-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
fix:[dfsv1][elm]Fixed a memory leak in dfs_elm_close #10868
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
wdfk-prog
wants to merge
1
commit into
RT-Thread:master
Choose a base branch
from
wdfk-prog:dfsv1_elm
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+23
−5
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
bug/错误: The assertion
file->data != RT_NULLshould usefile->data != NULLfor consistency with the rest of the codebase. RT-Thread code typically usesRT_NULLfor RT-Thread API pointer parameters butNULLfor standard C pointer checks. However, more critically, this assertion may be too strict - whenref_count > 1, thefile->datacould legitimately be NULL since thedfs_elm_openfunction only allocatesfile->datawhenref_count == 1(line 345-353 shows early return when ref_count > 1, and data allocation happens later). This assertion could cause crashes in valid multi-reference scenarios.English: The assertion on line 472 is problematic. When
vnode->ref_count > 1, multiple file descriptors share the same vnode but may have differentfile->datavalues. Thedfs_elm_openfunction only allocates memory forfile->datawhen opening a new file (ref_count == 1), but returns early when ref_count > 1. This means that for duplicate file descriptors,file->datamight not be allocated, making this assertion incorrect and potentially causing crashes.中文:第472行的断言存在问题。当
vnode->ref_count > 1时,多个文件描述符共享同一个vnode但可能有不同的file->data值。dfs_elm_open函数仅在打开新文件时(ref_count == 1)为file->data分配内存,但在 ref_count > 1 时会提前返回。这意味着对于重复的文件描述符,file->data可能未被分配,使得此断言不正确并可能导致崩溃。