Skip to content

No newline in concatenated further description #219

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
euronion merged 3 commits into from
May 19, 2025
Merged

No newline in concatenated further description #219

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
27c9f68
code: Remove adding newline in concated further_description
euronion May 19, 2025
c30a323
doc: Update release notes
euronion May 19, 2025
0a9717c
data: Regenerate outputs
euronion May 19, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions docs/release_notes.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -64,6 +64,8 @@ Upcoming Release

* Include further unit tests for compile_cost_assumptions.py (https://github.com/PyPSA/technology-data/pull/210)

* Removed additional newlines in the output csv's, if multiple `further_description` are given and concatenated. Each row in the output csv's should now indicate exactly one technology (https://github.com/PyPSA/technology-data/pull/219)

`v0.11.0 <https://github.com/PyPSA/technology-data/releases/tag/v0.11.0>`__ (24th January 2025)
=======================================================================================

Expand Down
9 changes: 3 additions & 6 deletions outputs/US/costs_2020.csv
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -15,8 +15,7 @@ Alkaline electrolyzer,investment,1285.1528,USD/kW,"ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions,
Alkaline electrolyzer,lifetime,30.0,years,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,,,
Ammonia cracker,FOM,4.3,%/year,"Ishimoto et al. (2020): 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.017 , table 7.","Estimated based on Labour cost rate, Maintenance cost rate, Insurance rate, Admin. cost rate and Chemical & other consumables cost rate.",2015.0,,
Ammonia cracker,ammonia-input,1.46,MWh_NH3/MWh_H2,"ENGIE et al (2020): Ammonia to Green Hydrogen Feasibility Study (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/880826/HS420_-_Ecuity_-_Ammonia_to_Green_Hydrogen.pdf), Fig. 10.",Assuming a integrated 200t/d cracking and purification facility. Electricity demand (316 MWh per 2186 MWh_LHV H2 output) is assumed to also be ammonia LHV input which seems a fair assumption as the facility has options for a higher degree of integration according to the report).,,,
Ammonia cracker,investment,1123945.3807,EUR/MW_H2,"Ishimoto et al. (2020): 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.017 , table 6.","Calculated. For a small (200 t_NH3/d input) facility. Base cost for facility: 51 MEUR at capacity 20 000m^3_NH3/h = 339 t_NH3/d input. Cost scaling exponent 0.67. Ammonia density 0.7069 kg/m^3. Conversion efficiency of cracker: 0.685. Ammonia LHV: 5.167 MWh/t_NH3.; and
Calculated. For a large (2500 t_NH3/d input) facility. Base cost for facility: 51 MEUR at capacity 20 000m^3_NH3/h = 339 t_NH3/d input. Cost scaling exponent 0.67. Ammonia density 0.7069 kg/m^3. Conversion efficiency of cracker: 0.685. Ammonia LHV: 5.167 MWh/t_NH3.",2015.0,,
Ammonia cracker,investment,1123945.3807,EUR/MW_H2,"Ishimoto et al. (2020): 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.017 , table 6.",Calculated. For a small (200 t_NH3/d input) facility. Base cost for facility: 51 MEUR at capacity 20 000m^3_NH3/h = 339 t_NH3/d input. Cost scaling exponent 0.67. Ammonia density 0.7069 kg/m^3. Conversion efficiency of cracker: 0.685. Ammonia LHV: 5.167 MWh/t_NH3.; and Calculated. For a large (2500 t_NH3/d input) facility. Base cost for facility: 51 MEUR at capacity 20 000m^3_NH3/h = 339 t_NH3/d input. Cost scaling exponent 0.67. Ammonia density 0.7069 kg/m^3. Conversion efficiency of cracker: 0.685. Ammonia LHV: 5.167 MWh/t_NH3.,2015.0,,
Ammonia cracker,lifetime,25.0,years,"Ishimoto et al. (2020): 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.017 , table 7.",,2015.0,,
BEV Bus city,FOM,0.0001,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, inputs/data_sheets_for_commercial_freight_and_passenger_transport_0.xlsx",BEV B1,2022.0,,
BEV Bus city,Motor size,300.0,kW,"Danish Energy Agency, inputs/data_sheets_for_commercial_freight_and_passenger_transport_0.xlsx",BEV B1,2022.0,,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -979,14 +978,12 @@ H2 (l) transport ship,capacity,11000.0,t_H2,"Cihlar et al 2020: http://op.europa
H2 (l) transport ship,investment,393737000.0,EUR,"Cihlar et al 2020: http://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/7e4afa7d-d077-11ea-adf7-01aa75ed71a1/language-en , Table 3-B, based on IEA 2019.",,2019.0,,
H2 (l) transport ship,lifetime,20.0,years,"Cihlar et al 2020: http://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/7e4afa7d-d077-11ea-adf7-01aa75ed71a1/language-en , Table 3-B, based on IEA 2019.",,2019.0,,
H2 evaporation,FOM,2.5,%/year,"DNV GL (2020): Study on the Import of Liquid Renewable Energy: Technology Cost Assessment, https://www.gie.eu/wp-content/uploads/filr/2598/DNV-GL_Study-GLE-Technologies-and-costs-analysis-on-imports-of-liquid-renewable-energy.pdf .",,2020.0,,
H2 evaporation,investment,146.8405,EUR/kW_H2,"IRENA (2022): Global Hydrogen Trade to Meet the 1.5° Climate Goal: Technology Review of Hydrogen Carriers, https://www.irena.org/publications/2022/Apr/Global-hydrogen-trade-Part-II , pg. 62f.","Pessimistic assumption for large scale facility / near-term estimate for medium sized facility, in between low / mid estimate with e.g. DNV numbers (Fig. 3.15).; and
Optimistic assumption for large scale facility 2500 t/d, cf Fig. 3.15 .",2022.0,,
H2 evaporation,investment,146.8405,EUR/kW_H2,"IRENA (2022): Global Hydrogen Trade to Meet the 1.5° Climate Goal: Technology Review of Hydrogen Carriers, https://www.irena.org/publications/2022/Apr/Global-hydrogen-trade-Part-II , pg. 62f.","Pessimistic assumption for large scale facility / near-term estimate for medium sized facility, in between low / mid estimate with e.g. DNV numbers (Fig. 3.15).; and Optimistic assumption for large scale facility 2500 t/d, cf Fig. 3.15 .",2022.0,,
H2 evaporation,lifetime,20.0,years,Guesstimate.,Based on lifetime of liquefaction plant.,2015.0,,
H2 liquefaction,FOM,2.5,%/year,"DNV GL (2020): Study on the Import of Liquid Renewable Energy: Technology Cost Assessment, https://www.gie.eu/wp-content/uploads/filr/2598/DNV-GL_Study-GLE-Technologies-and-costs-analysis-on-imports-of-liquid-renewable-energy.pdf .",,2020.0,,
H2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.203,MWh_el/MWh_H2,"Heuser et al. (2019): Techno-economic analysis of a potential energy trading link between Patagonia and Japan based on CO2 free hydrogen (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.156), table 1.","6.78 kWh/kg_H2, considering H2 with LHV of 33.3333 MWh/t",,,
H2 liquefaction,hydrogen-input,1.017,MWh_H2/MWh_H2,"Heuser et al. (2019): Techno-economic analysis of a potential energy trading link between Patagonia and Japan based on CO2 free hydrogen (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.156), table 1.",corresponding to 1.65% losses during liquefaction,,,
H2 liquefaction,investment,889.9426,EUR/kW_H2,"IRENA (2022): Global Hydrogen Trade to Meet the 1.5° Climate Goal: Technology Review of Hydrogen Carriers, https://www.irena.org/publications/2022/Apr/Global-hydrogen-trade-Part-II , pg. 62f.","Assumption for a 200t/d facility (Pessimistic long-term or optimistic short-term value).; and
Assumption for a large >300t/d, e.g. 2500 t/d facility (Optimistic long-term value without change in base technology mentioned in report).",2022.0,,
H2 liquefaction,investment,889.9426,EUR/kW_H2,"IRENA (2022): Global Hydrogen Trade to Meet the 1.5° Climate Goal: Technology Review of Hydrogen Carriers, https://www.irena.org/publications/2022/Apr/Global-hydrogen-trade-Part-II , pg. 62f.","Assumption for a 200t/d facility (Pessimistic long-term or optimistic short-term value).; and Assumption for a large >300t/d, e.g. 2500 t/d facility (Optimistic long-term value without change in base technology mentioned in report).",2022.0,,
H2 liquefaction,lifetime,20.0,years,"Reuß et al 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.050 , Table 9.",,2022.0,,
H2 pipeline,FOM,3.0,%/year,TODO, from old pypsa cost assumptions,2015.0,,
H2 pipeline,investment,282.5452,EUR/MW/km,Welder et al https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.059, from old pypsa cost assumptions,2015.0,,
Expand Down
9 changes: 3 additions & 6 deletions outputs/US/costs_2025.csv
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -15,8 +15,7 @@ Alkaline electrolyzer,investment,1141.4358,USD/kW,"ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions,
Alkaline electrolyzer,lifetime,30.0,years,ICCT IRA e-fuels assumptions ,,,,
Ammonia cracker,FOM,4.3,%/year,"Ishimoto et al. (2020): 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.017 , table 7.","Estimated based on Labour cost rate, Maintenance cost rate, Insurance rate, Admin. cost rate and Chemical & other consumables cost rate.",2015.0,,
Ammonia cracker,ammonia-input,1.46,MWh_NH3/MWh_H2,"ENGIE et al (2020): Ammonia to Green Hydrogen Feasibility Study (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/880826/HS420_-_Ecuity_-_Ammonia_to_Green_Hydrogen.pdf), Fig. 10.",Assuming a integrated 200t/d cracking and purification facility. Electricity demand (316 MWh per 2186 MWh_LHV H2 output) is assumed to also be ammonia LHV input which seems a fair assumption as the facility has options for a higher degree of integration according to the report).,,,
Ammonia cracker,investment,1123945.3807,EUR/MW_H2,"Ishimoto et al. (2020): 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.017 , table 6.","Calculated. For a small (200 t_NH3/d input) facility. Base cost for facility: 51 MEUR at capacity 20 000m^3_NH3/h = 339 t_NH3/d input. Cost scaling exponent 0.67. Ammonia density 0.7069 kg/m^3. Conversion efficiency of cracker: 0.685. Ammonia LHV: 5.167 MWh/t_NH3.; and
Calculated. For a large (2500 t_NH3/d input) facility. Base cost for facility: 51 MEUR at capacity 20 000m^3_NH3/h = 339 t_NH3/d input. Cost scaling exponent 0.67. Ammonia density 0.7069 kg/m^3. Conversion efficiency of cracker: 0.685. Ammonia LHV: 5.167 MWh/t_NH3.",2015.0,,
Ammonia cracker,investment,1123945.3807,EUR/MW_H2,"Ishimoto et al. (2020): 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.017 , table 6.",Calculated. For a small (200 t_NH3/d input) facility. Base cost for facility: 51 MEUR at capacity 20 000m^3_NH3/h = 339 t_NH3/d input. Cost scaling exponent 0.67. Ammonia density 0.7069 kg/m^3. Conversion efficiency of cracker: 0.685. Ammonia LHV: 5.167 MWh/t_NH3.; and Calculated. For a large (2500 t_NH3/d input) facility. Base cost for facility: 51 MEUR at capacity 20 000m^3_NH3/h = 339 t_NH3/d input. Cost scaling exponent 0.67. Ammonia density 0.7069 kg/m^3. Conversion efficiency of cracker: 0.685. Ammonia LHV: 5.167 MWh/t_NH3.,2015.0,,
Ammonia cracker,lifetime,25.0,years,"Ishimoto et al. (2020): 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.017 , table 7.",,2015.0,,
BEV Bus city,FOM,0.0002,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, inputs/data_sheets_for_commercial_freight_and_passenger_transport_0.xlsx",BEV B1,2022.0,,
BEV Bus city,Motor size,320.6897,kW,"Danish Energy Agency, inputs/data_sheets_for_commercial_freight_and_passenger_transport_0.xlsx",BEV B1,2022.0,,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1015,14 +1014,12 @@ H2 (l) transport ship,capacity,11000.0,t_H2,"Cihlar et al 2020: http://op.europa
H2 (l) transport ship,investment,393737000.0,EUR,"Cihlar et al 2020: http://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/7e4afa7d-d077-11ea-adf7-01aa75ed71a1/language-en , Table 3-B, based on IEA 2019.",,2019.0,,
H2 (l) transport ship,lifetime,20.0,years,"Cihlar et al 2020: http://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/7e4afa7d-d077-11ea-adf7-01aa75ed71a1/language-en , Table 3-B, based on IEA 2019.",,2019.0,,
H2 evaporation,FOM,2.5,%/year,"DNV GL (2020): Study on the Import of Liquid Renewable Energy: Technology Cost Assessment, https://www.gie.eu/wp-content/uploads/filr/2598/DNV-GL_Study-GLE-Technologies-and-costs-analysis-on-imports-of-liquid-renewable-energy.pdf .",,2020.0,,
H2 evaporation,investment,146.8405,EUR/kW_H2,"IRENA (2022): Global Hydrogen Trade to Meet the 1.5° Climate Goal: Technology Review of Hydrogen Carriers, https://www.irena.org/publications/2022/Apr/Global-hydrogen-trade-Part-II , pg. 62f.","Pessimistic assumption for large scale facility / near-term estimate for medium sized facility, in between low / mid estimate with e.g. DNV numbers (Fig. 3.15).; and
Optimistic assumption for large scale facility 2500 t/d, cf Fig. 3.15 .",2022.0,,
H2 evaporation,investment,146.8405,EUR/kW_H2,"IRENA (2022): Global Hydrogen Trade to Meet the 1.5° Climate Goal: Technology Review of Hydrogen Carriers, https://www.irena.org/publications/2022/Apr/Global-hydrogen-trade-Part-II , pg. 62f.","Pessimistic assumption for large scale facility / near-term estimate for medium sized facility, in between low / mid estimate with e.g. DNV numbers (Fig. 3.15).; and Optimistic assumption for large scale facility 2500 t/d, cf Fig. 3.15 .",2022.0,,
H2 evaporation,lifetime,20.0,years,Guesstimate.,Based on lifetime of liquefaction plant.,2015.0,,
H2 liquefaction,FOM,2.5,%/year,"DNV GL (2020): Study on the Import of Liquid Renewable Energy: Technology Cost Assessment, https://www.gie.eu/wp-content/uploads/filr/2598/DNV-GL_Study-GLE-Technologies-and-costs-analysis-on-imports-of-liquid-renewable-energy.pdf .",,2020.0,,
H2 liquefaction,electricity-input,0.203,MWh_el/MWh_H2,"Heuser et al. (2019): Techno-economic analysis of a potential energy trading link between Patagonia and Japan based on CO2 free hydrogen (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.156), table 1.","6.78 kWh/kg_H2, considering H2 with LHV of 33.3333 MWh/t",,,
H2 liquefaction,hydrogen-input,1.017,MWh_H2/MWh_H2,"Heuser et al. (2019): Techno-economic analysis of a potential energy trading link between Patagonia and Japan based on CO2 free hydrogen (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.156), table 1.",corresponding to 1.65% losses during liquefaction,,,
H2 liquefaction,investment,889.9426,EUR/kW_H2,"IRENA (2022): Global Hydrogen Trade to Meet the 1.5° Climate Goal: Technology Review of Hydrogen Carriers, https://www.irena.org/publications/2022/Apr/Global-hydrogen-trade-Part-II , pg. 62f.","Assumption for a 200t/d facility (Pessimistic long-term or optimistic short-term value).; and
Assumption for a large >300t/d, e.g. 2500 t/d facility (Optimistic long-term value without change in base technology mentioned in report).",2022.0,,
H2 liquefaction,investment,889.9426,EUR/kW_H2,"IRENA (2022): Global Hydrogen Trade to Meet the 1.5° Climate Goal: Technology Review of Hydrogen Carriers, https://www.irena.org/publications/2022/Apr/Global-hydrogen-trade-Part-II , pg. 62f.","Assumption for a 200t/d facility (Pessimistic long-term or optimistic short-term value).; and Assumption for a large >300t/d, e.g. 2500 t/d facility (Optimistic long-term value without change in base technology mentioned in report).",2022.0,,
H2 liquefaction,lifetime,20.0,years,"Reuß et al 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.050 , Table 9.",,2022.0,,
H2 pipeline,FOM,3.0,%/year,TODO, from old pypsa cost assumptions,2015.0,,
H2 pipeline,investment,282.5452,EUR/MW/km,Welder et al https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.059, from old pypsa cost assumptions,2015.0,,
Expand Down
Loading