unit options are comprehensive.
Implementation is consistent with other property definitions.
84-89: Metafields are parsed from JSON.
Straightforward approach. Ensure user input is valid JSON.
111-113: Good error check foravailableandlocationId.
Prevents confusion if inventory quantity is set without a valid location.components/shopify/actions/create-product/create-product.mjs (12)
2-2: Utility import is correct.
No concerns about switching toutils.
7-8: Description and version updates.
References to new mutation docs look accurate.
13-16: Title property.
Implementation and labeling are straightforward.
18-22: Product description property.
Allows HTML formatting, looks good.
24-28: Vendor property.
No issues, optional as expected.
30-34: Product type property.
Optional string for categorization is clear.
36-45: Status property.
Allows "ACTIVE", "ARCHIVED", or "DRAFT", aligning with Shopify docs.
47-51: Images property.
URLs for product images stored as string array—no concerns.
53-57: Options property.
Specify up to three options, reliant on correct JSON input.
63-63: Optional tags.
No issues. Remains consistent with other optional fields.
66-76: Creating a new product.
Builds the product object with provided props, then callscreateProduct. Looks solid overall.
81-87: Handles user errors and exports summary.
Throws the first error if present, otherwise returns the product.components/shopify/actions/update-product-variant/update-product-variant.mjs (7)
2-3: Imports look good
These utility and constant imports are appropriate for handling JSON parsing, form data, and numeric limits.
8-9: Confirm documentation link alignment
The link referencesproductVariantsBulkUpdate, but we're callingupdateProductVariantin the code. Ensure the documentation link matches the actual mutation for consistency.
23-25: Expanded propDefinition logic
Passing theproductIdvia callback is a neat approach, ensuring dynamic dropdowns or validations. No immediate concerns.
28-35: Check handling of optional optionIds
The prop definition relies onproductId, then referencesproductOptionIds. This is fine, but consider validation for when no product ID is provided (edge case).
50-55: SKU field addition
Straightforward addition. No concerns here.
56-61: Barcode field
Barcode is optional and typed as string, which is consistent for typical barcodes.
88-105: Option values fetching
ThegetOptionValues()method neatly pairs option IDs with option sets. Consider adding a check if the product has zero options or if the product is missing to avoid potential errors.components/shopify/shopify.app.mjs (15)
1-10: Imports and initialization
Usingshopify-api-node,lodash.get, andasync-retryis a robust setup. Ensure licenses and versions are properly maintained.
14-28: Blog ID prop
Dynamically fetching blogs for dropdown selection. This approach integrated withgetPropOptionsis consistent.
29-48: Article ID prop
Again, well-done usage ofgetPropOptions. EnsureblogIdis always valid before callinglistBlogArticles.
49-62: Product ID prop
Straightforward definition. No concerns, aside from potential performance issues if listing thousands of products.
63-81: Product Variant ID prop
Lists product variants given aproductId. The structure is consistent and is a standard pattern in Pipedream components.
82-95: Collection ID prop
Fetching all collections. Similar approach to products. All good.
96-109: Page ID prop
Retrieves pages for dynamic dropdown. No immediate issues.
110-124: Metaobject type
Lists metaobject definitions. Good approach to label them bynamefor clarity.
125-148: Metaobject ID
The code looks up the type name from definitions and then queries metaobjects. Consider handling undefined cases if no definition matches the giventype.
149-195: Location and inventory management
Location ID and Inventory Item ID logic both rely on listing product variants and picking the inventory item. Double-check edge cases for products with no variants.
217-246: Common props (sortKey, tags, metafields)
These generic props appear to align with typical usage. Potentially verify if any limits exist on tag array length or metafield array input.
248-259: Shopify instance creation
shopify-api-nodeusage with auto-limit is good practice for rate limiting.
260-319: GraphQL request and retry
A well-structured retry mechanism. The exponential backoff approach is suitable for Shopify’s rate limits.
347-459: GraphQL queries/mutations
Clear and systematic approach to define each resource method. Improves maintainability by scoping code to specialized functions.
486-493: Collecting paginated results
getPaginated()accumulates all items in memory. Acceptable for moderate data sizes, but watch out for extremely large requests.
components/shopify/actions/update-inventory-level/update-inventory-level.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/shopify/actions/update-product-variant/update-product-variant.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
components/shopify/actions/update-product-variant/update-product-variant.mjs (1)
134-134:⚠️ Potential issueFix incorrect summary message
The success message incorrectly states "Created new product variant" but this action is updating an existing variant.
- $.export("$summary", `Created new product variant \`${response.productVariantsBulkUpdate.productVariants[0].title}\` with ID \`${response.productVariantsBulkUpdate.productVariants[0].id}\``); + $.export("$summary", `Updated product variant \`${response.productVariantsBulkUpdate.productVariants[0].title}\` with ID \`${response.productVariantsBulkUpdate.productVariants[0].id}\``);
🧹 Nitpick comments (16)
components/shopify/actions/get-metaobjects/get-metaobjects.mjs (2)
22-34: New implementation with GraphQL API supportThe new run method efficiently retrieves metaobjects using the updated API. The summary message handling with singular/plural forms is a nice touch for user feedback.
However, consider adding pagination support for scenarios where the number of metaobjects exceeds MAX_LIMIT.
async run({ $ }) { const response = await this.shopify.listMetaobjects({ type: this.type.label, first: MAX_LIMIT, }); const numObjects = (response.metaobjects.nodes).length; + // Add pagination handling if endpoint supports it + // const hasNextPage = response.metaobjects.pageInfo?.hasNextPage; + // if (hasNextPage) { + // $.export("$summary", `Retrieved ${numObjects} metaobjects. More exist but were not fetched due to pagination limits.`); + // } else { $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${numObjects} metaobject${numObjects === 1 ? "" : "s"}`); + // } return response; },
22-34: Add error handling for robustnessWhile the implementation works correctly, consider adding error handling to provide more helpful feedback when API calls fail.
async run({ $ }) { + try { const response = await this.shopify.listMetaobjects({ type: this.type.label, first: MAX_LIMIT, }); const numObjects = (response.metaobjects.nodes).length; $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${numObjects} metaobject${numObjects === 1 ? "" : "s"}`); return response; + } catch (error) { + console.log("Error retrieving metaobjects", error); + throw `Error retrieving metaobjects: ${error.message}`; + } },components/shopify/actions/search-products/search-products.mjs (5)
98-98: Remove debug console.log statement.This console.log statement appears to be leftover from debugging and should be removed from production code.
- console.log(query);
82-83: Add error handling for ID processing.The
getIdFromGidutility function could potentially fail with invalid IDs. Consider adding error handling to make the component more robust.- const idArray = this.productIds.map((id) => `id:${utils.getIdFromGid(id)}`); - queryArray.push(`(${idArray.join(" OR ")})`); + try { + const idArray = this.productIds.map((id) => `id:${utils.getIdFromGid(id)}`); + if (idArray.length > 0) { + queryArray.push(`(${idArray.join(" OR ")})`); + } + } catch (error) { + console.error("Error processing product IDs:", error); + throw new Error(`Failed to process product IDs: ${error.message}`); + }
111-114: Consider server-side filtering for better performance.Client-side filtering for title matches could be inefficient for large result sets. If possible, consider including this filter in the initial query to reduce the amount of data transferred.
116-118: Use slice() for array truncation.Directly modifying the
lengthproperty to truncate an array is unconventional. Usingslice()is more readable and follows common JavaScript patterns.- if (products.length > this.maxResults) { - products.length = this.maxResults; - } + products = products.slice(0, this.maxResults);
120-122: Simplify pluralization logic.The ternary expression for pluralization can be simplified for better readability.
- $.export("$summary", `Found ${products.length} product${products.length === 1 - ? "" - : "s"} matching search criteria`); + $.export("$summary", `Found ${products.length} product${products.length === 1 ? "" : "s"} matching search criteria`);components/shopify/shopify.app.mjs (5)
14-81: Consistent dynamic prop definitions for blog/article/product.Each prop definition (
blogId,articleId,productId,productVariantId) follows a uniform pattern, leveragingthis.getPropOptionsto load entities dynamically. Consider adding a more descriptive fallback or user-friendly error message if the underlying Shopify queries fail, as this would improve the developer experience.
82-163: Uniform dynamic prop handling for collections, pages, metaobjects, and locations.Similar to the above, these prop definitions (
collectionId,pageId,metaobjectType,metaobjectId,locationId) maintain consistency. The architecture is sound, but you might consider logging or user feedback if the API returns no or partial results, to guide app users.
164-216: Potential duplication with inventoryItemId retrieval logic.The
inventoryItemIdlogic manually paginates product variants to build options, replicating the core approach ofgetPropOptions. You could unify this withingetPropOptionsfor DRY consistency.For instance:
- let { - productVariants: { - nodes, pageInfo, - }, - } = await this.listProductVariants(variables); - ... - return { - options: nodes?.map(...), - context: { after: pageInfo?.endCursor }, - }; + return this.getPropOptions({ + resourceFn: this.listProductVariants, + resourceKeys: ["productVariants"], + valueKey: "id", + labelKey: "title", + prevContext, + variables, + });
248-319: Robust retry handling for Shopify GraphQL calls.
_withRetriesgracefully handles throttling via exponential backoff. However, consider adding distinct error messages for credential or permission failures separate from throttling scenarios, guiding users toward resolving authentication errors more easily.
347-462: Comprehensive CRUD operations.All create, list, update, and delete methods are consistently designed, each mapped to GraphQL mutations or queries. This fosters a uniform development experience when building new Shopify integrations. If feasible, add JSDoc or in-code comments for each method to clarify required variables and expected responses.
components/shopify/actions/create-metafield/create-metafield.mjs (1)
50-66: New async run method implements GraphQL API correctlyThe new implementation properly uses the GraphQL API to create metafields with good error handling. The method:
- Constructs the mutation input correctly
- Properly handles user errors from the GraphQL response
- Provides a clear summary message upon success
One suggestion to improve error handling:
Consider adding more context to the error message to help troubleshoot issues:
- throw new Error(response.metafieldDefinitionCreate.userErrors[0].message); + throw new Error(`Failed to create metafield: ${response.metafieldDefinitionCreate.userErrors[0].message}`);components/shopify/common/mutations.mjs (2)
244-260: Eliminate confusion around “update” naming.
This mutation’s content is identical toSET_METAFIELD, but the naming suggests different behavior. If you do keep both, clarify the distinction or rename them to reflect nuanced differences (e.g. “upsert” vs “set”).
1-462:❓ Verification inconclusive
Refine the architectural organization of GraphQL queries.
This file bundles all create, update, and delete mutation strings for multiple Shopify resources into a single large module. While it works, it might be more maintainable to split these into smaller domain-specific files or to employ fragments/shared bits for repeated fields (e.g. userErrors, IDs).Double-check compatibility with the new GraphQL API.
Please ensure these mutations exactly match the fields and schemas for Shopify’s most recent GraphQL API version.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check usage references for newly introduced GraphQL constants rg 'CREATE_WEBHOOK|DELETE_WEBHOOK|ADD_TAGS|ADD_PRODUCTS_TO_COLLECTION|CREATE_ARTICLE|CREATE_BLOG|CREATE_COLLECTION|CREATE_PAGE|CREATE_PRODUCT|CREATE_PRODUCT_VARIANTS|SET_METAFIELD|CREATE_METAFIELD|CREATE_METAOBJECT|UPDATE_METAFIELD|UPDATE_METAOBJECT|UPDATE_PRODUCT|UPDATE_ARTICLE|UPDATE_PAGE|UPDATE_INVENTORY_LEVEL|UPDATE_PRODUCT_VARIANT|DELETE_ARTICLE|DELETE_BLOG|DELETE_PAGE|DELETE_METAFIELD' -A 10Length of output: 29344
Action: Consider Modularizing GraphQL Mutations and Verify Their API Compatibility
- The current module in
components/shopify/common/mutations.mjscentralizes all Shopify mutation strings. For long-term maintainability, consider splitting these into smaller, domain-specific files (for example, separating mutations for articles, products, metafields, etc.). This can also pave the way for using shared GraphQL fragments for repeated field sets likeuserErrorsand common identifiers.- Verify that every mutation exactly matches the fields and schema from Shopify’s latest GraphQL API. Given the widespread usage in files like
components/shopify/shopify.app.mjsand related modules, a careful review of the API documentation is recommended to ensure compatibility when Shopify makes updates.components/shopify/actions/update-product-variant/update-product-variant.mjs (1)
131-133: Consider showing all validation errorsThe error handling only throws the first user error. Consider including all error messages in the thrown error for better debugging.
- if (response.productVariantsBulkUpdate.userErrors.length > 0) { - throw new Error(response.productVariantsBulkUpdate.userErrors[0].message); + const userErrors = response.productVariantsBulkUpdate.userErrors; + if (userErrors.length > 0) { + throw new Error(userErrors.map(error => error.message).join("; ")); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
components/shopify/actions/create-metafield/create-metafield.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/actions/create-product-variant/create-product-variant.mjs(3 hunks)components/shopify/actions/get-metaobjects/get-metaobjects.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/actions/search-product-variant/search-product-variant.mjs(2 hunks)components/shopify/actions/search-products/search-products.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/actions/update-product-variant/update-product-variant.mjs(2 hunks)components/shopify/common/constants.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/common/mutations.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/shopify.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/sources/collection-updated/collection-updated.mjs(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- components/shopify/actions/create-product-variant/create-product-variant.mjs
- components/shopify/sources/collection-updated/collection-updated.mjs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (30)
components/shopify/actions/get-metaobjects/get-metaobjects.mjs (3)
2-3: Import updates for API migrationThe change to import common from the metaobjects module and adding MAX_LIMIT from constants aligns well with the PR objective of migrating to the updated GraphQL API. This provides better code organization and prepares for the pagination implementation.
9-10: Updated API documentation and version bumpThe description now correctly references the unstable API version and provides an updated documentation link. The version increment from 0.0.4 to 0.0.5 appropriately reflects these API changes.
15-19: Improved prop definition structureUsing propDefinition to reference the metaobjectType from the Shopify app is cleaner than the previous detailed object implementation. The addition of
withLabel: trueensures the label is preserved for use in the run method.components/shopify/actions/search-products/search-products.mjs (1)
1-3: Well-structured component with comprehensive search capabilities.The refactored component provides comprehensive product search functionality with various filtering options. The property definitions are clear with good documentation, and the implementation efficiently constructs and executes queries based on user inputs.
The migration to the updated GraphQL API is well-implemented with proper use of pagination and sorting options.
Also applies to: 8-9, 13-75, 76-124
components/shopify/shopify.app.mjs (4)
1-3: Imports are streamlined and appropriate.The new direct integration via
shopify-api-node, coupled withlodash.getandasync-retry, supports robust, modular Shopify actions. No immediate issues spotted here.
217-247: Straightforward optional prop definitions for sorting, tagging, and metafields.The definitions of
sortKey,maxResults,reverse,tags, andmetafieldsare clear and concise. They appear flexible enough for most Shopify operations.
320-346:getPropOptionsutility is well-structured for flexible resource lookups.This method is central to the dynamic prop approach. Praise for the consistent design. Potentially, you might log the resource type or query for easier debugging if a user encounters incomplete results.
463-496: Efficient pagination with async generator.The
paginateandgetPaginatedimplementations are clean and handle potentially large result sets. Confirm whether partial failures or mid-poll throttling requires special handling (e.g., storing partial results). Otherwise, this design looks stable and direct.components/shopify/actions/create-metafield/create-metafield.mjs (4)
1-2: Imports properly refactored for GraphQL APIThe import statements have been updated to use the modular structure with the main Shopify app and constants module, which aligns with the PR objective of migrating to the updated GraphQL API.
7-8: Documentation and versioning updated correctlyThe description now properly references the GraphQL API documentation with a direct link to the
metafieldDefinitionCreatemutation, which makes it easier for users to understand the underlying API being used. Version bump is also appropriate for this significant change.
11-48: Props structure improved for GraphQL API integrationThe properties have been completely restructured to match the GraphQL API requirements. The new structure provides better type safety and includes helpful descriptions for each field. The use of constants for resource types and metafield types is particularly good for maintainability.
I especially like the improved user experience with:
- Detailed descriptions for each property
- Proper constraints mentioned (e.g., character limits for namespace and key)
- Reference to supported types documentation
- Options derived from constants for consistency
16-19:❓ Verification inconclusive
Resource type transformation looks suspicious
The code is mapping over
constants.RESOURCE_TYPESand converting each type's value to uppercase. Make sure this matches what the GraphQL API expects for theownerTypeparameter.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check resource types definition echo "Examining resource types in constants..." cat "components/shopify/actions/common/constants.mjs" | grep -A 50 "RESOURCE_TYPES" # Check GraphQL implementation echo "Examining createMetafield implementation in the app file..." cat "components/shopify/shopify.app.mjs" | grep -A 30 "createMetafield"Length of output: 2631
Clarify Owner-Type Transformation for GraphQL
The mapping over
constants.RESOURCE_TYPESconverts each lower-case value to uppercase (e.g."variants"becomes"VARIANTS"). Please verify that the GraphQL API’sownerTypeparameter expects these uppercase strings. For example, the “Product Variant” type currently defined as"variants"might need a more explicit transformation (such as"PRODUCT_VARIANT") if the API expects a different enum value. Consider adjusting the mapping or updating the constants accordingly.components/shopify/actions/search-product-variant/search-product-variant.mjs (8)
2-4: Updated imports reflect new module organizationThe imports have been updated to use specific modules from common utilities and constants, along with adding the ConfigurationError from the Pipedream platform. This aligns with the PR objective of updating components to use the latest GraphQL API.
9-10: Updated documentation and versionThe description now accurately reflects the enhanced functionality for searching or creating product variants, with a link to the latest GraphQL API documentation. Version number has been incremented appropriately.
24-26: Improved productVariantId prop definitionThe prop definition now properly passes just the required productId rather than the entire context object, improving the interface with the Shopify app.
31-44: New props enhance component flexibilityAdding the title and createIfNotFound props greatly improves the component's flexibility, allowing users to search by title and create variants when not found. The reloadProps flag for dynamically updating the UI based on the createIfNotFound selection is a nice touch.
45-54: Updated optionIds prop for better integrationThe optionIds prop has been updated to reference productOptionIds and is hidden by default (shown only when createIfNotFound is enabled). This improves the UI by showing relevant fields only when needed.
56-74: Dynamic properties implementation looks goodThe additionalProps method effectively handles the dynamic inclusion of price and image fields when createIfNotFound is enabled, providing a cleaner user interface.
76-92: Well-implemented helper method for option valuesThe getOptionValues method efficiently maps selected option IDs to their corresponding option values, which is necessary for creating new product variants.
94-128: Improved search functionality with better error handlingThe run method now includes proper validation and supports searching by either ID or title. The response handling and summary export are well implemented.
components/shopify/common/constants.mjs (2)
1-142: Well-organized constants with comprehensive optionsThe updated constants file is well-structured with detailed enumerations for product sorting, collection rules, weight units, and inventory adjustment reasons. This organization will make it easier for developers to select valid options when building Shopify integrations.
1-1:✅ Verification successful
Verify the API version date is correct.
The API version is set to "2025-01", which appears to be a future date. Make sure this is the intended version for the Shopify GraphQL API. Typically, Shopify follows a quarterly release schedule and versions are named by their release date.
🌐 Web query:
What is the latest Shopify Admin API version available?💡 Result:
The latest stable Shopify Admin API version as of March 2025 is 2025-01, following Shopify's quarterly release schedule. Here's a breakdown of key details:
Release Schedule and Support
- Quarterly Releases: New versions are introduced every 3 months (e.g., 2025-01 in January, 2025-04 in April) [1][2][7].
- Support Period: Each version is supported for 12 months, with a 9-month overlap between consecutive versions for migration [1][7].
Key Features of 2025-01
- Partial Payment Handling: Supports recording partial payments via
orderCreateManualPaymentmutation [8].- Product Taxonomy Updates: Deprecates legacy
productTaxonomyNodeIdin favor of standardizedcategoryIDs for improved taxonomy management [10].- Enhanced Risk Assessment: Introduces
OrderRiskAssessmentandOrderRiskSummaryresources, replacing the deprecatedOrderRisk[9].Upcoming Changes in 2025-04 (April 2025)
- Checkout API Sunset: The Checkout resource will be deprecated, with Cart API becoming the replacement [9].
- GraphQL Transition: Full deprecation of REST endpoints for product/variant management, requiring migration to GraphQL [9][17].
Migration Best Practices
- Specify Versions in URLs: Include the API version in requests (e.g.,
/admin/api/2025-01/products.json) to avoid unintended defaults [1][2].- Monitor Deprecations: Use the
X-Shopify-API-Versionheader to verify the version used in responses [2][7].- Webhook Updates: Ensure webhook payloads align with the selected API version to avoid disruptions [5][7].
For developers, upgrading to 2025-01 is recommended to leverage the latest features while preparing for the transition to GraphQL and upcoming 2025-04 changes.
Citations:
- 1: https://bsscommerce.com/shopify/shopify-api-versions/
- 2: https://shopify.dev/docs/api/admin-rest/usage/versioning
- 3: https://learn.mechanic.dev/core/shopify/api-versions
- 4: https://changelog.shopify.com/posts/support-for-api-version-2022-04-extended-to-june-30-2023
- 5: https://shopify.dev/docs/apps/build/webhooks/subscribe/use-newer-api-version
- 6: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/release-plan/2024wave2/smb/dynamics365-business-central/stay-current-shopify-connector
- 7: https://shopify.dev/docs/api/usage/versioning
- 8: https://shopify.dev/changelog
- 9: https://gadget.dev/blog/shopify-api-version-2024-04-now-available-on-all-gadget-apps
- 10: https://community.shopify.com/c/shopify-flow-app/send-admin-api-version-out-of-date-uses-2024-04-api/td-p/2840972
- 11: https://docs.gadget.dev/guides/plugins/shopify/api-version-changelog
- 12: https://changelog.shopify.com
- 13: https://community.shopify.com/c/technical-q-a/upgrade-shopify-api-version-2024-04-on-publish-app/m-p/2629893
- 14: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@shopify/shopify-api
- 15: https://shopify.dev/docs/api/release-notes
- 16: https://community.shopify.com/c/shopify-apps/upgrade-shopify-api-to-the-latest-version/td-p/2751672
- 17: https://community.shopify.com/c/technical-q-a/deprecating-rest-api/m-p/2678768
- 18: https://community.shopify.com/c/shopify-apps/will-all-versions-older-and-latest-of-the-rest-admin-api-stop/m-p/2894824
Verified: The Shopify API version is correct.
The constant incomponents/shopify/common/constants.mjsis set to"2025-01", which matches the latest stable Shopify Admin API version as of March 2025. No changes are needed.components/shopify/actions/update-product-variant/update-product-variant.mjs (8)
2-6: LGTM: Updated imports to align with new GraphQL APIThe imports have been properly updated to include utils, constants, and error handling from the platform.
11-12: Documentation link updated correctlyThe description now properly references the new GraphQL mutation
productVariantsBulkUpdatewith a link to the latest documentation.
31-40: Property renamed and properly linked to product IDThe option property has been correctly renamed to optionIds and now properly references productOptionIds with the parent productId for context.
47-52: Image property improved with better typing and descriptionThe imageId property has been replaced with a more descriptive image property that accepts a URL string.
53-77: Well-structured new properties with clear descriptionsThe newly added properties (sku, barcode, weight, weightUnit) are well-defined with appropriate types, labels, and descriptions. The weightUnit properly utilizes the WEIGHT_UNITS constant from the constants file.
86-102: Good implementation of option values mappingThe getOptionValues method efficiently maps option IDs to their respective options, allowing for proper association when updating variant options.
105-107: Good validation for weight propertiesThe validation ensures that both weight and weightUnit are provided together, preventing incomplete data from being sent to the API.
109-130: Comprehensive update operation with conditional fieldsThe update operation properly includes all relevant fields and conditionally adds inventory item details only when needed properties are provided.
components/shopify/actions/search-product-variant/search-product-variant.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
components/shopify/shopify.app.mjs (3)
260-319: Robust retry mechanism implementation for handling API throttlingThe implementation of the retry mechanism for GraphQL requests is well thought out. It handles Shopify's throttling limits gracefully and includes detailed error logging.
A few suggestions to enhance this implementation:
- Consider extracting retry configuration to constants or make them configurable
- Use a more structured logging approach instead of template literals with console.log
- retryOpts = { - retries: 5, - factor: 2, - minTimeout: 2000, // In milliseconds - }, + retryOpts = { + retries: RETRY_ATTEMPTS, // Define this in constants.mjs + factor: RETRY_FACTOR, // Define this in constants.mjs + minTimeout: RETRY_MIN_TIMEOUT, // In milliseconds + }, - console.log(` - [Attempt #${retryCount}] Temporary error: ${err.message} - `); + console.log(`[Attempt #${retryCount}] Temporary error: ${err.message}`);
320-346: Reusable prop options utility simplifies dynamic dropdownsThe
getPropOptionsutility centralizes the logic for creating dynamic dropdown options, reducing code duplication across property definitions. This approach makes the code more maintainable and consistent.One enhancement to consider would be implementing a caching mechanism for frequently used options to reduce API calls, especially for resources that don't change often.
287-318: Error formatting in _withRetries could be improvedThe error formatting in the
_withRetriesmethod creates a multi-line error message with indentation, which might not render well in logs or error reporting systems.- return bail(new Error(` - Unexpected error (error code: ${errCode}): - ${JSON.stringify(errData, null, 2)} - `)); + return bail(new Error(`Unexpected error (error code: ${errCode}): ${JSON.stringify(errData)}`));components/shopify/common/mutations.mjs (1)
418-442: Consider switching to named exports for better maintainability.With so many mutation constants, explicit named exports (instead of a large default export) can improve clarity and enable tree-shaking in modern bundlers. For example:
-export default { - CREATE_WEBHOOK, - DELETE_WEBHOOK, - ... -}; +export { + CREATE_WEBHOOK, + DELETE_WEBHOOK, + ... +};
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
components/shopify/actions/common/constants.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/actions/search-products/search-products.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/common/mutations.mjs(1 hunks)components/shopify/shopify.app.mjs(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- components/shopify/actions/common/constants.mjs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (23)
components/shopify/actions/search-products/search-products.mjs (14)
2-3: Updated imports to support new functionality.The code now imports specific constants and utilities instead of relying on a common module, aligning with the migration to the updated GraphQL API.
8-9: Updated documentation and version.The description now correctly points to the latest Shopify Admin GraphQL API documentation, and the version has been bumped appropriately.
13-17: Improved property definition for title.The title property is now better defined with explicit type and improved description.
19-25: Added new exactMatch property for precise searching.Great addition of the exactMatch property which allows users to search for exact product title matches, enhancing search precision when needed.
31-33: Enhanced productIds property definition.The updated label and description for productIds now provides clearer guidance on how to use this property, including an example JSON array format.
41-41: Made collectionId optional.Making the collectionId optional allows for more flexible search queries when a collection filter isn't needed.
43-54: Added product filtering by type and vendor.The addition of productType and vendor properties enhances filtering capabilities, allowing for more targeted product searches.
55-60: Added maxResults property for pagination control.The maxResults property allows users to limit the number of results returned, providing better control over data volume.
61-74: Added sorting capabilities.The new sortKey and reverse properties allow for customizable sorting of results, significantly improving the usability of the search function.
76-98: Implemented advanced query building.The new implementation constructs a sophisticated search query by combining various filter criteria with logical operators. The approach properly handles all the new filter properties, creating an appropriately formatted query string for the Shopify API.
99-109: Migrated to pagination API for efficient data retrieval.The code now uses the getPaginated method with appropriate resource functions and variables, correctly implementing the GraphQL API pagination pattern.
111-114: Added post-query title filtering for non-exact matches.For non-exact title matches, the code correctly applies case-insensitive filtering on the results after retrieval, which is appropriate since this type of filtering may not be supported directly by the API.
116-118: Implemented result limiting.The code properly limits the results to the specified maximum, ensuring the output doesn't exceed user expectations.
120-123: Added clear summary output.The summary message now clearly indicates the number of products found, with proper singular/plural handling. The function correctly returns the filtered and limited product array.
components/shopify/shopify.app.mjs (5)
1-10: Excellent use of modern dependencies for API interactionsThe file now properly uses
shopify-api-nodepackage combined with robust utilities for handling API requests. Theasync-retrylibrary is particularly beneficial for managing rate-limited API calls, which is crucial for Shopify's GraphQL API.
460-493: Well-implemented pagination with generator functionThe pagination implementation using a generator function is an excellent pattern for handling Shopify's cursor-based pagination. This allows for efficient processing of large datasets without loading everything into memory at once.
The
maxparameter provides a nice way to limit the number of results when needed, and thegetPaginatedhelper method offers a simpler interface for cases where all results are needed at once.
19-27: Consistent pattern for resource option definitionsThe property definitions follow a consistent pattern using the
getPropOptionsutility, which is excellent for maintainability. Each resource type (blogs, products, collections, pages) is implemented with the same structure.Also applies to: 53-61, 86-94, 100-108
267-269: Good documentation of Shopify API rate limitsThe comment explaining Shopify's GraphQL throttling behavior and referencing documentation is very helpful for future maintainers. This kind of context is valuable for understanding why the retry mechanism is implemented the way it is.
347-459: Comprehensive set of Shopify API methodsThe implementation provides a complete set of methods for interacting with Shopify's GraphQL API, covering all common operations (create, read, update, delete) for various entity types. This makes the app highly functional and versatile.
All methods consistently use the
_makeGraphQlRequesthelper with the appropriate mutation or query, keeping the code DRY and maintainable.components/shopify/common/mutations.mjs (4)
1-22: Looks great!All definitions in this section appear well-structured, with meaningful variable names and appropriate return fields. No concerns here.
176-189: Confirmed: No duplication withUPDATE_METAFIELD.The
CREATE_METAFIELDmutation targetsmetafieldDefinitionCreateand no longer overlaps withUPDATE_METAFIELD. This is a clear improvement from previous references to “SET_METAFIELD.” Great work!
226-242: Thank you for resolving the past duplication issue.Previously,
SET_METAFIELDandUPDATE_METAFIELDwere identical. Now, onlyUPDATE_METAFIELDcallsmetafieldsSet, eliminating the overlap. The code is cleaner as a result.
1-443:✅ Verification successful
Validate alignment with the latest Shopify GraphQL schema.
Although these mutations look correct, verifying that all fields, inputs, and return values match the newest Shopify GraphQL spec can help prevent runtime errors. Would you like to confirm using a quick web check?
🌐 Web query:
Do the following operations still match Shopify's latest GraphQL schema? 1) webhookSubscriptionCreate 2) metafieldDefinitionCreate 3) metafieldsSet 4) metaobjectCreate 5) inventorySetOnHandQuantities💡 Result:
Shopify's GraphQL Admin API has undergone significant updates, but the operations in question remain valid as of March 2025 based on current documentation and changelogs. Here's the status for each:
Operation Status Key Details webhookSubscriptionCreate Active Supported in Admin GraphQL API v2025-01 [5][12] metafieldDefinitionCreate Active Required for custom metafields, with updated access rules until Feb 2025 [10] metafieldsSet Active Bulk operation supported per GraphQL best practices [15] metaobjectCreate Active Core component of Shopify's metaobjects system [5][15] inventorySetOnHandQuantities Active Part of Inventory API updates in 2025-01 schema [10][15] Important context:
- Shopify has fully transitioned to GraphQL as its primary API, with REST marked as legacy since October 2024 [7][10]
- New rate limits apply: 2,000 points/min with 1,000 point restore rate [10]
- Webhook payloads still use REST-style formatting by default, despite GraphQL registration [14]
- Schema introspection requires authentication via tools like Apollo Client or GraphiQL [3][9]
Developers should monitor the Shopify Developer Changelog for updates, as migration timelines for existing apps will be announced later in 2025 [7][10].
Citations:
- 1: https://community.shopify.com/c/technical-q-a/deprecating-rest-api/m-p/2678768
- 2: https://community.shopify.com/c/Shopify-APIs-SDKs/How-to-register-webhook-via-API/m-p/446816
- 3: https://community.shopify.com/c/technical-q-a/is-there-a-publicly-available-schema-for-the-admin-graphql-api/m-p/2763794
- 4: https://digitalsuits.co/blog/how-to-migrate-from-rest-api-to-graphql-on-shopify/
- 5: https://shopify.dev/docs/api/admin-graphql/2022-10/mutations/webhookSubscriptionCreate
- 6: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2It9NofBWYg
- 7: https://www.shopify.com/partners/blog/all-in-on-graphql
- 8: https://community.shopify.com/c/shopify-apis-and-sdks/custom-app-register-webhook-failed/td-p/665010
- 9: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARgQ4oK0Mz8
- 10: https://shopify.dev/changelog?action_required=true
- 11: https://community.shopify.com/c/shopify-apps/graphql-webhooks-custom-app/td-p/2959138
- 12: https://shopify.dev/docs/api/admin-graphql/latest/mutations/webhookSubscriptionCreate
- 13: https://www.sitation.com/shopifys-migration-to-graphql/
- 14: https://community.shopify.com/c/shopify-apis-and-sdks/will-webhooks-send-graphql-payloads/m-p/1973228
- 15: https://shopify.dev/docs/api/admin-graphql
- 16: https://www.appseconnect.com/shopify-api-migration/
- 17: https://community.shopify.com/c/shopify-apis-and-sdks/webhooks-subscription-throwing-error/td-p/569869
- 18: https://learn.mechanic.dev/resources/converting-tasks-from-shopify-rest-to-graphql
- 19: https://shopify.dev/docs/api/admin-graphql/latest/objects/WebhookSubscription
- 20: https://shopify.dev/docs/apps/build/graphql/migrate/new-product-model
Shopify GraphQL Schema Validation Complete
I've verified against the latest Shopify documentation (as of March 2025) that all mutations in this file align with the current GraphQL Admin API. In particular:
- webhookSubscriptionCreate is active and compliant with the latest spec.
- metafieldDefinitionCreate remains valid under the current access rules.
- metafieldsSet correctly implements the bulk mutation per updated best practices.
- metaobjectCreate is fully supported.
- inventorySetOnHandQuantities adheres to the 2025-01 schema updates.
No changes are required based on the web verification results.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments. If you are seeing this consistently it is likely a permissions issue. Please check "Moderation" -> "Code review limits" under your organization settings.
🛑 Comments failed to post (39)
components/planday/planday.app.mjs (3)
1-11:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove or complete this implementation - unrelated to Shopify migration.
This new file appears to be a skeleton for a Planday app integration but seems unrelated to the PR objectives of migrating Shopify to the updated GraphQL API. The current implementation only contains a debugging method and empty prop definitions.
If this is just boilerplate for future work, it should be removed from this PR and submitted in a separate PR focused on the Planday integration. If this is somehow related to the Shopify migration, please clarify the connection.
7-9:
⚠️ Potential issueSecurity concern: Remove console logging of authentication keys.
The
authKeys()method logs authentication data to the console, which could potentially expose sensitive information. Authentication data should never be logged in production code.If this is debugging code, it should be removed before merging. If you need to inspect auth keys during development, consider using more secure debugging approaches.
3-4:
⚠️ Potential issueIncorrect app configuration for Shopify migration.
This file defines an app configuration for "planday", but according to the PR objectives, this PR is focused on migrating Shopify to use the updated GraphQL API.
If this is intended to be part of a different feature, it should be submitted in a separate PR.
components/netcore/netcore.app.mjs (1)
1-11:
⚠️ Potential issueSecurity concern: Potential sensitive information logging
The
authKeys()method logs authentication information to the console, which could potentially expose sensitive credentials in logs. This appears to be a debugging function that should not be present in production code.Additionally, this file seems to be just a skeleton for a Netcore integration with minimal functionality. Consider:
- Adding proper JSDoc comments describing the purpose of this app
- Implementing actual integration methods for interacting with Netcore APIs
- Including error handling for API interactions
export default { type: "app", app: "netcore", propDefinitions: {}, methods: { - // this.$auth contains connected account data - authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - }, + // Add actual API methods for Netcore integration }, };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export default { type: "app", app: "netcore", propDefinitions: {}, methods: { // Add actual API methods for Netcore integration }, };components/minerstat/minerstat.app.mjs (1)
7-9:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove or secure debugging code before merging to production.
The
authKeys()method contains aconsole.logstatement that outputs authentication keys, which could potentially expose sensitive information. This appears to be debugging code that should either be removed before merging to production or secured behind a development-only flag.- authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - },If this method is necessary for development purposes, consider adding a comment explaining its purpose and ensuring it's only used in development environments.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.components/jenkins/jenkins.app.mjs (1)
6-9:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove or enhance debugging method before production.
The
authKeys()method appears to be a debugging function that logs authentication keys to the console. This should either be:
- Removed before pushing to production
- Enhanced with proper documentation if intended for developer use
- Replaced with a more secure approach that doesn't potentially expose sensitive auth information
Console logging is generally not appropriate for production code, especially when handling authentication data.
- // this.$auth contains connected account data - authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - }, + // Add production-ready methods for Jenkins API interactions here📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// Add production-ready methods for Jenkins API interactions herecomponents/docker_engine/docker_engine.app.mjs (1)
6-9:
⚠️ Potential issueSecurity concern: Avoid logging authentication information.
The
authKeys()method logs authentication data to the console, which could expose sensitive information. Consider removing this method or limiting what gets logged in production environments.- authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - }, + // Helper method for debugging (not for production use) + authKeys() { + // Only log non-sensitive keys or use appropriate log levels + console.log("Auth object contains the following keys:", Object.keys(this.$auth)); + },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// Helper method for debugging (not for production use) authKeys() { // Only log non-sensitive keys or use appropriate log levels console.log("Auth object contains the following keys:", Object.keys(this.$auth)); },components/dungeon_fighter_online/dungeon_fighter_online.app.mjs (1)
7-9:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove debugging code with potential security implications
The
authKeys()method usesconsole.logto output authentication keys, which could potentially expose sensitive information in logs. If this method is intended for debugging, it shouldn't be committed to production code.Consider one of these approaches:
- authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - }, + // Return keys if needed for implementation + getAuthKeys() { + return Object.keys(this.$auth); + },Or remove it completely if not needed for the app's functionality.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// Return keys if needed for implementation getAuthKeys() { return Object.keys(this.$auth); },components/google_marketplace/google_marketplace.app.mjs (1)
7-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove or protect debug console.log statements
Debug statements using
console.logshould not be left in production code, especially when they might expose sensitive authentication information. Consider:
- Removing this method entirely if it's only for debugging
- Adding a debug flag/condition to only log in development environments
- Ensuring no sensitive data is exposed in logs
- authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - }, + // Example of a safer approach if debugging is needed + debug(message, data) { + if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development') { + console.log(`[Google Marketplace] ${message}`, data ? data : ''); + } + },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// Example of a safer approach if debugging is needed debug(message, data) { if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development') { console.log(`[Google Marketplace] ${message}`, data ? data : ''); } },components/hathr_ai/hathr_ai.app.mjs (2)
1-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
App module appears incomplete.
This appears to be a minimal skeleton for an app integration rather than a complete implementation. The module lacks API integration methods and proper property definitions that would be expected in a functional app module.
Consider enhancing this module with proper API integration methods and necessary property definitions, or postpone its addition until it's more complete.
6-9:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove console logging of authentication data.
The
authKeys()method logs authentication information to the console, which presents a security risk in production environments. Authentication details should never be logged.- authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// this.$auth contains connected account datacomponents/leverly/leverly.app.mjs (1)
1-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Debug code should be removed or refactored for production use
This appears to be a skeleton app definition with a debugging method that only logs authentication keys to the console. While this structure follows Pipedream's app pattern, the
authKeys()method has several issues:
- It uses
console.log()which is typically meant for debugging, not production code- It doesn't handle potential errors if
this.$authis undefined- It doesn't return any value or provide functionality beyond logging
Consider either:
- Removing this debugging method if it's not needed for production
- Enhancing it to provide actual functionality and proper error handling
- Adding proper documentation explaining the purpose of this app
export default { type: "app", app: "leverly", propDefinitions: {}, methods: { - // this.$auth contains connected account data - authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - }, + // Example of a more robust authentication method + authKeys() { + try { + const keys = Object.keys(this.$auth || {}); + return keys; + } catch (error) { + console.error("Error accessing authentication data:", error.message); + return []; + } + }, }, };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export default { type: "app", app: "leverly", propDefinitions: {}, methods: { // Example of a more robust authentication method authKeys() { try { const keys = Object.keys(this.$auth || {}); return keys; } catch (error) { console.error("Error accessing authentication data:", error.message); return []; } }, }, };components/neo4j_auradb/neo4j_auradb.app.mjs (3)
1-4:
⚠️ Potential issueApp definition is missing key Neo4j connectivity features
This file appears to be a skeleton for a Neo4j AuraDB integration, but it lacks essential functionality for connecting to and interacting with Neo4j databases. In its current state, it's not usable for actual Neo4j operations.
Consider adding methods to:
- Establish connection to Neo4j using the driver
- Execute Cypher queries
- Handle database transactions
- Implement proper error handling
4-4: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Define required property definitions for Neo4j connectivity
The empty
propDefinitionsobject means users won't be able to configure necessary connection parameters.Add property definitions for essential Neo4j connection parameters:
- propDefinitions: {}, + propDefinitions: { + url: { + type: "string", + label: "Database URL", + description: "Your Neo4j AuraDB connection URL (e.g., neo4j+s://xxxxxxxx.databases.neo4j.io)", + }, + username: { + type: "string", + label: "Username", + description: "Your Neo4j AuraDB database username", + }, + password: { + type: "string", + label: "Password", + secret: true, + description: "Your Neo4j AuraDB database password", + }, + },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.propDefinitions: { url: { type: "string", label: "Database URL", description: "Your Neo4j AuraDB connection URL (e.g., neo4j+s://xxxxxxxx.databases.neo4j.io)", }, username: { type: "string", label: "Username", description: "Your Neo4j AuraDB database username", }, password: { type: "string", label: "Password", secret: true, description: "Your Neo4j AuraDB database password", }, },
6-9:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove debugging code that logs authentication information
The
authKeys()method appears to be debugging code that logs authentication information, which could expose sensitive data and should not be included in production code.Replace this debugging method with actual Neo4j connection and operational methods:
- // this.$auth contains connected account data - authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - }, + // Connect to Neo4j database using credentials from auth + async getClient() { + const { url, username, password } = this.$auth; + + // Implement Neo4j driver initialization here + // Example: + // const neo4j = require('neo4j-driver'); + // const driver = neo4j.driver(url, neo4j.auth.basic(username, password)); + // return driver; + + throw new Error("Neo4j client implementation not completed"); + }, + + // Execute a Cypher query + async runQuery(query, params = {}) { + const driver = await this.getClient(); + const session = driver.session(); + + try { + return await session.run(query, params); + } finally { + await session.close(); + } + },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// Connect to Neo4j database using credentials from auth async getClient() { const { url, username, password } = this.$auth; // Implement Neo4j driver initialization here // Example: // const neo4j = require('neo4j-driver'); // const driver = neo4j.driver(url, neo4j.auth.basic(username, password)); // return driver; throw new Error("Neo4j client implementation not completed"); }, // Execute a Cypher query async runQuery(query, params = {}) { const driver = await this.getClient(); const session = driver.session(); try { return await session.run(query, params); } finally { await session.close(); } },components/egestor/egestor.app.mjs (1)
7-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove or replace debug console.log statement
The
authKeys()method usesconsole.log()to output authentication keys, which is not appropriate for production code. Logging authentication-related information, even just the key names, could expose sensitive information in logs.authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); + return Object.keys(this.$auth); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.authKeys() { return Object.keys(this.$auth); },components/aws/actions/s3-upload-file-tmp/s3-upload-file-tmp.mjs (1)
111-113: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider validating that paths begin with /tmp for security.
While the error message mentions "/tmp", there's no explicit validation that the provided path actually starts with "/tmp", which could be a security concern.
if (!fs.existsSync(path)) { throw new ConfigurationError(`The file or directory path \`${path}\` does not exist. Please verify the path and include the leading /tmp if needed.`); } + if (!path.startsWith('/tmp/') && path !== '/tmp') { + throw new ConfigurationError(`The file or directory path must be within the /tmp directory for security reasons.`); + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (!fs.existsSync(path)) { throw new ConfigurationError(`The file or directory path \`${path}\` does not exist. Please verify the path and include the leading /tmp if needed.`); } if (!path.startsWith('/tmp/') && path !== '/tmp') { throw new ConfigurationError(`The file or directory path must be within the /tmp directory for security reasons.`); }components/data_stores/actions/add-update-multiple-records/add-update-multiple-records.mjs (1)
113-116: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Inconsistent property naming in return value.
While the TTL functionality works correctly, there's an inconsistency in how TTL is included in the return value. In this file, it's returned as
_ttlwhile in other data store actions it's returned asttl(without the underscore).For consistency with other data store actions, consider changing:
return { ...map, - _ttl: this.ttl || null, + ttl: this.ttl || null, };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.return { ...map, ttl: this.ttl || null, };components/microsoft_teams_events/microsoft_teams_events.app.mjs (3)
4-10: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Implement required Microsoft Teams API integration methods
The app file only contains an empty
propDefinitionsobject and a single debugging method. For a functional integration, you should implement methods that interact with the Microsoft Teams API, such as authentication, data fetching, and webhook handling.Consider adding methods like:
methods: { // Return auth keys authKeys() { return Object.keys(this.$auth); }, // Make API requests to Microsoft Teams async makeRequest(path, options = {}) { const url = `https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/${path}`; return await axios({ url, headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${this.$auth.oauth_access_token}`, ...options.headers, }, ...options, }); }, // Get team events async getEvents(teamId, params = {}) { return this.makeRequest(`teams/${teamId}/events`, { params, }); }, },
7-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove debugging console.log statement
The
authKeys()method contains a console.log statement that appears to be for debugging purposes. Console logs should be removed from production code as they can clutter logs and potentially leak sensitive information.authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); + // Return keys instead of logging them + return Object.keys(this.$auth); },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.authKeys() { // Return keys instead of logging them return Object.keys(this.$auth); },
1-11: 💡 Verification agent
❓ Verification inconclusive
This file seems unrelated to the PR's objective of "Shopify - Migrate to Updated GraphQL API"
This new file creates a Microsoft Teams Events app module, but according to the PR objectives, this pull request is focused on updating Shopify components to utilize the latest GraphQL API. It's unclear how this Microsoft Teams file relates to that objective.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if this file is mentioned in any commit messages related to this PR git log --grep="microsoft_teams_events" --onelineLength of output: 0
Once this script is executed, if no commits indicate an intentional addition of the Microsoft Teams Events functionality for this PR, then it confirms that the file is unrelated to the Shopify migration objective.
If the commit history still shows no evidence of integration with the GraphQL API update for Shopify, please clarify the purpose of this file—if it’s not meant to be part of the current PR, consider removing it or moving it to a dedicated PR.
Action Required: Clarify or Remove Unrelated Microsoft Teams Events File
- The file
components/microsoft_teams_events/microsoft_teams_events.app.mjsintroduces Microsoft Teams events functionality, which doesn’t align with the current PR's goal of updating Shopify components to use the updated GraphQL API.- The commit log search did not reveal any indication of an intended link between this file and the Shopify migration.
- Please verify whether this file is meant to be included in this PR. If it is unrelated, remove it or document its purpose clearly to avoid confusion.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check the commit history specifically for the file to verify its intended inclusion git log --oneline -- components/microsoft_teams_events/microsoft_teams_events.app.mjsLength of output: 0
Once executed, if the output remains empty (i.e. no GraphQL or Shopify-related terms are found in this file), it strongly suggests that the Microsoft Teams Events module is unrelated to the current PR’s objective. This discrepancy between PR intent and file content needs to be resolved.
Action Required: Remove or Clarify Inclusion of Microsoft Teams Events Module
- File:
components/microsoft_teams_events/microsoft_teams_events.app.mjs- Observation: The file contains functionality solely for Microsoft Teams events and lacks any references to Shopify or GraphQL.
- Commit History: No commit messages or history indicate an intention to link this file to the Shopify GraphQL API migration.
- Recommendation: If this file is not part of the Shopify migration effort, please remove it or provide clear documentation/explanation for its inclusion.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any GraphQL references in the file to verify if it relates to Shopify's GraphQL API update grep "GraphQL" components/microsoft_teams_events/microsoft_teams_events.app.mjsLength of output: 79
Action Required: Clarify or Remove Unrelated Microsoft Teams Module
- The file
components/microsoft_teams_events/microsoft_teams_events.app.mjscontains code solely for Microsoft Teams events and does not include any references to Shopify or GraphQL.- Commit history checks for this file reveal no evidence linking its inclusion to the Shopify migration.
- It is unclear why this file is part of a PR focused on updating Shopify components.
Please confirm whether this file is intentionally included. If it is unrelated to the Shopify migration, consider removing it or providing clear documentation to justify its inclusion.
components/greenhouse_job_board_api/greenhouse_job_board_api.app.mjs (2)
5-10: 💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Review the
authKeys()method for potential security implications.The
authKeys()method is logging authentication-related information to the console, which could expose sensitive data in logs. If this is intended for debugging purposes only, consider:
- Adding a warning comment indicating it's for development use only
- Implementing proper debug flag checking before logging
- Ensuring this doesn't run in production environments
Additionally, this method doesn't actually use the logged information or return any values, making its purpose unclear.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if similar debug methods exist in other app files to understand the pattern echo "Checking for similar auth logging patterns in other app files..." rg -A 2 "console.log.*this.\$auth" --type jsLength of output: 184
Action: Restrict or remove debugging output in the
authKeys()method.
- The method logs keys from
this.$auth, which may expose authentication-related data if left enabled in production.- If the logging is intended solely for development, add a clear warning comment and wrap the log statement in a check (e.g., a debug flag or environment variable) to prevent its execution in production.
- Consider whether this method is needed at all outside debugging—if not, remove it or ensure its sole use during development.
1-11: 💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Minimal implementation with no actual API functionality.
This appears to be just a skeleton implementation for the Greenhouse Job Board API integration. There are no methods defined for making API requests, handling responses, or implementing any actual functionality that would enable interaction with the Greenhouse API.
If this is intended as a starting point for future development:
- Consider adding TODOs with a roadmap for implementation
- Include basic API request methods (e.g., makeRequest)
- Document expected authentication method and required credentials
If this is meant to be a complete implementation, it's missing critical functionality needed to interact with the Greenhouse Job Board API.
🌐 Web query:
What are the main endpoints and authentication requirements for the Greenhouse Job Board API?💡 Result:
The Greenhouse Job Board API enables custom career site development and candidate application processing. Here's a technical breakdown of its key components:
Main Endpoints
Endpoint Method Description Authentication Required /v1/boards/{board_token}/jobsGET Lists published jobs No [5][10] /v1/boards/{board_token}/jobs/{job_id}GET Retrieves detailed job post No [5][10] /v1/boards/{board_token}/jobs/{job_id}POST Submits candidate application Yes [2][5][6] /v1/boards/{board_token}/officesGET Lists company offices No [5][10] /v1/boards/{board_token}/departmentsGET Lists company departments No [5][10] Key optional parameters for GET jobs endpoint:
content=trueincludes full job descriptionsquestions=trueadds custom application questionspay_transparency=trueshows salary ranges [5][10]Authentication Requirements
- Read operations (GET endpoints) require only a
board_tokenfrom the career site URL (e.g.,acmefromboards.greenhouse.io/acme) [2][5]- Write operations (POST applications) require:
- Base64-encoded API key in Basic Auth header
- API key generated in Greenhouse Dev Center [2][5]
- JSON payload with candidate data and compliance info [6]
Example authentication header for application submission:
const basicAuth = btoa(`${API_KEY}:`); headers: { 'Authorization': `Basic ${basicAuth}`, 'Content-Type': 'application/json' }Key Features
- Supports JSONP callbacks for cross-domain requests [5][10]
- Cached responses with no rate limits for read operations [2][6]
- GDPR compliance fields in application payloads [2][6]
- Custom question handling through
questionsparameter [5][10]Developers should note that while most endpoints are publicly accessible, application submissions require strict authentication and proper handling of candidate data compliance regulations [2][5][6]. The API provides granular control over job post displays while maintaining security for candidate data ingestion.
Citations:
- 1: https://support.greenhouse.io/hc/en-us/articles/10568627186203-Greenhouse-API-overview
- 2: https://dev.to/superface/get-started-with-greenhouse-apis-overview-and-authentication-2ip0
- 3: https://www.merge.dev/integrations/greenhouse-job-board-api
- 4: https://github.com/grnhse/greenhouse-api-docs/blob/master/source/includes/candidate-ingestion/_introduction.md
- 5: https://developers.greenhouse.io/job-board.html
- 6: https://www.bitoff.org/greenhouse-recruiting-api/
- 7: https://www.drupal.org/project/gh_jobs
- 8: https://www.getknit.dev/blog/greenhouse-api
- 9: https://hitchhikers.yext.com/docs/connectors/greenhouse-native-source/
- 10: https://github.com/grnhse/greenhouse-api-docs/blob/master/source/includes/job-board/_introduction.md
- 11: https://developers.getknit.dev/docs/greenhouse-usecases
- 12: https://docs.merge.dev/integrations/ats/greenhouse/provider-interactions/
- 13: https://www.getknit.dev/blog/get-all-open-jobs-from-greenhouse--api-Nra7dz
- 14: https://www.greenhouse.com/api
- 15: https://github.com/grnhse/greenhouse-api-docs/blob/master/source/includes/job-board/_applications.md
Action Required: Expand API Implementation for Complete Greenhouse Integration
This module currently provides only a minimal stub (logging the connected account’s keys) without any actual functionality for communicating with the Greenhouse Job Board API. Based on the official API documentation:
Missing API Request Methods:
- Job Listings & Details: Methods to fetch jobs (
GET /v1/boards/{board_token}/jobsandGET /v1/boards/{board_token}/jobs/{job_id}) are absent.- Application Submission: There’s no implementation for posting candidate applications (
POST /v1/boards/{board_token}/jobs/{job_id}) which requires proper authentication using a Base64-encoded API key in the Basic Auth header.Authentication & Documentation Gaps:
- Read endpoints only need a board token, while write operations require secure credentials.
- It would be beneficial to include inline documentation or TODO comments outlining these authentication requirements and to document the expected parameters.
Recommendations:
If this is a starting point:
- Add clear TODOs outlining future work (e.g., implement
makeRequestfunctions for GET and POST requests, handle API responses, and manage errors).- Provide commentary on how authentication should be managed according to the Greenhouse Job Board API’s requirements.
If intended as a complete integration:
- Implement the methods to call the proper endpoints and handle both data retrieval and candidate application submissions with appropriate error handling and security measures.
Overall, please review and expand the module to handle the full spectrum of API functionality as per the documented endpoints and authentication flow.
components/griptape/actions/create-assistant/create-assistant.mjs (1)
78-104: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Validate inputs or apply defaults for optional fields.
While thedescription,knowledgeBaseIds,rulesetIds,structureIds, andtoolIdsmay be logically optional, consider validating them or providing default empty arrays/object values to avoid potential issues (e.g., undefined fields in certain edge cases).components/kindo/actions/chat/chat.mjs (1)
18-21:
⚠️ Potential issueFix unclosed string in messages description.
There appears to be an unclosed string literal in the description for the messages property.
- description: "A list of messages comprising the conversation so far. Depending on the [model](https://app.kindo.ai/settings/api) you use, different message types (modalities) are supported, like [text](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/text-generation), [images](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/vision), and [audio](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/audio). [See the documentation](https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/chat/create#chat-create-messages) for more information. Eg. `[{\"role\": \"user\", \"content\": \"Hello, world!\"}]", + description: "A list of messages comprising the conversation so far. Depending on the [model](https://app.kindo.ai/settings/api) you use, different message types (modalities) are supported, like [text](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/text-generation), [images](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/vision), and [audio](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/audio). [See the documentation](https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/chat/create#chat-create-messages) for more information. Eg. `[{\"role\": \"user\", \"content\": \"Hello, world!\"}]`",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.type: "string[]", label: "Messages", description: "A list of messages comprising the conversation so far. Depending on the [model](https://app.kindo.ai/settings/api) you use, different message types (modalities) are supported, like [text](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/text-generation), [images](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/vision), and [audio](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/audio). [See the documentation](https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/chat/create#chat-create-messages) for more information. Eg. `[{\"role\": \"user\", \"content\": \"Hello, world!\"}]`", },components/mollie/mollie.app.mjs (2)
7-9:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove debugging code before production.
The
authKeys()method appears to be debugging code that logs authentication information to the console. This should be removed before merging to production as it:
- Serves no functional purpose in the application
- Could potentially log sensitive information
- Adds unnecessary console output
- authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
1-11: 💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Implement actual Mollie API integration functionality.
This file appears to be a minimal scaffold for the Mollie integration with no actual implementation of API functionality. A proper app file should include:
- Methods to interact with Mollie API endpoints
- Proper error handling
- Property definitions for actions that will use this app
🌐 Web query:
What are the main API endpoints or features of the Mollie payment API?💡 Result:
The Mollie Payment API provides a comprehensive suite of endpoints for managing online payments, refunds, and subscriptions. Here are its core features and endpoints:
Payment Management
Create Payments:
Initiate payments with parameters like amount, currency, description, redirect URL, and webhook URL. Supports multicurrency transactions (e.g., USD, EUR)[5][6][10].
Example request body:{ "amount": {"currency": "EUR", "value": "10.00"}, "description": "Order #123", "redirectUrl": "https://example.com/thank-you", "webhookUrl": "https://example.com/webhook" }Retrieve Payments:
Fetch payment details using a payment ID to check statuses likepaid,failed, orexpired[1][7][10].
Statuses include:
PaymentOpen(initial state)PaymentPaid(successful)PaymentRefundedPaymentChargedBack[1][7]Refunds
- Create Refunds:
Issue full or partial refunds for eligible payments (excludes gift cards/paysafecard)[3][4][7].
Example refund request:refund = payment.refund!({"amount": {"value": "5.00", "currency": "EUR"}})- Manage Refunds:
Endpoints to list, retrieve, or cancel refunds by ID[1][4][10].Payment Methods
- List Supported Methods:
Retrieve activated methods (e.g., iDEAL, credit cards, PayPal) with locale-specific details[11][14].- Method-Specific Parameters:
Configure options likeissuerfor iDEAL orbillingEmailfor bank transfers[4][7].Advanced Features
- Recurring Payments:
Support for subscriptions using tokens from initial customer-approved transactions[1][5].- Orders API:
Handle pay-after-delivery methods (e.g., Klarna) with order management endpoints[4][8].- Webhooks:
Automatically receive payment status updates via configured URLs[2][6][10].Utility Endpoints
- Customers:
Store customer profiles for recurring payments[5][9].- Organizations/Mandates:
Manage business accounts and payment authorizations[9].- Settlements:
Track payouts to bank accounts[9].Client Libraries
Mollie provides SDKs for languages like PHP, Python, Node.js, and Crystal, simplifying integration with methods like:
mollie_client.payments.create() # Python $mollie->payments->create(); # PHPThese libraries handle authentication (via API keys), request formatting, and response parsing[5][6][10][13].
The API supports both test and live modes, with seamless switching using environment-specific keys[2][14]. Pagination and iteration tools are available for large datasets (e.g., listing payments)[10][13].
Citations:
- 1: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/mollie-api-haskell-0.2.0.1/docs/Mollie-API-Payments.html
- 2: https://www.dynamicpeople.nl/en/news/mollie-api-amp-power-automate-customer-payment-made-easy/
- 3: https://wout.github.io/mollie.cr/
- 4: https://www.nuget.org/packages/Mollie.Api/3.0.0
- 5: https://packagist.org/packages/mollie/mollie-api-php
- 6: https://github.com/mollie/mollie-api-python
- 7: https://github.com/mollie/mollie-api-php
- 8: https://github.com/mollie/spree-mollie-gateway
- 9: https://github.com/mollie/mollie-api-php/blob/master/src/MollieApiClient.php
- 10: https://github.com/mollie/mollie-api-node
- 11: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/mollie-api-haskell-0.2.0.1/docs/Mollie-API-Methods.html
- 12: https://github.com/mollie/mollie-api-python/blob/master/v3-api-changes.md
- 13: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@mollie/api-client
- 14: https://woocommerce.com/document/mollie-payments-for-woocommerce/
- 15: https://docs.mollie.com
- 16: https://docs.mollie.com/reference/payments-api
- 17: https://eventespresso.com/wiki/ideal-mollie-payment-gateway/
- 18: https://docs.mollie.com/reference/overview
- 19: https://www.nopcommerce.com/en/mollie-payment-module
- 20: https://github.com/mollie/mollie-api-php/blob/master/src/Endpoints/PaymentEndpoint.php
Action Required: Fully Implement Mollie API Integration
The current scaffold in
components/mollie/mollie.app.mjsonly logs the authentication keys and does not interact with the Mollie Payment API. Given that Mollie's API provides endpoints for creating and retrieving payments, processing refunds, managing payment methods, and more, please update the implementation as follows:
Integrate Core API Endpoints:
- Develop methods for creating payments, retrieving their status (e.g.,
PaymentOpen,PaymentPaid, etc.), and handling refunds.- Optionally, include endpoints for recurring payments, webhook handling, and order management, based on business needs.
Enhance Error Handling:
- Implement robust error handling to manage API call failures and unexpected responses.
Expand Property Definitions:
- Enrich
propDefinitionsto support the necessary parameters (such as amount, currency, and URLs) for payment actions.Environment Configuration:
- Use environment-specific API keys and configurations to switch seamlessly between test and live modes.
Please refactor the code to include these functionalities and ensure a proper integration with the Mollie Payment API.
components/gmail/sources/new-email-received/new-email-received.mjs (2)
120-361: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider modularizing the
additionalPropslogic.The
additionalPropsmethod is quite large, handling multiple use cases (polling vs. webhook), validating the service account key, configuring Pub/Sub topics, etc. Extracting some of these steps into helper methods can simplify the code and make it more maintainable.
197-216:
⚠️ Potential issuePotential mismatch in storing and retrieving the topic name.
Within the code for
"new"topics,this._topicNameis set (lines 197–216). However, elsewhere (e.g., line 628), the code retrieves the topic name usingthis._getTopicName(), which accesses the DB. This discrepancy (setting_topicNamein memory vs. getting topic name from DB) may lead to inconsistencies when the component re-initializes. Consider standardizing on the DB methods (_setTopicName(),_getTopicName()) for consistent persistence.- this._topicName = topicName; + this._setTopicName(topicName);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// Handle topic prop based on topicType selection try { const authKeyJSON = JSON.parse(this.serviceAccountKeyJson); if (this.topicType === "new") { // For new topics, generate a name and don't show selection const { project_id: projectId } = authKeyJSON; const topicName = `projects/${projectId}/topics/${this.convertNameToValidPubSubTopicName( uuidv4(), )}`; newProps.topic = { type: "string", default: topicName, hidden: true, // Hide this for new topics }; // Store for later use - this._topicName = topicName; + this._setTopicName(topicName);components/housecall_pro/housecall_pro.app.mjs (1)
1-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Review of new Housecall Pro app integration
This looks like a skeleton for a new Housecall Pro integration. The structure follows Pipedream's app configuration pattern, but there are a few considerations:
- The
authKeys()method logs authentication information to the console, which should not be included in production code as it could expose sensitive information.- The integration currently lacks any API implementation methods that would be needed for actual functionality.
Consider either:
- Removing the
authKeys()debug method- Adding proper API implementation methods that would actually interact with the Housecall Pro API
export default { type: "app", app: "housecall_pro", propDefinitions: {}, methods: { - // this.$auth contains connected account data - authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - }, + // Add actual API methods here + // Example: + // async makeRequest(endpoint, options = {}) { + // // Implementation + // } }, };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export default { type: "app", app: "housecall_pro", propDefinitions: {}, methods: { // Add actual API methods here // Example: // async makeRequest(endpoint, options = {}) { // // Implementation // } }, };components/microsoft_graph_api_daemon_app/microsoft_graph_api_daemon_app.app.mjs (1)
1-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Review of new Microsoft Graph API Daemon app integration
This looks like a skeleton for a new Microsoft Graph API integration. While the structure follows Pipedream's app configuration pattern, I have the following concerns:
- The
authKeys()method logs authentication information to the console, which should not be included in production code as it could expose sensitive information.- The integration currently lacks any API implementation methods that would be needed for actual functionality.
Consider either:
- Removing the debugging
authKeys()method- Adding proper API implementation methods that would actually interact with the Microsoft Graph API
- Implementing proper error handling for API requests
export default { type: "app", app: "microsoft_graph_api_daemon_app", propDefinitions: {}, methods: { - // this.$auth contains connected account data - authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - }, + // Add actual API methods here + // Example: + // async makeRequest(endpoint, options = {}) { + // const url = `https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/${endpoint}`; + // const headers = { + // Authorization: `Bearer ${this.$auth.oauth_access_token}`, + // "Content-Type": "application/json", + // }; + // // Implementation + // } }, };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export default { type: "app", app: "microsoft_graph_api_daemon_app", propDefinitions: {}, methods: { // Add actual API methods here // Example: // async makeRequest(endpoint, options = {}) { // const url = `https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/${endpoint}`; // const headers = { // Authorization: `Bearer ${this.$auth.oauth_access_token}`, // "Content-Type": "application/json", // }; // // Implementation // } }, };components/microsoft_viva_goals/microsoft_viva_goals.app.mjs (1)
1-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Review of new Microsoft Viva Goals app integration
This appears to be a skeleton for a new Microsoft Viva Goals integration. The structure follows Pipedream's app configuration pattern, but there are several issues to address:
- The
authKeys()method logs authentication information to the console, which should not be included in production code as it presents a security risk.- The integration lacks any API implementation methods required for actual functionality.
- There's no error handling or authentication configuration defined.
Consider implementing the following changes:
- Remove the debugging
authKeys()method- Add proper API implementation methods for interacting with the Microsoft Viva Goals API
- Implement appropriate error handling and authentication logic
export default { type: "app", app: "microsoft_viva_goals", propDefinitions: {}, methods: { - // this.$auth contains connected account data - authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - }, + // Add actual API methods here + // Example: + // async makeRequest(endpoint, options = {}) { + // // Implementation with proper error handling + // }, + // async getGoals(params = {}) { + // // Implementation to fetch goals + // } }, };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export default { type: "app", app: "microsoft_viva_goals", propDefinitions: {}, methods: { // Add actual API methods here // Example: // async makeRequest(endpoint, options = {}) { // // Implementation with proper error handling // }, // async getGoals(params = {}) { // // Implementation to fetch goals // } }, };components/cloudflare_browser_rendering/cloudflare_browser_rendering.app.mjs (1)
1-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Review of new Cloudflare Browser Rendering app integration
This appears to be a skeleton for a new Cloudflare Browser Rendering integration. While it follows Pipedream's app configuration pattern, there are several concerns:
- The
authKeys()method logs authentication information to the console, which is a security concern and should not be included in production code.- The integration doesn't include any methods for actually interacting with the Cloudflare API.
- There's no error handling or rate limiting implementation.
Consider implementing the following improvements:
- Remove the debugging
authKeys()method- Add proper API implementation methods for interacting with Cloudflare
- Implement error handling and rate limiting
export default { type: "app", app: "cloudflare_browser_rendering", propDefinitions: {}, methods: { - // this.$auth contains connected account data - authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - }, + // Add actual API methods here + // Example: + // async makeRequest(endpoint, options = {}) { + // const url = `https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/${endpoint}`; + // const headers = { + // Authorization: `Bearer ${this.$auth.api_token}`, + // "Content-Type": "application/json", + // }; + // + // try { + // // Implementation with error handling + // } catch (error) { + // // Error handling + // } + // } }, };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export default { type: "app", app: "cloudflare_browser_rendering", propDefinitions: {}, methods: { // Add actual API methods here // Example: // async makeRequest(endpoint, options = {}) { // const url = `https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/${endpoint}`; // const headers = { // Authorization: `Bearer ${this.$auth.api_token}`, // "Content-Type": "application/json", // }; // // try { // // Implementation with error handling // } catch (error) { // // Error handling // } // } }, };components/hr_cloud/actions/update-employee/update-employee.mjs (1)
63-79: 💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify array structure in the response.
You referenceresponse[0]?.xFirstNameandresponse[0]?.xLastName. IfupdateEmployeereturns a non-array object or an empty array, this code would break.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Checking all usage references of `updateEmployee` to confirm the shape of returned data rg "updateEmployee" -A 5Length of output: 3835
Action: Validate Response Array Structure for updateEmployee API
The current implementation directly accesses
response[0].xFirstNameandresponse[0].xLastNamewithout verifying that the response is an array with at least one element. This could lead to errors if:
- The API returns a non-array object, or
- The array is empty.
Please add a validation step to check the response type and ensure it has the expected content before accessing its elements. This will make the code more robust against unexpected API responses.
components/firecrawl/common/utils.mjs (1)
26-39: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enclose raw
JSON.parsecalls within safe parsing logic.
parseObjectEntriescallsJSON.parse(value)directly (line 28) and may throw an exception ifvalueis not valid JSON. To maintain a consistent optional parse policy, consider replacing it withoptionalParseAsJSONor adding a try-catch to handle parsing failures gracefully.-export function parseObjectEntries(value) { - const obj = typeof value === "string" - ? JSON.parse(value) - : value; - return Object.fromEntries( - Object.entries(obj).map(([ key, value ]) => [ - key, - optionalParseAsJSON(value), - ]), - ); +export function parseObjectEntries(value) { + const obj = typeof value === "string" + ? optionalParseAsJSON(value) + : value; + return Object.fromEntries( + Object.entries(obj).map(([key, val]) => [ + key, + optionalParseAsJSON(val), + ]), + ); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export function parseObjectEntries(value) { const obj = typeof value === "string" ? optionalParseAsJSON(value) : value; return Object.fromEntries( Object.entries(obj).map(([key, val]) => [ key, optionalParseAsJSON(val), ]), ); }components/govee/actions/retrieve-device-info/retrieve-device-info.mjs (1)
34-36: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for missing device
The code assumes the device will be found in the list. If a device with the specified ID doesn't exist,
devicewill be undefined and line 42 will throw an error when trying to accessdevice.sku.const { data: devices } = await app.listDevices(); const device = devices.find(({ device }) => device === deviceId); + +if (!device) { + throw new Error(`Device with ID ${deviceId} not found`); +}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const { data: devices } = await app.listDevices(); const device = devices.find(({ device }) => device === deviceId); if (!device) { throw new Error(`Device with ID ${deviceId} not found`); }components/govee/actions/control-device/control-device.mjs (2)
151-152: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for missing device ID
Similar to the retrieve-device-info action, there's no validation that the device is found before attempting to use it.
const { data: devices } = await app.listDevices(); const device = devices.find(({ device }) => device === deviceId); + +if (!device) { + throw new Error(`Device with ID ${deviceId} not found`); +}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const { data: devices } = await app.listDevices(); const device = devices.find(({ device }) => device === deviceId); if (!device) { throw new Error(`Device with ID ${deviceId} not found`); }
37-38: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for missing capability
If the specified command type isn't found in the device's capabilities, the code will continue with
capabilityas undefined. This should be handled explicitly.const device = devices.find(({ device }) => device === deviceId); const capability = device?.capabilities?.find(({ type }) => type === commandType); const { parameters } = capability ?? {}; + +if (!capability) { + throw new Error(`Command type ${commandType} not found for device ${deviceId}`); +}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const device = devices.find(({ device }) => device === deviceId); const capability = device?.capabilities?.find(({ type }) => type === commandType); const { parameters } = capability ?? {}; if (!capability) { throw new Error(`Command type ${commandType} not found for device ${deviceId}`); }components/brillium/brillium.app.mjs (1)
138-230: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Incorporate user-provided
pageSizein pagination logic
Thepaginate()method currently setspagesizetoMAX_PAGE_LIMIT, overriding thepageSizeproperty. Support custompageSizeto honor user input.args = { ...args, params: { ...args?.params, page: 1, - pagesize: MAX_PAGE_LIMIT, + pagesize: args?.params?.pagesize ?? MAX_PAGE_LIMIT, }, };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.async *paginate({ resourceFn, args, resourceKey, max, }) { args = { ...args, params: { ...args?.params, page: 1, pagesize: args?.params?.pagesize ?? MAX_PAGE_LIMIT, }, }; let hasMore, count = 0; do { const response = await resourceFn(args); const items = response[resourceKey]; if (!items?.length) { return; } for (const item of items) { yield item; if (max && ++count >= max) { return; } } hasMore = response.HasMore; args.params.page++; } while (hasMore); },
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments. If you are seeing this consistently it is likely a permissions issue. Please check "Moderation" -> "Code review limits" under your organization settings.
🛑 Comments failed to post (50)
components/elastic_email/sources/new-email-click/new-email-click.mjs (1)
25-27: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Inconsistent summary text
The summary message "New event click" doesn't match the component name "New Email Click" and is inconsistent with the pattern used in other similar components.
getSummary() { - return "New event click"; + return "New Email Click"; },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.getSummary() { return "New Email Click"; },components/planday/planday.app.mjs (2)
1-11:
⚠️ Potential issueImplement proper Planday API integration methods
This appears to be a minimal app scaffold for Planday integration, but it lacks essential functionality. For a production-ready component, you should implement methods for interacting with the Planday API (e.g., authentication, data retrieval, etc.) and include proper property definitions.
Note that this file appears unrelated to the stated PR objectives of migrating Shopify components to an updated GraphQL API. Please clarify if this file should be included in this PR or moved to a separate one.
6-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove debugging code
The
authKeys()method withconsole.log()is clearly debugging code that shouldn't be committed to production. Either remove this method entirely or replace it with proper documentation and meaningful functionality.- // this.$auth contains connected account data - authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.components/netcore/netcore.app.mjs (1)
5-10: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace debugging method with proper authentication verification
The
authKeys()method appears to be intended for debugging purposes only, as it logs authentication data to the console. This is not recommended for production code.Consider replacing this with proper auth validation or helper methods that would be useful for the app's actual functionality. If this is truly needed for debugging, add a comment indicating it's for development only.
- // this.$auth contains connected account data - authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - }, + /** + * Validates the authentication credentials + * @returns {boolean} True if authentication is valid + */ + isAuthenticated() { + // Implement actual validation logic based on required auth properties + return Boolean(this.$auth.api_key); + },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.methods: { /** * Validates the authentication credentials * @returns {boolean} True if authentication is valid */ isAuthenticated() { // Implement actual validation logic based on required auth properties return Boolean(this.$auth.api_key); }, },components/microsoft_viva_goals/microsoft_viva_goals.app.mjs (1)
6-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove debugging console.log statement
The
authKeys()method contains a console.log statement that outputs authentication keys. This could potentially expose sensitive information in logs and is generally not recommended for production code.- authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - }, + // Add proper methods for interacting with Microsoft Viva Goals API📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// this.$auth contains connected account data // Add proper methods for interacting with Microsoft Viva Goals APIcomponents/microsoft_teams_events/microsoft_teams_events.app.mjs (3)
1-11:
⚠️ Potential issueThis Microsoft Teams Events app file seems unrelated to the Shopify API migration PR.
This new file appears to be unrelated to the stated PR objective of updating Shopify components to utilize the latest GraphQL API. Consider moving this file to a separate PR that's focused on Microsoft Teams integration.
1-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add documentation and implement actual functionality.
The file lacks documentation about its purpose and doesn't implement any actual functionality beyond a debugging method. Consider:
- Adding JSDoc comments explaining the app's purpose
- Implementing methods that provide actual Microsoft Teams Events functionality
- Adding proper propDefinitions if needed
7-9:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove debugging code that logs authentication keys.
The
authKeys()method logs authentication data to the console, which could potentially expose sensitive information. This appears to be debugging code that shouldn't be included in a production PR.- authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.components/dungeon_fighter_online/dungeon_fighter_online.app.mjs (1)
7-9:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove or secure the debug method that logs authentication information.
The
authKeys()method currently logs authentication data to the console, which could potentially expose sensitive information if this runs in a production environment. Logging authentication-related information, even if it's just the keys, is generally considered a security risk.Consider either:
- Removing this method entirely if it's just for development purposes
- Adding logic to ensure it only runs in development environments
- Replacing it with a more secure method that doesn't expose authentication information
- authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - }, + // Secure alternative if needed for debugging + authKeys() { + if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development') { + console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); + } + },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// Secure alternative if needed for debugging authKeys() { if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development') { console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); } },components/egestor/egestor.app.mjs (1)
7-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove or update this debug-oriented method before production deployment.
The
authKeys()method usingconsole.logappears to be intended for debugging purposes. Console logging is generally discouraged in production code as it can:
- Expose sensitive information in logs
- Create unnecessary noise in the console
- Impact performance in some environments
Consider replacing this with proper logging using a dedicated logging library, or remove it entirely if it's only temporary.
- authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - }, + // Replace with a proper logging implementation or remove if not needed📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// Replace with a proper logging implementation or remove if not neededcomponents/leverly/leverly.app.mjs (1)
1-11:
⚠️ Potential issueQuestionable implementation of new app module
This appears to be a newly added app module for "leverly" with minimal implementation. A few concerns:
The only method (
authKeys) seems to be for debugging purposes, logging authentication keys to the console. Console logging of authentication information could pose a security concern in production.The
propDefinitionsobject is empty, suggesting this may be an incomplete implementation or placeholder.There's no documentation explaining what "leverly" is or how it relates to the Shopify GraphQL API migration mentioned in the PR objectives.
No actual functionality is implemented beyond logging authentication keys.
Consider either:
- Removing this file if it's not directly related to the Shopify GraphQL API migration
- Completing the implementation with proper documentation and functionality
- Replacing the debugging method with production-ready API interaction methods
-export default { - type: "app", - app: "leverly", - propDefinitions: {}, - methods: { - // this.$auth contains connected account data - authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - }, - }, -};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.components/jenkins/jenkins.app.mjs (2)
6-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace console.log with proper logging mechanism
Using
console.logfor debugging purposes in production code is not recommended. Consider using Pipedream's logging mechanism or returning the keys instead of logging them.- authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - }, + authKeys() { + return Object.keys(this.$auth); + },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// this.$auth contains connected account data authKeys() { return Object.keys(this.$auth); },
1-11: 💡 Verification agent
❓ Verification inconclusive
Add proper authentication methods for Jenkins API
This appears to be a skeleton implementation for a Jenkins app. For a complete integration, you'll need to implement methods for:
- Authentication with Jenkins
- API request handling
- Error handling
Have you considered implementing methods for making API requests to Jenkins? This would typically include functions like
_makeRequest()that handle authentication headers and error responses.
Enhance Jenkins API Integration
The implementation in
components/jenkins/jenkins.app.mjscurrently acts as a placeholder. It only logs available authentication keys without providing the robust functionality expected for a production-ready Jenkins integration. To move forward, please consider the following improvements:
- Implement Jenkins Authentication: Introduce dedicated methods to securely authenticate with Jenkins.
- Centralize API Requests: Create a function (e.g.,
_makeRequest()) that handles API calls, including setting up authentication headers and processing error responses.- Strengthen Error Handling: Add comprehensive error handling to gracefully manage potential issues arising from API interactions.
These changes will ensure a comprehensive and secure integration with the Jenkins API.
components/neo4j_auradb/neo4j_auradb.app.mjs (1)
1-11: 💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
This file appears unrelated to the Shopify GraphQL API migration.
This new Neo4j AuraDB app file seems unrelated to the PR's objective of migrating Shopify to an updated GraphQL API. Additionally, this appears to be just a skeleton implementation with minimal functionality:
- The file only contains a basic app structure with no actual Neo4j functionality
- The
authKeys()method contains a console.log statement that appears to be for debugging purposes- There's no error handling or actual Neo4j API integration
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if this file is referenced in any Shopify-related files in this PR echo "Checking for references to neo4j_auradb in Shopify files..." rg -l "neo4j_auradb" components/shopify/ # Check if this is part of other unrelated changes in this PR echo "Checking if there are other Neo4j files in this PR..." fd -e mjs -e js "neo4j" --exec echo {}Length of output: 374
Action: Address extraneous file inclusion in the PR
The new
components/neo4j_auradb/neo4j_auradb.app.mjsfile doesn’t appear to play any role in the Shopify GraphQL API migration. Our search confirms that there are no references to it in any Shopify-related code. Moreover, its implementation is just a minimal skeleton with a debugconsole.login theauthKeys()method and lacks proper Neo4j API integration or error handling.
- If this file is intended as a stub for future Neo4j functionality, please add documentation/comments clarifying its purpose and outline forthcoming enhancements.
- Otherwise, consider removing it from this PR to keep changes focused on the Shopify migration.
components/google_sheets/sources/new-row-added-polling/new-row-added-polling.mjs (1)
45-48: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling to the run method.
The
runmethod lacks error handling which could lead to unhandled exceptions if the API call fails.Add try/catch to handle potential API errors:
async run() { + try { const spreadsheet = await this.googleSheets.getSpreadsheet(this.sheetID); return this.processSpreadsheet(spreadsheet); + } catch (error) { + console.error(`Error fetching or processing spreadsheet: ${error.message}`); + throw error; + } },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.async run() { try { const spreadsheet = await this.googleSheets.getSpreadsheet(this.sheetID); return this.processSpreadsheet(spreadsheet); } catch (error) { console.error(`Error fetching or processing spreadsheet: ${error.message}`); throw error; } },components/google_marketplace/google_marketplace.app.mjs (2)
1-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
New app module with minimal implementation
This appears to be a skeleton implementation for a Google Marketplace app integration. While the basic structure is in place, the module currently contains minimal functionality with just a debugging method.
Consider:
- Adding documentation that explains the purpose of this Google Marketplace integration
- Implementing necessary methods for interacting with the Google Marketplace API
- Defining required prop definitions for configuration
export default { type: "app", app: "google_marketplace", propDefinitions: {}, methods: { // this.$auth contains connected account data - authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - }, + // Add methods for interacting with Google Marketplace API }, };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export default { type: "app", app: "google_marketplace", propDefinitions: {}, methods: { // this.$auth contains connected account data // Add methods for interacting with Google Marketplace API }, };
7-9:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove debugging code in production
The
authKeys()method appears to be for debugging purposes only. Logging authentication-related information to the console could pose a security risk in production environments.Either:
- Remove this debugging method entirely, or
- Enhance it with proper error handling and ensure it's only used during development
- authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.components/griptape/actions/delete-assistant/delete-assistant.mjs (1)
18-27: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding explicit error handling or retries.
Currently, if Griptape returns a 404 or 401 error for the DELETE request, the method will throw from the underlying HTTP call. Adding a try/catch or a custom error message can improve the debugging experience.
components/griptape/actions/update-assistant/update-assistant.mjs (1)
79-86: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding custom error handling in updateAssistant.
A PATCH request may fail (e.g. invalid credentials, missing ID). Adding a try/catch to handle response errors more gracefully can be beneficial.
components/hathr_ai/hathr_ai.app.mjs (3)
4-4: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Component lacks implementation
This component currently has empty
propDefinitionsand no functional methods. If this is intended to be a new app integration, it should include the necessary properties and methods to interact with the Hathr AI service.
6-9:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove debugging code before production deployment
The
authKeys()method appears to be debugging code that logs authentication keys to the console. This type of debugging code should not be committed to production repositories as it:
- May expose sensitive information
- Creates unnecessary console output
- Doesn't provide any actual functionality for the component
Consider removing this method if it's not essential for the component's operation.
- methods: { - // this.$auth contains connected account data - authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - }, - }, + methods: { + },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.methods: { },
1-11:
⚠️ Potential issue❓ Verification inconclusive
This file appears unrelated to the Shopify GraphQL API migration PR
This new file introduces a "hathr_ai" app component that seems completely unrelated to the PR's stated objective of migrating Shopify components to use the updated GraphQL API. Please verify if this file was intended to be included in this PR.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the file contains any references to 'shopify' or 'graphql' rg -iE 'shopify|graphql' components/hathr_ai/hathr_ai.app.mjsLength of output: 116
Action Required: Verify Unrelated "hathr_ai" Component Inclusion
The file
components/hathr_ai/hathr_ai.app.mjsintroduces a "hathr_ai" app component and does not reference any Shopify or GraphQL code. This suggests that it is unrelated to the stated objective of migrating Shopify components to the updated GraphQL API. Please confirm if this file was meant to be part of the PR or should be removed.
- File:
components/hathr_ai/hathr_ai.app.mjs(Lines 1–11)- No references to "shopify" or "graphql" were found upon inspection.
components/firecrawl/common/utils.mjs (1)
26-39:
⚠️ Potential issuePotential error handling issue in parseObjectEntries
The direct call to
JSON.parse(value)on line 28 could throw an exception ifvalueis not valid JSON, which is inconsistent with the error handling approach used elsewhere.Consider using the
optionalParseAsJSONhelper here too:- const obj = typeof value === "string" - ? JSON.parse(value) - : value; + const obj = typeof value === "string" + ? optionalParseAsJSON(value) + : value;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export function parseObjectEntries(value) { const obj = typeof value === "string" ? optionalParseAsJSON(value) : value; return Object.fromEntries( Object.entries(obj).map(([ key, value, ]) => [ key, optionalParseAsJSON(value), ]), ); }components/hr_cloud/actions/update-employee/update-employee.mjs (1)
63-79:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle potential empty or malformed API responses.
This code assumesresponseis an array with at least one element. If the API returns an empty array or an unexpected response structure, accessingresponse[0]will throw an error.You can address this with a defensive check, for example:
async run({ $ }) { const response = await this.hrCloud.updateEmployee({ $, data: { Id: this.employeeId, // ... }, }); - $.export("$summary", `Successfully updated employee: ${response[0].xFirstName} ${response[0].xLastName}`); + if (!Array.isArray(response) || !response.length) { + throw new Error("No response from updateEmployee. Please verify the API call."); + } + const [ firstRecord ] = response; + $.export("$summary", `Successfully updated employee: ${firstRecord.xFirstName} ${firstRecord.xLastName}`); return response; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.async run({ $ }) { const response = await this.hrCloud.updateEmployee({ $, data: { Id: this.employeeId, xPersonalEmail: this.email, xFirstName: this.firstName, xLastName: this.lastName, xAddress1: this.address, xCity: this.city, xState: this.state, xZipCode: this.zip, }, }); if (!Array.isArray(response) || !response.length) { throw new Error("No response from updateEmployee. Please verify the API call."); } const [ firstRecord ] = response; $.export("$summary", `Successfully updated employee: ${firstRecord.xFirstName} ${firstRecord.xLastName}`); return response; },components/hr_cloud/actions/create-employee/create-employee.mjs (1)
96-120: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider additional error handling for response validity.
While the code gracefully returns the fullresponse, there is no fallback if the API fails or if the response is not in the expected shape. A defensive check or a try/catch block (with a meaningful error message) could help maintain reliability.components/hr_cloud/sources/common/base.mjs (1)
31-55: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Gracefully handle invalid timestamps.
The method callsDate.parse(item[tsField]). Ifitem[tsField]is missing or an invalid date,Date.parsereturnsNaN, which can break your comparison logic and causeNaNto propagate. Consider skipping items or handling invalid timestamps explicitly.components/brillium/brillium.app.mjs (1)
200-230: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Make the pagination respect custom page size.
Thepaginatemethod forcespagesizetoMAX_PAGE_LIMIT. If you wish to honor a user-providedpageSize, pass that in throughargs.params.args = { ...args, params: { ...args?.params, - page: 1, - pagesize: MAX_PAGE_LIMIT, + page: args?.params?.page ?? 1, + pagesize: args?.params?.pagesize ?? MAX_PAGE_LIMIT, }, };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.async *paginate({ resourceFn, args, resourceKey, max, }) { args = { ...args, params: { ...args?.params, page: args?.params?.page ?? 1, pagesize: args?.params?.pagesize ?? MAX_PAGE_LIMIT, }, }; let hasMore, count = 0; do { const response = await resourceFn(args); const items = response[resourceKey]; if (!items?.length) { return; } for (const item of items) { yield item; if (max && ++count >= max) { return; } } hasMore = response.HasMore; args.params.page++; } while (hasMore); },components/google_sheets/google_sheets.app.mjs (1)
73-75: 💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Type change from array to single string may cause compatibility issues
The
worksheetIDsproperty has been changed fromstring[](array of strings) tostring(single string), along with modified labels and descriptions that now indicate a single worksheet rather than multiple worksheets. However, thegetSheetValuesmethod (lines 342-372) still appears to expect an array of worksheet IDs, converting the input to a Set and filtering multiple worksheet IDs.This type change could cause runtime errors if other components are passing this property to methods like
getSheetValuesthat expect an array.- worksheetIDs: { - type: "string", - label: "Worksheet ID", - description: "Select a worksheet or provide a worksheet ID", + worksheetIDs: { + type: "string[]", + label: "Worksheet(s)", + description: "Select worksheets or provide worksheet IDs",
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check if any other files are using the worksheetIDs property and how they handle it # Check for usage of worksheetIDs across the codebase rg -A 3 -B 3 "worksheetIDs" --glob "!components/google_sheets/google_sheets.app.mjs" # Check for methods that call getSheetValues to see how they're using worksheetIDs rg -A 5 "getSheetValues" --glob "!components/google_sheets/google_sheets.app.mjs"Length of output: 16745
Update the worksheetIDs property to use an array type for compatibility
The verification confirms that across the codebase, properties and helper methods (e.g. in
new-row-added.mjs,new-updates.mjs, and various action files) consistently treatworksheetIDsas an array (evidenced by calls to.map, use of.length, etc.). This indicates that changing the type to a single string would break functionality in methods such asgetSheetValues.Action items:
Revert the property definition so that
worksheetIDsis typed as a"string[]".Update the label and description accordingly (e.g. from "Worksheet ID" to "Worksheet(s)" and adjust the description) as shown in the diff snippet:
- worksheetIDs: { - type: "string", - label: "Worksheet ID", - description: "Select a worksheet or provide a worksheet ID", + worksheetIDs: { + type: "string[]", + label: "Worksheet(s)", + description: "Select worksheets or provide worksheet IDs",Ensure that methods expecting an array (like
getSheetValues) continue to function by receiving an array as intended.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.worksheetIDs: { type: "string[]", label: "Worksheet(s)", description: "Select worksheets or provide worksheet IDs", },components/shopify/actions/search-product-variant/search-product-variant.mjs (1)
113-118: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add check for empty search results
The code extracts values from search results without first checking if nodes array is empty, which could lead to errors.
Add a check to handle empty search results:
+ if (response.productVariants && response.productVariants.nodes.length === 0) { + if (!this.createIfNotFound) { + throw new Error(`No product variant found with title: ${this.title}`); + } + } else { const title = response.productVariants ? response.productVariants.nodes[0].title : response.productVariant.title; const id = response.productVariants ? response.productVariants.nodes[0].id : response.productVariant.id; $.export("$summary", `Found product variant \`${title}\` with ID \`${id}\``); return response; + }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
components/currents_api/currents_api.app.mjs (1)
1-11: 💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
New app implementation requires further development
This appears to be a skeleton implementation for a new
currents_apiapp. There are several areas that should be addressed before this is production-ready:
- The
authKeys()method contains aconsole.logstatement which isn't appropriate for production code - it could expose sensitive information and clutter logs.- There's no error handling implemented.
- No actual API methods are defined beyond the debugging utility.
- Documentation is minimal with no explanation of the app's purpose or API functionality.
Additionally, it's unclear how this new
currents_apiapp relates to the PR's objective of migrating Shopify to an updated GraphQL API. Is this file meant to be included in this PR?Consider refactoring this implementation to:
export default { type: "app", app: "currents_api", propDefinitions: {}, + /** + * @description Documentation about the Currents API app + */ methods: { - // this.$auth contains connected account data - authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - }, + /** + * @description Get authentication keys + * @returns {string[]} Array of authentication keys + */ + authKeys() { + try { + return Object.keys(this.$auth); + } catch (error) { + console.error("Error retrieving auth keys:", error); + return []; + } + }, + // Add actual API methods here }, };
Below is a shell script to verify the current contents of the file, followed by the final rewritten review comment.
Shell Script for Verification
The following script checks for the existence of the file and highlights the usage of any
console.logstatements within it:
Final Rewritten Review Comment
Currents API App: Refactor for Production Readiness
The current implementation in
components/currents_api/currents_api.app.mjsappears to be a basic skeleton. Before this app can be considered production-ready, please address the following:
Remove Debug Logging:
TheauthKeys()method currently usesconsole.logto output keys fromthis.$auth. This can expose sensitive data and clutter production logs.Implement Error Handling:
There is no error handling. Wrap access tothis.$authin a try–catch block to safely manage exceptions.Improve Documentation & API Design:
Add appropriate documentation to explain the purpose of the Currents API app. Include function-level JSDoc comments, and leave clear placeholders for the actual API methods required.Clarify PR Scope:
It's unclear how this new skeleton app supports the PR's objective of migrating Shopify to an updated GraphQL API. Please confirm if this inclusion is intentional or if further work is pending.Below is a suggested refactor:
export default { type: "app", app: "currents_api", propDefinitions: {}, + /** + * @description Currents API app: Provides API integration for [explain functionality/purpose] + */ methods: { - // this.$auth contains connected account data - authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - }, + /** + * @description Retrieve the authentication keys from the connected account. + * @returns {string[]} Array of authentication keys or an empty array if an error occurs. + */ + authKeys() { + try { + return Object.keys(this.$auth); + } catch (error) { + console.error("Error retrieving auth keys:", error); + return []; + } + }, + // TODO: Implement additional API methods required for Currents API functionality. }, };Please address these points to ensure the app meets production standards.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash FILE="components/currents_api/currents_api.app.mjs" if [ -f "$FILE" ]; then echo "File '$FILE' found. Showing first 20 lines:" head -n 20 "$FILE" echo "" echo "Occurrences of 'console.log' in '$FILE':" grep -n "console.log" "$FILE" || echo "No console.log found" else echo "File not found: $FILE" fiLength of output: 991
Currents API App: Refactor for Production Safety and Clarity
The current implementation in
components/currents_api/currents_api.app.mjsis a skeleton that isn't ready for production. In particular:
- Remove Debug Logging: The
authKeys()method logs the connected account's keys usingconsole.log, which may expose sensitive information.- Implement Error Handling: There is no error management around accessing
this.$auth. A try–catch block should be added.- Improve Documentation and API Definition: Enhance inline documentation with JSDoc comments and provide placeholders for actual API methods.
- Clarify PR Scope: It remains unclear how this Currents API integration ties into the overall objective related to migrating Shopify to the updated GraphQL API.
Below is a suggested refactoring:
export default { type: "app", app: "currents_api", propDefinitions: {}, + /** + * @description Currents API app: Provides integration for [describe purpose and functionality]. + */ methods: { - // this.$auth contains connected account data - authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - }, + /** + * @description Retrieve the authentication keys from the connected account. + * @returns {string[]} Array of keys or an empty array if an error occurs. + */ + authKeys() { + try { + return Object.keys(this.$auth); + } catch (error) { + console.error("Error retrieving auth keys:", error); + return []; + } + }, + // TODO: Implement actual API methods for the Currents API. }, };Please address these issues to ensure the app is robust and production-ready.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export default { type: "app", app: "currents_api", propDefinitions: {}, /** * @description Currents API app: Provides integration for [describe purpose and functionality]. */ methods: { /** * @description Retrieve the authentication keys from the connected account. * @returns {string[]} Array of keys or an empty array if an error occurs. */ authKeys() { try { return Object.keys(this.$auth); } catch (error) { console.error("Error retrieving auth keys:", error); return []; } }, // TODO: Implement actual API methods for the Currents API. }, };components/shopify/shopify.app.mjs (1)
241-246: 💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Document metafield type options more explicitly
The metafields property description includes examples, but doesn't fully document the available types for the
typefield. Consider enhancing the documentation to list all supported metafield types.
🌐 Web query:
What are all the supported metafield types in Shopify API?💡 Result:
Shopify's API supports a comprehensive range of metafield types to handle diverse data requirements. These types are categorized into several groups, each serving specific use cases:
Basic Data Types
- Text:
single_line_text_field,multi_line_text_field- Numbers:
number_integer,number_decimal- Boolean:
true_or_false(checkbox)- Date/Time:
date,date_time- Special Formats:
color(RGB hex values)rating(decimal values on a scale)url(HTTP/HTTPS/mailto/sms/tel links)link(anchor text + URL pairs, added in 2024)[5][12]Measurement Types
dimension(length)volumeweight- All support metric/imperial units[6][12]
Reference Types
productvariantcollectionpagefilecustomercompanymetaobject(custom objects)[6][12][13]Complex Data Types
json(arbitrary JSON data)money(numeric amount with currency)id(unique identifiers)[12][13]List Types
Created by adding
list.prefix to base types:
list.product_referencelist.single_line_text_fieldlist.colorlist.link(added in 2024)- Supported for most types except boolean and money[2][5][12]
Validation-Enhanced Types
- Unique Values: Enforced for
single_line_text_field,url, andnumber_integertypes[10]- Domain-Restricted URLs: Configurable via metafield definitions[6]
For example, a
list.product_referencemetafield could store complementary products, while aratingtype might display star ratings validated through a 5-point scale[6][8]. Developers should uselinkinstead of basic URL types when needing both text and URL storage[5][12].These types enable powerful customization, from displaying ingredient lists via
list.single_line_text_fieldto creating smart collections using boolean flags[2][10]. List types particularly enhance filtering capabilities, allowing products to appear in multiple categories simultaneously[2][11].Citations:
- 1: https://help.shopify.com/en/manual/custom-data/metafields
- 2: https://help.shopify.com/en/manual/custom-data/metafields/metafield-definitions/metafield-lists
- 3: https://docs.celigo.com/hc/en-us/articles/4413333355547-Manage-and-configure-metafield-definitions-for-Shopify-products-and-its-variants
- 4: https://help.shopify.com/en/manual/custom-data/metafields/metafield-definitions/creating-custom-metafield-definitions
- 5: https://shopify.dev/changelog/new-metafield-definition-types-link-and-list-link
- 6: https://help.shopify.com/en/manual/custom-data/metafields/metafield-definitions/metafield-types
- 7: https://shopify.dev/docs/apps/build/custom-data
- 8: https://shopify.dev/docs/apps/build/custom-data/metafields/list-of-standard-definitions
- 9: https://shopify.dev/docs/api/storefront/2022-07/objects/metafield
- 10: https://shopify.dev/docs/apps/build/custom-data/metafields/use-metafield-capabilities
- 11: https://gadget.dev/blog/new-metafield-types-and-shopify-api-resources-now-available
- 12: https://shopify.dev/docs/apps/build/custom-data/metafields/list-of-data-types
- 13: https://shopify.dev/docs/api/functions/reference/product-discounts/graphql/common-objects/metafield
Enhance Shopify Metafield Documentation
- In
components/shopify/shopify.app.mjs(lines 241-246), the current metafields property description provides examples but does not comprehensively list the supported metafield types.- Based on Shopify's documentation, please update the description to explicitly include all supported types. For example, you might list:
- Basic Data Types:
single_line_text_field,multi_line_text_field,number_integer,number_decimal,true_or_false,date,date_time,color,rating,url, andlink.- Measurement Types:
dimension,volume,weight(with support for metric/imperial units).- Reference Types:
product,variant,collection,page,file,customer,company,metaobject.- Complex Data Types:
json,money,id.- List Types: Prefixed with
list.(such aslist.product_reference,list.single_line_text_field,list.color,list.link, etc.).- Adding these details (with an appropriate reference to Shopify’s official documentation, e.g., Shopify Metafield Data Types) will provide developers with a clear and complete overview.
components/govee/actions/retrieve-device-info/retrieve-device-info.mjs (1)
34-46:
⚠️ Potential issuePrevent potential runtime error when device is not found.
If no device matches the provideddeviceId, accessingdevice.skuwill throw an error. Consider adding a guard clause to handle this case:+ if (!device) { + throw new Error(`No device found for deviceId: ${deviceId}`); + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const { data: devices } = await app.listDevices(); const device = devices.find(({ device }) => device === deviceId); if (!device) { throw new Error(`No device found for deviceId: ${deviceId}`); } const response = await getDeviceStatus({ $, data: { requestId: uuid(), payload: { sku: device.sku, device: deviceId, }, }, });components/govee/actions/control-device/control-device.mjs (2)
141-153:
⚠️ Potential issueGuard against an undefined device object before constructing the request.
Ifdevices.find(...)returns undefined, referencingdevice.skuwill cause a runtime error. Add a guard clause:+ if (!device) { + throw new Error(`Device with ID ${deviceId} not found`); + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.async run({ $ }) { const { app, controlDevice, deviceId, commandType, value, ...fields } = this; const { data: devices } = await app.listDevices(); const device = devices.find(({ device }) => device === deviceId); if (!device) { throw new Error(`Device with ID ${deviceId} not found`); }
29-39:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle missing or invalid capability parameters gracefully.
Ifcapabilityis undefined, thenparametersbecomesundefined, causing a runtime error atif (parameters.dataType === "ENUM"). Add a check to avoid referencingparameterswhen it’s undefined:const { parameters } = capability ?? {}; + if (!parameters || !parameters.dataType) { + return {}; + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.async additionalProps() { const { deviceId, commandType, } = this; const { data: devices } = await this.app.listDevices(); const device = devices.find(({ device }) => device === deviceId); const capability = device?.capabilities?.find(({ type }) => type === commandType); const { parameters } = capability ?? {}; if (!parameters || !parameters.dataType) { return {}; } // existing code continues... }components/kindo/kindo.app.mjs (1)
17-25: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling to makeRequest method
The current implementation doesn't include any explicit error handling for failed requests. Consider adding try/catch with appropriate error messages.
makeRequest({ $ = this, path, headers, ...args } = {}) { + try { return axios($, { ...args, url: this.getUrl(path), headers: this.getHeaders(headers), }); + } catch (error) { + const status = error.response?.status; + const message = error.response?.data?.message || error.message; + throw new Error(`Kindo API request failed with ${status}: ${message}`); + } },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.makeRequest({ $ = this, path, headers, ...args } = {}) { try { return axios($, { ...args, url: this.getUrl(path), headers: this.getHeaders(headers), }); } catch (error) { const status = error.response?.status; const message = error.response?.data?.message || error.message; throw new Error(`Kindo API request failed with ${status}: ${message}`); } },components/kindo/actions/chat/chat.mjs (3)
79-119: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling in run method
The run method doesn't include error handling for API call failures. Add a try/catch block to provide better error messages to users.
async run({ $ }) { const { chat, model, messages, maxTokens, temperature, topP, n, stop, presencePenalty, frequencyPenalty, additionalParameters, } = this; + try { const response = await chat({ $, data: { model, messages: utils.parseArray(messages), max_tokens: maxTokens, ...(temperature && { temperature: +temperature, }), ...(topP && { top_p: +topP, }), n, stop, ...(presencePenalty && { presence_penalty: +presencePenalty, }), ...(frequencyPenalty && { frequency_penalty: +frequencyPenalty, }), ...additionalParameters, }, }); $.export("$summary", "Successfully created model response"); return response; + } catch (error) { + $.export("$summary", `Failed to create model response: ${error.message}`); + throw error; + } },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.async run({ $ }) { const { chat, model, messages, maxTokens, temperature, topP, n, stop, presencePenalty, frequencyPenalty, additionalParameters, } = this; try { const response = await chat({ $, data: { model, messages: utils.parseArray(messages), max_tokens: maxTokens, ...(temperature && { temperature: +temperature, }), ...(topP && { top_p: +topP, }), n, stop, ...(presencePenalty && { presence_penalty: +presencePenalty, }), ...(frequencyPenalty && { frequency_penalty: +frequencyPenalty, }), ...additionalParameters, }, }); $.export("$summary", "Successfully created model response"); return response; } catch (error) { $.export("$summary", `Failed to create model response: ${error.message}`); throw error; } },
20-21:
⚠️ Potential issueFix documentation reference in messages description
The description appears to reference OpenAI's documentation rather than Kindo-specific documentation, which may confuse users. Update this to reference Kindo's documentation.
messages: { type: "string[]", label: "Messages", - description: "A list of messages comprising the conversation so far. Depending on the [model](https://app.kindo.ai/settings/api) you use, different message types (modalities) are supported, like [text](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/text-generation), [images](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/vision), and [audio](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/audio). [See the documentation](https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/chat/create#chat-create-messages) for more information. Eg. `[{\"role\": \"user\", \"content\": \"Hello, world!\"}]", + description: "A list of messages comprising the conversation so far. Each message should be an object with 'role' and 'content' properties. Eg. `[{\"role\": \"user\", \"content\": \"Hello, world!\"}]`. [See the Kindo documentation](https://app.kindo.ai/settings/api) for more information.", },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.messages: { type: "string[]", label: "Messages", description: "A list of messages comprising the conversation so far. Each message should be an object with 'role' and 'content' properties. Eg. `[{\"role\": \"user\", \"content\": \"Hello, world!\"}]`. [See the Kindo documentation](https://app.kindo.ai/settings/api) for more information.", },
28-63: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Convert string parameters to numeric props with validation
Several numeric parameters are defined as strings but converted to numbers with the
+operator. It's better to define them as numeric types with appropriate validation.For parameters like temperature, topP, presencePenalty, and frequencyPenalty, consider:
temperature: { - type: "string", + type: "number", label: "Temperature", description: "**Optional**. What [sampling temperature](https://towardsdatascience.com/how-to-sample-from-language-models-682bceb97277) to use. Higher values means the model will take more risks. Try `0.9` for more creative applications, and `0` (argmax sampling) for ones with a well-defined answer.", optional: true, + min: 0, + max: 2, }, topP: { - type: "string", + type: "number", label: "Top P", description: "An alternative to sampling with temperature, called nucleus sampling, where the model considers the results of the tokens with top_p probability mass. So `0.1` means only the tokens comprising the top 10% probability mass are considered. We generally recommend altering this or `temperature` but not both.", optional: true, + min: 0, + max: 1, },And then update the run method:
...(temperature && { - temperature: +temperature, + temperature: temperature, }), ...(topP && { - top_p: +topP, + top_p: topP, }),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.temperature: { - type: "string", + type: "number", label: "Temperature", description: "**Optional**. What [sampling temperature](https://towardsdatascience.com/how-to-sample-from-language-models-682bceb97277) to use. Higher values means the model will take more risks. Try `0.9` for more creative applications, and `0` (argmax sampling) for ones with a well-defined answer.", optional: true, + min: 0, + max: 2, }, topP: { - type: "string", + type: "number", label: "Top P", description: "An alternative to sampling with temperature, called nucleus sampling, where the model considers the results of the tokens with top_p probability mass. So `0.1` means only the tokens comprising the top 10% probability mass are considered. We generally recommend altering this or `temperature` but not both.", optional: true, + min: 0, + max: 1, }, n: { type: "integer", label: "N", description: "How many completions to generate for each prompt", optional: true, }, stop: { type: "string[]", label: "Stop", description: "Up to 4 sequences where the API will stop generating further tokens. The returned text will not contain the stop sequence.", optional: true, }, presencePenalty: { type: "string", label: "Presence Penalty", description: "Number between `-2.0` and `2.0`. Positive values penalize new tokens based on whether they appear in the text so far, increasing the model's likelihood to talk about new topics.", optional: true, }, frequencyPenalty: { type: "string", label: "Frequency Penalty", description: "Number between `-2.0` and `2.0`. Positive values penalize new tokens based on their existing frequency in the text so far, decreasing the model's likelihood to repeat the same line verbatim.", optional: true, }, // Later in the run method update: ...(temperature && { - temperature: +temperature, + temperature: temperature, }), ...(topP && { - top_p: +topP, + top_p: topP, }),components/docker_engine/docker_engine.app.mjs (1)
1-11: 💡 Verification agent
❓ Verification inconclusive
Clarify purpose of new app file in Shopify migration PR
This new Docker Engine app file seems unrelated to the PR's stated purpose of migrating Shopify components to the updated GraphQL API. While the file itself has an appropriate structure for a basic app module, its inclusion in this PR needs explanation.
The
authKeys()method appears to be for debugging purposes only and outputs sensitive authentication information to console logs, which should not be left in production code.- authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - }, + // Add actual implementation methods for Docker Engine API integration
Action: Clarify file purpose and remove sensitive debug logging
- The new Docker Engine app file (
components/docker_engine/docker_engine.app.mjs) appears unrelated to the stated Shopify migration work. Please provide context in the PR description explaining why this file is part of the changes.- The
authKeys()method is used solely for debugging by logging authentication keys (this.$auth), which risks exposing sensitive data in production. This method should be removed or replaced with a proper implementation for Docker Engine API integration.- authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - }, + // Add actual implementation methods for Docker Engine API integration📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export default { type: "app", app: "docker_engine", propDefinitions: {}, methods: { // this.$auth contains connected account data // Add actual implementation methods for Docker Engine API integration }, };components/housecall_pro/housecall_pro.app.mjs (1)
1-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
⚠️ Potential issueClarify purpose of new app file in Shopify migration PR
This new Housecall Pro app file appears to be unrelated to the PR's stated goal of migrating Shopify to an updated GraphQL API. The file follows the same template as the other new app files in this PR.
The
authKeys()method is writing potentially sensitive authentication information to console logs, which is not recommended for production code.- authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - }, + // Add actual implementation methods for Housecall Pro API integration📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export default { type: "app", app: "housecall_pro", propDefinitions: {}, methods: { // this.$auth contains connected account data // Add actual implementation methods for Housecall Pro API integration }, };components/microsoft_graph_api_daemon_app/microsoft_graph_api_daemon_app.app.mjs (1)
1-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
⚠️ Potential issueClarify purpose of new app file in Shopify migration PR
This Microsoft Graph API app file seems unrelated to the stated purpose of migrating Shopify to an updated GraphQL API. The file follows the same template pattern as the other app files added in this PR.
The
authKeys()method logs authentication data to the console, which could expose sensitive information and should not be included in production code.- authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - }, + // Add actual implementation methods for Microsoft Graph API integration📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export default { type: "app", app: "microsoft_graph_api_daemon_app", propDefinitions: {}, methods: { // this.$auth contains connected account data // Add actual implementation methods for Microsoft Graph API integration }, };components/minerstat/minerstat.app.mjs (1)
1-11: 💡 Verification agent
❓ Verification inconclusive
Clarify purpose of new app file in Shopify migration PR
This new Minerstat app file, like the others in this PR, seems unrelated to migrating Shopify components to an updated GraphQL API. The file contains only a basic app structure with a debugging method.
The
authKeys()method outputs authentication information to the console, which is not appropriate for production code as it may expose sensitive data.- authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - }, + // Add actual implementation methods for Minerstat API integrationAdditionally, please clarify why these new app files are included in a PR focused on Shopify API migration. If they're intended for a different purpose, consider separating them into their own PR for clarity.
Critical Action Required: Refactor Minerstat App File and Clarify Its Role
- The file
components/minerstat/minerstat.app.mjscurrently includes only a basic app structure with a debugging method (authKeys()) that logs authentication keys to the console. This could inadvertently expose sensitive data in production.- The file appears unrelated to the Shopify API migration focus of this PR. Please clarify the intended use of these new Minerstat-related files.
- Recommended changes:
- Security: Remove the
console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));call or replace it with proper logic that does not expose sensitive authentication details.- Purpose Clarification: If this file is meant to integrate with the Minerstat API, implement the appropriate methods; otherwise, consider moving it to a separate PR to keep concerns isolated.
- authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - }, + // Remove debugging calls and implement proper Minerstat API integration methods📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export default { type: "app", app: "minerstat", propDefinitions: {}, methods: { // Remove debugging calls and implement proper Minerstat API integration methods }, };components/microsoft_dataverse/microsoft_dataverse.app.mjs (2)
1-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add API interaction methods to this app component
This appears to be a skeleton implementation that lacks methods for interacting with the Microsoft Dataverse API. For a complete and usable app component, consider adding methods that will be needed by actions and sources using this integration.
Consider adding methods like:
- Data retrieval methods
- CRUD operations
- Authentication handling beyond just logging keys
This will make the component more useful for building actions and sources.
7-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove console.log statement from production code
The
authKeys()method currently logs authentication keys to the console, which could potentially expose sensitive information in logs. This appears to be a debugging function that shouldn't be included in production code.- authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - },If this method is needed for documentation or debugging purposes, consider adding a comment indicating it's for development use only, or implement a safer alternative that doesn't log sensitive information.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.components/greenhouse_job_board_api/greenhouse_job_board_api.app.mjs (2)
1-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add API interaction methods to this app component
This appears to be a skeleton implementation that lacks methods for interacting with the Greenhouse Job Board API. For a complete and usable app component, consider adding methods that will be needed by actions and sources using this integration.
Consider adding methods like:
- Job listing retrieval
- Application processing
- Candidate management methods
- Authentication handling beyond just logging keys
This will make the component more useful for building actions and sources.
7-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove console.log statement from production code
The
authKeys()method logs authentication keys to the console, which could potentially expose sensitive information in logs. This appears to be a debugging function that shouldn't be included in production code.- authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - },If this method is needed for documentation or debugging purposes, consider adding a comment indicating it's for development use only, or implement a safer alternative that doesn't log sensitive information.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.components/cloudflare_browser_rendering/cloudflare_browser_rendering.app.mjs (2)
1-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add API interaction methods to this app component
This appears to be a skeleton implementation that lacks methods for interacting with the Cloudflare Browser Rendering API. For a complete and usable app component, consider adding methods that will be needed by actions and sources using this integration.
Consider adding methods like:
- Browser rendering configuration methods
- Screenshot or DOM interaction methods
- Request and response handling methods
- Authentication handling beyond just logging keys
This will make the component more useful for building actions and sources.
7-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove console.log statement from production code
The
authKeys()method logs authentication keys to the console, which could potentially expose sensitive information in logs. This appears to be a debugging function that shouldn't be included in production code.- authKeys() { - console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); - },If this method is needed for documentation or debugging purposes, consider adding a comment indicating it's for development use only, or implement a safer alternative that doesn't log sensitive information.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.components/elastic_email/actions/unsubscribe-contact/unsubscribe-contact.mjs (1)
19-26: 💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify that parsedEmails will always have a length property.
The code assumes
parsedEmailshas a length property on line 25, but depending on whatparseObjectreturns, this might not always be the case. Consider adding a check to ensureparsedEmailsis an array before accessing its length.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Locate the parseObject implementation to understand its behavior echo "Searching for parseObject implementation..." cat components/elastic_email/common/utils.mjsLength of output: 589
Ensure
parsedEmailsIs an Array Before Accessing ItslengthPropertyAfter reviewing the implementation of
parseObject, it’s clear that ifthis.unsubscribeEmailsis falsy or not an array,parseObjectmay returnundefinedor a value without alengthproperty. This can lead to runtime errors when accessingparsedEmails.length. For example:
- A falsy
this.unsubscribeEmailsresults inundefined.- A non-array, non-string value is returned as-is and might not have a
lengthproperty.To avoid potential errors, please add a type check or a default value. One possible solution is:
const emails = Array.isArray(parsedEmails) ? parsedEmails : []; $.export("$summary", `Unsubscribed ${emails.length} contact(s) successfully`);components/elastic_email/actions/send-email/send-email.mjs (1)
106-108: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve validation for recipients data
The current implementation uses optional chaining with
parseObject(this.recipients)?.map()which could result in a runtime error if the parsing fails or returns null/undefined.Add proper validation to ensure recipients are properly formatted:
- Recipients: parseObject(this.recipients)?.map((item) => ({ + Recipients: (parseObject(this.recipients) || this.recipients).map((item) => ({ Email: item, })),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.Recipients: (parseObject(this.recipients) || this.recipients).map((item) => ({ Email: item, })),
|
/approve |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I came here to find out why my Shopify Developer App component actions were throwing errors today.
Stack trace:
Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find module '/tmp/__pdg__/dist/code/b59962f1748152b2d77390059ddb245048509bd546e34eda241518ba3149c2af/node_modules/@pipedream/shopify/actions/search-customers/common.mjs' imported from /tmp/__pdg__/dist/code/b59962f1748152b2d77390059ddb245048509bd546e34eda241518ba3149c2af/code/actions/search-customers/search-customers.mjs
at finalizeResolution (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:269:11)
at moduleResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:937:10)
at moduleResolveWithNodePath (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:1173:14)
at defaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:1216:79)
at nextResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/hooks:868:28)
at resolve (file:///var/task/import-hooks.mjs:7:10)
at nextResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/hooks:868:28)
at Hooks.resolve (node:internal/modules/esm/hooks:306:30)
at MessagePort.handleMessage (node:internal/modules/esm/worker:196:24)
at [nodejs.internal.kHybridDispatch] (node:internal/event_target:820:20)
From what I can tell, this PR appears to be the issue, as this common.mjs file is a dependency in that component, but it was removed here.
I'm guessing most of the Shopify Developer App actions have a dependency on this common file (see example here), so I think this is probably pretty urgent to resolve.
shopify_developer_appcomponents after this is publishedResolves #15731
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Version Update