[Components] lamini - new components #16822
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThis update introduces a new Lamini integration featuring five actions and one polling source. The actions enable uploading datasets, creating and evaluating fine-tune jobs, generating completions, and handling batch completions. The polling source emits events on fine-tuning job status. Supporting utility and constants modules, as well as app-level API and property definitions, are also included. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant LaminiApp
participant LaminiAPI
User->>LaminiApp: Upload Dataset (fileUrl, inputKey, ...)
LaminiApp->>LaminiAPI: POST /datasets/upload
LaminiAPI-->>LaminiApp: Dataset ID
LaminiApp-->>User: Dataset upload summary
User->>LaminiApp: Create Fine-Tune Job (modelName, datasetId, ...)
LaminiApp->>LaminiAPI: POST /train
LaminiAPI-->>LaminiApp: Fine-tune Job ID
LaminiApp-->>User: Fine-tune job summary
User->>LaminiApp: Evaluate Job (jobId)
LaminiApp->>LaminiAPI: GET /finetune_eval/jobs/{jobId}
LaminiAPI-->>LaminiApp: Evaluation result
LaminiApp-->>User: Evaluation summary
User->>LaminiApp: Generate Completion (modelName, prompt, ...)
LaminiApp->>LaminiAPI: POST /completions
LaminiAPI-->>LaminiApp: Completion result
LaminiApp-->>User: Completion summary
User->>LaminiApp: Get Batch Completions (modelName, prompts, ...)
LaminiApp->>LaminiAPI: POST /batch_completions
LaminiAPI-->>LaminiApp: Batch ID
LaminiApp->>LaminiAPI: GET /batch_completions/{id}/result
LaminiAPI-->>LaminiApp: Batch completion results
LaminiApp-->>User: Batch completion summary
Note over LaminiApp, LaminiAPI: Polling Source
LaminiApp->>LaminiAPI: GET /jobs/{jobId} (periodic)
LaminiAPI-->>LaminiApp: Job status
LaminiApp-->>User: Emit job status event
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
components/lamini/actions/get-batch-completions/get-batch-completions.mjsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs components/lamini/actions/generate-completion/generate-completion.mjsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs components/lamini/actions/create-fine-tune-job/create-fine-tune-job.mjsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (9)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
components/lamini/actions/generate-completion/generate-completion.mjs (1)
51-74: Consider adding error handling and input validation.The run method lacks error handling for the API call and doesn't validate required inputs before making the request.
Consider adding basic validation and error handling:
async run({ $ }) { const { generateCompletion, modelName, prompt, outputType, maxTokens, maxNewTokens, } = this; + if (!prompt?.trim()) { + throw new ConfigurationError("Prompt is required and cannot be empty."); + } - const response = await generateCompletion({ + try { + const response = await generateCompletion({ $, data: { model_name: modelName, prompt, output_type: utils.parseJson(outputType), max_tokens: maxTokens, max_new_tokens: maxNewTokens, }, - }); + }); $.export("$summary", `Successfully generated completion for prompt with model ${modelName}.`); return response; + } catch (error) { + throw new ConfigurationError(`Failed to generate completion: ${error.message}`); + } },components/lamini/actions/upload-dataset/upload-dataset.mjs (2)
10-10: Version inconsistency with other components.This component is at version 0.0.6 while other components in this PR are at 0.0.1. Consider aligning versions for consistency.
68-70: File format validation could be more robust.The current validation only checks file extensions, not actual content format. Consider validating the actual JSON Lines format.
Consider adding content-based validation:
if (!fileName.endsWith(".jsonl") && !fileName.endsWith(".jsonlines")) { throw new ConfigurationError(`Unsupported file format for \`${fileName}\`. Only **.jsonl** and **.jsonlines** files are supported.`); } + // Validate that file contains valid JSON Lines format + const fileContent = fs.readFileSync(filePath, "utf8"); + const lines = fileContent.trim().split("\n"); + + if (lines.length === 0) { + throw new ConfigurationError(`File ${fileName} is empty or contains no valid lines.`); + }components/lamini/lamini.app.mjs (1)
138-161: Consider adding error handling for file operationsThe
downloadFileToTmpmethod should handle potential file system errors to provide better error messages to users.async downloadFileToTmp({ $, url, }) { const fileName = url.split("/").pop(); const resp = await this.makeRequest({ $, url, responseType: "arraybuffer", headers: { noHeaders: true, }, }); const rawcontent = resp.toString("base64"); const buffer = Buffer.from(rawcontent, "base64"); const filePath = `/tmp/${fileName}`; - fs.writeFileSync(filePath, buffer); + try { + fs.writeFileSync(filePath, buffer); + } catch (error) { + throw new ConfigurationError(`Failed to write file to temporary directory: ${error.message}`); + } return { fileName, filePath, };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
components/lamini/actions/create-fine-tune-job/create-fine-tune-job.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/actions/evaluate-job/evaluate-job.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/actions/generate-completion/generate-completion.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/actions/get-batch-completions/get-batch-completions.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/actions/upload-dataset/upload-dataset.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/common/constants.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/common/utils.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/lamini.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/package.json(2 hunks)components/lamini/sources/get-job-status/get-job-status.mjs(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
🔇 Additional comments (13)
components/lamini/common/constants.mjs (1)
1-14: LGTM! Well-structured constants module.The constants are well-organized with a clear separation between base URL and version paths. The multiple API versions indicate good forward compatibility planning, and the export structure follows ES6 module best practices.
components/lamini/package.json (2)
3-3: Appropriate version bump for new features.The version bump from "0.0.1" to "0.1.0" correctly follows semantic versioning conventions for a minor release that introduces new functionality.
15-17:✅ Verification successful
Verify the dependency version is current.
Ensure that the "@pipedream/platform" version "^3.0.3" is the latest stable version available.
🌐 Web query:
What is the latest version of @pipedream/platform npm package?💡 Result:
The latest version of the @pipedream/platform npm package is 3.0.3. This version was published approximately 7-8 months ago according to the first search result, though another result indicates it was published 16 days ago (which likely refers to the last update to the package page rather than the package itself)[1][2]. The package provides Pipedream platform globals for typing and runtime type checking and is available through npm by installing it with the command
npm i @pipedream/platform[1].Pipedream is a serverless integration and compute platform that makes it easy to connect apps and develop event-driven workflows. The platform supports over 300 fully integrated applications with managed authentication and offers access to over 1 million npm packages[5], allowing developers to easily integrate various APIs and services.
Citations:
- 1: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@pipedream/platform
- 2: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@pipedream/platform?activeTab=readme
- 3: https://pipedream.com/apps/npm
- 4: https://pipedream.com/apps/npm/integrations/deepgram/list-projects-with-deepgram-api-on-new-package-version-from-npm-api-int_yqsN1dK7
- 5: https://www.npmjs.com/package/pipedream
- 6: https://pipedream.com/docs/workflows/building-workflows/code/nodejs
- 7: https://pipedream.com/apps/npm/integrations/oto/list-orders-with-oto-api-on-new-package-version-from-npm-api-int_yqsV4aZZ
- 8: https://github.com/PipedreamHQ/pipedream
- 9: https://pipedream.com/integrations/get-task-details-with-twin-api-on-new-package-version-from-npm-api-int_4RsrMzR0
- 10: https://pipedream.com
Dependency version is up-to-date
The
@pipedream/platformentry incomponents/lamini/package.jsonis already set to^3.0.3, which matches the latest stable release on npm. No update is needed.components/lamini/actions/evaluate-job/evaluate-job.mjs (1)
1-43: LGTM! Well-implemented Pipedream action.The action follows Pipedream conventions correctly:
- Proper import structure and metadata definition
- Good use of
propDefinitionfor reusable job ID property- Clean separation of concerns with dedicated
evaluateJobmethod- Appropriate async handling and user feedback via
$.export- Correct API path construction using template literals
The implementation demonstrates good practices for Pipedream component development.
components/lamini/actions/generate-completion/generate-completion.mjs (1)
1-76: LGTM! Well-structured Pipedream action component.The component follows Pipedream conventions well with proper imports, prop definitions, and API integration. The use of shared app prop definitions promotes consistency across the integration.
components/lamini/sources/get-job-status/get-job-status.mjs (1)
30-38: LGTM! Proper event emission pattern.The processEvent method correctly implements the Pipedream event emission pattern with unique IDs, summary, and timestamps.
components/lamini/actions/create-fine-tune-job/create-fine-tune-job.mjs (3)
34-44: Excellent comprehensive documentation for complex parameters.The detailed descriptions for fineTuneArgs and gpuConfig with specific parameter examples and documentation links provide excellent user guidance for these complex configuration objects.
59-66: Good use of API versioning.The implementation correctly uses the version path constant for API versioning, which is a best practice for API integrations.
80-91: Proper data transformation and null handling.The data object construction correctly transforms camelCase to snake_case and uses utils.parseJson for optional JSON parameters, with proper null handling.
components/lamini/actions/upload-dataset/upload-dataset.mjs (2)
79-95: Good error handling for JSON parsing and required fields.The error handling appropriately catches JSON parsing errors, validates required input keys, and provides clear error messages. The logic to skip invalid JSON lines while preserving critical validation errors is well implemented.
97-99: Appropriate validation for empty datasets.Good validation to ensure at least some valid data exists before proceeding with upload.
components/lamini/actions/get-batch-completions/get-batch-completions.mjs (2)
4-42: Props definition looks good!The component metadata and props are well-structured with appropriate types and descriptions. The use of
propDefinitionfor shared properties promotes consistency across actions.
58-88: Run method implementation is well-structured!The async flow properly submits the batch completion request and retrieves results using the returned ID. The summary message provides clear feedback to users.
jcortes
force-pushed
the
lamini-new-components
branch
from
c60d3b7 to
e8839b8
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
components/lamini/lamini.app.mjs (1)
130-137: Method reference issue has been correctly fixed.The previous issue with
this.app.makeRequest()has been properly resolved - line 133 now correctly callsthis.makeRequest()within the app context.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
components/lamini/lamini.app.mjs (1)
96-102: Enhance error handling for better API diagnostics.While the status 424 handling is good, consider adding more comprehensive error handling for other common API issues.
} catch (error) { if (error.status === 424 && error.data === "") { console.log("API is not ready yet. Retrying...", error); throw new ConfigurationError("The API is not ready yet. Please try again later."); } + if (error.status === 401) { + throw new ConfigurationError("Invalid API key. Please check your authentication credentials."); + } + if (error.status === 403) { + throw new ConfigurationError("Access forbidden. Please verify your API permissions."); + } throw error; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
components/lamini/actions/create-fine-tune-job/create-fine-tune-job.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/actions/evaluate-job/evaluate-job.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/actions/generate-completion/generate-completion.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/actions/get-batch-completions/get-batch-completions.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/actions/upload-dataset/upload-dataset.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/common/constants.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/common/utils.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/lamini.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/package.json(2 hunks)components/lamini/sources/get-job-status/get-job-status.mjs(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
- components/lamini/common/constants.mjs
- components/lamini/actions/evaluate-job/evaluate-job.mjs
- components/lamini/package.json
- components/lamini/actions/upload-dataset/upload-dataset.mjs
- components/lamini/sources/get-job-status/get-job-status.mjs
- components/lamini/actions/generate-completion/generate-completion.mjs
- components/lamini/actions/get-batch-completions/get-batch-completions.mjs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/lamini/common/utils.mjs (1)
1-30: Excellent fixes applied - infinite recursion and circular reference issues resolved.The implementation correctly addresses all the critical issues mentioned in the previous review:
✅ Fixed infinite recursion: Line 9 now correctly calls
parseJson(JSON.parse(value), maxDepth - 1)instead of the problematic recursive call
✅ Added circular reference protection: UsesWeakSetto track seen objects (lines 2, 14-16)
✅ Implemented recursion depth limiting:maxDepthparameter with proper decrementing (lines 1, 4-6, 9)The design is well-thought-out: creating new WeakSet contexts for JSON string parsing while reusing contexts for object traversal is the correct approach for handling different object graphs.
components/lamini/actions/create-fine-tune-job/create-fine-tune-job.mjs (1)
86-87:❓ Verification inconclusive
Clarify the parseJson usage on object properties.
The
fineTuneArgsandgpuConfigprops are defined as type "object" but then passed throughutils.parseJson(). This raises questions about the expected data format:
- If these props are meant to receive JSON strings, they should be defined as type "string"
- If they're already objects, the parseJson calls might be unnecessary unless they contain nested JSON strings
Please clarify the intended usage or add comments explaining why object props need JSON parsing.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check how these object props are used in other Lamini actions # Expected: Find similar patterns or different approaches echo "Searching for fineTuneArgs usage patterns:" rg -A 3 -B 3 "fineTuneArgs|gpuConfig" --type js echo -e "\nSearching for parseJson usage on object props:" rg -A 2 -B 2 "parseJson.*\)" --type jsLength of output: 294
Clarify utils.parseJson usage on object props
The
fineTuneArgsandgpuConfigprops are defined asobjectbut then passed throughutils.parseJson(), which typically parses JSON strings. Please verify and adjust:
- If these props should accept JSON strings, change their prop type to
string.- If they should accept objects, remove or guard the
parseJsoncalls.- Add inline validation or schema checks for required fields within
fineTuneArgsandgpuConfig.Diff suggestion:
- finetune_args: utils.parseJson(fineTuneArgs), - gpu_config: utils.parseJson(gpuConfig), + finetune_args: fineTuneArgs, + gpu_config: gpuConfig,
jcortes
force-pushed
the
lamini-new-components
branch
from
e8839b8 to
4c6ac62
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
components/lamini/lamini.app.mjs (2)
25-32: Add null safety for model name mapping.The code assumes
custom_model_nameexists but it could be null or undefined, which would result in incorrect option labels.Apply this diff to add null safety:
const tunedModels = jobs.filter(({ status }) => status === "COMPLETED") .map(({ custom_model_name: label, model_name: value, }) => ({ - label, + label: label || value, value, }));This ensures the label falls back to the model name if no custom name is provided.
162-166: Fix incorrect buffer handling in downloadFileToTmp method.The buffer handling logic is incorrect and will likely cause issues:
- Line 162:
resp.toString("base64")assumesrespis a string/buffer, but withresponseType: "arraybuffer",respis the entire axios response object- Line 163: Converting the string back to Buffer is unnecessary
Apply this diff to fix the buffer handling:
- const rawcontent = resp.toString("base64"); - const buffer = Buffer.from(rawcontent, "base64"); + const buffer = Buffer.from(resp.data);The
resp.datacontains the actual ArrayBuffer from the response.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
components/lamini/actions/create-fine-tune-job/create-fine-tune-job.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/actions/evaluate-job/evaluate-job.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/actions/generate-completion/generate-completion.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/actions/get-batch-completions/get-batch-completions.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/actions/upload-dataset/upload-dataset.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/common/constants.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/common/utils.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/lamini.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/package.json(2 hunks)components/lamini/sources/get-job-status/get-job-status.mjs(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (9)
- components/lamini/package.json
- components/lamini/common/constants.mjs
- components/lamini/common/utils.mjs
- components/lamini/actions/generate-completion/generate-completion.mjs
- components/lamini/actions/evaluate-job/evaluate-job.mjs
- components/lamini/actions/get-batch-completions/get-batch-completions.mjs
- components/lamini/actions/create-fine-tune-job/create-fine-tune-job.mjs
- components/lamini/actions/upload-dataset/upload-dataset.mjs
- components/lamini/sources/get-job-status/get-job-status.mjs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
🔇 Additional comments (1)
components/lamini/lamini.app.mjs (1)
95-101: Good error handling for API readiness.The error handling for 424 status with empty response body appropriately catches API readiness issues and provides a clear error message to users.
components/lamini/actions/get-batch-completions/get-batch-completions.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
jcortes
force-pushed
the
lamini-new-components
branch
from
37ca970 to
ac9cce1
Compare
|
/approve |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
components/lamini/lamini.app.mjs (3)
25-32: Add null safety for model name mapping.The code assumes
custom_model_nameexists but it could be null or undefined, which would result in incorrect option labels.This is the same issue identified in previous review comments.
46-50: Add null safety for job label mapping.Similar to the modelName property, the jobId options mapping assumes
custom_model_nameexists, which could result in undefined labels.This is the same issue identified in previous review comments.
162-166: Fix incorrect buffer handling in downloadFileToTmp method.The buffer handling logic is incorrect and will likely cause issues.
This is the same issue identified in previous review comments regarding incorrect handling of axios response with arraybuffer responseType.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
components/lamini/lamini.app.mjs (1)
16-35: Add error handling for async options methods.The async options methods should handle potential API errors gracefully to provide better user experience.
Consider wrapping the API calls in try-catch blocks:
async options({ includeFineTunedModels = true }) { + try { const models = await this.listDownloadedModels(); const hfModels = models.map(({ model_name: modelName }) => modelName); if (!includeFineTunedModels) { return hfModels; } const jobs = await this.listTrainedJobs(); const tunedModels = jobs.filter(({ status }) => status === "COMPLETED") .map(({ custom_model_name: label, model_name: value, }) => ({ label, value, })); return hfModels.concat(tunedModels); + } catch (error) { + console.error("Error loading model options:", error); + return []; + } },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
components/lamini/actions/create-fine-tune-job/create-fine-tune-job.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/actions/evaluate-job/evaluate-job.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/actions/generate-completion/generate-completion.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/actions/get-batch-completions/get-batch-completions.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/actions/upload-dataset/upload-dataset.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/common/constants.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/common/utils.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/lamini.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/lamini/package.json(2 hunks)components/lamini/sources/get-job-status/get-job-status.mjs(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (9)
- components/lamini/package.json
- components/lamini/common/constants.mjs
- components/lamini/common/utils.mjs
- components/lamini/actions/generate-completion/generate-completion.mjs
- components/lamini/sources/get-job-status/get-job-status.mjs
- components/lamini/actions/create-fine-tune-job/create-fine-tune-job.mjs
- components/lamini/actions/upload-dataset/upload-dataset.mjs
- components/lamini/actions/evaluate-job/evaluate-job.mjs
- components/lamini/actions/get-batch-completions/get-batch-completions.mjs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
jcortes
force-pushed
the
lamini-new-components
branch
from
ac9cce1 to
03cb8f3
Compare
WHY
Resolves #16731
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores