-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
Add new model configuration for OMY end tool #54
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…namixel model list
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @Woojin-Crive, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request introduces a new, specialized Dynamixel model configuration for the OMY End virtual DXL, named omy_end_rh_p12_rn. The changes involve registering this new model and refactoring existing model definitions to ensure that specific control table parameters are associated with the correct, specialized model rather than a more generic one. This improves the modularity and accuracy of model configurations.
Highlights
- New Model Configuration: Added a new Dynamixel model configuration,
omy_end_rh_p12_rn, specifically for the OMY End virtual DXL. - Model Registration: Registered the new
omy_end_rh_p12_rn.modelwith ID 231 in thedynamixel.modelindex, making it discoverable within the system. - Control Table Refactoring: Refactored control table definitions by moving specific registers (e.g., Hardware Error Status, Present Current, Goal Position) from the generic
omy_end.modelto the new, specializedomy_end_rh_p12_rn.model. This ensures that these parameters are accurately associated with the specific variant.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request adds a new model configuration file for a virtual DXL and registers it in the main dynamixel model list. It also removes several control table entries from the existing omy_end.model file. The new model file seems correctly formatted, but the removal of standard control table entries from omy_end.model could potentially break existing configurations that rely on those entries. Additionally, the new model file is missing the torque_constant parameter, which will cause a default value to be used.
…ToBulkWrite for varying item sizes
…rite configurations
…ion write for OMY sync table
…features and synchronization improvements
yun-goon
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good!
sunghowoo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will make the OMY End Unit more stable to use. Great work!
Added omy_end_rh_p12_rn for OMY End virtual_dxl