[Components] finerworks #10976 #18830
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub. 2 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThree new action modules are introduced to the FinerWorks component: Get Prices, Get Product Details, and Validate Address. The core app file is enhanced with comprehensive property definitions and HTTP-based API methods to support these actions, while the package version is bumped and a platform dependency is added. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Action as Action Module
participant App as finerworks.app
participant HTTP as FinerWorks API
Action->>App: Call API method<br/>(e.g., getPrices, validateAddress)
App->>App: _baseUrl() + route
App->>App: _makeRequest(opts)<br/>with auth headers
App->>HTTP: POST request
HTTP-->>App: API response
App-->>Action: Return response
Action->>Action: $.export('summary', ...)<br/>based on response
Action-->>User: Return response
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes The three action modules follow a consistent, repetitive pattern with minimal logic variation. The app file introduces new methods and prop definitions with moderate complexity, but the changes are straightforward and well-structured. The package configuration update is trivial. Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
components/finerworks/actions/get-prices/get-prices.mjs (1)
39-39: Consider a more descriptive summary message.The current message "Successfully sent the request" is generic. Consider making it more specific to improve user experience, e.g., "Successfully retrieved price for the specified product" or "Successfully fetched pricing information."
Apply this diff to improve the summary:
- $.export("$summary", "Successfully sent the request"); + $.export("$summary", "Successfully retrieved price for the specified product");components/finerworks/finerworks.app.mjs (1)
131-138: Consider whether the empty data object is necessary.The
getProductsmethod passesdata: {}to the API. If the FinerWorks API doesn't require a data payload for this endpoint, this could be simplified by removing it.If the API doesn't require a data payload, apply this diff:
async getProducts(args = {}) { return this._makeRequest({ path: "/list_virtual_inventory", method: "post", - data: {}, ...args, }); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
components/finerworks/actions/get-prices/get-prices.mjs(1 hunks)components/finerworks/actions/get-product-details/get-product-details.mjs(1 hunks)components/finerworks/actions/validate-address/validate-address.mjs(1 hunks)components/finerworks/finerworks.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/finerworks/package.json(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (4)
components/finerworks/actions/validate-address/validate-address.mjs (2)
components/finerworks/actions/get-prices/get-prices.mjs (1)
response(30-38)components/finerworks/actions/get-product-details/get-product-details.mjs (1)
response(30-40)
components/finerworks/actions/get-product-details/get-product-details.mjs (2)
components/finerworks/actions/get-prices/get-prices.mjs (1)
response(30-38)components/finerworks/finerworks.app.mjs (1)
response(78-78)
components/finerworks/actions/get-prices/get-prices.mjs (2)
components/finerworks/actions/get-product-details/get-product-details.mjs (1)
response(30-40)components/finerworks/actions/validate-address/validate-address.mjs (1)
response(84-101)
components/finerworks/finerworks.app.mjs (3)
components/finerworks/actions/get-prices/get-prices.mjs (1)
response(30-38)components/finerworks/actions/get-product-details/get-product-details.mjs (1)
response(30-40)components/finerworks/actions/validate-address/validate-address.mjs (1)
response(84-101)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
🔇 Additional comments (7)
components/finerworks/package.json (1)
3-3: LGTM! Version bump and dependency addition are appropriate.The version bump to 0.1.0 correctly reflects the addition of new features (actions), and the platform dependency is necessary for the axios import used in the app file.
Also applies to: 15-17
components/finerworks/actions/get-product-details/get-product-details.mjs (2)
3-13: LGTM! Action metadata is well-defined.The action metadata follows Pipedream conventions with appropriate annotations for a read-only operation.
29-40: Verify data structure consistency with the Finerworks API documentation.The codebase shows that
get-pricespassesdata: [...](direct array) whileget-product-detailspassesdata: { products: [...] }(nested under products property). Both methods delegate directly to_makeRequest, which sends the data untransformed to the respective API endpoints (/get_pricesand/get_product_details).The different structures appear intentional since they target different endpoints, but no inline documentation, tests, or validation rules in the codebase confirm this aligns with the official Finerworks API specifications. Please verify both payloads match the current API requirements to ensure correctness.
components/finerworks/actions/get-prices/get-prices.mjs (1)
3-13: LGTM! Action metadata is properly configured.The metadata and annotations are appropriate for this read-only pricing query action.
components/finerworks/actions/validate-address/validate-address.mjs (1)
3-82: LGTM! Comprehensive address validation props.The action metadata and props are well-structured, with proper reuse of propDefinitions from the app. The address fields cover all necessary components for validation.
components/finerworks/finerworks.app.mjs (2)
1-1: LGTM! Comprehensive propDefinitions with dynamic options.The propDefinitions are well-structured with appropriate types, labels, descriptions, and optional flags. The productSku prop includes a dynamic options resolver that fetches available products, providing a good user experience.
Also applies to: 6-88
90-109: LGTM! Clean HTTP request infrastructure.The base URL and request helper methods are well-implemented, with proper authentication header injection and flexible options spreading.
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| $.export("$summary", "Successfully sent the request. Validation success: " + response.status.success); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Guard against undefined response.status.success.
The summary message directly concatenates response.status.success, which could fail or produce "Validation success: undefined" if the response structure differs from expectations or the API returns an error.
Consider using optional chaining and a fallback:
- $.export("$summary", "Successfully sent the request. Validation success: " + response.status.success);
+ $.export("$summary", `Successfully sent the request. Validation success: ${response.status?.success ?? 'unknown'}`);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| $.export("$summary", "Successfully sent the request. Validation success: " + response.status.success); | |
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully sent the request. Validation success: ${response.status?.success ?? 'unknown'}`); |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In components/finerworks/actions/validate-address/validate-address.mjs around
line 102, the summary concatenates response.status.success directly which can be
undefined and produce misleading text or throw; update the expression to use
optional chaining and a safe fallback (e.g., response?.status?.success ?? false
or convert to a string like String(response?.status?.success ?? 'unknown')) so
the summary always displays a deterministic value and won’t throw when response
or status is missing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same for this summary (also worth checking CodeRabbit's comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the summary messages in the other action files
cat components/finerworks/actions/get-prices/get-prices.mjs | grep -A 2 -B 2 '\$\.export.*\$summary'
echo "---"
cat components/finerworks/actions/get-product-details/get-product-details.mjs | grep -A 2 -B 2 '\$\.export.*\$summary'
Length of output: 247
@GTFalcao, I checked all the summary messages in this PR. The good news is that get-prices.mjs and get-product-details.mjs are already using safe static strings for their summaries, so they don't have the same issue.
Only validate-address.mjs has the unsafe property access problem that CodeRabbit flagged. You should apply the fix here using optional chaining and a template literal:
$.export("$summary", `Successfully sent the request. Validation success: ${response.status?.success ?? 'unknown'}`);Alternatively, if you want to make it more robust and user-friendly, you could use:
$.export("$summary", `Address validation ${response.status?.success ? 'succeeded' : 'failed'}`);This would give a clearer message about whether the validation actually passed or not.
🧠 Learnings used
Learnt from: GTFalcao
PR: PipedreamHQ/pipedream#12731
File: components/hackerone/actions/get-members/get-members.mjs:3-28
Timestamp: 2024-07-04T18:11:59.822Z
Learning: When exporting a summary message in the `run` method of an action, ensure the message is correctly formatted. For example, in the `hackerone-get-members` action, the correct format is `Successfully retrieved ${response.data.length} members`.
Learnt from: GTFalcao
PR: PipedreamHQ/pipedream#12731
File: components/hackerone/actions/get-members/get-members.mjs:3-28
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:33:38.240Z
Learning: When exporting a summary message in the `run` method of an action, ensure the message is correctly formatted. For example, in the `hackerone-get-members` action, the correct format is `Successfully retrieved ${response.data.length} members`.
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| }); | ||
| $.export("$summary", "Successfully sent the request"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary is a bit odd - does the action not return the prices immediately?
| ], | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| $.export("$summary", "Successfully sent the request to get details of the specified product"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same here, summary usually describes the action being performed (a request being sent is implied and is usually not part of the summary)
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| $.export("$summary", "Successfully sent the request. Validation success: " + response.status.success); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same for this summary (also worth checking CodeRabbit's comment)
2 participants
WHY
Summary by CodeRabbit