Microsoft Outlook: Repy to Message action #16067
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ |
WalkthroughThis pull request updates version numbers across multiple Microsoft Outlook integration modules. In addition to uniform version bumps in several existing action and source files, a new "Reply to Email" action has been introduced. The application’s main module now includes conditional logic improvements in message preparation as well as a new method to handle email replies via the Microsoft Graph API. The package version has also been updated. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant ReplyAction
participant OutlookApp
participant GraphAPI
User->>ReplyAction: Trigger reply action with messageId & content
ReplyAction->>OutlookApp: Call replyToEmail({ messageId, ... })
OutlookApp->>GraphAPI: _makeRequest(POST reply)
GraphAPI-->>OutlookApp: Response received
OutlookApp-->>ReplyAction: Return reply result
ReplyAction-->>User: Confirm email reply
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
components/microsoft_outlook/actions/find-contacts/find-contacts.mjsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs components/microsoft_outlook/actions/approve-workflow/approve-workflow.mjsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs components/microsoft_outlook/actions/create-draft-email/create-draft-email.mjsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
components/microsoft_outlook/actions/add-label-to-email/add-label-to-email.mjs (1)
35-38: Consider a Safe Default for Email Categories.
The code retrieves message categories usingconst labels = message?.categories;If
message.categoriesis everundefined, calling.includes(this.label)(and later using the spread operator with...labels) may throw an error. To ensure robustness, consider defaultinglabelsto an empty array. For example:- const labels = message?.categories; + const labels = message?.categories || [];This change would help prevent potential runtime errors when the categories are not provided by the API.
components/microsoft_outlook/actions/remove-label-from-email/remove-label-from-email.mjs (1)
34-36: Handling Undefined Categories: Default to an Empty ArrayThe
labelsvariable is set usingmessage?.categories, which might beundefinedif the message has no categories. This can lead to errors when callingindexOf. Consider initializinglabelsto an empty array to ensure safe operations:- let labels = message?.categories; + let labels = message?.categories || [];This change would safeguard against runtime errors in cases where no categories exist.
components/microsoft_outlook/actions/approve-workflow/approve-workflow.mjs (1)
30-34: Review of Message Options ConstructionIn constructing the
optsobject, the use of the spread operator onthis(...this) could include extra properties from the component context that might not be intended for the message body. Consider explicitly selecting only the necessary properties to avoid any unintended side effects.components/microsoft_outlook/actions/list-labels/list-labels.mjs (1)
16-19: Message Summary ConstructionThe inline ternary used to pluralize “label” is correct. For improved readability, consider assigning the pluralization result to a variable before incorporating it into the export summary.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (18)
components/microsoft_outlook/actions/add-label-to-email/add-label-to-email.mjs(1 hunks)components/microsoft_outlook/actions/approve-workflow/approve-workflow.mjs(1 hunks)components/microsoft_outlook/actions/create-contact/create-contact.mjs(1 hunks)components/microsoft_outlook/actions/create-draft-email/create-draft-email.mjs(1 hunks)components/microsoft_outlook/actions/find-contacts/find-contacts.mjs(1 hunks)components/microsoft_outlook/actions/find-email/find-email.mjs(1 hunks)components/microsoft_outlook/actions/list-contacts/list-contacts.mjs(1 hunks)components/microsoft_outlook/actions/list-folders/list-folders.mjs(1 hunks)components/microsoft_outlook/actions/list-labels/list-labels.mjs(1 hunks)components/microsoft_outlook/actions/move-email-to-folder/move-email-to-folder.mjs(1 hunks)components/microsoft_outlook/actions/remove-label-from-email/remove-label-from-email.mjs(1 hunks)components/microsoft_outlook/actions/reply-to-email/reply-to-email.mjs(1 hunks)components/microsoft_outlook/actions/send-email/send-email.mjs(1 hunks)components/microsoft_outlook/actions/update-contact/update-contact.mjs(1 hunks)components/microsoft_outlook/microsoft_outlook.app.mjs(2 hunks)components/microsoft_outlook/package.json(1 hunks)components/microsoft_outlook/sources/new-contact/new-contact.mjs(1 hunks)components/microsoft_outlook/sources/new-email/new-email.mjs(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (21)
components/microsoft_outlook/package.json (1)
3-3: Version Bump to "1.4.0" is Correct and Consistent.
The package version has been updated as part of the coordinated versioning changes in the Microsoft Outlook components.components/microsoft_outlook/sources/new-contact/new-contact.mjs (1)
8-8: Version Update to "0.0.12" is Consistent.
This update aligns well with similar changes across other modules and maintains uniformity.components/microsoft_outlook/actions/update-contact/update-contact.mjs (1)
6-6: Version Bump to "0.0.11" is Appropriate.
The updated version is in sync with the overall versioning cadence observed in other related components.components/microsoft_outlook/actions/list-contacts/list-contacts.mjs (1)
6-6: Version Update to "0.0.11" is Consistent with Collaborative Changes.
The version change is straightforward and does not impact the existing action logic.components/microsoft_outlook/actions/add-label-to-email/add-label-to-email.mjs (1)
8-8: Version Increment to "0.0.4" is Correct.
The version number has been updated in line with other Microsoft Outlook action modules.components/microsoft_outlook/actions/move-email-to-folder/move-email-to-folder.mjs (1)
7-7: Version Update: Bump to "0.0.2"The version has been incremented appropriately to reflect the coordinated update across Microsoft Outlook modules. No functional issues are evident.
components/microsoft_outlook/actions/create-contact/create-contact.mjs (1)
6-6: Version Update: Bump to "0.0.11"The updated version aligns with the overall update strategy. The rest of the code—including the use of the spread operator on
expandfor additional contact details—is clear and consistent with expected behavior.components/microsoft_outlook/actions/remove-label-from-email/remove-label-from-email.mjs (1)
7-7: Version Update: Bump to "0.0.4"This version bump is consistent with similar changes across other components.
components/microsoft_outlook/actions/approve-workflow/approve-workflow.mjs (1)
7-7: Version Update: Bump to "0.0.2"The version update is applied consistently. The rest of the module’s structure and logic appear sound.
components/microsoft_outlook/actions/list-labels/list-labels.mjs (1)
7-7: Version Update: Bump to "0.0.4"The version update is in line with the coordinated changes across modules.
components/microsoft_outlook/actions/find-email/find-email.mjs (1)
7-7: Version Bump Update: Consistency CheckThe version update to
"0.0.2"is correctly applied. Please confirm that this update aligns with your release documentation and any dependency registries used for Microsoft Outlook actions.components/microsoft_outlook/actions/list-folders/list-folders.mjs (1)
7-7: Version Increment VerificationThe version change to
"0.0.2"is consistent with similar updates across other Microsoft Outlook modules. No functional modifications accompany this change.components/microsoft_outlook/actions/find-contacts/find-contacts.mjs (1)
6-6: Version Bump ConfirmationThe update from
"0.0.10"to"0.0.11"confirms your intent to standardize versioning across contact-related actions. Double-check that any references to this action elsewhere (e.g., in documentation or integration tests) are updated accordingly.components/microsoft_outlook/sources/new-email/new-email.mjs (1)
10-10: Source Version Update NotedThe version bump from
"0.0.14"to"0.0.15"in the new email event source maintains consistency with the overall integration. No code logic has been altered.components/microsoft_outlook/actions/create-draft-email/create-draft-email.mjs (1)
6-6: Action Version Increment ConfirmedThe version has been incremented to
"0.0.11", aligning with the similar version updates across the module suite. This change is non-functional and purely for version control consistency.components/microsoft_outlook/actions/send-email/send-email.mjs (1)
6-6: Version bump looks good.The version has been incremented from 0.0.11 to 0.0.12, which is appropriate for adding new functionality to the Microsoft Outlook integration.
components/microsoft_outlook/actions/reply-to-email/reply-to-email.mjs (3)
1-77: New "Reply to Email" action looks well-structured.The implementation follows the established pattern for Microsoft Outlook actions. The props are well-defined with appropriate descriptions, and the run method correctly calls the newly added
replyToEmailmethod from the Microsoft Outlook app.
42-48: Good job renaming the parameter to "comment".Using "comment" instead of "content" for the reply body makes the purpose clearer, and the description properly indicates this is for the reply's content.
63-75:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify message body preparation for reply functionality.
The implementation reuses the
prepareMessageBodymethod, which is good for consistency. Just confirm that this method works correctly in the context of replies, as some email clients format replies differently than new messages.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the prepareMessageBody method has been used in other similar actions rg -A 3 -B 3 "prepareMessageBody" --glob "*.mjs" | grep -v "reply-to-email.mjs"Length of output: 2619
Email Reply Formatting Verification
The
prepareMessageBodymethod is consistently reused in other email actions (e.g., create-draft, send-email, approve-workflow), which supports its intended uniformity. For the reply-to-email action, it’s important to manually verify that the message body formatting meets the requirements of different email clients regarding replies. Please double-check the integration tests or perform manual reviews to ensure that reply-specific formatting is handled as expected.components/microsoft_outlook/microsoft_outlook.app.mjs (2)
261-267: Improved message preparation with conditional properties.The updated code now:
- Only adds the body property if content exists
- Only adds toRecipients if there are recipients to add
This is a good improvement to prevent sending empty or unnecessary properties in the API request.
280-288: Correctly implemented replyToEmail method.The new method follows the same pattern as other API methods in the file:
- Accepts messageId and other parameters
- Makes a POST request to the correct Microsoft Graph API endpoint
- Returns the response
This implementation is clean and consistent with the codebase's patterns.
Resolves #16045
Summary by CodeRabbit