Skip to content

Conversation

@dannyroosevelt
Copy link
Collaborator

@dannyroosevelt dannyroosevelt commented Apr 24, 2025

WHY

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Enhanced debug logging for token validation to provide more detailed information during troubleshooting. No changes to user-facing functionality.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 24, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Apr 24, 2025 6:12pm
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Apr 24, 2025 6:12pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Apr 24, 2025 6:12pm

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 24, 2025

Walkthrough

Detailed debug logging has been added to the validateRequest function within the utility script. The new logs capture and display key request headers, the received and expected tokens, and whether they match. If the tokens do not match, the code attempts to decode both tokens from base64 to UTF-8 and logs the results or any decoding errors. These enhancements are introduced just before the existing token mismatch check and response logic.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
docs-v2/pages/api/demo-connect/utils.js Added extensive debug logging in validateRequest for request headers, token values, match status, and base64 decoding of tokens when mismatched. No changes to exported or public entities.

Poem

Debug logs now light the way,
Tokens checked without delay.
Headers peeked and secrets shown,
Even base64 is overthrown!
If errors lurk, they’re logged with care—
A rabbit’s touch for code laid bare.
🐇✨

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 ESLint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

docs-v2/pages/api/demo-connect/utils.js

Oops! Something went wrong! :(

ESLint: 8.57.1

Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs
at packageResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:839:9)
at moduleResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:908:18)
at defaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:1038:11)
at ModuleLoader.defaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:557:12)
at ModuleLoader.resolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:525:25)
at ModuleLoader.getModuleJob (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:246:38)
at ModuleJob._link (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:126:49)

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docs-v2/pages/api/demo-connect/utils.js (2)

159-160: Enhance error logging for easier troubleshooting.

The error logging could be more informative to help with troubleshooting.

- console.log("Error decoding tokens:", e.message);
+ console.log("Error decoding tokens:", {
+   message: e.message,
+   received: requestToken,
+   expected: expectedToken
+ });

139-140: Consider a more robust approach to user-agent truncation.

The current approach for truncating the user-agent is simple but could be improved.

- userAgent: req.headers["user-agent"]?.substring(0, 50) + "...",
+ userAgent: req.headers["user-agent"] ? 
+   (req.headers["user-agent"].length > 50 ? 
+     req.headers["user-agent"].substring(0, 50) + "..." : 
+     req.headers["user-agent"]) : 
+   "undefined",
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 257d716 and 990eefa.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs-v2/pages/api/demo-connect/utils.js (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Lint Code Base

Comment on lines +149 to +161
// If there's a mismatch, decode both tokens to see what's different
if (requestToken !== expectedToken) {
try {
const decodedReceived = Buffer.from(requestToken, "base64").toString();
const decodedExpected = Buffer.from(expectedToken, "base64").toString();
console.log("Decoded tokens:", {
received: decodedReceived,
expected: decodedExpected,
});
} catch (e) {
console.log("Error decoding tokens:", e.message);
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Good approach for diagnosing token mismatches.

The approach of decoding tokens when they don't match provides valuable debugging information and includes proper error handling. The truncation of user-agent also shows good attention to log size management.

Since this is labeled as "temporary logging" in the PR title, please consider adding a TODO comment indicating when these logs should be removed, or implementing a more permanent solution with proper log levels:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any TODO comments about removing logs
grep -n "TODO.*remov.*log" docs-v2/pages/api/demo-connect/utils.js || echo "No removal plan found for temporary logs"

Length of output: 159


Add a removal plan for temporary debug logs

I didn’t find any TODO or similar comment indicating when to remove these temporary logs. Since this PR is explicitly adding diagnostic logging, please:

  • Add a TODO (or FIXME) comment in docs-v2/pages/api/demo-connect/utils.js noting when or under what condition these logs should be removed.
  • Or replace the console.log calls with a proper logger at a debug level so they can be toggled off in production.

Example:

   // If there's a mismatch, decode both tokens to see what's different
   if (requestToken !== expectedToken) {
     try {
-      const decodedReceived = Buffer.from(requestToken, "base64").toString();
+      // TODO: Remove or lower log level once token mismatch issue is resolved
+      const decodedReceived = Buffer.from(requestToken, "base64").toString();
       const decodedExpected = Buffer.from(expectedToken, "base64").toString();
       console.log("Decoded tokens:", {
         received: decodedReceived,
         expected: decodedExpected,
       });
     } catch (e) {
-      console.log("Error decoding tokens:", e.message);
+      // TODO: Remove or lower log level once token mismatch issue is resolved
+      console.log("Error decoding tokens:", e.message);
     }
   }

Let’s ensure these logs are either removed or controlled by log levels before merging.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
// If there's a mismatch, decode both tokens to see what's different
if (requestToken !== expectedToken) {
try {
const decodedReceived = Buffer.from(requestToken, "base64").toString();
const decodedExpected = Buffer.from(expectedToken, "base64").toString();
console.log("Decoded tokens:", {
received: decodedReceived,
expected: decodedExpected,
});
} catch (e) {
console.log("Error decoding tokens:", e.message);
}
}
// If there's a mismatch, decode both tokens to see what's different
if (requestToken !== expectedToken) {
try {
// TODO: Remove or lower log level once token mismatch issue is resolved
const decodedReceived = Buffer.from(requestToken, "base64").toString();
const decodedExpected = Buffer.from(expectedToken, "base64").toString();
console.log("Decoded tokens:", {
received: decodedReceived,
expected: decodedExpected,
});
} catch (e) {
// TODO: Remove or lower log level once token mismatch issue is resolved
console.log("Error decoding tokens:", e.message);
}
}

Comment on lines +133 to +161
// Debug logging to diagnose token validation issues
console.log("Request headers:", {
host: req.headers.host,
origin: req.headers.origin,
referer: req.headers.referer,
// Truncate user-agent to avoid huge logs
userAgent: req.headers["user-agent"]?.substring(0, 50) + "...",
});

// Log token information
console.log("Token comparison:", {
received: requestToken,
expected: expectedToken,
matches: requestToken === expectedToken,
});

// If there's a mismatch, decode both tokens to see what's different
if (requestToken !== expectedToken) {
try {
const decodedReceived = Buffer.from(requestToken, "base64").toString();
const decodedExpected = Buffer.from(expectedToken, "base64").toString();
console.log("Decoded tokens:", {
received: decodedReceived,
expected: decodedExpected,
});
} catch (e) {
console.log("Error decoding tokens:", e.message);
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider security implications of debug logging sensitive information.

While these debug logs are valuable for diagnosing token validation issues, they contain potentially sensitive information such as request headers and tokens. Consider:

  1. Adding a toggle mechanism based on environment variables to enable/disable logging
  2. Using a proper logging framework with configurable log levels instead of console.log
  3. Adding a comment indicating when these logs should be removed or under what conditions they should remain active
+ // Environment-based logging control
+ const ENABLE_DEBUG_LOGGING = process.env.ENABLE_DEBUG_LOGGING === 'true';

  // Debug logging to diagnose token validation issues
- console.log("Request headers:", {
-   host: req.headers.host,
-   origin: req.headers.origin,
-   referer: req.headers.referer,
-   // Truncate user-agent to avoid huge logs
-   userAgent: req.headers["user-agent"]?.substring(0, 50) + "...",
- });
+ if (ENABLE_DEBUG_LOGGING) {
+   console.log("Request headers:", {
+     host: req.headers.host, 
+     origin: req.headers.origin,
+     referer: req.headers.referer,
+     // Truncate user-agent to avoid huge logs
+     userAgent: req.headers["user-agent"]?.substring(0, 50) + "...",
+   });

Apply similar conditional logging to the other log statements below as well.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
// Debug logging to diagnose token validation issues
console.log("Request headers:", {
host: req.headers.host,
origin: req.headers.origin,
referer: req.headers.referer,
// Truncate user-agent to avoid huge logs
userAgent: req.headers["user-agent"]?.substring(0, 50) + "...",
});
// Log token information
console.log("Token comparison:", {
received: requestToken,
expected: expectedToken,
matches: requestToken === expectedToken,
});
// If there's a mismatch, decode both tokens to see what's different
if (requestToken !== expectedToken) {
try {
const decodedReceived = Buffer.from(requestToken, "base64").toString();
const decodedExpected = Buffer.from(expectedToken, "base64").toString();
console.log("Decoded tokens:", {
received: decodedReceived,
expected: decodedExpected,
});
} catch (e) {
console.log("Error decoding tokens:", e.message);
}
}
// Environment-based logging control
const ENABLE_DEBUG_LOGGING = process.env.ENABLE_DEBUG_LOGGING === 'true';
// Debug logging to diagnose token validation issues
if (ENABLE_DEBUG_LOGGING) {
console.log("Request headers:", {
host: req.headers.host,
origin: req.headers.origin,
referer: req.headers.referer,
// Truncate user-agent to avoid huge logs
userAgent: req.headers["user-agent"]?.substring(0, 50) + "...",
});
}
// Log token information
if (ENABLE_DEBUG_LOGGING) {
console.log("Token comparison:", {
received: requestToken,
expected: expectedToken,
matches: requestToken === expectedToken,
});
}
// If there's a mismatch, decode both tokens to see what's different
if (requestToken !== expectedToken) {
try {
const decodedReceived = Buffer.from(requestToken, "base64").toString();
const decodedExpected = Buffer.from(expectedToken, "base64").toString();
if (ENABLE_DEBUG_LOGGING) {
console.log("Decoded tokens:", {
received: decodedReceived,
expected: decodedExpected,
});
}
} catch (e) {
if (ENABLE_DEBUG_LOGGING) {
console.log("Error decoding tokens:", e.message);
}
}
}

@dannyroosevelt dannyroosevelt merged commit c08015b into master Apr 24, 2025
7 checks passed
@dannyroosevelt dannyroosevelt deleted the danny-docs-sdk-interactivity-patch branch April 24, 2025 18:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants