fix: Support more complex 'simple reporter' blocks (experimental) #773
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Collaborator
Author
|
PTAL @gonfunko. @microbit-robert if you can, could you please verify this finishes the functionality per RaspberryPiFoundation/blockly#9456 that's needed for micro:bit? |
1 task
Contributor
I've tested this change locally and it looks good, thanks. |
gonfunko
approved these changes
Dec 4, 2025
Collaborator
Author
|
Thanks @microbit-robert & @gonfunko. Going ahead and merging (which should auto-deploy the test page on GH Pages). |
BenHenning
merged commit 47a726d
into
RaspberryPiFoundation:add-screen-reader-support-experimental
5 of 6 checks passed
1 task
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes RaspberryPiFoundation/blockly#9456
This updates the 'enter' shortcut to work correctly for blocks that can have more than field but still be considered 'single input' (due to only having one mutable field). The base support for this change was done in the experimental branch in core Blockly via #9484.