New Components - testlocally #16901
New Components - testlocally #16901
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe code introduces a new integration for TestLocally, implementing an app component with full API interaction capabilities, several actions for managing and retrieving tests, a polling source for new test runs, and supporting utilities. The package metadata is updated, and sample event data is provided for testing. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Action
participant TestLocallyApp
participant TestLocallyAPI
User->>Action: Trigger "Run Test" action
Action->>TestLocallyApp: runTest(params)
TestLocallyApp->>TestLocallyAPI: POST /tests (params)
TestLocallyAPI-->>TestLocallyApp: Test run response
TestLocallyApp-->>Action: Response
Action-->>User: Test run details
sequenceDiagram
participant Source
participant TestLocallyApp
participant TestLocallyAPI
Source->>TestLocallyApp: listTests(filters)
TestLocallyApp->>TestLocallyAPI: GET /tests (filters)
TestLocallyAPI-->>TestLocallyApp: List of tests
TestLocallyApp-->>Source: Tests
Source-->>Source: Emit new test events
Assessment against linked issues
Assessment against linked issues: Out-of-scope changes
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
components/testlocally/actions/run-test/run-test.mjsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs components/testlocally/testlocally.app.mjsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
components/testlocally/actions/list-tests/list-tests.mjs (2)
2-2: Unused import detected.The
parseObjectutility is imported but only used forownersandlocationsparameters (lines 76-77). Consider whether other array/object parameters likeheadersshould also use this utility for consistency, or remove the import if not needed elsewhere.
68-96: Consider memory usage for large result sets.The current implementation collects all paginated results into memory before returning them. For large datasets, this could cause memory issues. Consider either:
- Streaming results instead of collecting them all
- Adding documentation about memory considerations for large result sets
- Implementing a more conservative default for
maxResultsThe current logic is functionally correct but may not scale well.
async run({ $ }) { - const results = this.testlocally.paginate({ + const resultGenerator = this.testlocally.paginate({ fn: this.testlocally.listTests, args: { $, params: { start: this.start, end: this.end, owners: parseObject(this.owners), locations: parseObject(this.locations), target: this.target, scheduled: this.scheduled, browser: this.browser, viewport: this.viewport, }, }, max: this.maxResults, }); const tests = []; - for await (const test of results) { + for await (const test of resultGenerator) { tests.push(test); + // Consider yielding periodically for very large datasets } $.export("$summary", `Retrieved ${tests.length || 0} test${tests.length === 1 ? "" : "s"}`); return tests; },components/testlocally/testlocally.app.mjs (1)
75-86: Consider adding request timeout and retry logic.API requests should have timeouts and potentially retry logic for better reliability.
_makeRequest({ $ = this, path, ...opts }) { return axios($, { url: `${this._baseUrl()}${path}`, headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${this.$auth.api_key}`, Accept: "application/json", }, + timeout: 30000, // 30 seconds ...opts, }); },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
components/testlocally/actions/get-test/get-test.mjs(1 hunks)components/testlocally/actions/list-tests/list-tests.mjs(1 hunks)components/testlocally/actions/run-test/run-test.mjs(1 hunks)components/testlocally/common/utils.mjs(1 hunks)components/testlocally/package.json(2 hunks)components/testlocally/sources/new-test-run/new-test-run.mjs(1 hunks)components/testlocally/sources/new-test-run/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)components/testlocally/testlocally.app.mjs(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
- GitHub Check: Ensure component commits modify component versions
🔇 Additional comments (14)
components/testlocally/common/utils.mjs (1)
1-13: LGTM! Well-implemented utility function.The
parseObjectfunction correctly handles flexible input parsing with appropriate fallbacks. The logic safely processes falsy values, attempts JSON parsing for strings, and gracefully returns the original value on parse errors or for non-string types.components/testlocally/package.json (2)
3-3: Appropriate version bump for new functionality.The version increment from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 correctly reflects the addition of significant new functionality in this integration.
15-17:✅ Verification successful
Verify the platform dependency version is current.
The
@pipedream/platformdependency version^3.0.3should be verified to ensure it's the latest stable version and includes all necessary features for this integration.
🌐 Web query:
What is the latest version of @pipedream/platform npm package?💡 Result:
Based on the search results, the latest version of the @pipedream/platform npm package is 3.0.3, which was last published about 8 months ago according to one source, and about 5 months ago according to another source[1][2]. This package provides Pipedream platform globals, including typing and runtime type checking functionality.
The package can be installed using the npm command:
npm i @pipedream/platformThe @pipedream/platform package is hosted on GitHub under the PipedreamHQ organization, and its repository can be found at github.com/PipedreamHQ/platform[1][2]. The package is released under the MIT license and has a size of approximately 57.8 kB.
It's worth noting that there's also an older package called @pipedreamhq/platform (with "hq" in the name), which has a different latest version (0.8.1) and was last published about 5 years ago[8].
Citations:
- 1: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@pipedream/platform
- 2: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@pipedream/platform?activeTab=readme
- 3: https://pipedream.com/apps/npm
- 4: https://www.npmjs.com/package/pipedream
- 5: https://pipedream.com
- 6: https://pipedream.com/docs/workflows/building-workflows/code/nodejs
- 7: https://pipedream.com/integrations/create-task-with-teamwork-api-on-new-package-version-from-npm-api-int_LMsD1G3b
- 8: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@pipedreamhq/platform
- 9: https://pipedream.com/integrations/create-database-with-neon-api-on-new-package-version-from-npm-api-int_XesjDqez
- 10: https://socket.dev/npm/package/@pipedream/platform/overview/1.6.6
Dependency Version Confirmed
The
@pipedream/platformdependency incomponents/testlocally/package.jsonis already at version^3.0.3, which is the latest stable release available. No update is required.components/testlocally/actions/list-tests/list-tests.mjs (1)
60-66:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify maxResults default aligns with API limits.
The default value of 100 for
maxResultsshould be verified against TestLocally's API rate limits and pagination constraints to ensure it's appropriate.
🌐 Web query:
What are the TestLocally API rate limits and pagination constraints for listing tests?💡 Result:
TestLocally API Rate Limits and Pagination Constraints for Listing Tests
Based on the search results, there is no official documentation specifically for the "TestLocally" API rate limits and pagination constraints. However, I can summarize best practices and typical patterns from reputable API providers and documentation that you are likely to encounter or can expect:
API Rate Limiting Practices
- Most APIs enforce rate limiting to protect against excessive usage. Common strategies include per-minute and per-hour quotas, and sometimes a burst rate for short-term spikes[1][2][5].
- Example policies: 60 requests per minute, 1000 requests per hour, and a burst of up to 10 requests per second[1].
- APIs typically communicate rate limits via headers such as:
X-Rate-Limit-Limit(maximum quota)X-Rate-Limit-Remaining(remaining requests in the current window)X-Rate-Limit-Reset(timestamp or seconds until quota reset)Retry-After(seconds until allowed to retry after exceeding limits)[1][3].- On exceeding limits, APIs return a
429 Too Many Requestsstatus, often with instructions on when it is safe to retry[1][3][9].Pagination Constraints for Listing Resources (e.g., Tests)
- APIs that return large data sets commonly implement pagination to control response size and prevent performance issues[6][10][8].
- Standard pagination parameters:
pageorpage_number: Which page of results to fetch.page_sizeorlimit: How many records to return per page.- Many APIs default the page size (e.g., 20, 50, or 100 records per page) but usually allow consumers to specify a smaller or larger page size, sometimes with a documented maximum (to preserve performance)[6][8][10].
- Pagination responses may also include indicators like
next_pageor flags (e.g.,additional_pages) to inform clients if more pages exist[8].- Good API practice is to document maximum allowed values and expected patterns for paginated endpoints, including edge case handling when pages are empty or incomplete[6][10].
Typical Example (not specific to TestLocally but widely adopted):
- Rate limit: 60 requests per minute per user.
- Pagination:
- Default: 50 results per page.
- Maximum allowed: 100 results per page.
- Use
pageandpage_sizeparameters for navigation.What to Do If You Need the Specifics for "TestLocally"
- Check the official API documentation for TestLocally (not covered in these search results).
- Look for rate limit headers in actual API responses when making requests.
- Observe for a
429status code if exceeding limits.- Review examples for pagination parameters such as
page,limit, or similar, and whether a maximum page size is enforced.If TestLocally follows standard practices, expect documented (or discoverable via headers) rate limits and the use of page/size or similar parameters for paginated endpoints. Always consult the vendor's official documentation or support channels for authoritative values.
Citations:
- 1: https://aptori.dev/blog/what-is-api-rate-limiting-and-how-to-test-rate-limits
- 2: https://tyk.io/learning-center/api-rate-limiting/
- 3: https://beeceptor.com/docs/rate-limits-for-apis/
- 4: https://developer.candid.org/reference/rate-limits-and-thresholds
- 5: https://datadome.co/bot-management-protection/what-is-api-rate-limiting/
- 6: https://www.merge.dev/blog/api-pagination-best-practices
- 7: https://docs.runpod.io/serverless/development/local-testing
- 8: https://support.labstats.com/knowledge-base/terms-and-limits-for-the-labstats-api/
- 9: https://www.devzery.com/post/mastering-rate-limit-testing-apis-a-complete-guide
- 10: https://www.getknit.dev/blog/api-pagination-best-practices
Verify default
maxResultsagainst TestLocally’s pagination limitsWe weren’t able to find official documentation for TestLocally’s maximum page size or rate-limit headers. Please confirm that using a default of
100formaxResultsis supported by the API and won’t trigger errors or performance issues.Suggestions for verification:
- Consult TestLocally’s official API docs or support channels for the maximum allowed page size.
- Inspect actual API responses for pagination headers or error codes (e.g., a
429status or amax-page-sizeheader).- If an upper limit is lower than 100, adjust the default (or document the override) to match the vendor constraints.
components/testlocally/sources/new-test-run/test-event.mjs (1)
1-79: Comprehensive and realistic test fixture.This test event fixture provides excellent coverage with:
- Multiple server locations (brisbane, luxembourg, hongkong)
- Both successful and error scenarios (safety-check error in hongkong)
- Complete metadata including timestamps, URLs, and geographic data
- Realistic data structure that matches the API response format
The inclusion of error scenarios makes this particularly valuable for testing edge cases.
components/testlocally/actions/get-test/get-test.mjs (1)
6-6:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify the documentation URL endpoint.
The documentation URL references
/api_v0_test_results, but based on the method namegetTestand the endpoint path in the app file (/tests/${testId}), it should likely reference a different endpoint for retrieving a single test.
🌐 Web query:
What is the correct TestLocally API documentation URL for retrieving a single test by ID?💡 Result:
Based on the search results provided, I cannot find specific information about the TestLocally API documentation URL for retrieving a single test by ID.
The search results mention TestLocally as a tool that "takes location-aware screenshots"[2] and that allows users to "integrate screenshot functionality directly into CI/CD pipeline, testing tools, or internal dashboards"[1], but there is no specific API endpoint documentation for retrieving a single test by ID.
While the search results do reference that there is API documentation available for TestLocally ("View the API documentation here"[1]), they do not provide the actual URL or specific API endpoints for retrieving tests by ID.
The search results contain information about various other testing APIs and frameworks (like Clarifai, RunPod, Snowpark Python, qTest), but none of these appear to be related to the TestLocally API specifically.
If you're looking for the TestLocally API documentation URL for retrieving a single test by ID, you might want to check the official TestLocally documentation which should be available through their website.
Citations:
- 1: https://testlocal.ly/features
- 2: https://wonderproxy.com/blog/introducing-testlocally/
- 3: https://doc.testquality.com/api
- 4: https://docs.clarifai.com/compute/models/upload/test-locally/
- 5: https://swagger.io/blog/api-development/how-to-perform-a-basic-api-test/
- 6: https://docs.runpod.io/serverless/development/local-testing
- 7: https://jazz.net/forum/questions/287110/how-to-retrieve-all-testcases-data-using-rest-api
- 8: https://galasa.dev/docs/reference/rest-api-docs/
- 9: https://docs.snowflake.com/en/developer-guide/snowpark/python/testing-locally
- 10: https://documentation.tricentis.com/qtest/od/en/content/manager/requirements_and_test_design/using_apis_to_link_test_cases_and_requirements.htm
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Locate and display the contents of get-test.mjs for context echo "=== Locating get-test.mjs ===" fd --absolute-path "get-test.mjs" echo "=== Displaying first 200 lines ===" sed -n '1,200p' components/testlocally/actions/get-test/get-test.mjsLength of output: 973
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Locate the app integration file echo "=== Locating testlocally.app.mjs ===" fd --absolute-path testlocally.app.mjs # Display the first 200 lines for context echo "=== Displaying first 200 lines of testlocally.app.mjs ===" sed -n '1,200p' components/testlocally/testlocally.app.mjs # Search for the getTest method definition echo "=== Searching for getTest implementation ===" rg -n "getTest" -C3 components/testlocally/testlocally.app.mjsLength of output: 3931
Documentation link mismatch for single-test endpoint
The action’s description links to
/api_v0_test_results, but thegetTestmethod callsGET https://testlocal.ly/api/v0/tests/{testId}. Please verify and update the docs URL to the correct page for retrieving a single test by ID—ensuring both the domain (testlocal.lyvs.testlocally.readme.io) and path (/tests/{testId}) match your official documentation.• File:
components/testlocally/actions/get-test/get-test.mjs, line 6
Update the description link to the correct single-test endpoint docs.components/testlocally/actions/run-test/run-test.mjs (1)
29-34:❌ Incorrect review comment
Review the use of parseObject for array-type properties.
The
serversprop is defined as string array in the app's propDefinitions, andclicksis defined asstring[]. UsingparseObjecton these properties might cause issues if they're already arrays.data: { target: this.target, browser: this.browser, viewport: this.viewport, - servers: parseObject(this.servers), + servers: this.servers, headers: parseObject(this.headers), skipCompression: this.skipCompression, - clicks: parseObject(this.clicks), + clicks: this.clicks, },Also applies to: 47-52, 61-61, 64-64
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check the parseObject implementation to understand its behavior cat components/testlocally/common/utils.mjsLength of output: 256
No change required:
parseObjectis safe for array propsThe
parseObjectutility returns non-string values (including arrays) unchanged, so applying it tothis.serversorthis.clickshas no adverse effect and maintains consistency for JSON-string inputs.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
components/testlocally/sources/new-test-run/new-test-run.mjs (7)
1-4: LGTM! Clean import structure.The imports are well-organized and all necessary dependencies are included appropriately.
6-12: LGTM! Proper component metadata.The component definition follows Pipedream conventions correctly with appropriate key, name, description, version, type, and deduplication strategy.
13-58: LGTM! Well-structured props definition.The props are properly defined using the propDefinition pattern to leverage the TestLocally app's prop definitions for consistent filtering options.
111-114: LGTM! Appropriate initialization logic.The deploy hook correctly initializes the component by processing up to 25 recent tests, which is a reasonable limit for initial setup.
116-118: LGTM! Clean run method implementation.The run method correctly calls processEvent without a limit to process all new tests since the last run.
119-119: LGTM! Sample emit included for testing.Good practice to include sample emit data for component testing and development.
90-103:⚠️ Potential issueVerify timestamp logic and add error handling.
The timestamp filtering logic has a potential issue that could cause missed events in edge cases.
Issue 1: Edge case with identical timestamps
If multiple tests have the samecreatedtimestamp aslastTs, the current logic (test.created > lastTs) will skip all tests with that exact timestamp, potentially missing events.Issue 2: Missing error handling
The API call could fail and cause the component to crash without proper error handling.Apply this diff to address the timestamp comparison and add error handling:
async processEvent(max) { const lastTs = this._getLastTs(); - const results = this.testlocally.paginate({ - fn: this.testlocally.listTests, - args: { - params: { - owners: parseObject(this.owners), - locations: parseObject(this.locations), - target: this.target, - scheduled: this.scheduled, - browser: this.browser, - viewport: this.viewport, - }, - }, - max, - }); + try { + const results = this.testlocally.paginate({ + fn: this.testlocally.listTests, + args: { + params: { + owners: parseObject(this.owners), + locations: parseObject(this.locations), + target: this.target, + scheduled: this.scheduled, + browser: this.browser, + viewport: this.viewport, + }, + }, + max, + }); const tests = []; for await (const test of results) { - if (test.created > lastTs) { + if (test.created >= lastTs) { tests.push(test); } else { break; } } if (!tests.length) { return; } this._setLastTs(tests[0].created); + } catch (error) { + console.error("Error processing TestLocally events:", error); + throw error; + }Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
|
/approve |
Resolves #16893
Summary by CodeRabbit