Skip to content

Conversation

@luancazarine
Copy link
Collaborator

@luancazarine luancazarine commented Jul 24, 2025

Resolves #17699

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added the ability to create financial transactions with detailed properties, including support for recurring transactions.
    • Introduced a trigger that emits events when new transactions are created, allowing for real-time updates and automation.
    • Enabled dynamic folder selection when creating transactions.
    • Provided a sample event for testing transaction-related features.
  • Improvements

    • Enhanced API communication and authentication for more reliable and secure interactions.
    • Improved transaction status summaries for clearer feedback on transaction creation results.
  • Chores

    • Updated package version and dependencies.

Actions
 - Create Transaction

Sources
 - New Transaction
@luancazarine luancazarine linked an issue Jul 24, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 24, 2025

Walkthrough

This update introduces a new integration for the Rewiser platform, adding the ability to create transactions and detect new transactions via polling. It implements API communication, dynamic property options, utility functions, and test fixtures. The changes include new action and source modules, utility enhancements, and expanded app logic for structured API interactions.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
components/rewiser/actions/create-transaction/create-transaction.mjs New action module to create a financial transaction with properties, validation, and API call logic.
components/rewiser/common/utils.mjs Added getSummary utility to generate status messages based on API response arrays.
components/rewiser/package.json Bumped version to 0.1.0 and added @pipedream/platform dependency.
components/rewiser/rewiser.app.mjs Major expansion: added propDefinitions, API communication methods, dynamic folder options, and removed unused method.
components/rewiser/sources/new-transaction-created/new-transaction-created.mjs New polling source to emit events for newly created transactions, with deduplication and event metadata.
components/rewiser/sources/new-transaction-created/test-event.mjs New static test event fixture for transaction events.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant ActionModule as Create Transaction Action
    participant App as Rewiser App
    participant API as Rewiser API

    User->>ActionModule: Provide transaction details
    ActionModule->>App: Call createTransaction()
    App->>API: POST /transactions (with data)
    API-->>App: Response (inserted/errors/duplicates/skipped)
    App-->>ActionModule: Response data
    ActionModule-->>User: Summary of transaction creation
Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant Source as New Transaction Source
    participant App as Rewiser App
    participant API as Rewiser API
    participant DB as Database

    Source->>DB: Get last processed timestamp
    Source->>App: getRecentTransactions()
    App->>API: GET /transactions/recent
    API-->>App: List of recent transactions
    App-->>Source: Transactions data
    Source->>DB: Update last processed timestamp
    Source-->>User: Emit new transaction events
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~18 minutes

Poem

A rabbit hopped through Rewiser’s code,
New actions and sources, down the API road.
Transactions created, events now detected,
With folders and summaries, all well-connected.
Version bumped up, dependencies in tow,
In this garden of features, watch integrations grow!
🐇💸✨

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 ESLint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

components/rewiser/actions/create-transaction/create-transaction.mjs

Oops! Something went wrong! :(

ESLint: 8.57.1

Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs
at Object.getPackageJSONURL (node:internal/modules/package_json_reader:255:9)
at packageResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:767:81)
at moduleResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:853:18)
at defaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:983:11)
at ModuleLoader.defaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:801:12)
at #cachedDefaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:725:25)
at ModuleLoader.resolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:708:38)
at ModuleLoader.getModuleJobForImport (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:309:38)
at #link (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:202:49)

components/rewiser/sources/new-transaction-created/new-transaction-created.mjs

Oops! Something went wrong! :(

ESLint: 8.57.1

Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs
at Object.getPackageJSONURL (node:internal/modules/package_json_reader:255:9)
at packageResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:767:81)
at moduleResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:853:18)
at defaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:983:11)
at ModuleLoader.defaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:801:12)
at #cachedDefaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:725:25)
at ModuleLoader.resolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:708:38)
at ModuleLoader.getModuleJobForImport (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:309:38)
at #link (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:202:49)

components/rewiser/sources/new-transaction-created/test-event.mjs

Oops! Something went wrong! :(

ESLint: 8.57.1

Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs
at Object.getPackageJSONURL (node:internal/modules/package_json_reader:255:9)
at packageResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:767:81)
at moduleResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:853:18)
at defaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:983:11)
at ModuleLoader.defaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:801:12)
at #cachedDefaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:725:25)
at ModuleLoader.resolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:708:38)
at ModuleLoader.getModuleJobForImport (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:309:38)
at #link (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:202:49)

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 48a397d and fe86261.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • components/rewiser/actions/create-transaction/create-transaction.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/rewiser/sources/new-transaction-created/new-transaction-created.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/rewiser/sources/new-transaction-created/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • components/rewiser/sources/new-transaction-created/test-event.mjs
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • components/rewiser/actions/create-transaction/create-transaction.mjs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
🔇 Additional comments (6)
components/rewiser/sources/new-transaction-created/new-transaction-created.mjs (6)

1-3: LGTM!

The imports are correctly structured and all appear necessary for the component functionality.


5-26: Well-structured component definition.

The component metadata and props follow Pipedream conventions correctly. The informational alert is particularly helpful for users to understand the API limitations.


27-34: Clean utility methods for state management.

The database abstraction methods are well-implemented with appropriate default fallback to Unix epoch.


52-56: Good event emission structure.

The event metadata follows Pipedream conventions well with unique ID, descriptive summary, and proper timestamp. The summary format provides useful information at a glance.


59-59: Proper test sample integration.

Good practice including the sampleEmit for testing and documentation purposes.


35-58: Verify API response sorting and enhance timestamp parsing

The run method currently assumes getRecentTransactions() returns transactions sorted by created_at in descending order (newest first). We couldn’t locate any documentation or implementation in the codebase confirming this. To avoid subtle bugs, please verify the API’s sort order or make the logic defensive:

  • Confirm whether the Rewiser API guarantees descending sort by created_at.
  • If uncertain, explicitly sort the results before processing:
    const { data: transactions } = await this.rewiser.getRecentTransactions();
    // Defensive: ensure newest-first ordering
    transactions.sort((a, b) => new Date(b.created_at) - new Date(a.created_at));
  • Replace all Date.parse(…) calls with new Date(…).getTime() (or similar) for more consistent error handling:
    - if (Date.parse(transaction.created_at) < Date.parse(lastDate)) {
    + if (new Date(transaction.created_at) < new Date(lastDate)) {
        break;
      }
    
    // …
    
    - ts: Date.parse(transaction.created_at),
    + ts: new Date(transaction.created_at).getTime(),
  • Ensure this.setLastDate(...) still captures the newest timestamp after sorting.
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch 17699-components-rewiser

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 24, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jul 25, 2025 3:03pm
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jul 25, 2025 3:03pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jul 25, 2025 3:03pm

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
components/rewiser/common/utils.mjs (1)

1-25: Consider adding input validation and handling the undefined case.

The function logic is sound, but there are potential edge cases to consider:

  1. If all arrays are empty or undefined, the function returns undefined which may not be the desired behavior
  2. The function doesn't validate that the input parameters are actually arrays

Consider this improvement:

export const getSummary = ({
  inserted, errors, duplicates, skipped,
}) => {
+  // Ensure all inputs are arrays
+  const safeArrays = {
+    inserted: Array.isArray(inserted) ? inserted : [],
+    errors: Array.isArray(errors) ? errors : [],
+    duplicates: Array.isArray(duplicates) ? duplicates : [],
+    skipped: Array.isArray(skipped) ? skipped : [],
+  };
+
-  const actions  = {
-    inserted,
-    errors,
-    duplicates,
-    skipped,
-  };
+  const actions = safeArrays;

  const [
    action,
-  ] = Object.keys(actions).filter((key) => actions[key].length > 0);
+  ] = Object.keys(actions).filter((key) => actions[key].length > 0);

  switch (action) {
  case "inserted":
    return "Inserted transaction";
  case "errors":
    return "Transaction creation failed";
  case "duplicates":
    return "Transaction creation duplicate";
  case "skipped":
    return "Transaction creation skipped";
+  default:
+    return "No action taken";
  }
};
components/rewiser/actions/create-transaction/create-transaction.mjs (1)

38-46: Consider improving the planned date description.

The current description could be clearer about whether time components are supported or just dates.

    plannedDate: {
      type: "string",
      label: "Planned Date",
-      description: "The planned date for the transaction Format: YYYY-MM-DD. E.g. 2025-01-01",
+      description: "The planned date for the transaction. Format: YYYY-MM-DD (e.g., 2025-01-01) or YYYY-MM-DDTHH:mm:ss.sssZ for full datetime.",
    },
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d9ea0d2 and 8bcedcb.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • components/rewiser/actions/create-transaction/create-transaction.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/rewiser/common/utils.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/rewiser/package.json (2 hunks)
  • components/rewiser/rewiser.app.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/rewiser/sources/new-transaction/new-transaction.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/rewiser/sources/new-transaction/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (6)
components/rewiser/package.json (2)

Learnt from: jcortes
PR: #14935
File: components/sailpoint/package.json:15-18
Timestamp: 2024-12-12T19:23:09.039Z
Learning: When developing Pipedream components, do not add built-in Node.js modules like fs to package.json dependencies, as they are native modules provided by the Node.js runtime.

Learnt from: js07
PR: #17375
File: components/zerobounce/actions/get-validation-results-file/get-validation-results-file.mjs:23-27
Timestamp: 2025-07-01T17:07:48.193Z
Learning: "dir" props in Pipedream components are hidden in the component form and not user-facing, so they don't require labels or descriptions for user clarity.

components/rewiser/sources/new-transaction/test-event.mjs (1)

Learnt from: GTFalcao
PR: #14265
File: components/the_magic_drip/sources/common.mjs:35-43
Timestamp: 2024-10-10T19:18:27.998Z
Learning: In components/the_magic_drip/sources/common.mjs, when processing items in getAndProcessData, savedIds is intentionally updated with IDs of both emitted and non-emitted items to avoid emitting retroactive events upon first deployment and ensure only new events are emitted as they occur.

components/rewiser/common/utils.mjs (2)

Learnt from: GTFalcao
PR: #12731
File: components/hackerone/actions/get-members/get-members.mjs:3-28
Timestamp: 2024-07-04T18:11:59.822Z
Learning: When exporting a summary message in the run method of an action, ensure the message is correctly formatted. For example, in the hackerone-get-members action, the correct format is Successfully retrieved ${response.data.length} members.

Learnt from: GTFalcao
PR: #12731
File: components/hackerone/actions/get-members/get-members.mjs:3-28
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:33:38.240Z
Learning: When exporting a summary message in the run method of an action, ensure the message is correctly formatted. For example, in the hackerone-get-members action, the correct format is Successfully retrieved ${response.data.length} members.

components/rewiser/actions/create-transaction/create-transaction.mjs (3)

Learnt from: jcortes
PR: #14467
File: components/gainsight_px/actions/create-account/create-account.mjs:4-6
Timestamp: 2024-10-30T15:24:39.294Z
Learning: In components/gainsight_px/actions/create-account/create-account.mjs, the action name should be "Create Account" instead of "Create Memory".

Learnt from: GTFalcao
PR: #12731
File: components/hackerone/actions/get-members/get-members.mjs:3-28
Timestamp: 2024-07-04T18:11:59.822Z
Learning: When exporting a summary message in the run method of an action, ensure the message is correctly formatted. For example, in the hackerone-get-members action, the correct format is Successfully retrieved ${response.data.length} members.

Learnt from: GTFalcao
PR: #12731
File: components/hackerone/actions/get-members/get-members.mjs:3-28
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:33:38.240Z
Learning: When exporting a summary message in the run method of an action, ensure the message is correctly formatted. For example, in the hackerone-get-members action, the correct format is Successfully retrieved ${response.data.length} members.

components/rewiser/sources/new-transaction/new-transaction.mjs (3)

Learnt from: GTFalcao
PR: #14265
File: components/the_magic_drip/sources/common.mjs:35-43
Timestamp: 2024-10-10T19:18:27.998Z
Learning: In components/the_magic_drip/sources/common.mjs, when processing items in getAndProcessData, savedIds is intentionally updated with IDs of both emitted and non-emitted items to avoid emitting retroactive events upon first deployment and ensure only new events are emitted as they occur.

Learnt from: GTFalcao
PR: #15376
File: components/monday/sources/name-updated/name-updated.mjs:6-6
Timestamp: 2025-01-23T03:55:15.166Z
Learning: Source names in Monday.com components don't need to start with "New" if they emit events for updated items (e.g., "Name Updated", "Column Value Updated") rather than new items. This follows the component guidelines exception where the "New" prefix is only required when emits are limited to new items.

Learnt from: GTFalcao
PR: #12697
File: components/salesforce_rest_api/sources/common.mjs:97-98
Timestamp: 2024-07-24T02:05:59.531Z
Learning: The processTimerEvent method in the components/salesforce_rest_api/sources/common.mjs file is intentionally left unimplemented to enforce that subclasses must implement this method, similar to an abstract class in object-oriented programming.

components/rewiser/rewiser.app.mjs (1)

Learnt from: GTFalcao
PR: #16954
File: components/salesloft/salesloft.app.mjs:14-23
Timestamp: 2025-06-04T17:52:05.780Z
Learning: In the Salesloft API integration (components/salesloft/salesloft.app.mjs), the _makeRequest method returns response.data which directly contains arrays for list endpoints like listPeople, listCadences, listUsers, and listAccounts. The propDefinitions correctly call .map() directly on these responses without needing to destructure a nested data property.

🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
components/rewiser/actions/create-transaction/create-transaction.mjs (1)
components/rewiser/common/utils.mjs (2)
  • getSummary (1-25)
  • getSummary (1-25)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
  • GitHub Check: pnpm publish
🔇 Additional comments (17)
components/rewiser/package.json (2)

3-3: LGTM! Version bump is appropriate.

The version update from "0.0.1" to "0.1.0" correctly reflects the addition of new functional components (action, source, utilities).


15-17: Platform dependency addition is correct.

The "@pipedream/platform" dependency is properly added and necessary for the new components that use platform features like DEFAULT_POLLING_SOURCE_TIMER_INTERVAL.

components/rewiser/sources/new-transaction/test-event.mjs (1)

1-11: LGTM! Well-structured test event data.

The sample transaction object includes all necessary fields with appropriate data types and realistic values. This will provide good test coverage for the source component.

components/rewiser/actions/create-transaction/create-transaction.mjs (2)

1-11: LGTM! Clean imports and component structure.

The component structure follows Pipedream conventions with appropriate imports and well-defined metadata.


85-106: LGTM! Well-structured run method.

The API call structure and response handling follow good practices. The use of the getSummary utility provides consistent response formatting.

components/rewiser/sources/new-transaction/new-transaction.mjs (6)

1-4: LGTM! Proper imports and dependencies.

Good use of the platform constant for consistent polling intervals and appropriate component imports.


21-25: Helpful user information.

The alert provides valuable context about API limitations that users should be aware of.


27-33: LGTM! Clean database helper methods.

The getter/setter methods for lastDate are simple and effective, with a sensible default fallback.


51-57: LGTM! Proper event emission with chronological ordering.

Good practice reversing the array to emit events in chronological order and using appropriate event metadata structure.


59-59: LGTM! Sample emit inclusion.

Proper inclusion of sample event data for testing and documentation purposes.


40-45: Verify getRecentTransactions ordering
The loop in run() assumes the transactions array is sorted by created_at descending (newest first) so that hitting an older date safely breaks out. If the API doesn’t guarantee that order, this logic can skip newer records. Please confirm or adjust:

  • File: components/rewiser/sources/new-transaction/new-transaction.mjs
  • Method: async run()
  • Location: the for (const transaction of transactions) loop (around lines 40–45)

If the API isn’t guaranteed to return descending data, sort transactions by created_at descending before iterating.

components/rewiser/rewiser.app.mjs (6)

1-5: LGTM! Proper import and app structure.

The axios import and basic app configuration follow Pipedream's standard patterns correctly.


24-26: LGTM! Proper base URL configuration.

The base URL is correctly configured with HTTPS and follows the expected Supabase Edge Functions pattern.


27-32: LGTM! Proper authentication and headers.

The headers method correctly implements Bearer token authentication and sets appropriate content-type for JSON APIs.


33-41: LGTM! Well-structured generic request method.

The _makeRequest method follows Pipedream best practices by centralizing HTTP request logic and properly combining base URL, headers, and additional options.


42-60: Align createTransaction with its plural endpoint and verify response shape.

There’s a mismatch between the method name and the endpoint path—it’s called createTransaction (singular) but hits /create_multiple_transactions. Please confirm the API’s behavior and update accordingly:

• In components/rewiser/rewiser.app.mjs:
– Rename createTransaction(opts = {}) to createTransactions(opts = {}) (or alias it) to match /create_multiple_transactions.
– Update the path or method name if the endpoint actually only creates a single transaction.

• In components/rewiser/actions/create-transaction/create-transaction.mjs:
– Change calls from this.rewiser.createTransaction to this.rewiser.createTransactions.
– Verify that response.data returns an array of created transactions (or adjust return logic for a single object if that’s what the API returns).

• In components/rewiser/sources/new-transaction/new-transaction.mjs:
– Ensure any downstream handling of the create action matches the confirmed response structure.

Please confirm the endpoint’s payload and response format and adjust method naming and return values to keep the codebase consistent.


6-22: Verify get-folders API response structure
Please confirm that listFolders() returns an array of objects with key and label properties so that this mapping works as expected:

  • File: components/rewiser/rewiser.app.mjs, lines 12–16
    return folders.map(({ key: value, label }) => ({ label, value }));

If the API wraps the array in another property or uses different field names, update the destructuring accordingly.

Copy link
Collaborator

@GTFalcao GTFalcao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Just one minor text suggestion that doesn't impact functionality

luancazarine and others added 2 commits July 25, 2025 11:57
- Implemented a new source that emits events when a new transaction is created in Rewiser.
- Added methods to manage the last processed transaction date and emit new transactions.
- Included a sample event for testing purposes.
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
components/rewiser/actions/create-transaction/create-transaction.mjs (1)

94-94: Add error handling for amount parsing.

The parseFloat() call could fail silently or produce NaN if the amount string is invalid, which needs proper error handling to prevent silent failures.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8bcedcb and 48a397d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/rewiser/actions/create-transaction/create-transaction.mjs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
components/rewiser/actions/create-transaction/create-transaction.mjs (1)
components/rewiser/common/utils.mjs (2)
  • getSummary (1-25)
  • getSummary (1-25)
🪛 Biome (2.1.2)
components/rewiser/actions/create-transaction/create-transaction.mjs

[error] 46-46: expected , but instead found )

Remove )

(parse)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: pnpm publish
  • GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
🔇 Additional comments (3)
components/rewiser/actions/create-transaction/create-transaction.mjs (3)

1-2: LGTM!

The import statements are properly structured and import the necessary dependencies.


4-9: LGTM!

The action metadata follows Pipedream conventions with proper key naming, clear description, and appropriate documentation link.


85-93: LGTM!

The run method implementation follows good patterns with proper async handling, correct data structure mapping, and appropriate use of utility functions for response processing.

Also applies to: 95-106

…on.mjs

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@luancazarine
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/approve

@luancazarine luancazarine requested a review from GTFalcao July 25, 2025 15:03
@luancazarine luancazarine merged commit dae0a6a into master Jul 25, 2025
11 checks passed
@luancazarine luancazarine deleted the 17699-components-rewiser branch July 25, 2025 20:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Components] Rewiser

2 participants