-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New Components - finalscout #17222
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New Components - finalscout #17222
Conversation
WalkthroughSeveral new action modules and utility functions were added to the Finalscout integration, enabling email discovery via LinkedIn, news articles, and professional details, as well as task status retrieval. The Finalscout app was refactored to centralize API logic, add new endpoint methods, and introduce common property definitions and utilities. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Action
participant FinalscoutApp
participant FinalscoutAPI
User->>Action: Provide input (e.g. LinkedIn URL, News Article, etc.)
Action->>FinalscoutApp: Call relevant method (e.g. findEmailViaLinkedIn)
FinalscoutApp->>FinalscoutAPI: Send HTTP request with input data
FinalscoutAPI-->>FinalscoutApp: Return API response
FinalscoutApp-->>Action: Return processed response
Action-->>User: Output result and summary
Assessment against linked issues
Assessment against linked issues: Out-of-scope changesNo out-of-scope changes found. Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
components/finalscout/actions/find-email-linkedin/find-email-linkedin.mjsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
components/finalscout/common/utils.mjs (1)
2-4: Consider preserving valid falsy values.The current logic returns
undefinedfor all falsy values, but0,false, and""are valid values that should be preserved.- if (!obj) { + if (obj === null || obj === undefined) { return undefined; }components/finalscout/actions/find-email-linkedin/find-email-linkedin.mjs (1)
12-16: Consider adding URL validation.The LinkedIn profile URL prop accepts any string without validation. Consider adding basic URL format validation or LinkedIn URL pattern validation to provide better user experience.
url: { type: "string", label: "LinkedIn Profile URL", description: "The URL of the LinkedIn profile.", + validate: (value) => { + const linkedinPattern = /^https:\/\/(www\.)?linkedin\.com\/in\/[a-zA-Z0-9-]+\/?$/; + if (!linkedinPattern.test(value)) { + throw new Error("Please provide a valid LinkedIn profile URL"); + } + }, },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
components/finalscout/actions/find-email-linkedin/find-email-linkedin.mjs(1 hunks)components/finalscout/actions/find-email-news-article/find-email-news-article.mjs(1 hunks)components/finalscout/actions/find-email-professional/find-email-professional.mjs(1 hunks)components/finalscout/actions/get-single-task/get-single-task.mjs(1 hunks)components/finalscout/common/utils.mjs(1 hunks)components/finalscout/finalscout.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/finalscout/package.json(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
🔇 Additional comments (16)
components/finalscout/package.json (2)
3-3: LGTM: Appropriate version bump for new features.The version update from "0.0.1" to "0.1.0" correctly reflects the addition of new functionality according to semantic versioning.
15-17: Verify the platform dependency version for security and compatibility.Ensure that the "@pipedream/platform" version "^3.1.0" is current and doesn't have known security vulnerabilities.
What is the latest version of @pipedream/platform npm package and are there any known security vulnerabilities in version 3.1.0?components/finalscout/actions/get-single-task/get-single-task.mjs (1)
1-27: LGTM: Well-structured action following Pipedream conventions.The action correctly implements the required structure with proper metadata, parameter handling, and async execution. Good use of documentation linking and summary export.
components/finalscout/actions/find-email-news-article/find-email-news-article.mjs (1)
1-51: LGTM: Consistent action structure with good use of shared properties.The action properly implements the required functionality with good use of
propDefinitionsfor reusable properties and correct application of theparseObjectutility for metadata handling.components/finalscout/actions/find-email-professional/find-email-professional.mjs (1)
1-64: LGTM: Consistent implementation with proper API data structure.The action maintains consistency with other Finalscout actions while correctly implementing the professional email finder functionality. Good use of snake_case properties for API compatibility and proper optional parameter handling.
components/finalscout/actions/find-email-linkedin/find-email-linkedin.mjs (3)
1-2: LGTM!The imports are correct and follow standard patterns for Pipedream actions.
4-9: LGTM!The action metadata follows Pipedream conventions with appropriate key naming, descriptive name, documentation link, and initial version.
48-64: LGTM!The main execution logic is well-structured. It correctly maps input props to the API format, uses the parseObject utility for metadata, and follows standard Pipedream patterns for exporting results.
components/finalscout/finalscout.app.mjs (8)
1-1: LGTM!The axios import follows the standard Pipedream platform pattern.
6-25: LGTM!The propDefinitions are well-structured with appropriate types, labels, and descriptions. Making them optional provides good flexibility for users.
27-29: LGTM!The base URL method is clean and follows convention for API integrations.
41-47: LGTM!The findEmailViaLinkedIn method correctly uses POST method and the appropriate endpoint path.
48-54: LGTM!The findEmailViaNewsArticle method follows the same pattern with correct POST method and endpoint.
55-61: LGTM!The findEmailProfessional method is consistent with the other methods.
62-67: LGTM!The getSingleTask method appropriately defaults to GET method for status retrieval, which is the correct HTTP method for this operation.
30-40: Verify the authorization header format.The current implementation uses
Authorization: this.$auth.api_keydirectly. Verify that FinalScout's API expects the API key in this format rather than a Bearer token or API key with a prefix.What is the correct authorization header format for FinalScout API? Does it use Bearer tokens, API key prefix, or direct API key?
Resolves #17021
Summary by CodeRabbit