Conversation
|
@markotoplak I saw your comment in #765 (comment) and wondered if my approach here with a custom |
|
Yes, it could IF that model is connected to something that is changing a context setting AND that context setting is not limited in the same way as the model. |
a413658 to
4744a06
Compare
|
Hmm for part one, definitely: For part two, indeed they seem to have different definitions: exclude_attributes is not exactly the same as |
|
I see some tests are failing now :D I'll dig more |
|
Indeed this triggers biolab/orange3#6721 in So I'm starting to think it's not worth the complexity, especially now that the attr_x/y combo boxes aren't hidden. |
Continuing from #654 (I'll rebase when ready)
Users get very confused (and I find it annoying) when Hyperspectra plots vs (clusters, map_x) or something instead of just (map_x, map_y) when they are present.
I added a XYDomainModel which reliably plots XY data in Hyperspectra if both these vars are present (otherwise reverts to existing behaviour).
If this works, I'll also apply to the other mapping-aware widgets (Bin, Stack, Polar, etc)