Skip to content

Conversation

@Woojin-Crive
Copy link
Member

Added omy_end_rh_p12_rn for OMY End virtual_dxl

@Woojin-Crive Woojin-Crive self-assigned this Jun 20, 2025
@Woojin-Crive Woojin-Crive added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 20, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to 🌱 Todo in Platform Jun 20, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @Woojin-Crive, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a new, specialized Dynamixel model configuration for the OMY End virtual DXL, named omy_end_rh_p12_rn. The changes involve registering this new model and refactoring existing model definitions to ensure that specific control table parameters are associated with the correct, specialized model rather than a more generic one. This improves the modularity and accuracy of model configurations.

Highlights

  • New Model Configuration: Added a new Dynamixel model configuration, omy_end_rh_p12_rn, specifically for the OMY End virtual DXL.
  • Model Registration: Registered the new omy_end_rh_p12_rn.model with ID 231 in the dynamixel.model index, making it discoverable within the system.
  • Control Table Refactoring: Refactored control table definitions by moving specific registers (e.g., Hardware Error Status, Present Current, Goal Position) from the generic omy_end.model to the new, specialized omy_end_rh_p12_rn.model. This ensures that these parameters are accurately associated with the specific variant.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds a new model configuration file for a virtual DXL and registers it in the main dynamixel model list. It also removes several control table entries from the existing omy_end.model file. The new model file seems correctly formatted, but the removal of standard control table entries from omy_end.model could potentially break existing configurations that rely on those entries. Additionally, the new model file is missing the torque_constant parameter, which will cause a default value to be used.

@Woojin-Crive Woojin-Crive moved this from 🌱 Todo to 📝 Pull Request in Platform Jun 23, 2025
Copy link
Member

@yun-goon yun-goon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good!

Copy link
Member

@sunghowoo sunghowoo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will make the OMY End Unit more stable to use. Great work!

@Woojin-Crive Woojin-Crive merged commit f519f98 into main Jun 23, 2025
11 checks passed
@Woojin-Crive Woojin-Crive deleted the feature-omy-end branch June 23, 2025 07:23
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 📝 Pull Request to 🚩Done in Platform Jun 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants