Updated formatting

[badasahog]

Hopefully no conflicts?

Once this is merged I'll get more aggressive with #6968 and #6971

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 97.12644% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 98.50%. Comparing base (c446f2e) to head (6c50dbc).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/fwrite.c	96.82%	4 Missing ⚠️
src/fwriteR.c	97.91%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7135      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.51%   98.50%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          81       81              
  Lines       15013    15015       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits        14790    14791       +1     
- Misses        223      224       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[github-actions]

No obvious timing issues in HEAD=fwriteReformat

Generated via commit 6c50dbc

Download link for the artifact containing the test results: ↓ atime-results.zip

Task	Duration
R setup and installing dependencies	2 minutes and 54 seconds
Installing different package versions	21 seconds
Running and plotting the test cases	2 minutes and 36 seconds

[MichaelChirico]

Thanks! What was done this round to avoid the need for follow-up PRs? It makes the git history cleaner if we can avoid multiple "style-only" edits

[badasahog]

@MichaelChirico I thought it was better to separate style out. I can add more in on top, in future PRs. Up to you.

[MichaelChirico]

What I have in mind is #7106 / #7112, where we wound up with 3 commits doing ~the same formatting-only changes. Can we avoid that by using tooling to identify the changes needed, or otherwise taking another pass at the file now before merging?

[badasahog]

I think this one is simpler, so that won't be needed.

I'll make sure to include other improvements with future PRs