Skip to content

[release/2.9] Add gfx110X and gfx115X to prefered hipBLASLt list #2742

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: release/2.9
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[release/2.9] Add gfx110X and gfx115X to prefered hipBLASLt list #2742

wants to merge 3 commits into from
+13 −4

Conversation

@vuksan314
Copy link

@vuksan314 vuksan314 commented Oct 23, 2025

hipblaslt should provide better performance in general

@rocm-repo-management-api
Copy link

rocm-repo-management-api bot commented Oct 23, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Jenkins build for 96d08441542c9f74c5c8bcb001df3a532489c2ba commit finished as FAILURE
Links: Blue Ocean view / Build artifacts

@rocm-repo-management-api
Copy link

rocm-repo-management-api bot commented Oct 24, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Jenkins build for 151b746dcd92a12c80c8a5dd80cb503aae2d15f8 commit finished as FAILURE
Links: Blue Ocean view / Build artifacts

@slojosic-amd slojosic-amd changed the title update support/prefer hipblaslt architectures [release/2.9] Add gfx110X and gfx115X to prefered hipBLASLt list Oct 28, 2025
@rocm-repo-management-api
Copy link

rocm-repo-management-api bot commented Oct 30, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Jenkins build for 79e71b11e289eefae454fe413d81d62fbad1f54e commit finished as FAILURE
Links: Blue Ocean view / Build artifacts

jagadish-amd
jagadish-amd approved these changes Oct 31, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@jagadish-amd jagadish-amd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, @pruthvistony

@vuksan314
Copy link
Author

vuksan314 commented Nov 4, 2025

@pruthvistony is it ok on your side?
@jagadish-amd @pruthvistony I have same PR but for pytorch 2.8 here #2741 could have a look at that PR as well?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jagadish-amd jagadish-amd jagadish-amd approved these changes

Assignees

@pruthvistony pruthvistony

@jagadish-amd jagadish-amd

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@vuksan314 @jagadish-amd @pruthvistony