Skip to content

add online runs for disagg#123

Open
sixiang-google wants to merge 1 commit intoQiliangCui:mainfrom
sixiang-google:main
Open

add online runs for disagg#123
sixiang-google wants to merge 1 commit intoQiliangCui:mainfrom
sixiang-google:main

Conversation

@sixiang-google
Copy link

No description provided.

@@ -1,2 +1,6 @@
Device,Model,MaxNumSeqs,MaxNumBatchedTokens,TensorParallelSize,MaxModelLen,Dataset,InputLen,OutputLen,ExpectedETEL,NumPrompts
v6e-8,meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct,128,1024,2,2048,sonnet,1800,128,,1000
Device,Model,MaxNumSeqs,MaxNumBatchedTokens,TensorParallelSize,MaxModelLen,Dataset,InputLen,OutputLen,ExpectedETEL,NumPrompts,RequestRate
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the code now can't be smart enough to find "RequestRate" in this case... the first line is just CSV header, in your case, this needs to be

Device,Model,MaxNumSeqs,MaxNumBatchedTokens,TensorParallelSize,MaxModelLen,Dataset,InputLen,OutputLen,ExpectedETEL,NumPrompts,MODELTAG,PREFIX_LEN,RequestRate

here https://github.com/QiliangCui/bm-infra/blob/main/scripts/scheduler/schedule_run.sh#L48 is how it is read


Copy link
Collaborator

@patemotter patemotter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall LGTM, the only real issue is whether or not the ExtraEnvs logic does things in a way that we need to move your new entry before it.

@@ -1,2 +1,6 @@
Device,Model,MaxNumSeqs,MaxNumBatchedTokens,TensorParallelSize,MaxModelLen,Dataset,InputLen,OutputLen,ExpectedETEL,NumPrompts
v6e-8,meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct,128,1024,2,2048,sonnet,1800,128,,1000
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: Was this entry meant to be deleted?

v6e-8,meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct,128,1024,2,2048,sonnet,1800,128,,1000

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, we want to test more using mlperf. This is too prefill-heavy.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants